The Morton Marr Poetry Prize
The Morton Marr Poetry Prize is an endowment by Marilyn Klepak of Dallas in honor of her father, whose love of poetry has encouraged her to pass this love on to others. Generous supplemental donations were also provided by Mr. and Mrs. David T. Searls, Jr. The first prize is $1,000 and the second place prize is $500. Both prizes earn publication in Southwest Review pages. Judging for 2009 was Dan Chiasson.
To see the 2009 winners, click here.
To see the 2008 winners, click here.
RULES: This contest is open to writers who have not yet published a first book of poetry. Contestants may submit no more than six, previously unpublished poems in a "traditional" form (e.g. sonnet, sestina, villanelle, rhymed stanzas, blank verse, etc.). Poems should be printed blank with name and address information only on a cover sheet or letter. (If work is submitted online, please omit the author's name from the final "submission content text area"). There is a $5.00 per poem entry/handling fee. Postmarked deadline for entry is September 30, 2010. Submissions will not be returned. For notification of winning poems, include a SASE. Winners will be announced in December. Entries should be addressed to: The Morton Marr Poetry Prize, Southwest Review, P.O. Box 750374, Dallas, TX 75275-0374.
click here to pay your Marr entry fee with a VISA, MasterCard, or Discover card.
click here to submit your Marr poem(s) by email.
NOTE: Your Marr entry is not complete until you have completed both of the above steps.
To submit your work for regular publication, click here.
Southern Methodist University
PO Box 750374 . Dallas TX 75275-0374
214-768-1037 . Fax 214-768-1408
Email: swr@smu.edu
Copyright Southwest Review 2010
Sol Books Contests
Sol Books sponsors one annual contest for book-length collections of poetry and prose
- Deadline: October 31st, 2010
- Closed
- Deadline: October 31st, 2010
- Entrants to either the Poetry or Prose Contests that are received from recipients living in the Upper Midwest will have their manuscripts automatically entered into this contest
All entries will be reviewed by a panel of judges, and copies of the winning collections can be ordered directly from (click here for an order form) us or through one of our affiliates.
For further questions, please email submissions@solbooks.com.

GO HERE TO HEAR AUDIO INTERVIEW> accessinterviews.com
English novelist Zadie Smith's latest offering is a wide-ranging collection of her essays examining a range of literary and political subjects. It it intriguingly titled Changing My Mind, perhaps not the most obvious choice for such a famously self-assured author.
"I wanted a title which expressed that there might be something positive about movement, ambivalence and change rather than decided views," she tells Today presenter Justin Webb.
"I wrote at the end of one of my essays that I hoped that Mr Obama would create an ambivalent feeling in the country, but I wasn't sure if that was the case."
The US, she asserts, "seems more divided and more obsessively ideological that it ever has".
Obama "has transcended representing that particular community - he won't be considered a bad black president, he'll just be considered a bad president."
Ms Smith frequently visits the US, where she will be teaching this year: "I love New York, I love Boston, maybe it's something about the literary community there."
In her acclaimed first novel, White Teeth (2000), Ms Smith tackled immigration in the UK and drew on her own mixed-heritage background and upbringing.
"The idea of multi-culturalism as an idea or an ideology is something I never understood. We don't walk around our neighbourhood thinking how is this experiment going - this is not how people live. It's just a fact.
"Once people are able to move freely in the world by plane or by boat it is an inevitability," she says. "So instead of arguing about it as an ideological concept you might as well deal with the reality."
Turning Iraqi Cities into Slums
By Adil E. Shamoo
August 23, 2010
Editor’s Note: Many Americans want to believe that the United States improved the condition for the Iraqi people by invading their country and ousting dictator Saddam Hussein.
However, in this guest essay, Adil E. Shamoo cites new statistics on how human misery has spread across the country in the wake of the U.S.-led invasion:
Iraq has between 25 and 50 percent unemployment, a dysfunctional parliament, rampant disease, an epidemic of mental illness, and sprawling slums. The killing of innocent people has become part of daily life.
What a havoc the United States has wreaked in Iraq.
UN-HABITAT, an agency of the United Nations, recently published a 218-page report entitled State of the World’s Cities, 2010-2011. The report is full of statistics on the status of cities around the world and their demographics.
It defines slum dwellers as those living in urban centers without one of the following: durable structures to protect them from climate, sufficient living area, sufficient access to water, access to sanitation facilities, and freedom from eviction.
Almost intentionally hidden in these statistics is one shocking fact about urban Iraqi populations. For the past few decades, prior to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, the percentage of the urban population living in slums in Iraq hovered just below 20 percent.
Today, that percentage has risen to 53 percent: 11 million of the 19 million total urban dwellers. In the past decade, most countries have made progress toward reducing slum dwellers. But Iraq has gone rapidly and dangerously in the opposite direction.
According to the U.S. Census of 2000, 80 percent of the 285 million people living in the United States are urban dwellers. Those living in slums are well below 5 percent. If we translate the Iraqi statistic into the U.S. context, 121 million people in the United States would be living in slums.
If the United States had an unemployment rate of 25-50 percent and 121 million people living in slums, riots would ensue, the military would take over, and democracy would evaporate.
So why are people in the United States not concerned and saddened by the conditions in Iraq?
Because most people in the United States do not know what happened in Iraq and what is happening there now. Our government, including the current administration, looks the other way and perpetuates the myth that life has improved in post-invasion Iraq. Our major news media reinforces this message.
I had high hopes that the new administration would tell the truth to its citizens about why we invaded Iraq and what we are doing currently in the country. President Obama promised to move forward and not look to the past.
However problematic this refusal to examine on the past — particularly for historians — the president should at least inform the U.S. public of the current conditions in Iraq. How else can we expect our government to formulate appropriate policy?
More extensive congressional hearings on Iraq might have allowed us to learn about the myths propagated about Iraq prior to the invasion and the extent of the damage and destruction our invasion brought on Iraq.
We would have learned about the tremendous increase in urban poverty and the expansion of city slums. Such facts about the current conditions of Iraq would help U.S. citizens to better understand the impact of the quick U.S. withdraw and what are our moral responsibilities in Iraq should be.
Adil E. Shamoo is a senior analyst at Foreign Policy In Focus, and a professor at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. He writes on ethics and public policy. He can be reached at: ashamoo@umaryland.edu.
Workers Rebuilding New Orleans Face Rampant Wage Theft
Undocumented Workers Vital to Reconstruction Face Discrimination and Abuse
![]()
A decline in construction jobs in New Orleans has not created a decline in wage theft, workers' rights groups say. (iStock photo)
This week, The Washington Independent is featuring a series of investigative stories on the rebuilding of New Orleans, five years after Hurricane Katrina. Find all of them here.
Jacinta Gonzalez, an organizer with the Congress of Day Laborers in New Orleans, tells a story about the abuse of workers rebuilding the city after the devastation of Hurricane Katrina. She once met a man who went to his employer’s house to demand payment for his labor on a construction site after the employer stiffed him of his dues. The man’s boss came at him, swinging a hammer. The worker immediately called the police.
The politics of immigration are thorny, but it is a simple truth that construction companies routinely use day laborers without checking their immigration status: Thousands of those workers have helped and are helping to rebuild New Orleans. But those workers commonly suffer abuse due to their immigration status, including threats of violence and wage theft. Despite the best efforts of workers’ rights groups, five years after the hurricane, advocates say abuse remains rampant. Now, those groups are calling for specific legislation to protect vulnerable workers — documented and not — and to make sure they get their due.
After Hurricane Katrina, the number of undocumented workers in New Orleans increased substantially, in part because of a Department of Homeland Security directive to suspend employment immigration enforcement in the area immediately following the storm. The suspension expired quickly, but it created an inviting environment for undocumented immigrants, says Elizabeth Fussell, a professor at Washington State University.
“Conditions were set to attract a labor force of Latino immigrants,” Fussell says. “There was a large population of undocumented immigrants who were coming to do the work that was necessary in the city.”
Though there are no firm numbers on undocumented workers, social scientists point to increases in the Latino population to show the influx of immigrants. The Latino population increased from a 4.4 percent share of the population in 2000 to 6.6 percent last year, according to Census data. Advocacy groups say it is likely higher, about 10 percent.
Thousands of those workers came to work rebuilding New Orleans — clearing debris, fixing roads, building houses, constructing schools. “After Katrina hit, there was much more work and much more wages for people — there were other wages to be found,” Gonzalez says.
And along with the rise of undocumented workers and construction problems came wage theft — to which undocumented immigrants are particularly vulnerable. In a 2007 survey of Mexican migrants at the Mexican mobile consulate in a suburb of New Orleans, Fussell found that 24 percent had experienced situations where an employer did not pay, while about 16 percent had been paid less than they were promised. Nearly 90 percent of those surveyed were working in the country illegally. The Congress of Day Laborers last year found that 80 percent of the workers it represents had been victims of wage theft in the past year.
The consequences are particularly dire for undocumented workers, who do not have access to the same legal and policing resources as other workers. “When you’re not paid for that money, the consequences can be much more serious. It’s the difference between being able to pay rent and being homeless,” says Gonzales.
Nonprofit and advocacy groups stepped in to fill the void, helping undocumented workers regain wages from bosses who stiffed them. The Pro Bono Project and Loyola New Orleans’ School of Law help workers sue their employers, for instance. At the Pro Bono clinic, established in 2007, lawyer Vanessa Spinazola says 90 percent of the workers represented are undocumented. Last year, in a nine-month period, lawyers at the clinic saw 476 workers, filed 365 cases and helped draft 146 demand letters.
Oxfam America funds the Pro Bono clinic, but was forced to discontinue its project on workers’ rights in July due to a lack of funds. Ilana Scherl, a field representative for Oxfam who previously worked on the worker’s rights project, says New Orleans just had too much need and too little funding for the initiative. “I guess a lot of foundations feel like five years later everything should be taken care of,” she says. “The problems are still there but the funds are not.” Spinazola says the clinic has enough funding from Oxfam to operate until July 2011, and she is “writing grants as fast as possible” to find money to continue the clinics.
The clinic is still very much needed, particularly because workers often face violence from employers for demanding their wages, she says. The clinic tells workers to put the address of a clinic P.O. box on their demand letters, so that if employers want to retaliate they won’t have their home addresses. Workers whose employers know their addresses often move before sending the letter. Fear deters some workers from seeking their wages, but others move forward with claims, Spinazola says. “They’re afraid but they need the money or they think they deserve their money — which they do.”
Of course, for illegal immigrants there is also a fear that their employers will call ICE. Spinazola said she suspects that happened a few years ago, when the clinic helped a group of about 40 men who were living and working in an apartment complex to send a letter demanding wages. Most of the men moved out before the letter was sent, but seven were still present when the employer received the demand letter. Two days later, Spinazola said ICE raided the apartments. Three of the men were deported.
Worker’s rights advocates argue that a city ordinance is essential to combating a wage theft problem too big for advocates and undocumented workers to deal with on their own. “The workers need protection, they’re not getting it right now,” Scherl says. “The only way we see to achieve that is to have a policy in place protecting the workers.”
The New Orleans Center for Racial Justice helped develop a policy, but the exact direction of the potential ordinance remains unclear. New Orleans City Councilman Arnie Fielkow has said he would support a wage theft ordinance, and groups are now negotiating the ordinance with the mayor’s office and other officials at city hall.
In New Orleans, some advocates of a wage theft ordinance said they are concerned growing anti-illegal immigrant sentiment will play into their effort to pass the ordinance. But they are hoping the general goodwill many New Orleans residents feel toward the workers who helped rebuild their city will make matters easier.
“In this climate, the fear of opposition is always there,” Gonzalez says. “But New Orleans is a city that recognizes that day laborers did participate and did come to the rescue in terms of reconstruction.”
I Can't Write Left Handed
<br /><b>I Can't Write Left Handed</b><br /><i>Uploaded by yardie4lifever2. - See video of the biggest web video personalities.</i>
______________________________________________
John Legend x The Roots – Wake Up!
| Album Cover & Tracklist
>from Soul Culture
by Tahirah Edwards Byfield
I’m super excited about this! John Legend and The Roots collaborative effort, Wake Up! is due for release on September 21st.
The 11-track album contains covers of songs from the ’60s and ’70s, including Marvin Gaye’s “Wholy Holy,” Donny Hathaway’s “Little Ghetto Boy,” and the Common and Melanie Fiona-assisted first single “Wake Up Everybody.” The inspiring collection also features one original composition called “Shine,” which serves as the theme for the documentary Waiting for Superman.
Check out the tracklist under the jump
Tracklist
1. “Compared to What”
2. “Hard Times”
3. “Little Ghetto Boy”
4. “Wake Up Everybody” ft Common and Melanie Fiona
5. “Our Generation”
6. “Love the Way It Should Be”
7. “Hang On in There”
8. “I Can’t Write Left Handed”
9. “Wholy Holy”
10. “I Wish I Knew How It Would Feel to Be Free”
11. “Shine”______________________________________________
John Legend x The Roots x Common Live @TheTroubadour [Videos] > from Soul Culture
August 23, 2010 by M. Gosho Oakes
Filed under Live Musichttp://www.soulculture.co.uk/blogs/music-blog/livemusic/john-legend-x-the-roo...
John Legend and The Roots hit The Troubadour in LA yesterday with special guest emcee Common to perform “They Say” [from Common's 2005 album, Be] alongside Legend’s Andre 3000 featuring hit “Greenlight” and songs from his forthcoming collaborative album with The Roots, Wake Up! – including lead single “Wake Up Everybody” and “Hard Times.”
Their new album, Wake Up!, is due for release on September 21st via Sony Music.
Scroll on for four live performances…
“Green Light”:
“They Say” ft. Common:
“Wake Up” ft. Common:
“Hard Times”:
“Fresh” Chess Connections (Today In History)
Today in history, September 1, 1972… American chess legend Bobby Fischer beat Boris Spassky of the then Soviet Union to win the international chess crown in a match made for the cold war era, in Reykjavík, Iceland.
In 1993, Laurence Fishburne co-starred in a drama titled Searching For Bobby Fischer, which wasn’t about the chess master, but rather was based on the life of another chess prodigy, Joshua Waitzkin, who wasn’t even born when Fischer won the 1972 title. The title of the film speaks to Waitzkin’s desire to be the kind of winner that Fischer was in his prime.
But I’d like to point you to another film in which the rules of the game of chess play a pivotal role in the progression of the film and the influence it has on its characters. I’m referring to Boaz Yakin’s 1994 crime drama, Fresh, which I rarely hear mentioned anymore, despite how fresh (pun intended) the movie is, with a stellar cast that included Giancarlo Esposito, Samuel L. Jackson, N’Bushe Wright, and Sean Nelson, as the titular character.
In Fresh, Boaz Yakin’s feature debut, a 12-year-old drug runner nicknamed Fresh (Nelson), a precocious, introspective kid, uses chess philosophy, steadfastly taught to him by his estranged father (Samuel L. Jackson), a speed chess player/hustler, as the chess board becomes a metaphor for life, as seen through the eyes of young Fresh, who plots a coldly brilliant plan to save himself and his junkie sister (Wright) from their world of drugs and violence.
If you haven’t seen Fresh, it’s well worth a look! And lucky for you, it’s on DVD, as well as VOD via Amazon.com; also someone uploaded the entire film onto YouTube!
Here’s scene 5: