INTERVIEW: Michael Hastings—Rolling Stone magazine writer explains McChrystal article


President Obama meeting with General McChrystal
===========================================
Rolling Stone Reporter Speaks Realism


Michael Hastings, the author of the Rolling Stone article on General Stanley McChrystal, tells Al Jazeera what the top US and Nato commander in Afghanistan was trying to achieve by giving a journalist so much access. (June 23, 2010)

=======================================

McChrystal Survived Tillman Cover-Up And Detainee Abuse, But Not Rolling Stone's Profile

First Posted: 06-23-10 03:25 PM   |   Updated: 06-23-10 03:25 PM

Stanley McChrystal, the general and chief architect of the counterinsurgency operations in Afghanistan, was relieved of his command on Wednesday, following a series of disparaging quotes that he and his aides made about the president and civilian leadership.

It was a remarkable conclusion to a frantic two-day period of frenzied coverage, climaxing with a Rose Garden appearance in which the president explained his rationale. In the end, it will remain a confounding episode for both historians and politicos alike. It was not McChrystal's connections to a scarring episode of detainee abuse and the cover-up of a revered soldier's death or his disparagement of the vice president's proposal for Afghanistan that did the general in. It was a series of interviews withRolling Stone magazine, of all things.

"The conduct represented in the recently published article," said President Obama, "does not meet the standard that should be set by a commanding general."

Indeed, as Obama spoke in front of a throng of reporters at the Rose Garden, it seemed nearly surreal to imagine that a freelance reporter -- fortuitously embedded with McChrystal during an alcohol-filled bus trip from Paris to Berlin (the flight had been canceled due to volcanic activity in Iceland) -- had put the wheels in motion. McChrystal, after all, had made gaffes before, including publicly mocking Joe Biden's preference for a limited troop presence in Afghanistan ("Chaos-stan" he chided). More than that, he had been either intimately connected or directly tied to two very controversial episodes in recent military history. And no one seemed to notice.

McChrystal was the head of Special Operations command in Afghanistan when Army Ranger and former football star Pat Tillman was killed by friendly fire. He approved the paperwork awarding Tillman a Silver Star for dying in the line "of enemy fire" -- and he was "accountable for the inaccurate and misleading assertions" contained therein, according to an investigation -- despite knowing (or at least suspecting) that Tillman had died in an episode of fratricide. That episode barely registered with the public or, for that matter, Congress, when McChrystal went before the Senate Armed Services Committee waiting to take over control in Afghanistan. The one person who questioned whether more answers were needed was journalist Jon Krakauer who had just penned a book on Tillman's death and thought the general's explanations were "preposterous" and "unbelievable."

The second episode was even less well-known. Years after the Tillman death, McChrystal was mentioned several times in a report by Human Rights Watch which documented the abuse and torture of detained prisoners at Camp Nama in Iraq. A soldier, quoted anonymously in the findings, recalled seeing McChrystal at the facility "a couple of times." It was also reported that the general himself said there was no way that the Red Cross would ever be allowed through the door at Nama -- where treatment of detainees was so bad, it earned the nickname Nasty Ass Military Area.

"It is not easy to say what his role was accurately because the entire program of detention and interrogation going on there remains highly classified," said John Siston, an author of the Human Rights Watch report. "But HRW was able to learn enough to say that he was in the chain of command that oversaw the operations of that special task force and the interrogation unit that took care of the detainees that that special task force detained."

Nama, like Tillman, never played a role in McChrystal's quick ascendancy through the military ranks. Indeed, one of the most ignored nuggets in the Rolling Stone piece involved the general and his staff prepping for tough questioning on both of these topics, only to discover that Congress didn't care.

In May 2009, as McChrystal prepared for his confirmation hearings, his staff prepared him for hard questions about Camp Nama and the Tillman cover-up. But the scandals barely made a ripple in Congress, and McChrystal was soon on his way back to Kabul to run the war in Afghanistan.

Congress it seemed was more invested in moving forward than looking back. And so it was that McChrystal became embroiled in a career-threatening controversy only after the Rolling Stonepiece raised questions as to whether his shaky relationship with civilian leadership would compromise the Afghan mission.

It wasn't an unworthy basis for the general's dismissal though it may have fallen a bit short of the official definition of insubordination (but not by much). But it was telling for some that after dodging several other bullets, it was an article in a music magazine (and not even a cover article at that) that did the trick.

"Given that there are a lot of unanswered questions about McChrystal's role in detainee abuse in Iraq," Stacy Sullivan, a spokesperson for Human Rights Watch said hours before his resignation, "it would be ironic if a few careless comments to Rolling Stone magazine were to bring about his undoing."

>via: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/23/mcchrystal-survived-tillm_n_622919.html

 

=======================================

As it happened: Gen McChrystal controversy

 

President Obama: McChrystal's conduct "does not meet the standard that should be set by a commanding general"

LIVE TEXT COMMENTARY (all times EDT: GMT -4)

 

By Matthew Danzico, Washington

 

2030 Thanks for joining our live coverage of the General Stanley McChrystal controversy today. We've appreciated all your comments and insights along the way. As always, the BBC News website will continue to provide the latest news and analysis on this story as it develops.

 

 

David Willis
2026 The BBC's David Willis in Washington Next week the Senate will be asked to approve General Petraeus' appointment as Stanley McChrystal's successor. Given his reputation that is expected to be a formality, whereupon he could be on the ground in Afghanistan in a matter of weeks. But this is a man likely to be cautious about timings, possibly including President Obama's commitment to bring troops home by this time next year. Giving evidence to Congress last week, the general said: "'In a perfect world Mr chairman we have to be very careful with timelines.'"

 

e-mail sent in by reader
2014 Charles from Oklahoma City, OK writes: If some lieutenant or captain spoke to the press disparagingly of Gen McChrystal, that would be insubordination and a court marshal offence. The troops need to see that what applies to them also applies to their commanders. Obama did the right thing.

 

 

2010 A grim statistic to put today's events in context is that June looks set to be confirmed as the deadliest month for the Nato-led forces in Afghanistan since the war began in 2001. A total of 76 international service members have died this month - including 46 Americans.

 

 

e-mail sent in by reader
1942 Bob from Suffolk, UK writes: An elected official of a government has no right to 'sack' a highly trained soldier from his given job. War and peace is given by good soldiering not tit for tat politics.

 

 

1937 The White House says President Obama has spoken to President Hamid Karzai, telling him a change in command does not change US policy in Afghanistan.

 

 

comment from blogger
1920 Toby Harnden, Daily Telegraph The way Obama fired McChrystal was choreographed to humiliate the general and bolster the president's credentials as a macho man. So much for "no drama Obama". The manner of the firing came dangerously close to putting political theatre and image-burnishing above the conduct of a war.

 

e-mail sent in by reader
1917 Sadiq Mehdi from Los Angeles, California writes: General McChrystal was correct to speak his mind if he saw appropriate. One should not get to such heights in the army if their opinion does not matter. Shame on you US army for letting your top general get treated this way. You all can lose life and limb for this administration but if you have an opinion, you are fired. 

 

 

1915 Kori Schake, a former professor at the US Military Academy at West Point, tells MSNBC Gen McChrystal was "the centre of gravity of political relationships with President Karzai and other Afghan and regional leaders".

 

 

1909 Great metaphor from contributing analyst Ted Koppel on BBC World News America - comparing Mr Obama to a circus performer with a foot on two horses. Worth watching in full.

 

 

tweet
1902 Gert from the Bronx, New York tweets: I think what happened to General McChrystal is absolutely unfair and unacceptable. Focus on BP instead, Obamster. Read Gert's tweets

 

 

tweet
1856 Karen Freeman tweets: You ever hear the saying "loose lips sink ships", Gen McChrystal? Why would a decorated soldier compromise a mission? Read Karefreeman's tweets

 

 

Paul Adams
1837 The BBC's Paul Adams in Washington The president's appeal for unity within his national security team was telling: the rivalries and lack of trust between key members of the team, as well as their differing views on President Karzai, are fairly well known. Gen McChrystal was only part of that dysfunctional setup.

 

 

1835 High stakes gambling analogies abound in correspondent David Martin's report on the McChrystal affair for the CBS Evening News. This is not "double down", this is Mr Obama's "all in" moment, Martin says.

 

 

1817 Retired US Army four-star Gen Barry McCaffrey tells MSNBC that his main concern with the resignation of Gen McChrystal is "the time factor". He says that the war in Afghanistan is unpredictable, and that Gen McChrystal is "probably the best counterterrorism person we have produced in the war." Gen McCaffrey says that it is unfortunate that Gen McCaffrey "brought along this commando group of staffers" who "started talking badly about the chain of command".

 

Paul Adams
1757 The BBC's Paul Adams in Washington By getting rid of his undiplomatic general, President Obama doubtless hopes to reassert his authority over the military and political strategy. But with a review of that strategy due in September, he may decide that other changes are needed too.

 

 

President Obama's national security team
Obama's national security team on Afghanistan and Pakistan met, minus Gen McChrystal. His replacement, Gen Petraeus is seated far left.

 

1748 The White House has released information on President Obama's earlier phone call with British PM David Cameron (see1529). Mr Cameron confirmed that UK Lt Gen Nick Parker will serve as the acting Commander of Nato's International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan until a replacement is approved. Gen Parker sent a message to the president saying the mission "would not miss a beat".

 

 

Steve Kingstone
1711 The BBC's Steve Kingstone in Washington The interesting thing here is that President Obama actually picked up on one of the things that was clear from that Rolling Stone article - there have been divisions here in Washington between the military and the civilian side. And in the civilian side, there has been a lot of back biting and sniping between high profile figures behind the scenes.

 

1703 All the background noise so far suggests that General Petraeus will have a quick and easy confirmation hearing in the Senate, which must approve his nomination by the president (see 1642)

 

 

Kim Ghattas
1655 The BBC's Kim Ghattas in Washington Obama had to choose between continuity in leadership of the war effort at a crucial time for Afghanistan and unity within a leadership that showed respect for him as commander in chief. By choosing Petraeus he probably managed to get both. Petraeus, the man who turned around Iraq, is in essence the one who devised the counterinsurgency strategy that McChrystal was implementing. As head of Centcom, he was also in charge of Afghanistan and has travelled there regularly. He's also in regular, close contact with Pakistan's top brass, a key to the regional strategy.

 

 

e-mail sent in by reader
1649 John Price from Port Richey, Florida writes: Obama is too thin-skinned. He just can't handle the truth. McChrystal was frustrated over not being able to get the White House support. Obama reacted wrong, perhaps a beer together in the Rose Garden while they talked things over would have been more appropriate, then send Gen McChrystal back to work with a renewed mutual understanding of each other, and the war. Petraeus, while an excellent general, should be allowed to do what he was doing, which will be rather difficult from Afghanistan. 

 

1642 Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee Carl Levin, a Democrat from Michigan, says Gen Petraeus' nomination hearing "will be no later than next Tuesday".

 

1633 Former CIA Covert Operations Officer Mike Baker tells CNN that President Obama "handled it the only way he could." Mr Obama could not overlook the statements made by General McChrystal, Baker says, but he question whether McChrystal's controvers