PUB: Writer's Digest Science Fiction / Fantasy Competition


First Annual Science Fiction/Fantasy Competition from Writer's Digest

SCIENCE FICTION/FANTASY

 

Deadline: September 15, 2011

COMPETE and WIN with your best fiction!

Take your first step into a new frontier. Enter by September 15

Entry Fee: All entries are $20.00. You may pay with a check or money order, Visa, Mastercard or American Express when you enter online or via regular mail.

Prizes

First Prize: The First Place-Winner receives $1,000 cash, promotion in Writer's Digest, $100 worth of Writer's Digest Books and the 2012 Novel & Short Story Writer's Market.

Second Prize: The Second Place-Winner receives $500 cash, promotion in Writer's Digest, $100 worth of Writer's Digest Books and the 2012 Novel & Short Story Writer's Market.

Honorable Mention: Honorable Mentions will receive promotion in Writer's Digest and the 2012 Novel & Short Story Writer's Market.

Entry Deadline: September 15, 2011

Competition Rules

The Categories:

You may enter as many manuscripts as you like. All manuscripts must be 4,000 words or fewer.

Preparing Your Entry:

If you are submitting your entry via regular mail, the entry must be accompanied by an Official Entry Form or facsimile, and the required entry fee (credit card information, check or money order made payable to F+W Media, Inc.). If you are entering more than one manuscript, you may mail all entries in the same envelope and write one check for the total entry fee; however, each manuscript must have its category indicated in the upper left-hand corner.
Your entry must be original, in English, unpublished and unproduced, not accepted by any other publisher or producer at the time of submission. Writer's Digest retains one-time publication rights to the First Prize, Second Prize and Honorable Mention winning entries in each category to be published in a Writer's Digest outlet.
If you are submitting your entry via regular mail, the entry must be typed on one side of 8-1/2 x 11 white paper (computer printout acceptable) or A4 paper. Manuscripts must be double-spaced. If you are entering via regular mail, your name, address, phone number and competition category must appear in the upper left-hand corner of the first page—otherwise your entry is disqualified. No refunds will be issued for disqualified entries. Online entries must be submitted in one of the following file types: doc, docx, rtf or pdf. We recommend that you avoid adding your own symbols/punctuation in file names of the documents you are uploading.
Be sure of your word count! Entries exceeding the word limit will be disqualified. Type the exact word count (counting every single word, except the title) at the top of the manuscript.
Mailed entries must be stapled.

Judging and Notification

Every entry will be read by the judges. Judges' decisions are final.
Judges reserve the right to re-categorize entries.
Entries must be entered online or postmarked by 11:59 pm EST on September 15, 2011. We cannot return submitted manuscripts; however, to receive notification of the receipt of your manuscript, send a self-addressed stamped postcard along with your entry. Please note that it may take up to 30 days after the deadline for all entries and payment to be processed.
The following are not permitted to enter the contest: employees of F+W Media, Inc., and their immediate family members; Writer's Digest contributing editors and correspondents as listed on our masthead; Writer's Online Workshops instructors; and Grand Prize Winners from the previous three years in any Writer's Digest competitions.
Top Award Winners will be notified by mail by December 31, 2011. Winners will be listed in the May/June 2012 issue of Writer's Digest, and on www.writersdigest.com after the May/June 2012 issue is published.

Questions?
For questions, contact us at (715) 445-4612 ext. 13430 or email writing-competition@fwmedia.com

FAQ

Q: Is it okay to have illustration pictures on the cover?
A: Please send the text only

Q: If there is a word count, how many words per page am I allowed?
No preference

Q: How large of print is allowed?
No preference

Q: Are pen names allowed?
Pen names are fine. Write your pen name on all forms etc. so there is no mistakes on credits. Please be advised that we only need your real name if you are chosen as a winner (in order to issue prizes).

Q: What if I am not a U.S. resident?
WD writing competitions are open to non-U.S. residents as well. Please refer to the entry form and guidelines. All entry fees are due in U.S. Dollars.

Q: Is there an age limit for entrants?
No

Q: What if I wanted to submit only part of my novel into the competition (to stay with in the maximum number of words)?
If you submit a portion of a novel, please understand that it will be judged as a complete story, not part of another work, so it needs to be a complete story in and of itself.

Q: When will winners be notified?
Top Award Winners will be notified by December 31, 2011. Winners in each category will be listed in the May/June 2012 issue of Writer's Digest and on www.writersdigest.com after the May/June 2012 issue is published. Prizes/awards certificates will be mailed by April 30, 2012.

Q: What are the word count requirements?
The word count is 4,000 words maximum.

Q: How do I order books published by F+W Media?
www.fwbookstore.com/category/writers-digest

Q: How do I subscribe to Writer's Digest?
visit www.writersdigest.com and click on the link

Q: Are there other writing competitions?
Yes! Visit www.writersdigest.com/competitions for other competitions for writers

Privacy Promise
Occasionally we make portions of our customer list available to other companies so they may contact you about products and services that may be of interest to you. If you prefer we withhold your name, simply send a note with your name, address, and the competition name to: List Manager, F+W Media, Inc., 4700 E. Galbraith Road, Cincinnati, OH 45236.

Entry Form

To submit your entry online, visit our secure online entry form.

To enter via regular mail, use the printable form, and send it with your manuscript(s) and entry fee to:

WD Science Fiction/Fantasy Competition
4700 East Galbraith Road
Cincinnati, OH 45236

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INFO: Breath of Life—Herbie Hancock, Maiysha and Nguyen Le

We start off by exploring the three phases of Herbie Hancock’s musical development, and then we are serenaded (and rocked out) by Maiysha, and close the week with innovative cover music from Vietnamese guitarist Nguyen Le.

>http://www.kalamu.com/bol/

 

 

__________________________

Black power Herbie Hancock may seem oxymoronic to those that have followed his long career because we can not see a race-first, upraised fist in the thinking and behavior of a Buddhist but that’s only because we are de-contextualizing Herbie’s development and looking at each piece as though it were totally separate from what preceded and what followed. Moreover, we are also probably reducing each phase to a stereotype and to media definitions thereby ensuring that we do not get an accurate asessment.

 

For young, intelligent Black people, the seventies was a time of unbridled creativity fueled by encouragement to explore and experiment, especially delve deeply into non-mainstream modes of expression and thought. Black power encouraged Black people to think for themselves even when, or should we say “especially” when the thoughts were not standard thoughts. In counter distinction to how the time period is often characterized and mis-represented, while natural hair was in vogue (hence Herbie’s hair-do), the thoughts inside those nappy heads, like the hairs on those heads, was streaming in all directions. Plus, Herbie was from Chicago, whose musical avant garde, the AACM, promoted out of the box thought and expression. Being black didn’t mean being like all other blacks, in that period the watch words were “do your thing.” And some people were running with some pretty wild things including a deep, deep use of electronics as an integral part of music making—remember that Sun Ra was the pioneer of electronic keyboards in music and Sun Ra had been based in Chicago for a major period. Yes, I am flat out saying that Sun Ra also influenced Herbie Hancock.

—kalamu ya salaam

 

>via: http://www.kalamu.com/bol/

INFO: New Items of Interest

Ger: To Be Separate

 

Hi guys

 

So my friend Ger is one of the most inspirational people i know, From acting to modeling he does it all. His new Documentary follows him on a Journey back to Sudan where we will see Ger's mission to "help rebuild his nation" unfold. 

 

 

Although there has been billions in aid to Africa i feel that the real issues has often been ignored or excessive focus has been applied on limited aspects. From guerrilla conflicts to civil war, Africa is in dire need of aid, Medics but most of all EDUCATION!!!!!!!!!! I believe in order to reduce poverty and create jobs, Africa must become economically competitive and that can AND WILL happen through youth initiative. 


Here are a few pics from the film opening.


But anyways i don't want to blab on and on. Just wanted to bring a little awareness to Ger's project and hopefully one day i can follow in his footsteps and go on a mission of my own. 

 



 

Directed by Kenyan Film Director Wanuri Kahiu

 

“Ger: To Be Separate document’s one man’s odyssey from child soldier to refugee to Hollywood actor and international top model, and his amazing journey back home as he votes for the first time for a new Sudan and celebrates its division.  The release of this documentary will mark the beginning of Ger’s mission to help rebuild his nation, bringing educational institutions and healthcare facilities to his home village.”

 

African and proud!
xoxo
Abby

 

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 Pages from a Black Radicals Notebook

“When I first came upon James Boggs's writings three decades ago, it changed my life. Poring over each of the essays collected here by the indefatigable Stephen Ward, I know why he had such an impact. His work was always incisive, clear, dialectical, and genuinely revolutionary. A visionary thinker, Boggs is as relevant now as he ever was.”

—Robin D. G. Kelley

Pages from a Black Radical’s Notebook

A James Boggs Reader

 

Edited by Stephen M. Ward
 

Published February 2011
 

Size: 7 x 10, Pages: 424

 

Subjects: Africana Studies: Labor and PoliticsHistory: AmericanLabor and Urban Studies: Labor History

Series: African American Life Series

Paper - 9780814332566 
Price: $27.95s 

Order Book


Born in the rural American south, James Boggs lived nearly his entire adult life in Detroit and worked as a factory worker for twenty-eight years while immersing himself in the political struggles of the industrial urban north. During and after the years he spent in the auto industry, Boggs wrote two books, co-authored two others, and penned dozens of essays, pamphlets, reviews, manifestos, and newspaper columns to become known as a pioneering revolutionary theorist and community organizer. In Pages from a Black Radical’s Notebook: A James Boggs Reader, editor Stephen M. Ward collects a diverse sampling of pieces by Boggs, spanning the entire length of his career from the 1950s to the early 1990s.

Pages from a Black Radical’s Notebook is arranged in four chronological parts that document Boggs’s activism and writing. Part 1 presents columns from Correspondence newspaper written during the 1950s and early 1960s. Part 2 presents the complete text of Boggs’s first book, The American Revolution: Pages from a Negro Worker’s Notebook, his most widely known work. In part 3, “Black Power—Promise, Pitfalls, and Legacies,” Ward collects essays, pamphlets, and speeches that reflect Boggs’s participation in and analysis of the origins, growth, and demise of the Black Power movement. Part 4 comprises pieces written in the last decade of Boggs’s life, during the 1980s through the early 1990s. An introduction by Ward provides a detailed overview of Boggs’s life and career, and an afterword by Grace Lee Boggs, James Boggs’s wife and political partner, concludes this volume.

Pages from a Black Radical’s Notebook documents Boggs’s personal trajectory of political engagement and offers a unique perspective on radical social movements and the African American struggle for civil rights in the post–World War II years. Readers interested in political and ideological struggles of the twentieth century will find Pages from a Black Radical’s Notebook to be fascinating reading.

Published by Wayne State University Press

>via: http://wsupress.wayne.edu/books/792/Pages-from-a-Black-Radicals-Notebook

 

 

__________________________

 

 

New Book: Afro-Cuba, Mystery and Magic of Afro-Cuban Spirituality

Afro-Cuba: Mystery and Magic of Afro-Cuban Spirituality (English and German hardcover edition; Benteli Verlag 2011) by photographer Anthony Caronia and art historian Ania Rodríguez Alonso, is a black-and-white photographic documentary exploring the world of Afro-Cuban religion.

Description: The purpose of this photographic project is to carefully report on a complex religion, its different ceremonies and rich folklore; a window into a magical world, a world where African spirits manifest their presence in everyday Cuban life.  Rodriguez Alonso provides a historical introduction chapter and descriptions of religious rites and beliefs for Caronia’s photos.

Anthony Caronia (1968, Rome) studied photography in New York and Rome. His photographic work focuses on world cultures; he has photographed (and lived in) countries such as Malta, Mexico, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United States, and now lives in Brazil.

Ania Rodríguez Alonso (1977, Havana) studied art history at the University of Havana and is currently a curator and an art critic.

 

 

 

 

 

__________________________

 

 

 

Toward Surrealist Renaissance


Freedom Dreams:

The Black Radical Imagination

by Robin D. G. Kelley

Surrealism stands for a continued rejection of a great many things, possibly giving it the lasting appeal it has had since its formation in inter-war France.  It can be broadly summarized as a rejection of western capitalist society and its values, a rejection of the intolerance, alienation and war that follow from its supposed rationality.  Robin D.G. Kelley’s book

 Freedom Dreams: The Black Radical Imagination (found in the Provisions Library) includes a chapter arguing that through an affinity of European Surrealism, particularly its anti-colonial leanings, and the African diaspora. The poet and Statesman Aimé Césaire of Martinique claimed that non-whites ought to repossess their destroyed culture, and explore the spirituality offered outside of Anglo-European methods and religions. The Surrealist interest in spontaneity and rejection of classical rationalism translates directly into the genre of “jazz” music, which was already in full swing before the first Surrealist manifesto was even written, and Kelley describes Thelonious Monk as an unwitting surrealist in a comparison to the Comte de Lautréamont.

In this instance, the Surrealist search for “the marvellous” becomes a quest for a new spiritual identity for the colonized as part of a rejection of the superimposed culture of the colonizer.  Kelley advocates the influence of Surrealism in the Black Freedom movement as a positive, visionary source of revolutionary change.  It’s optimism and faith in the poetic as a medium for social change shines through in Kelley’s writing, and its force as an active proponent of a worldwide creative freedom makes it a powerful force for any anti-colonialist, or, perhaps more pertinently, anti-capitalist cause; and Kelly urges a re-examination of the Surreality of any such exploit.

>via: http://provisionslibrary.com/?p=12298

 

SOUTH AFRICA: Three different stories

Ntsiki Biyela - Wine maker

 

The NYtimes profiles Ntsiki Biyela:
While still a student, Ms. Biyela was given a part-time job at Delheim, a large winery, and this led to her oenological conversion. She not only worked in the vineyards and the cellar but also served wine to visitors in the tasting room and was consequently obliged to discuss what she poured. So she too tasted. She developed her palate.After graduation, Stellekaya, a boutique winery in Stellenbosch, hired her as its winemaker. It was a big leap, and the winery was taking a big chance on someone so inexperienced. A consultant helped her in the beginning, but soon she was on her own. Her very first red blend won a gold medal at the country’s prestigious Michelangelo awards.
More here

 

__________________________

The South African government has admitted it will not reach its redistribution target by 2014 The South African government has admitted it will not reach its redistribution target by 2014

Apartheid land reforms

in chaos as blacks

sell farms back to whites

 

 

By Alex Duval Smith in Cape Town

 

Saturday, 3 September 2011

The South African government has conceded that 30 per cent of land it has bought since the end of apartheid for redistribution to black farmers has been resold by the beneficiaries, often to the original owners.

The admission by Land Reform Minister Gugile Nkwinti came as his long-delayed green paper on the controversial issue was met with scepticism, both by commercial farmers and pro-poor campaigners.

All, however, agree that the exploitative agricultural system that was put in place under apartheid earns valuable export income for the country, but that it risks imploding if it is not tackled. The various groups worry that the situation could eventually replicate that of Zimbabwe several years ago, when the implementation of land reform policy was met with widespread violence and economic meltdown.

Eighty per cent of South African produce still comes from 15 per cent of its farms, most of them large-scale and white-owned.

"The basic problem is that the government has never treated land reform and agriculture as two sides of the same coin," said Theo de Jager, the deputy president of Agri SA, the main commercial farmers' union. "The government does not want black farmers to join us as members. They want them to remain beholden."

Clear figures are not available showing how much land is owned by different groups in South Africa. The government claims 7 per cent has passed to black farmers but Agri SA puts the figure at 15 per cent, claiming that the government itself owns up to a third.

The 12-page green paper on land reform, released on Wednesday, proposes replacing the existing Land Claims Commission with two new bodies that would have the controversial power to invalidate deeds and set values. This would abolish the willing-buyer, willing- seller principle, which requires the government to pay market rates.

Mr Nkwinti said that principle "distorts the markets", adding that the government has already spent 40bn rands (£3.4bn) on land purchases. In future, he said, it would buy land at fair rates and lease it to black farmers.

Commercial farmers and the opposition Democratic Alliance (DA) claim abolishing the existing system would violate the constitutional principle of property rights. "Appointing a non-independent body to determine compensation is open to abuse," said DA spokeswoman Lindiwe Mazibuko.

But the government faces powerful internal and grassroots pressures to redress racial and economic imbalances in farming and land ownership. Ever since the founding of the African National Congress in 1912, the land question has been at the core of the South African liberation struggle.

The system put in place after the first all-race elections in 1994 has moved too slowly to redress the imbalances in land ownership in South Africa. Mr Nkwinti admitted the government no longer expected to reach its target of redistributing 30 per cent of farmland to black farmers by 2014. After several big resettlement failures it thenstopped handing out any acquired land in 2008.

But Mr de Jager said the framework proposed in the green paper – under which the government would lease land to black farmers – was unlikely to succeed either. "We have 70,000 black members and they do not like the proposal either. It would mean whites would remain landowners while blacks could only be leaseholders. That is wrong."

Pro-poor activist Andile Mngxitama said the green paper's proposal to create two new bodies to administer land distribution just appeared to replace one layer of ineffective bureaucracy with another.

"The heart of the issue is that the land was taken by force and must be redistributed. It is a matter of ending apartheid," he said.

"However, the process need not be as chaotic as in Zimbabwe if you redistribute according to need and skill to people who still have a relationship with the land, and who show due regard for the environment," he added.

>via: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/apartheid-land-reforms-in-chao...

 

__________________________

 

 

Second generation trauma

by Pheladi Sethusa

24/08/2011 # 7:25 am # Impressions - my diary # 4 Comments

I attended an amazing seminar at the University of the Witwatersrand on Thursday 18th of August. The speaker at the seminar was Eva Hoffman, who is both a writer and an academic. The topic of the seminar was “Lost and Found in Transition: Contested memories and moving on from difficult pasts” , and more specifically second generation trauma. A phenomenon I have recently come to learn about and find very intriguing.

Second generation trauma has to do with the aftershocks that the children of survivors of gratuitous violence experience. The expression was first used to describe the children of Holocaust survivors. I came across this term when reading Maus, a great graphic novel by Art Spiegelman. He not only tells his father’s story of living through the genocide but also tells his personal story of trying to deal with that ‘passed on’ trauma. Eva Hoffman’s autobiography Lost in Translation does the same. She too is a second hand trauma victim.

Eva Hoffman described second hand trauma as encapsulating contested memories and transitions after great wrongs have been committed. This can prove problematic when trying to achieve reconciliation, especially because the afterlife of atrocity is long. She went on to say that democracy and freedom are difficult to negotiate after such a traumatic experience and that this initiation is necessary. Not from the victims’ side but from the perpetrators’. In Jewish consciousness, the Polish were and are seen as being conspirators with the Nazi’s in contributing to Jewish suffering. In the same breath, she said that Polish descendants cannot be blamed or punished for their forefathers, but they need to acknowledge what happened. “After such wrongs have been done, they can’t be undone… Recognition, not forgiveness needs to be the starting point of reconciliation.”

The whole time she was speaking I was thinking of the South African example of the above. As the seminar went on Ms Hoffman delved deeper into the nature of second generation trauma. She said that it has to do with the transmission of memories but not exclusively; memory coupled with the after-effects of parental experience. This transmission often leads to the second generation being frozen in time, in so doing perpetuating the cycle of revenge within their generation. The children of survivors speak of despondency, depression and anger which all arise from trying to locate their parents’ context in history. None of the above can be resolved unless a second generation dialogue is initiated.

Second generation dialogue refers to the conversations that need to take place between the children of the victims and those of the perpetrators. We need to recognise that children of the perpetrators are also going through some form of trauma. They are traumatised by the silence of their parents, their inability to admit they were wrong. As a result they try to reject their parents but cannot do that because it is easier said than done. The fact that both sides are trying to deal with inherited trauma should be the condition that allows for a dialogue to take place. Trust and understanding are imperative for this dialogue to work. This dialogue is the only means of getting on a reconciliatory path and leading to an expansion of minds.

I brought all of the above into a proximal context, a personal context. I consider myself as a victim of second generation trauma. I often wrestle with the issues that Ms Hoffman raised. I am angry and despondent about apartheid, and so are a lot of my peers. It is particularly difficult for us to ‘move on’ because the lived reality of inequality is still very real to us. What I mean by this is that South Africa inherited a structure of violence and immense inequality. Today we refer to it as the legacy of apartheid. How can we even begin to let go when the effects of that totalitarian system are still rife in our society? The racial disparities in our society are very obvious and this is something that needs to be addressed. However, when one starts to speak about such issues we are met with contestations of being too racialist. I find that a lot of liberal whites and blacks want us to repress the past. This would be folly; the past needs to be acknowledged and addressed. “Wrong doers cannot get forgiveness until they admit to crimes and are willing to repent for them”, said Hoffman.

 

This brought up questions from the audience about the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). One gentleman said it was highly idyllic and aimed to quickly cover up the past. He went on to say it failed because forgiveness is a Christian doctrine and forced people to adhere along those lines. To counter this, a young lady said we cannot look at the TRC as a defining moment but a mere example of things that can be done to help the nation move on. Hoffman answered this by saying: “The side most responsible for atrocities needs to make the first step”. This is where the TRC failed. To add on to this point, another young lady said it is astonishing to her that “those who weren’t allowed to vote before 1994 are now responsible for reconciling a nation that was destroyed by those who were allowed to vote”. Surely it should be the inverse.

 

I must say this seminar did help me in negotiating my position as a young black person. Along with this I had a defining “aha moment”. I never thought about the equally complex psychological disposition of my white peers. Both ‘sides’ cannot reject or abandon their parental history but we need to remember it is not our own. The second generation dialogue resonated with me; it is the first step we can all take on this journey of reconciliation. It will not happen overnight; it will be a process. We need to create our own history that will reflect our willingness to try and amend the past.

Pheladi Sethusa is a second year BA student in Media Studies at the University of the Witwatersrand

>via: http://www.expressimpress.org/2011/08/24/second-generation-trauma/

 


OP-ED: The Detroit riots of 1967 hold some lessons for the UK> guardian.co.uk

The Detroit riots of 1967

hold some lessons for the UK

After America's deadliest riots, a journalist and a professor proved that many assumptions about the looters were wrong


A standoff in Newark during the wave of riots that crossed America in 1967. Photograph: New York Times Co/Getty Images

Early in the morning on Sunday 23 July 1967 the Detroit police raided an after-hours drinking establishment where more than 80 black men and women were celebrating the return of two Vietnam veterans. This in itself was hardly rare. Police used to raid "blind pigs" all the time.

What was extraordinary was what came next: an outpouring of protest, violence, looting, police brutality and, ultimately, full-scale federal military intervention. "To live in America, until recently, meant to be far from war," says Calliope Stephanides, the protagonist in Jeffrey Eugenides's novel Middlesex, which is set in the city at the time. "Wars happened in south-east Asian jungles … But then why, peeking out of the dormer window, did I see a tank rolling by our front lawn?"

Before the week was out there were 43 dead, 467 injured, more than 7,200 arrests, and more than 2,000 buildings destroyed: the deadliest riots in US history.

Nathan Caplan, a psychology professor at the University of Michigan's institute for social research (ISR), was unconvinced by his colleagues' claims that the riots were simply an expression of immaturity and social deviancy. So he went to the affected neighbourhoods with one of his graduate students to conduct some field research.

"There was still smoke in the air and bullets flying when we got there," recalls Caplan. "My academic colleagues had a habit of interpreting reality as though it's just a special case within theory. God forbid that anything they did became useful or that they actually spoke to anybody."

At the same time, Philip Meyer, a national correspondent for Knight Newspapers, which owned the Detroit Free Press, was also trying to break out of the constraints of his discipline. Just a few weeks earlier Meyer had returned from a career break as a Nieman fellow at Harvard, where he had studied social research methods. "Politicians were using them and I felt journalists had to understand them too," he explains.

When the riots in Detroit started he saw an opportunity to apply academic rigour to journalistic reportage. "It struck me like a bolt of lightning," says Meyer. "The University of California had just released their report into the Watts riots and I thought, we could do this too. But people wouldn't have to wait two years for the results. With journalists we could do it faster."

And so they did. Caplan and Meyer got together, drafted a questionnaire and then trained 30 black interviewers to go into the affected areas and gather information. The next week the interviewers went into the field, sending each day's interviews back to the university. In the third week Meyer and Caplan analysed the data and Meyer started writing it up. Just a month after the disturbances had started, the Free Press published its findings.

Entitled The People Beyond 12th street: A Survey of Attitudes of Detroit Negroes After the Riot of 1967, the report's methodology and language are very much of their time.

Seeking to explain black Detroit to white America, it reads like an anthropological survey of a foreign land. "In their alienation the rioters display some similarity to hippies," reads one part. "Both feel that the world is wrong and they want to set themselves apart from it. But hippies accept their share of the world's guilt while rioters project it. The hippie hands you a flower and says: 'Peace.' The rioter shouts: 'Get whitey' and throws a rock."

Nonetheless, even though by modern standards the sample was small and only a minority of those they spoke to were rioters, its data was revelatory.

It showed that, contrary to popular belief, there was no correlation between economic status or educational levels and propensity to riot. Nor had the riots been the work of recent immigrants from the south. The main grievances were police brutality, overcrowded living conditions, poor housing and lack of jobs.

 

 

Racial conflict

There are relatively few similarities between the Detroit riots in 1967 and those in England last month. The unrest in Detroit was part of a national conflagration led largely by the young. A riot had ended in Newark a week before and would continue in Milwaukee and Washington DC just days after. But these disturbances were rooted in racial conflict. "Detroit was becoming increasingly black and the police force and the city government remained primarily white," explains the veteran Detroit activist and author Grace Lee Boggs. "So the institutions in the city were seen as occupation forces."

It was also a pivotal moment in American racial history. A period of mass activism in the south had produced civil rights legislation just a few years before, securing black Americans the right to equality and the vote. 1967 was the year Muhammad Ali refused to serve in Vietnam, Cleveland became the first major city to elect a black mayor and bans on mixed-race marriages were finally made unconstitutional.

But while the contexts in England in 2011 and in Detroit more than 40 years earlier were quite different, many of the most popular explanations for the root causes were startlingly similar. The youth of those involved and the looting led many to dismiss those involved as just riffraff running amok.

"I was hearing that the riots were the product of immaturity and social deviancy by the lumpenproletariat," recalls Caplan. "But that's not what we were finding."

Then there is the apparent disconnect between the event that triggered the riot and the prevailing conditions that might explain it. "Every riot has a precipitating event," explains Meyer. "But then there are always more subtle factors."

Indeed, thanks largely to union jobs at the city's car plants, African Americans were materially better off in Detroit than elsewhere in the country. More than 40% owned their own homes. The city had the largest chapter of the NAACP, the nation's oldest and largest civil rights organisation, in the country and was the only city with two black congressmen.

By revealing there was no link between income or education levels and rioters, and that those born in Detroit were three times more likely to have been involved than those from the south, the ISR/Detroit Free Press survey provided evidence that effectively countered popular misconceptions. "The riffraff theory and the southern migrant theory just stopped being propagated," says Meyer. "They were more likely to be young but that's because they had less to lose. In that sense the young were like leading edge consumers."

"It gave an empirical basis to address some interpretations and it put them straight into the public sphere," says Caplan.

It also gave voice to the complex attitudes towards social unrest in areas most likely to play host to them. The overwhelming majority of black people in Detroit at the time (84%) thought the riots could happen again. Only a quarter believed they had more to gain than lose by resorting to violence. But, explained Meyer at the time, "even those who think the long-term effects of violence are likely to be bad see some compensating benefits". "They know we mean business now," one 31-year-old told him.

The Kerner commission, set up by the president, Lyndon Johnson, to examine the cause of the riots in Detroit and elsewhere, used the data from the Detroit Free Press/ISR survey in reaching its findings. "What white Americans have never fully understood – but what the Negro can never forget – is that white society is deeply implicated in the ghetto," it argued. "White institutions created it, white institutions maintain it, and white society condones it." Famously it concluded: "Our nation is moving towards two societies, one black, one white – separate and unequal."

 

A post-apocalyptic city

You can certainly see that society in Detroit today. Most respondents to the survey believed the attitudes of whites towards blacks would improve over the following five years. In fact whites just left the city en masse for the suburbs; a few decades later more affluent blacks followed. Following the collapse of the US car industry a couple of decades later, Detroit might best be described as post-industrial. But the immediate impression is post-apocalyptic: empty lots, abandoned houses, multistorey buildings left derelict, entire blocks boarded up. Detroit has lost 25% of its population in the past 10 years. It's what you would imagine a city would look like when capitalism decides that it doesn't really need the people any more.

Five minutes from 12th Street (which has been renamed Rosa Parks Boulevard) and Clairmount, the intersection where the riot started, you can buy a house for $1200 (£750). The only ad on the side of a row of dilapidated storefronts is for criminal defence lawyers. And even that has been defaced.

So if poverty and poor education did not cause the riots, what did? Alongside police brutality, Boggs describes an alienated youth who saw that technological changes in manufacturing would make them economically obsolete. "Young people felt expendable. They had to make a way out of no way."

The former black panther Wayne Curtis suggests that the apparent wealth belied lives of discrimination. "Growing up we saw people riding around in Cadillac convertibles. But we didn't see the conditions they worked in and the racism in the factories. They still had to deal with the police. We just didn't understand how marginalised they were."

Curtis recalls thinking that the civil rights victories had settled the question of equality once and for all. "We were told that this was it; that if we could vote everything would be OK. But it took a while to understand how the power structure works."

Both Caplan and Meyer call this the problem of rising expectations. Having fought for and ostensibly won social equality African Americans found that did not translate into economic justice. "Young black kids just weren't getting jobs," says Caplan. "The opportunity structure was just too narrow and everyone knew it. So you would see young people breaking windows and looting stores. But it was the older ones who were more frustrated and more militant in their views."

 

ECONOMICS: How France lives off Africa with the Colonial Pact City Life > This Is Africa

How France lives off Africa

with the Colonial Pact

Nicolas Sarkozy

We try to keep a positive vibe going here at This Is Africa, but every so often you come across something that just paints your mood black. Some of you may already be aware of this, but if like us you're hearing about this for the first time your jaw will drop. And it'll probably raise the same BIG questions in your mind that it did in ours. (Incidentally, once you read this you'll no longer wonder why French presidents' and ministers are sometimes greeted by protests when they visit former French colonies in Africa, even if the protests are about other issues. Though what other issues could be more important than this one we have no idea.)

Just before France conceded to African demands for independence in the 1960s, it carefully organised its former colonies (CFA countries) in a system of "compulsory solidarity" which consisted of obliging the 14 African states to put 65% of their foreign currency reserves into the French Treasury, plus another 20% for financial liabilities. This means these 14 African countries only ever have access to 15% of their own money! If they need more they have to borrow their own money from the French at commercial rates! And this has been the case since the 1960s.

Professor Nicolas Agbohou, Associate Professor at the Institute of Cheikh Anta Diop, University of Gabon

 

Believe it or not it gets worse.

France has the first right to buy or reject any natural resources found in the land of the Francophone countries. So even if the African countries can get better prices elsewhere, they can't sell to anybody until France says it doesn't need the resources.

In the award of government contracts, French companies must be considered first; only after that can these countries look elsewhere. It doesn’t matter if the CFA countries can obtain better value for money elsewhere.

Presidents of CFA countries that have tried to leave the CFA zone have had political and financial pressure put on them by successive French presidents.

Thus, these African states are French taxpayers - taxed at a staggering rate - yet the citizens of these countries aren't French and don't have access to the public goods and services their money helps pay for.

CFA zones are solicited to provide private funding to French politicians during elections in France.

The above is a summary of an article we came across in the February issue of the New African (and from an interview given by Professor Mamadou Koulibaly, Speaker of the Ivorian National Assembly, Professor of Economics, and author of the book The Servitude of the Colonial Pact), and we hope they won't mind us sharing it with you influx, so here goes:


THE COLONIAL PACT
It is the Colonial Pact that set up the common currency for the Francophone countries, the C.F.A franc, which demands that each of the 14 C.F.A member countries must deposit 65% (plus another 20% for financial liabilities, making the dizzying total of 85%) of their foreign exchange reserves in an “Operations Account” at the French Treasury in Paris.

The African nations therefore have only access to 15% of their own money for national development in any given year. If they are in need of extra money, as they always are, they have to borrow from their own 65% in the French Treasury at commercial rates. And that is not all: there is a cap on the credit extended to each member country equivalent to 20 % of their public revenue in the preceding year. So if the countries need to borrow more than 20%, too bad; they cannot do it. Amazingly, the final say on the C.F.A arrangements belongs to the French Treasury, which invests the African countries’ money in its own name on the Paris Bourse (the stock exchange).

It is also the Colonial Pact that demands that France has the first right to buy or reject any natural resources found in the land of the Francophone countries. So even if the African countries could get better prices elsewhere, they cannot sell to anybody until France says it does not want to buy those natural resources.

It is, again, the Colonial Pact that demands that in the award of government contracts in the African countries, French companies should be considered first; only after that can Africans look elsewhere. It doesn’t matter if Africans can obtain better value for money elsewhere, French companies come first, and most often get the contracts. Currently, there is the awkward case in Abidjan where, before the elections, former president Gbagbo’s government wanted to build a third major bridge to link the central business district (called Plateau) to the rest of the city, from which it is separated by a lagoon. By Colonial Pact tradition, the contract must go to a French company, which incidentally has quoted an astronomical price – to be paid in euros or US dollars.

Not happy, Gbagbo’s government sought a second quote from the Chinese, who offered to build the bridge at half the price quoted by the French company, and – wait for this – payment would be in cocoa beans, of which Cote d’Ivoire is the world’s largest producer. But, unsurprisingly, the French said “non, you can’t do that”.

Overall the Colonial Pact gives the French a dominant and privileged 
position over Francophone Africa, but in Côte d'Ivoire, the jewel of the former French possessions in Africa, the French are overly dominant. Outside parliament, almost all the major utilities - water, electricity, telephone, transport, ports and major banks - are run by French companies or French interests. The same story is found in commerce, construction, and agriculture.

In short, the Colonial Pact has created a legal mechanism under which
 France obtains a special place in the political and economic life of
 its former colonies.



THE BIG QUESTIONS
In what meaningful way can any of the 14 CFA countries be said to be independent?

If this isn't illegal and an international crime, then what is?

What is it going to take for this state of indentured servitude to end?

How much have the CFA countries lost as a result of this 50-year (and counting) "agreement"? (Remember, they've had to borrow their own money from the French at commercial rates)

Do French people know they're living off the wealth of African countries and have been doing so for over half a century? And if they know, do they give a damn?

When will France start paying back money they've sucked from these countries, not only directly from the interest on cash reserves and loans these countries have had to take out, but also on lost earnings from the natural resources the countries sold to France below market rates as well as the lost earnings resulting from awarding contracts to French companies when other contractors could have done things for less?

Does any such "agreement" exist between Britain and its former colonies, or did they really let go when they let go?


PLEASE READ
The economic and political effects of the CFA zone
The Servitude of the Colonial Pact (Interview with Professor Mamadou Koulibaly)
The CFA franc still controlled by Paris
Mamadou Koulibaly launches a African crusade
Good that Ouattara is the Cote d’Ivoire President but what about the Colonial Pact?

via thisisafrica.me

 

VIDEO: Mama Africa - Miriam Makeba Documentary > Al Jazeera English

Miriam Makeba


Mama Africa

The voice of a continent - Miriam Makeba's story as a political activist and legendary performer.

Filmmaker Mika Kaurismäki joins Amanda Palmer, Al Jazeera's head of entertainment, on The Fabulous Picture Show's Q&A to discuss the music, activism and legacy of the inimitable Miriam "Zenzi" Makeba, whose singing career took her from the townships of South Africa to the biggest musical arenas in the world. It was a journey that moved her fans to name her "Mama Africa: the voice of a continent".

Forced into political exile for performing in an anti-apartheid film, young Miriam moved to New York where she was soon discovered by musical impresario Harry Belafonte.

He introduced the US to Makeba's stunning voice, and with hits such as Pata Pata and The Click Song, she skyrocketed to international success.

A vociferous opponent of South Africa's apartheid government, and the bride of Black Panther, Stokely Carmichael, Makeba would become known to the world as much for her political activism as for her captivating vocal talent.

Acclaimed director Mika Kaurismäki's film combines astounding archive footage from across five decades, and interviews with those closest to the legendary performer.

 

VIDEO: Shadia Mansour featuring M1 of Dead Prez - ‘The Kufiyyeh is Arabic’

Shadia Mansour

First lady of Palestinian rap

features Dead Prez’s M1

official video for

‘The Kufiyyeh is Arabic’

 

by Seham on September 4, 2011

Shadia Mansour featuring M1 from Dead Prez,

Al-Kufiyyeh 3arabeyeh video

  

Lyrics

Good morning cousins, y’all welcome, come in
 

What would you like us to serve you, Arab blood or tears from our eyes?
 

I think that’s how they expected us to receive them
 

That’s why they got embarrassed when they realized their mistake
 

That’s why we rocked the kuffiyeh, the white and black
 

Now these dogs are startin to wear it as a trend
 

No matter how they design it, no matter how they change its color
 

The kuffiyeh is Arabic, and it will stay Arabic
 

The gear we rock, they want it; our culture, they want it

Our dignity, they want it; everything that’s ours, they want it

Half your country, half your home; why, why? No, I tell em

Stealin’ something that ain’t theirs, I can’t allow it

They imitatin us in what we wear, wear; from this land enough, what else do you want?

About Jerusalem, Jerusalem, would they be worried, how can you humans?

Before y’all ever rocked a kuffiyeh, we here to remind em who we are

And whether they like it or not, this is our clothing style

That’s why we rock the kuffiyeh, cuz it’s patriotic

The kuffiyeh, the kuffiyeh is Arabic

That’s why we rock the kuffiyeh, our essential identity

The kuffiyeh, the kuffiyeh is Arabic

Come on, throw up the kuffiyeh (throw that kuffiyeh up for me)

The kuffiyeh, the kuffiyeh is Arabic

Throw it up, come on “Bilad Al Sham” (Greater Syria)

The kuffiyeh is Arabic, and it will stay Arabic

There’s none yet like the Arab people

Show me which other nation in the world was more influential

The picture is clear, we are the cradle of civilization

Our history and cultural heritage testify to our existence

That’s why I rocked the Palestinian gear

From Haifa, Jenin, Jabal al Nar to Ramallah

Let me see the kuffiyeh, the white and red

Let me throw it up in the sky; I’m

Arab, and my tongue creates earthquakes

I shake the words of war

Listen, I’m Shadia Mansour, and the gear I’m rockin is my identity

Since the day I was born raisin people’s awareness been my responsibility

But I was raised between fear and evil; between two areas

Between the grudging and the poor, I seen life from both sides

God bless the kuffiyeh; however you rock me, wherever you see me

I stay true to my origins, Palestinian

 

PUB: Paumanok Poetry Award Guidelines

Paumanok Poetry Award Guidelines


The Visiting Writers Program

at Farmingdale State College

is pleased to announce

the twenty-first annual competition

for The Paumanok Poetry Award


One First Prize $1500 and expenses for a reading in our 2012 - 2013 series

Two Second Prizes $750 and expenses for a reading in our series

Interested writers should send the following items to Margery L. Brown, English Department, Knapp Hall, Farmingdale State College, 2350 Broadhollow Road, Farmingdale, New York 11735:

  • a cover letter
  • a one-paragraph bio
  • 3-5 of their best poems (no more than 10 pages, total)
  • the required $25 entry fee

Poems may be published or unpublished, and there are no restrictions on style, subject matter, or length of poems submitted: quality is the single criterion. Please note that the writer's name, address, and phone number should be clearly indicated on the cover page.  Multiple entries will not be accepted.  Entries from previous winners will not be considered.

Make checks payable to Farmingdale State College, VWP.

Poems will not be returned, but writers who want to know the results of the competition via snail mail should enclose a business-size SASE for results (notification by late December).  Results are also published on this website.

Deadline: Postmark no later than September 15, 2011.

Please direct any questions or requests for clarification via email to Margery Brown.

See the Paumanok Award Winners.

Check out the FAQs about the Paumanok Poetry Award.

 

PUB: Bloodroot Literary Magazine publishing poetry, short fiction and creative nonfiction

POETRY CONTEST

 

Three prizes of $200, $100, $50, three honorable mentions and publication in 2012 Bloodroot Literary Magazine edition. Reading period runs April 1 through September 15.

All entries are considered for publication.

Bloodroot endorses and abides by the Ethical Guidelines of the Council of Literary Magazines and Presses (CLMP).

CONTEST GUIDELINES - Printable Version:

  1. The competition is open to any poet who writes in English.
  2. Manuscripts should be typewritten or computer-printed on white 8-1/2" X 11" paper.
  3. We can only accept hard copies.
  4. Electronic submissions will not be accepted.
  5. Submit original, unpublished, free verse, 10 lines to 2 pages.
  6. Entry fee: $15 for three poems, $5 each additional poem.
  7. Final judge: April Ossmann
  8. Your name must not appear on the manuscript.
  9. Please provide name, address, email address, titles of poems in a cover letter.
  10. You may include SASE for results and SAS postcard for confirmation.
  11. Entries must be postmarked no later than September 15, 2011.
  12. Manuscripts cannot be returned.
  13. Please no simultaneous submission to other publications.
  14. Mail manuscript and entry fee to:

    The Editors
    Bloodroot Literary Magazine
    PO Box 322
    Thetford Center, VT 05075