![]()
This photo was taken on December 9, 2010.
UN-Troops-with-Shields
via: http://www.flickr.com/photos/26252815@N06/5248230006/in/photostream/
OPINION:
Time to go: The U.N.'s failing mission in Haiti
Published: Saturday, December 11, 2010
Updated: Saturday, December 11, 2010 23:12
Almost a year after a devastating earthquake hit Haiti, the country is facing a new disaster from an unexpected source: cholera. Unfortunately, those there to aid the country, particularly the U.N., have been failing miserably. By engaging in too many different activities that could be better accomplished by smaller organizations, the U.N. appears to be doing more harm than good.
In an article for Reuters, Joseph Guyler Delva references World Health Organization and Pan-American Health Organization estimates "that the outbreak could affect as many as 650,000 people in the next six months."
The outbreak has already claimed the lives of at least 2,000 Haitians, according to the U.N., which has pledged to do all it can to deal with the infection.
The U.N. has had an intermittent presence in Haiti since 1990. In 2004, the U.N. established the United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH), which continues operating in Haiti today with about 12,000 personnel, according to the U.N. website for the mission. Recent events, however, have indicated that the U.N. may well be more of a curse than a blessing.
As tragic as the cholera epidemic is shaping up to be, the truly surprising thing is that U.N. troops stationed in Haiti are the suspected source of the outbreak. French epidemiologist Renaud Piarroux, working for the French Foreign Ministry, investigated the cause of the epidemic and, according to the Associated Press, "concluded that the cholera originated in a tributary of Haiti's Artibonite river, next to a U.N. base outside the town of Mirebalais." .
The base houses U.N. troops from Nepal. Furthermore, the Associated Press also reported that "the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed in October that the strain of cholera bacteria in Haiti matched one from South Asia, a region that includes Nepal."
The article goes on to note that, "Piarroux's is the first scientific report linking the base to the epidemic, though many other epidemiologists and public health experts have said for weeks that the soldiers are the most likely source of the infection."
Of course, the U.N. denied the allegations.
But that's not the extent of U.N. mismanagement. Haiti held a U.N.-backed presidential election on November 28th but, amid allegations of fraud, Haitians are contesting the results and mass rioting has ensued. Delva writes that "At least two people were killed in the flaring violence, which appeared to dash international hopes that the U.N.-backed elections held on November 28 could create a stable new leadership for Haiti."
The article notes later on that the two individuals were reportedly killed by U.N. peacekeepers in the "south coast city of Les Cayes."
However, in the capital, Port au Prince, "local police appeared to be overwhelmed by the numbers of protesters. U.N. peacekeepers of the more than 12,000-strong U.N. force in Haiti were not seen intervening in the capital," writes Delva.
So, instead of providing humanitarian assistance in the middle of a national health crisis, U.N. troops are either completely absent or engaged in crowd control.
Even the Haitian people are tired of the U.N.'s presence. One Haitian interviewed in a Reuters video listed his grievances against the U.N.: "These guys are coming here and they rape our women, kill our people, and now bring us the disease. We are tired of them. They must go."
All of this comes at the bargain price of only $380,000,000, the cost of the U.N. mission from July to December, 2010, according to the MINUSTAH website.
While I assume that the U.N. mission in Haiti was undertaken with the best of intentions, recent events cast doubt on the effectiveness of maintaining a significant U.N. presence in Haiti. Certainly, some good work has been done. But consider this: the earthquake in Haiti killed 250,000 people, and the U.N.-induced cholera outbreak is expected to infect as many as 650,000. This alone has the potential to outweigh the loss in human life of the original disaster.
I think a strong argument can be made that the money being spent on maintaining the U.N. could be better spent by non-governmental relief and aid agencies. At least it could be done without the military footprint caused by U.N. presence.
One way or another, the mission seems to be causing more problems than it solves. I think the time has come to reconsider the U.N.'s presence in Haiti.
Contact Max Nelsen at max.nelsen@whitworthian.com.
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
February 27 - March 1, 2009
The Coup Five Years On
Haiti's Harsh Realities
By YVES ENGLER
Haiti can teach you a lot about the harsh reality of social affairs.
From the grips of the most barbaric form of plantation economy sprung probably the greatest example of liberation in the history of humanity. The 1791-1804 Haitian Revolution was simultaneously a struggle against slavery, colonialism and white supremacy. Defeating the French, British and Spanish empires, it led to freedom for all people regardless of color, decades before this idea found traction in Europe or North America.
Unfortunately, Haiti's history also demonstrates how fluidly Europe (and North America) moved from formal colonialism to neo-imperialism. Technically "independent" for more than two centuries, outsiders have long shaped the country's affairs. Through isolation, economic asphyxiation, debt dependence, gunboat diplomacy, occupation, foreign supported dictatorships, structural adjustment programs and "democracy promotion" Haiti is no stranger to the various forms of foreign political manipulation. Most recently, the elected government of Jean-Bertrand Aristide was destabilized and then overthrown on February 29 2004 by the US, France and Canada, which ushered in a terrible wave of political repression and an ongoing UN occupation.
As we approach the five-year anniversary of the coup, there are three important lessons to be learned from this intervention. First of all, the Canadian sponsored responsibility to protect" doctrine, which many want to encode in international law, is little more than a cover for
imperialism. Liberal Party officials justified cutting off aid and invading Haiti by citing a "responsibility to protect" the country, yet the intervention further devastated an already impoverished population.
The second lesson is that "peacekeepers" can be used to wage a brutal class war. In the two years after the coup, UN troops regularly provided vital support for the Haitian police's violent assaults on poor communities and peaceful demonstrations demanding the return of the elected government. UN forces also participated directly in this violent political pacification campaign, launching repeated anti-"gang" assaults on poor neighborhoods in Port-au-Prince. The two most horrific raids took place on January 6, 2005 and December 22, 2006, which together left some 35 innocent civilians dead and dozens wounded in the densely populated slum of Cité Soleil (a bastion of support for Aristide). In April 2008 UN troops once again demonstrated that their primary purpose in the country was to defend the status quo. During riots over the rising cost of food they put down protests by killing a handful of demonstrators. (Kevin Pina’s film Haiti: The UNtold Story, which will be shown across the country in the coming weeks, documents the chilling brutality of UN forces.)
Finally, Haiti provides an example of how self-described "progressive" Western government-funded NGOs function as an arm of imperialism. A sort of NGO laboratory, Haiti is a highly vulnerable society where NGOs have a great deal of influence. By one estimate, Haiti has the most development NGOs of any country per capita and the vast majority of the country's social services are run by domestic or foreign NGOs. Their influential position in Haiti provides a clear window into Western government-funded NGOs worst tendencies.
Many NGOs joined the Bush administration, Ottawa and a handful of armed thugs in calling for the removal of Haiti's democratically elected president in 2004. After repeatedly complaining about human rights violations under the elected government, these groups (Development and Peace, Rights and Democracy, Oxfam Québec, Alternatives etc.) ignored or denied the massive increase in human rights violations that took place in the aftermath of the coup. A January 2008 federal government-funded report published by Alternatives (Québec's biggest proponent of the World Social Forum) provides an eye into NGOs colonial attitude vis-a-vis Haiti: "In a country like Haiti, in which democratic culture has never taken hold, the concept of the common good and the meaning of elections and representation are limited to the educated elites, and in particular to those who have received citizen education within the social movements." According to Alternatives, Haitians are too stupid to know what's good for them, unless, that is, they've been educated by a foreign NGO. (For a detailed account of government-funded NGOs role in Haiti see Press for Conversion's three recent reports or Damning the Flood by Peter Hallward.)
In trying to reason with these groups, one discovers that information or rational argument does little to sway groups receiving millions of dollars from the Canadian government for work in Haiti. Maintaining a progressive agenda in a country considered "high priority" by the power brokers in Ottawa is extremely difficult. And with the intervention into Haiti - unlike say the invasion of Iraq -on few people's political radar, these NGOs felt limited grass-roots pressure to abandon their government benefactors.
Unlike in Canada Western government-funded NGOs are widely criticized in Haiti. Most progressive minded Canadians see NGOs as part of the solution to global poverty yet where these groups are "helping" out the situation is quite different. Across the country's political spectrum, Haitians have been highly critical of development NGOs role in undermining the country's government. A couple months ago the left-wing newspaper Haiti Progrès called NGOs in the country a "mafia" and on February 5 the country's president, René Préval, called on Washington to stop channeling its assistance through NGOs.
This weekend, on February 28, thousands of Haitians will once again demonstrate against the coup, expressing their opposition to the responsibility to protect, UN peacekeepers and Western government-funded NGOs. Yves Engler is the author of the forthcoming The Black Book of Canadian Foreign Policy and other books. If you would like to help organize a talk as part of a book tour in May/June Please e-mail: yvesengler [at] hotmail [.] com
>via: http://www.counterpunch.org/engler02272009.html
________________________________________________
This photo was taken on November 29, 2010.
Holding-Mickey-Sign
>via: http://www.flickr.com/photos/26252815@N06/5218973460/in/photostream/
________________________________________________
How the Fraud Was Done
Below the Haiti Democracy Project's electoral mission presents images showing how a ruling-party candidate running for the position of deputy in the lower house falsely inflated his total.
On the left are photos of carbon copies of the official returns of the polling place. On the right are the results posted by the Provisional Electoral Council (CEP), which may also be viewed on its website.
Note that the local electoral officials added either 100 or 200 votes to the ruling-party candidate's total on each return. This addition may be seen on the first line of the result posted by the Provisional Electoral Council. Note also that in many cases the padding increases the number of votes well beyond the number of valid ballots ("Total Bilten Ki Bon") reported on the CEP's results form, thus the result is internally inconsistent.This fact strongly suggests the Tabulation Center's complicity in the fraud. Most of the electoral officials in Haiti are adherents of the Unité Party. |
![]() |
Carbon copy of polling place official return |
Fraudulent result accepted and posted by Provisional Electoral Council |
>via: http://haitipolicy.org/fraud.html
________________________________________________
In Haiti, good intentions have unexpected and unfortunate results
Some of the international community's aid efforts have caused problems, including an increase in housing prices, political turmoil and perhaps even the cholera epidemic.
![]() A group of Haitians works on a makeshift house using tree branches, scraps of wood and tarp near Corail-Cesselesse.(Rick Loomis, Los Angeles Times / November 5, 2010) |
The wood-frame Carousel grammar school survived theearthquake that destroyed much of this city in January. Beatrice Moise had taught there for five years and hoped she would continue when schools reopened in spring.
But in February she found out that the director had rented the building out to the international relief group Oxfam. Buildings in the upscale suburb of Petionville, where foreigners like to live and work, were in high demand, and Oxfam paid $10,000 a month.
The students, mostly from wealthy families, would probably have little problem finding other schools. Moise and the other five teachers, however, were out of jobs.
Now nearly a year after the disaster, Moise, 38, is working part time as a cashier at a grocery store, earning a quarter of what she made as a teacher, while the influx of foreigners with big budgets has nearly tripled her rent and doubled the price of food.
Still, she doesn't blame the international groups — the blans (whites). She's applying for a secretarial position with Oxfam, and her brother already works there.
"I would rather lose my job than have the internationals leave," she said. "They came here to help."
The vast foreign aid apparatus in this Caribbean nation is struggling to make significant progress in easing Haiti's misery after the earthquake that killed an estimated 230,000 people.
But the international community's good intentions have created some ambiguous or outright unpleasant side effects: an increase in housing prices that is pushing Haitian professionals out of apartments and offices; political turmoil in the wake of a hastily prepared presidential election; and quite likely the cholera epidemic that has killed more than 2,000 people.
And the class benefiting the most financially from the international presence? The tiny wealthy elite so often disdained by foreigners for their perceived indifference to the rest of their country's plight. They own the car dealerships, the high-end grocery stores, the car rental and telecommunications firms, the office buildings, the luxury hotels and restaurants — which are getting more business than ever while more than a million people remain in tent camps.
"You wonder where all the money is going besides seeing all the blans driving new 4-by-4s," said Steeve Laguere, a Haitian-Canadian and longtime aid worker in Port-au-Prince who has worked for Catholic Relief Services and Plan International. "And people are opening restaurants like there is no tomorrow."
The Haitian government estimates that there are more than 4,000 foreign aid groups operating in the country of 10 million. With the help of the United Nations mission and the U.S. military, they coordinated a massive medical response after the earthquake and provided food, water and tents for the displaced and injured. And today, organizations are working to contain the cholera epidemic that started in October and has stricken about 100,000 people.
There are proposals to build schools, hospitals, sanitation systems, public housing.
But the delays, particularly in getting people out of the encampments and into temporary shelters, have given many poor Haitians the feeling that nothing has been done, that these new arrivals aretouris — a word they have used disparagingly for the U.N. troops here almost since they arrived six years ago.
The cholera epidemic only strengthened the notion that foreigners were muddling around with big clumsy feet.
Haitians in the Artibonite Valley, where the waterborne disease first occurred, quickly blamed a U.N. base staffed by Nepalese troops near Mirebalais for dumping their waste into a tributary of the Artibonite River. The head of the U.N. mission denied this. But Haiti had not seen the disease in more than a century and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention subsequently determined that the strain of cholera did indeed come from South Asia.
When a reporter and photographer visited the area in November, opinion on whether the Nepalese were at fault was sharply — almost violently — divided by who benefited from the U.N. presence and who did not.
"They don't need to be here," said Isaac Irat, 33. "They don't give us work. They don't know what they're doing. They march out three times a day. They're looking for women."
Others gathered to echo the sentiment and said the Nepalese were dumping their waste in the river. Then a young man who gave his name as Osner Bellevue (although the group gathering around him denied that was his real name) insisted they were all lying.
He said a sanitation company pumped out their latrines and emptied the waste outside the base in pits up the hill. He guided the journalists to them.
Black, bubbling muck filled a pit to about 3 feet below the rim. Some men said that whenever it rained, it overflowed and ran straight down the hill to the river. The whole area was muddy and strewn with shreds of sopping trash. Pigs wallowed about.
The cholera epidemic came just as Haiti was frantically preparing for the Nov. 28 election, pushed hard by the international community. With $6 billion in aid pledged for the country through 2011, the donor nations wanted a stable, legitimate government for the reconstruction effort.
Mark Schneider, senior vice president of the International Crisis Group, said that despite the need for elections, there should have been "some kind of reset when the cholera broke out."
Even before the epidemic sent the country into turmoil, the timing was so tight that many wondered how the electoral council could distribute voting cards, set up polling centers, tell more than a million displaced people where to vote and train poll workers by election day.
"As it was, they were training poll workers the night before the election," Schneider said.
The result was chaos at the polls, an election in widespread dispute and riots — with the electoral council, candidates, U.N. officials and foreign diplomats still trying to come to a resolution.
The way good intentions can go sideways in Haiti is embodied in the tale of Sean Penn and the Petionville Club.
The club was an old gathering spot for American diplomats with a sweeping, shockingly steep golf course. When the earthquake hit, Haitians fled their broken neighborhoods to the open space of the club. Within weeks, an estimated 50,000 people had set up camp there. Penn's newly formed relief group, JP/HRO, took over administering the camp, ensuring there were latrines, adequate water, access to healthcare.
As the rainy season approached in April, Penn, along with many other aid organizers, feared such camps would be swept away by mudslides and were demanding that the government implement a plan to move people to safer areas.
Media had been focusing intensely on Penn's camp, even though there were hundreds of others like it.
Two days later, U.N. troops began relocating some of the people from Penn's camp to a barren area miles outside the city called Corail-Cesselesse. Dust blew and the white tents set up for the new arrivals flapped hard in a relentless wind. Some of the people getting off the buses cried and said they'd been tricked. They wondered how they would get food and do business there.
Many observers criticized the government for picking such an isolated place. But President Rene Preval insisted that it was part of a larger plan to build houses and industry in the area. He mentioned that the government took it by eminent domain. Word quickly spread that land there was free for the taking, and thousands of families trekked out to stake their claims.
Miles of hillsides that were empty eight months ago are now filled with people building houses and shanties, planting little crops, fencing off their "properties." With its cactus and the sounds of hammers nailing, the place has the feel of a Western frontier town.
"This is the first time I planted anything in my life," said Yves Beline, 42. He had found a load of metal straps used to tie relief shipments to pallets, and was stringing them between sticks to keep the goats and pigs away from his corn, sugar cane, beans and pumpkins. "I had no choice, I had to come to the desert here. I followed some people who said we could live here."
Next door, Jonile Vital, a father of three, had just replaced his tarp roof with a tin one. He had staked out a much bigger plot than his neighbor and had a good size crop of corn. He said it was hard to find water. But in a way he felt less helpless.
"I have my land. I can grow things. I will be able to take care of my family."
So within six months of a Hollywood actor venting his legitimate concerns, a boomtown was born. The question is, will the new residents be allowed to remain when the business interests want to build their industrial city?
Copyright © 2010, Los Angeles Times