RACISM: Let Us Not Eat Cake

Swedish Golliwog Cake


 

Guest Post by Johan Palme

By now, it seems, the whole world has seen the picture. The Swedish Minister of Culture, Lena Adelsohn-Liljeroth, has just cut a piece from the crotch of a cake baked in the image of a distorted African body, complete with golliwog red lips and white eyes. Now, laughing heartily, she’s bent forward as if jokingly feeding a piece of the cake to itself. The whole room eggs her along, laughing, snapping photographs, caught up in the moment. It’s a horrific picture, and it has spread like fire on the web. Two days ago it started popping up in the facebook feeds of acquaintances of the artist who made the cake, Makode Linde. Yesterday it was everywhere in Sweden, in the morning peppering the social media with condemnation and trending on twitter; by noon the National Association of Afro-Swedes had demanded the culture minister’s resignation, and media hell broke loose. By evening, it was already spreading past international borders, and overnight it’s gone on to become a huge worldwide talking point, ending up on the BBC, on HuffPo, on Jezebel, Al Jazeera and condemned in no uncertain terms by activists from South Africa to Berlin, outraged at the picture, the artist, the crowd, the minister and their apologists. It has become a powerful photograph indeed. As such, I think it’s worth talking a little on how it came about.

It’s Sunday, April 15th, and at Moderna Museet the swedish Artists Organisation is organising a celebration of World Art Day, as well as celebrating its own 75th birthday. Invited to speak is Lena Adelsohn-Liljeroth, the culture minister, who – it’s worth noting – is reviled by large parts of the art world for her culture-sceptic stance and for previously condemning provocative art in what many see as a kind of censorship. Here’s her chance at patching things up.

A number of artists have been asked to create birthday cakes for the celebration. At some point, Lena Adelsohn-Liljeroth gets asked if she would go ahead and cut the first piece of cake, standard politician fare she thinks, and she agrees. Then she’s told that the cake will be about the limits of provocative art, which is a subject she now carefully treads around, and about female genital mutilation.

The cake is wheeled out and uncovered. The crowd stares, tittering nervously. The culture minister is placed at the crotch end, and starts cutting into the cake – when suddenly the head starts screaming in pain. It’s the artist, Makode Linde, whose own painted head is placed as the head of the cake. The crowd’s tittering erupts in nervous laughter; the uncomfortable humour of the situation, the classic Swedish fear of conflict, triggered by the surprise sound and movement. Lena Adelsohn-Liljeroth tries to play along as best she can in what she sees as a “bizarre” situation, reciprocating the laughter.

And on the other side of the cake, placed in the narrow space in front of a glass wall, stands one of the minister’s fiercest critics, visual artist and provocateur Marianne Lindberg De Geer, camera at the ready. And she snaps pictures of the whole series of events, as the minister is egged into doing more outrageous things, performing for the crowd.

It’s of course no coincidence. The whole thing was carefully planned, a “mousetrap” as one Swedish artist puts it. And based on how much traction the picture of the event has garnered, it was a very efficient mousetrap indeed.

Who’s Makode Linde, who staged the whole event? He is a visual artist, and as such has continuously asked uncomfortable questions about race, racial stereotyping and his own position as a black man in a condescending elite art world. The golliwog figure is a consistent image in his artwork, being placed on everyday objects, on paintings grinning nervously at the king, gawking in horror from children’s faces, at times undergoing almost formalist destruction. But just as importantly: he’s a club promoter and a DJ, one of Sweden’s most successful, who knows exactly how to manipulate crowds and their emotions.

And I’m left wondering – whatever the artist himself says – if the intended artwork here is not the cake, nor the performance, but the picture. Because what Makode Linde and Marianne Lindberg De Geer have produced is a picture which is incredibly powerfully laden with symbolism of colonial exploitation.

The all-white crowd, laughing bayingly and taking pictures while the African Other screams in anguish.

The cemented association between racist stereotyping and the haute bourgeoisie, as Johan Wirfält writes.

The visual connection not just to blackface but to parodied, racist depictions of African art, the kind that is looted by colonialists and that provide ongoing shame for western Ethnographical museums. At, of course, an event in a museum.

The cutting of the genitals, the literal removal of the sexual subjectivity of the screaming woman.

The feeding, not as an act of infinite compassion, but as an objectifying joke, the “recipient” made entirely passive and unintelligible.

And the fact that the source of the food is the symbolic African herself, the resources stolen from her belly.

It’s a brilliant staging of structural racism and post-colonial existence.

* Johan Palme blogs at Birdseeding.

 

__________________________

 

Why I think
Makode Aj Linde’s Cake
Was A Poignant,
Haunting Piece
(regardless of
his intentions)

:

ihavethisblog:

Disclaimer: All the intentions behind this cake, combined with the execution of the piece and the defenses of them are despicable. Taken as the artist intended ( as far as the public is aware), everything about this was poorly thought-out, ignorant, and racist as fuck.

Sometimes the most poignant art is accidental. The artist’s choices and intentions are used by the artwork itself to convey a different message than the artist intended. While I’m not sure if the artist necessarily deserves the credit for the message conveyed in these cases, this cake (for which I cannot find an actual title anywhere) is definitely an example of such an artwork. It says something concrete. It means something important.

It proves exactly how racist everyone who participated in it and everyone who sees it is.

That that woman could metaphorically cut up a screaming Black woman, others could eat the cake, people could laugh about it; that is the art. That is the meaning.

Makode Aj Linde may have made the piece with the intention of saying something else, but what it ended up being was a bunch of white people proving that they could happily participate in the murder and consumption of a shrieking Black body. It proved that the museum director and the curator saw no issue in allowing it to take place.

The appropriate reaction to being asked to cut that cake should have been one of horror. It should have struck a nerve. It should have been a devastating prospect. That representation of a body should have meant something, and it didn’t. Because, to the people laughing, eating, drinking, and defending; cutting up screaming Black bodies, especially stereotypically “African” bodies, doesn’t mean anything.

Makode Aj Linde accidentally made a perfect, poignant, inarguable display of the danger of internalized and “but I’m not a racist” racism. And it’s horrifying and crushing and awful but, most importantly, it’s reality.

I’m secretly still hoping this was his intention all along so it can be less of a display of internalized racism. Really really hoping. But then there’s still a level of using the image of a Black woman’s body and blackface to prove a point that is dehumanizing and exploitative. I doubt the intentions of everyone who helped this happen are in any way respectable.

As it stands, art > artist. Anyone who thinks the Swedish Minister of Culture wasn’t displaying racism is a danger to those around them.

No.  No.  This…it’s the same thing.  You’re saying the same thing.  You’re doing the same thing Linde is doing.  That everyone does to our bodies. You’re saying we’re open to violence and that this violence has a point. That it deserves to be. That we have no right to our own image. That it’s ok for anyone to use a Black woman’s body— even if it’s for horrific purposes!— if someone gets something “poignant” out of it.

But who is this poignant for? Who? Sartje Baartman?  I’m pretty sure she already got the point long ago.

There is no good that comes from other people carving up Black women’s bodies.  None. Not ever.  And I don’t understand how you could think you have a right to say this, to make this call.   It’s not your body and personhood on the line here.

Nobody gets to use our bodies to prove a point we already knew.

This is wrong, fam. Dead ass wrong.

No, Linde’s piece of “art” cannot be justified.

 

 

 

__________________________


In Sweden, firestorm over

cake art installation

Exclusive interview with artist behind controversy that has some calling for Minister of Culture's resignation.

 

Images above showing Sweden's Minister of Culture, Lena Adelsohn Liljeroth, cutting into a cake in the shape of a naked black woman have led to an outcry across the country and online, as The Localfirst reported. 

The art installation marking World Art Day was meant to highlight female genital mutilation, as the Minister can be seen cutting into the reproductive region of the exhibit. 

The National Afro-Swedish Association has called for the minister’s resignation, describing the event as a “racist spectacle.” 

The Stream spoke with Makode Linde, the artist behind the installation.

How did this idea come about as an art installation? 

Was the Minister of Culture aware of your art installation or was it a surprise?

How have people responded to you and the art installation?

Why did you choose female circumcision as the subject?

Do you expect to do something like this in the future, after the reactions?

How did social media impact the way the art installation was perceived?