INTERVIEW + AUDIO: “I’ve come to take you home” Interview with Diana Ferrus

Diana Ferrus

“I’ve come to take you home”

Interview with Diana Ferrus

In 1998 Diana Ferrus wrote the poem, “I’ve come to take you home” in honour of Sarah Baartman. In 1810, at age 20 Sarah Baartman was lured away under false pretences by British ship surgeon, William Dunlop. She was taken to England where she was paraded as a sexual freak. In 1814 Sarah was taken to France where she was sold to an animal trainer. The terrorizing violation of Sarah Baartman continued after her death. A plaster cast was made of her body and then her body, brain and genitalia were dissected and put on display in the Musee de l’Homme in Paris.

In the early 1950s, a South African indigenous people, the Griquas (one of the Khoi peoples) petitioned the French government for her remains to be returned to her country of birth. However, an 1850 French law stated that all artifacts in French museums belonged to France and the petition was refused. In 1996 President Nelson Mandela also made a petition to then French President Mitterrand. Finally in 2001 a French senator, Nicholas About introduced a Bill for her remains to be returned. The senator came across Diana’s poem, “I’ve come to take you home’ and presented the poem as part of his petition to show how Sarah’s people were ‘emotionally and psychologically’ affected by her remains still being in France. The petition was successful and for the first time, a poem was published in French law. On the 27th April, Diana left with a delegation from South Africa to collect Sarah Baartman’s remains and bring her home. On the 4th of May she arrived in Johannesburg and on the 9th August 2002 Sarah Baartman was finally laid to rest in peace after 192 years. Surely then, Diana played some part in bringing Sarah Baartman home!

In the interview I speak with Diana about her poetry on the themes of memory, healing, Africa and liberation. Diana reads four of her poems, “Dark Red Flowers” one of the many poems dedicated to her mother; “The African Drum” on identity and searching for African within us; The poem, Sarah Tait is in memory of her Irish grandmother who came to South Africa as an indentured servant to British colonials; Diana ends with the incredibly powerful moving story of Sarah Baartman’s return and the poem “I’ve come to take you home”

Links to Diana Ferrus – YouTube, The Peace Song; Badilisha Poetry

 

SCIENCE: Study shows gender bias in science is real. Here’s why it matters. > Unofficial Prognosis, Scientific American Blog Network

Unofficial Prognosis

It’s tough to prove gender bias.

In a real-world setting, typically the most we can do is identify differences in outcome. A man is selected for hire over a woman; fewer women reach tenure track positions; there’s a gender gap in publications. Bias may be suspected in some cases, but the difficulty in using outcomes to prove it is that the differences could be due to many potential factors. We can speculate: perhaps women are less interested in the field. Perhaps women make lifestyle choices that lead them away from leadership positions. In a real-world setting, when any number of variables can contribute to an outcome, it’s essentially impossible to tease them apart and pinpoint what is causative.

The only way to do that would be by a randomized controlled experiment. This means creating a situation where all variables other than the one of interest are held equal, so that differences in outcome can indeed be attributed to the one factor that differs. If it’s gender bias we are interested in, that would mean comparing reactions toward two identical human beings – identical in intelligence, competence, lifestyle, goals, etc. – with the one difference between them that one is a man and one is a woman. Not exactly a situation that exists in the real world.

But in a groundbreaking study published in PNAS last week by Corinne Moss-Racusin and colleagues, that is exactly what was done. On Wednesday, Sean Carroll blogged about and brought to light the research from Yale that had scientists presented with application materials from a student applying for a lab manager position and who intended to go on to graduate school. Half the scientists were given the application with a male name attached, and half were given the exact same application with a female name attached. Results found that the “female” applicants were rated significantly lower than the “males” in competence, hireability, and whether the scientist would be willing to mentor the student.

 

The scientists also offered lower starting salaries to the “female” applicants: $26,507.94 compared to $30,238.10.


 

This is really important. This is really important.

Whenever the subject of women in science comes up, there are people fiercely committed to the idea that sexism does not exist. They will point to everything and anything else to explain differences while becoming angry and condescending if you even suggest that discrimination could be a factor. But these people are wrong. This data shows they are wrong. And if you encounter them, you can now use this study to inform them they’re wrong. You can say that a study found that absolutely all other factors held equal, females are discriminated against in science. Sexism exists. It’s real. Certainly, you cannot and should not argue it’s everything. But no longer can you argue it’s nothing.

We are not talking about equality of outcomes here; this result shows bias thwarts equality of opportunity.

Here are three additional reasons why this study is such a big deal.

1) Both male and female scientists were equally guilty of committing the gender bias. Yes – women can behave in ways that are sexist, too. Women need to examine their attitudes and actions toward women just as much as men do. What this suggests is that the biases likely did not arise from overt misogyny but were rather a manifestation of subtler prejudices internalized from societal stereotypes. As the authors put it,

“If faculty express gender biases, we are not suggesting that these biases are intentional or stem from a conscious desire to impede the progress of women in science. Past studies indicate that people’s behavior is shaped by implicit or unintended biases, stemming from repeated exposure to pervasive cultural stereotypes that portray women as less competent…”

2) When scientists judged the female applicants more harshly, they did not use sexist reasoning to do so. Instead, they drew upon ostensibly sound reasons to justify why they would not want to hire her: she is not competent enough. Sexism is an ugly word, so many of us are only comfortable identifying it when explicitly misogynistic language or behavior is exhibited. But this shows that you do not need to use anti-women language or even harbor conscious anti-women beliefs to behave in ways that are effectively anti-women.

Practically, this fact makes it all the more easy for women to internalize unfair criticisms as valid. If your work is rejected for an obviously bad reason, such as “it’s because you’re a woman,” you can simply dismiss the one who rejected you as biased and therefore not worth taking seriously. But if someone tells you that you are less competent, it’s easy to accept as true. And why shouldn’t you? Who wants to go through life constantly trying to sort through which critiques from superiors are based on the content of your work, and which are unduly influenced by the incidental characteristics of who you happen to be? Unfortunately, too, many women are not attuned to subtle gender biases. Making those calls is bound to be a complex and imperfect endeavor. But not recognizing it when it’s happening means accepting: “I am not competent.” It means believing: “I do not deserve this job.”

3) As troubling as these results are, they are also critical toward solutions. That biases against women are often subconscious means people need extra prodding to realize and combat them. I’m willing to bet that many in the study, just like people who take Implicit Association Tests, would be upset to learn they subconsciously discriminate against women, and they would want to fix it. Implicit biases cannot be overcome until they are realized, and this study accomplishes that key first step: awareness.

From reading the comments on Sean Carroll’s post, most people who read this will have one of four reactions:

1) This is not surprising, but I’m glad we have something concrete to show what we’ve known all along.

2) This is surprising and disturbing.

3) Figure 2 is misleading because the y-axis does not start at zero. Therefore, I will reject everything else exposed by this study.

4) Equally qualified women should be discriminated against, because they could go off and get pregnant.

I’m afraid the 4’s do exist, and from my experience they are not very willing to have their minds changed. (For a concise article that touches on why their argument is flawed, I’d recommend this piece by my sister, Shara Yurkiewicz.)

What’s important is that the 2’s are out there. Certainly, some gender bias in the workplace still takes the form of blatant misogyny. But a large portion of it does not. It’s subtle. It’s subconscious. And many people who perpetrate it, if only made aware of what they are doing, would want to change. I once knew of a professor who consistently made eye contact with males when engaging in conversations about science; only when it was pointed out to him did he realize he was doing it, and he was grateful that someone told him so he could change.

The 2’s exist, but they can only change if they have the facts. These are the facts: equally competent women in science are viewed as less competent because of their gender. Remember them. Cite them. And if you want change, I would urge you to share them as widely as possible.

 

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++
Ilana Yurkiewicz Ilana Yurkiewicz is a second year student at Harvard Medical School who created Unofficial Prognosis to capture her reflections through her medical training. She graduated summa cum laude with a B.S. in biology from Yale University, where she did research in a genomics laboratory and was Editor-in-Chief of the Yale Scientific Magazine. Following graduation, she received an AAAS Mass Media Fellowship to become a science reporter for The News & Observer in Raleigh, North Carolina and then went on to write for Science Progress in Washington, DC. She has an academic interest in bioethics, currently conducting ethics research at Harvard after previously interning at the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.

Ilana welcomes questions and comments about her blog. You can email her directly at ilana.sciam@gmail.com

Follow on Twitter @ilanayurkiewicz.

Special thanks to Sharon Wegner-Larsen for creating the banner for Unofficial Prognosis. Sharon's website can be found at http://omegafauna.blogspot.com/. - - ilanayurkiewicz

 

HISTORY + AUDIO: Episode 60: The Atlantic Slave Data Network > Africa Past & Present

Episode 60:

The Atlantic Slave Data Network

Historians Gwendolyn Midlo Hall and Walter Hawthorne on Slave Biographies: The Atlantic Database Network — a digital history project of Matrix and the MSU History Department funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities. They discuss the origins of the ASDN, intellectual and technological challenges, and the wider significance of building a freely accessible web database on the identities of enslaved people in the Atlantic World.

 

VIDEO: Prince - performance, interview, remix, new song

PRINCE

iHeart Radio Festival

 

 

2012.09.22 - Special Guest Appearance with Mary J. Blige

 


 

 

     

 

 

__________________________

Prince – Kiss (Disco Tech Dj Edit)

Another simple and nice edit by Disco Tech.

Prince – Kiss (Disco Tech edit)

Hug Niklas on his Soundcloud

>via: http://www.chromemusic.de/music/prince-kiss-disco-tech-dj-edit/

__________________________

 

A peek into Prince's mind

The Tribune's Greg Kot gets a look behind the scenes as the musician and his 20-member ensemble rehearse for United Center residency

Prince

Prince performs at the Hop Farm festival in Paddock Wood, England, last year. He comes to Chicago to play the United Center next week. (Getty Images / September 20, 2012)

— Prince is rolling his eyes.

"The hardest thing with musicians," he explains to a visitor to his Paisley Park recording studio, "is getting them not to play."

The quintuple-threat singer-songwriter-producer-performer-multi-instrumentalist is running a nine-piece band through a vigorous rehearsal in preparation for a Monday-Wednesday residency at the United Center, and right now the arrangements are getting too busy for his liking. He's like a drill sergeant in a brown, button-up, Asian-style long coat with a hypnotist's lulling voice.

  • GREG KOT
  • Greg Kot

"John, what's the thing you're doing?" he asks John Blackwell, as if he were asking his drummer to pass a bag of potato chips. "Your time changed again and it got boomy and ugly." To a guitarist he calmly advises, "You should throw that pedal away ... it's just taking up too much space frequency-wise." To his bassist: "I wouldn't thumb this, either. Mute it. Mute it."

No big deal. The musicians comply and recalibrate. A little accent on the cymbal here, an up-stroke on the guitar strings there, and everything moves a little closer to the sound Prince imagines.

The singer wants to hear different combinations of instruments — guitars with drums, then with keyboards and bass; voices a cappella, then with tambourines and drums — and he is constantly tweaking, adjusting voicings ("give that last chord more value"), humming individual parts and then seeing how they gel. Much of this band has been with him for several years as he's traveled the world during his extended "Welcome 2" tour, usually playing long runs in major cities where he can vary the set lists nightly, explore every contour of his songbook and cover artists and songs both legendary (Wild Cherry's "Play That Funky Music") and surprising (Tommy James and the Shondells' "Crimson and Clover"). He wants more musical options ready for Chicago, and that's why he's pushing so hard at this rehearsal.

"Only a few days left," he says, almost to himself. Right now, he is aiming for absence, trying to carve space into the music where it can become something sexy and sinuous. At one point, to illustrate a point he invokes the Chuck Berry movie "Hail! Hail! Rock 'n' Roll." He describes a scene where Berry goes ballistic, accusing someone of changing his amplifier.

"Chuck Berry went 'St. Louis' on my boy," Prince says, throwing an air punch and laughing. The band cracks up. "Movie night!" one of his backing singers cackles.

Throwing a little mirth in the businesslike atmosphere seems to unlock something in everyone, and the parts that Prince has so carefully orchestrated start to pop and fire. "Which way is up?" the backing singers chant. "I got a new lease on life."

Now Prince is dancing with a huge, dimpled grin beneath his tight Afro.

"When the horns get on top of this," he exults, "Lord have mercy!"

As if on cue, 11 horn players drift into the room and take their place on the riser, the brass adding even more heft and swing to the stew of instruments. Pleased, Prince gives the entire 20-member ensemble a two-hour dinner break before everyone reconvenes later in the night.

He walks out into a hallway and into one of the offices in his cavernous, 70,000-square-foot property in the rolling hills southwest of Minneapolis.

"Remember the scene in (the movie) 'Amadeus,' where he's dying, and he's hearing the music in his head?" Prince asks. "It becomes impossible to explain. He doesn't have the vocabulary. Now, I'm short — literally and also when I speak — and it's easy to get all, 'Can't you hear this? Can't you hear what I'm hearing?' And so I use humor when I feel my blood pressure going up."

He also leans on his Bible lessons. A devout Jehovah's Witness for two decades, Prince says his Bible teacher was none other than soul-music great Larry Graham, the bassist in Sly and the Family Stone.

"He told me, 'Keep studying. There are things they don't explain at Bible school, so it's up to you to keep learning.'"

So too for music.

"I nearly had a nervous breakdown on 'The Purple Rain' tour (in 1984) because it was the same every night," he says. "It's work to play the same songs the same way for 70 shows. To me, it's not work to learn lots of different songs so that the experience is fresh to us each night."

Prince had made albums entirely on his own, playing all the instruments, singing all the vocals, writing and arranging all the songs. But now he savors the relationship he has with musicians such as Blackwell and keyboardist Cassandra O'Neal.

"My favorite instrument?” he says. "It's the band."

Though his musicians are highly skilled, he says technical ability is not the primary attribute he looks for when auditioning potential band members.

"They need heart, the willingness to try something different," he says. "When something's funky, everyone gravitates toward it. I love to see the joy when they can feel it happening."

Like Count Basie, Duke Ellington, James Brown, Sly Stone and George Clinton before him, Prince is taking the notion of what live performance can be to another level by combining composition and improvisation, precision and spontaneity. When he last performed in Chicago in 2004, he had built his band up through theater tours until it was ready to perform at a high level on a huge scale. His arena tour that year was a major commercial and critical success, pulling in more than $87 million in revenue and reviving Prince's career.

Now the music industry is in such a chaotic state of transition that he doesn't see much point in releasing the music he records "all the time" at Paisley Park. Once upon a time, new Prince albums flowed like water, particularly once he dropped out of the major-label system in the mid-'90s. In both 2003 and '04, he released three albums each year through various channels. But he hasn't released any new albums since 2010.

The artist who pioneered using the Internet as a way to communicate with his fans and distribute music in the '90s, declared the Internet "over" in 2010. His experiences with selling music through his Web sites were poorly managed and alienated many fans, so now he has no website. He says digital services such as iTunes and Spotify don't impress him.

"Remember Betamax?" Prince says with a grin, referring to the outmoded video cassette format. "That's the system we've got now in the music business. We're in a singles market again. It's crazy for me to walk into that with a new album. Young people have decided they like to listen to music in a certain way, through ear buds, and that's fine with me as long as it doesn't bother them that they're not hearing 90 percent of the music that way. But I don't have to record to eat or to get out of debt or to pay my taxes. I looked forward to the day I could do this. Freedom is an interesting thing. You have to work really hard to get free."

At one point, he turns to ask, "So what do you think the future of all this is going to be?" There are no sure answers. Nobody knows. And that's both a daunting and thrilling prospect. What excites him most, he says, is helping new artists. The 21-year-old drummer Hanna Ford is on his list of future band members. He's already jammed with rising jazz star Esperanza Spalding. He flips on video of a solo performance by the young British folk-soul singer Lianne La Havas. "She is Joni Mitchell to me, the way she tells a story, the way she puts those interesting guitar chords underneath it."

The next minute he's taking a call from his protege, Andy Allo, who will perform with him in Chicago. He moves to another room upstairs where he has two large computer screens set up, and he toggles between a video-in-progress of Allo and a video of a recent "Welcome 2" tour date in Australia. Then he dials up a YouTube video of the '70s singer Betty Davis, a gritty track called "If I'm in Luck, I Might Get Picked Up."

"I don't want anyone to fail, so if you can make money off music even though you can't sing or dance, that's genius," he says with a laugh. "More power to you. But I play Betty Davis for Andy Allo and say, 'This is what we aim for.'"

Prince has said repeatedly that he's not a great businessman, and he's taken his share of wrong turns in trying to fashion himself into a one-man music industry. But he is great at building bands, making music and inspiring people to dance. Though he's 54, he looks and moves like a much younger man. In part, he says, that's because the stress that dominated his life for much of the '80s and '90s is gone.

A new single, "RNR Affair," provides a small window into his life. It's a horn-spackled, guitar-chugging ode to "two people in love, with nothin' but the road ahead." A relaxed, sing-speak vocal rides the groove, then ascends to falsetto.

"It's a driving song," Prince says. "The world is so jagged, I like smooth waves. It's the way I live now. When Larry (Graham) first came around here (in the '90s) we had a lot of crazy people in here. Now, no one argues, no one swears, no one smokes, no one talks harsh. We all enjoy each other. You don't know what that's like till you start living like that, because for a long time I didn't. It was affecting me up here (points to his head), which in turn affected me here (points to throat). I changed the way I operate. A lot of my contemporaries didn't. That's the reason I'm still here, and a lot of them aren't."

It troubled him when people started to write him off in the '90s, when the hits dried up and he began playing smaller venues, partially by design.

"I had a former band member tell the media, 'He'll never play arenas again,'” Prince says. "Now why would someone want to go and say a thing like that?"

The singer gets defiant.

"That's like telling Michael Jordan he can't play any more. Like telling Ali he's washed up." Despite the bravado, he circles back to the topic later in the conversation. He'd like to suggest that the criticism bounces off him, that he's tougher than that. But he doesn't forget. The hurt lingers. He describes letters that the Chicago singer Mavis Staples wrote him in the '80s when they began working together on a couple of her solo albums: "They were so full of encouragement. You don't get much of that in this business."

And his eyes glisten when he recalls a few words spoken to him at the Jehovah's Witness Kingdom Hall just a few hundred yards down the road from Paisley Park, where he regularly attends Bible study.

"I had missed a bunch of meetings because I was on tour, and you know how people like to gossip and talk behind your back? Well, there was none of that," he says. "When I came back, there was one older person there who came up to me. He didn't lay a guilt trip on me. He just spoke with love and compassion, and I'll never forget what he said. 'We just miss you.'"

Rehearsal is about to resume, and he relishes the work ahead even though he's tired.

"You know what I look at when I'm stage? I look for the smile on people's faces. That's what I want, where I put all my energy."

He leans back in his chair.

"I remember those Park West shows (in Chicago) that I played when I was just starting out. I'll dream about the Park West sometime. I can see it so clearly in my dreams, that wide open look from the stage, the people right up on you. Those were life-changing shows."

And then, his heels click down the hallway toward the rehearsal hall. The band is still settling in, but the music has already started inside Prince's head.

greg@gregkot.com

Twitter @gregkot

Copyright © 2012, Chicago Tribune

>via: http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/music/turnitup/chi-prince-intervi...

__________________________

 

Prince unveils new song

“RNR Affair”


The legend that is Prince has unveiled a new track ahead of his three-date residency at the United Center in Chicago beginning on next week on September 24th.
 

The multi-award winning Musician and ‘Purple Yoda’ premiered the new song titled “RNR Affair” yesterday via Clear Channel radio stations across the United States and it is pleasantly reminiscent of some of the iconic artist’s material that I personally fell in love with.

>via: http://www.soulculture.co.uk/music-blog/newmusic/prince-unveils-new-song-rnr-...

 

 

VIDEO: The Souljazz Orchestra – Conquering Lion

The Souljazz Orchestra

– Conquering Lion (Video)


We recently reviewed The Souljazz Orchestra’s Solidarity album (read) and the crew just revealed a new video from their latest release. Conquerin?g Lion is described as “airtight B-Boy funk” and was captured using vintage analog video cameras to duplicate the analog gear that was used to create the album. The track is funky Funky FUNKY and perfect for uninhibited dancing on sunny days. Enjoy!

 

 

PUB: The Sentinel Literary Quarterly and Annual Competitions

SENTINEL COMPETITIONS

 

Sentinel Literary Quarterly Short Story Competition, September 2012

Judge: Jeremy Page

First Prize: £150.00, Second Prize: £75.00, Third Prize: £50.00, High Commendation: £10 x 3. Plus publication in Sentinel Champions magazine.

Enter by 30th September 2012 here>>

 

Sentinel Literary Quarterly Poetry Competition, September 2012

Judge: Andy Willoughby

First Prize: £150.00, Second Prize: £75.00, Third Prize: £50.00, High Commendation: £10 x 3. Plus publication in Sentinel Champions magazine.

Enter by 30th September, 2012 here>>

 

Sentinel Annual Short Story Competition 2012

Judge: David Caddy

First Prize: £500.00, Second Prize: £250.00, Third Prize: £125.00, High Commendation: £25 x 5. Plus publication in Sentinel Champions magazine.

Enter by 30th November 2012 here>>

 

Sentinel Annual Poetry Competition 2012

Judge: Roger Elkin

First Prize: £500.00, Second Prize: £250.00, Third Prize: £125.00, High Commendation: £25 x 5. Plus publication in Sentinel Champions magazine.

Enter by 30th November 2012 here>>

 

PUB: Guidelines - Elixir Press

Guidelines

Online Submissions Guidelines For All Contests
  • All manuscripts should be submitted anonymously. Please remove all identifying information from your file including the acknowledgments page

  • Your ms. should be a Microsoft Word doc, docx, or rtf; or Acrobat PDF.

  • Please consult the general guidelines for all other information.


13th Annual Poetry Awards

Elixir Press is sponsoring a poetry contest open to all poets writing in English. There will be a Judge's Prize of $2,500 and an Editors' Prize of $1,500. Both winning manuscripts will be published by Elixir Press. All entries will be considered for publication. An outside judge, to be announced later, will make the final decision for the first prize. The editors will make the final decision for the second prize.

  • Manuscripts should be typed on one side of the page and on standard paper. No more than one poem per page.

  • Send a business size SASE for reply only; manuscripts cannot be returned. An SAS postcard for receipt of manuscript is optional. Electronic submissions are acknowledged by an automated e-mail, but some submitters find this e-mail is caught by their spam/bulk filters. You may check the status of your own submission through the online submission manager. Replies to electronic submissions will be made by e-mail.

  • Please use a 12 to 14 point font.

  • Do not send the only copy of your manuscript.

  • Do not send biographical material, photographs, CDs, videos, or illustrations.

  • Enclose a cover sheet stating the name of the manuscript and the author's name,address, and telephone number and a cover sheet with the title alone.

  • Manuscripts must be paginated and include a table of contents and and acknowledgments page if appropriate.

  • Simultaneous submissions are welcome, so long as Elixir is notified immediately if a manuscript is accepted elsewhere.

  • Manuscripts must be at least 48 pages in length.

  • Please secure your manuscript with either a binder clip or file folder. Do not otherwise bind your manuscript.

  • Close friends, students, and former students of the final judges or editors of Elixir Press are ineligible for all contests.

 

The entry fee is $30.

Manuscripts will be accepted from August 1 to October 31, 2012.

Submit to:

 

Elixir Press
P. O. Box 27029
Denver, CO 80227

If you have questions, please contact us at info@elixirpress.com.

For electronic submissions, please use this link: Submit to Elixir Press

 

 

PUB: Southern Indiana Review Mary C. Mohr Award > Poets & Writers

Southern Indiana Review

Mary C. Mohr Award

Deadline:
October 1, 2012

Entry Fee: 
$20

E-mail address: 
sir@usi.edu

A prize of $1,500 and publication in Southern Indiana Review is given annually for a poem or a short story. This year’s award is given for a poem. Cornelius Eady will judge. All entries are considered for publication. Submit up to four poems totaling no more than 10 pages with a $20 entry fee  ($5 for each additional poem) by October 1. Call, e-mail, or visit the website for complete guidelines.

Southern Indiana Review, Mary C. Mohr Award, University of Southern Indiana, 8600 University Boulevard, Evansville, IN 47712. (812) 464-1784. Ron Mitchell, Editor.

via pw.org

 

PHOTO ESSAY: Aging Alone > Glenna Gordon

Santigi Sesay, who passed away in October, wasn’t able to talk much or leave his chair in his final days. He was cared for by the staff at the King George home to the best of their abilities. This is the last photograph of him ever taken.  While the home is run without much support from the government or regular contributions from charities, the staff are very committed to the residents. It is rare for the elderly to live in group homes in sub-Saharan Africa, but most of the residents at King George Home in Freetown, Sierra Leone, lost their children, their families, and their communities during the country's brutal civil war.
Abu Kamara dons his finest robe for his portrait with his wife, Isatu Kamara.  Like many residents, Abu has only two or three items of clothing and wanted to be photographed in his best outfit. Many residents are supported by family members who live outside the facility but cannot care for them full time. Abu has leprosy and it is slowly loosing more and more of his hands and feet. His wife visits him everyday and often sleeps next to him in his small metal cot.
Isatu Kanu enjoys some of the afternoon sunlight coming in through the newly painted window shutters at the King George Home for the Elderly in Freetown, Sierra Leone. It is rare for the elderly to live in group homes in sub-Saharan Africa, but most of the residents at King George Home in Freetown, Sierra Leone, lost their families during the country's brutal civil war. 
Like many unfortunate Sierra Leoneans, Fatu Sesay Maya lost both of her hands during the civil war to fighters who asked victims if they wanted “long sleeves" or "short sleeves.” She speaks no English or Krio, a language common in the capital and elsewhere, but still spends her days saying "Hawa, hawa," meaning yes, yes, in Limba, a language from Northern Sierra Leone. Despite her disability, she is still relatively self-sufficient.
Charles Doe rests quietly one afternoon. He spends most days playing his guitar and harmonica, alone in the corner where he lives and listens to the radio. “It is my best friend,” he says of the guitar. “It can’t lie.” He once dreamed of being a musician.  During the war, all of his children died and he lost track of his other relatives. King George’s has been his only home for the last decade.  He says he would like his guitar to decorate his coffin.
Daniel Williams lost his family and his vision during Sierra Leone’s civil war. He plays harmonic, recorder, and he sings. His best friend lives in the bed next to him, and his also named Daniel.

Living conditions at the King George home are very sparse. Residents have a metal cot with a thin mattress and little else. It is rare for the elderly in sub-Saharan Africa to live in group homes, but most of the residents at King George's lost their children during the civil war and are left alone and without a family or community to care for them.

AGING ALONE

By Glenna Gordon

On an unpaved road past a large oil refinery in eastern Freetown, Sierra Leone, an imposing gate surrounds the King George Home for the Elderly. Inside, half a dozen buildings face a leafy inner courtyard. Inside these buildings, fifty-three senior citizens share rooms, meals and lives.

There’s a word – orphans – for children who lose their parents. It’s a word far too familiar in countries like this one, with a history of brutal war, but even here, there’s no word to describe another kind of tragedy – parents who lose their children.
Between 1991 and 2001, over 50,000 people died, and more than 2.5 million people were displaced, in a civil war sparked by regional conflict. That’s a lot for a country of just six million people. A simplistic narrative of cruelty in combat became notorious internationally: drugged up child soldiers wielding machetes, chopping off limbs and burning down villages.

The aftermath, however, is largely ignored -- as are the residents at King George’s. They are almost all parents without children, chance survivors of a war that their families weren’t lucky enough to survive. Or, they are the disabled and the impaired, tolerated when times are good and resources are plentiful, but left behind when things take a turn for the worse.

While in much of the Western world, the elderly often live in group facilities, in sub-Saharan Africa, it is an anomaly for senior citizens to live in a group home. Most of the time, the elderly stay in at home and are cared for by their children, their relatives, or the community. The elderly have always been considered a resource – their wisdom and knowledge guides younger generations. But the war here changed that. The numbers of dead and displaced can only hint at a way of life fundamentally different than just a decade earlier.

The stories that the residents tell of how they came to King George’s are very similar: there was nowhere else to go. No one at King George’s really wants to be there, but they make do. With meager resources, the center provides one meal a day, and bread and tea in the morning, but cannot afford to offer the residents much more. The home gets occasional donations from individuals and NGOs, and some goods from the government, but it can’t pay a living wage to its staff or upgrade facilities. When residents fall ill, they must be cared for at hospitals or clinics nearby.

Some residents stay on their beds alone, lost in their own world of disability and isolation.  The more capable and alert residents of the King George’s spend their days  resting on the porches of their buildings, or lounging outside in broken down wheel chairs set up like lawn chairs. They listen to the radio and spend the day chatting. They do each other’s hair and laugh together in the warm afternoons before they retreat to their small metal cots when the sun starts to set. Without a generator or any municipal electricity, there’s no reason to stay up past dark. The day has simple and consistent rhythms: breakfast, prayers, sitting, eating, socializing, and sitting some more.