VIDEO: Eyes On The Rainbow (The Assata Shakur Documentary)

Eyes On The Rainbow

(The Assata Shakur

Documentary)

http://assatashakur.org/

"Eyes on the Rainbow" deals with the life of Assata Shakur, the Black Panther and Black Liberation Army leader who escaped from prison and was given political asylum in Cuba, where she has lived for close to 15 years. In it we visit with Assata in Havana and she tells us about her history and her life in Cuba. This film is also about Assata's AfroCuban context, including the Yoruba Orisha Oya, goddess of the ancestors, of war, of the cemetery and of the rainbow. Gloria Rolando on "Eyes of the Rainbow": 

"In the struggle of the African American people, many women's voices in the past and the present have always called for social justice, women who throughout the years have shown integrity and firmness in their principles. For this reason, "The Eyes of the Rainbow" is dedicated to all women who struggle for a better world. 

One of those voices that already forms a part of the history of the African American people is that of Assata Shakur. In the documentary "The Eyes of the Rainbow," she recounts aspects of her path as relentless warrior. We are able to create a meeting with Assata Shakur through the symbols of AfroCuban culture, which offer us beautiful songs evoking the ancestors. 

Representations of the Yoruba warrior orishas such as Oya and Ochosi support the discourse of this story, which also has its moments of poetry and tenderness as in the dance of Oshun, through which is illustrated Assata's decision to become mother while still in prison. 

The blues interpreted by Junius Williams and his "Magic Harp," the songs of Sweet Honey in the Rocks, and the Cuban group "Vocal Baobab" give a special stamp to this valiant testimony which defines the spirit of struggle in the African American woman."

PUB: New Mirage Journal

New Mirage Journal is now open for submissions of short story. We are interested in high quality work that dares to speak of race, the human condition, the “struggle,” in fresh new ways. Your story should be inspired by reality, mythology, folklore, or fairytales.


Please submit one short story of no more than 10 pages long with a short bio of no more than 50 words. All submissions must be sent as attachments via our submissions manger:

http://greensubmissions.com/96/new-mirage-journal/index.php

Submissions that reach the editor via other means will not be accepted. Simultaneous submissions will be considered for publication. Please wait until you receive an acceptance or rejection notice before submitting again.

Via: pawablog

CONTACT INFORMATION:

For inquiries: newmiragejournal@yahoo.com

For submissions: submit online here

Website: http://newmiragejournal.com/

PUB: Call for essays—Anthology of Modern Polytheistic Experiences

CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS -

RETURN OF THE GODS:

ANTHOLOGY OF MODERN

POLYTHEISTIC EXPERIENCES

 

 

Deadline: 21 June 2012

Minneapolis writer is compiling an anthology of modern, polytheistic experiences, tentatively titled Return of the Gods: The Varieties of Polytheistic Experience.

Seeking thoughtful, original, and previously unpublished non-fiction essays recounting first-hand encounters with Gods, ancestors, spirits, disembodied intelligences, and sacred presences in nature.

You may hail from a Hindu tradition, an indigenous tradition, a Pagan tradition, an African-based tradition, another tradition, or no tradition at all.

Electronic submissions only. Please submit only final, proofread copy, double-spaced, maximum 5,000 words. Please send your story as an MS Word attachment to williammcgillis [at] gmail [dot] com with the subject line: Return of the Gods. Please refrain from submitting if you are not open to edits.

Please ensure that your story file includes your (less than 75 word) bio along with contact details, including postal address and email address.

Compensation: All selected contributors will receive a complimentary copy of the book upon publication.

CONTACT INFORMATION:

For inquiries: williammcgillis [at] gmail [dot] com

For submissions: williammcgillis [at] gmail [dot] com

 

>via: http://writersafrika.blogspot.com/2012/03/call-for-submissions-return-of-gods...

PUB: Call for essays—29th International Competitions of Holy Quran

CALL FOR ESSAYS:

29TH INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIONS

OF HOLY QURAN

 

Deadline: 12 May 2012

The Holy Quran is the Divine Book and the unrivaled and insurmountable miracle of Allah the Almighty, brought by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).

So far 14 centuries have passed and nobody could have challenged its sublime language and style. The authenticity of its contents has shed light for the mankind, especially for its devout and ardent followers.

The brilliant verses of the Quran contain what is necessary for the felicity of the mankind. Therefore, the mankind has been in debt to the teachings of the Holy Quran, for it contains the ways to reach full development and spiritual proximity to the Almighty Allah. In the light of this capacity, the Quran exegetes and researchers have made extensive research to find out more about the solutions offered for the crisis of the mankind, past and present. In view of this capacity, the cultural division of Iranian endowments & charity affairs organization and the University of Quran Sciences and Knowledge (based at Qom) have decided to schedule a conference for upgrading the echelon of cultural enrichment on an international level through holding the 29th International competitions of Holy Quran. The sessions held will deal with articles submitted for participation in the competition. It is hoped that such contributions will lead to exploring more so-far-hidden aspects of the miracle of the Holy Quran. A selection of the articles will be published in the proceedings of the conference.

MAIN ISSUES AND SUBORDINATE TOPICS FOR WRITING QURANIC ARTICLES:

I. QURAN AND ISLAMIC AWAKENING

1. Foundations and characteristics of Islamic Awakening from the Perspective of the Holy Quran

2. Mechanisms of Realization of Islamic Awakening based on the Teachings of the Holy Quran

3. Causes of Deviation of Muslim Communities from Divine Goals in the Movements of Islamic Awakening from the Perspective of the Holy Quran

4. Factors and Mechanisms of safeguarding and Continuation of Islamic Awakening from the Perspective of the Holy Quran

5. Islamic Awakening and Materialization of Divine promises in the Holy Quran

6. Pathology of Islamic Movements according to the Holy Quran

7. Analysis of the Role of Zionism in the Deviation of Islamic Movements according to the Teachings of the Holy Quran

8. Ways of Interference of the West in the Movements of Islamic Awakening and Mechanisms of Counteracting them from the Perspective of the Holy Quran

9. Role of Unity in the Realization and Continuation of the Movements of Islamic Awakening and Conspiracies of Enemy in Opposing this Role according to the Holy Quran
10. Role of Leadership in the awakening of Muslim Communities according t
o the Holy Quran

11. Role and Position of the Teachings of the holy Quran in Realization, Organization, and Leading of Islamic Movements

12. Role and Position of Enlightened Youth in the Movements of Islamic Awakening according to the Teachings of the Holy Quran

13. Role of Women in the Movements of Islamic Awakening according to the Teachings of the Holy Quran

14. Characteristics of Islamic Awakening in the Islamic Revolution of Iran and Comparing them to the Recent Islamic Movements in the Light of Quranic Criteria

15. Necessity of the Establishment of a Just Islamic Government according to the Holy Quran

16. A Study of the Political System of the Islamic Republic of Iran as a Quranic, Islamic Example of a highly Qualified and Desirable System

II. THE HOLY QURAN AND PERFECTION OF HUMAN SOCIETY

1. Nature of Perfection and Spiritual Happiness in the Holy Quran

2. Features of Perfect Human Being in the Holy Quran along with a Study of Examples

3. Islamic Lifestyle according to the Holy Quran and Islamic Teachings

4. Position of Islamic Morality in the Teachings of the Holy Quran and its Role in the Perfection of Individual and Society

5. Nature of Islamic Ethical Values in the Holy Quran and Comparing them to the Ethical Norms of Western Foundations

6. Mechanisms of Realization of Islamic Morality towards Reaching a Perfect Society according to the Holy Quran

7. Factors of deviation of society from Moral Values as Examples of Cultural Invasion and Mechanisms of Counteracting them according to the Holy Quran

8. Ethical Pathology of the Youth and Mechanisms of Counteracting Moral Deviations according to the Holy Quran and Islamic Teachings

9. Quranic Mechanisms towards the Immunity of the Society against Dangerous Effects of Satellites, Internet, Computer Games, ……

10. Ways and Means of Benefitting from the Capacity of New Media and communication towards Materialization and Development of a Quranic Society

11. Role of Family in Counteracting Cultural Invasion , and Promotion of the Culture of Islamic Decency in the Society according to the Holy Quran

12. Role of Family in Safeguarding the Society and Mechanisms of its Realization based on the Holy Quran

WRITING STRUCTURE/FORMATTING

The Structure of Writing Essays for 29th International Competitions of Holy Quran

1- The structure of essay should follow: title, abstract, key words, introduction, main body text, conclusion, endnote (if there is), and references.

2- At the end of any quoted sentences should mention to the reference in a parenthesis as: (name and sure name of the author, published year, volume, page).

Note 1: repeated references should mention as the same first time. Do not use words like Ibid, opt …

Note 2: If there is more than a works for an author, specify it by alphabetical letters.

3- Additional explanations and proper names or expressions should come at the end of main body text titled endnote (references here would be as the same main body text that noted above).

4- References should sort based on alphabetical arrangement as:

• Book: sure name and first name (published year), title, translator (if there is), publication location, publisher, publishing number, volume.

• Essay: sure name and first name (published year), title, the name of journal, volume.

5- Abstract should contain 300 words including: JEL classification, title, subject, methodology of research and its most consequences, key words (utmost 10 words)

• Papers should select in a form of with margins: top 2cm, bottom 2.5cm, right and left 2cm.

• Essays should write in one column.

• Font should be Times New Roman 14

• Line spacing should be single.

KEY POINTS:
  • Whole document should contain 25 pages of 300 words.
  • It should have not published anywhere else.
  • Accepted essays will publish in a proceeding of 29th essays of international competition of holey Quran.

Full paper submission due: 12 May 2012

Notification of paper acceptance: 10 June 2012

Online submission will be available in: March 10

CONTACT INFORMATION:

For inquiries: via their online contact form

For submissions: submit online here

Website: http://www.pmfso.ir

POV: Go To Trial: Crash The Justice System - Michelle Alexander > NYTimes

GO TO TRIAL:

CRASH THE JUSTICE SYSTEM

More than 90 percent of criminal cases are never tried before a jury.

 

 

AFTER years as a civil rights lawyer, I rarely find myself speechless. But some questions a woman I know posed during a phone conversation one recent evening gave me pause: “What would happen if we organized thousands, even hundreds of thousands, of people charged with crimes to refuse to play the game, to refuse to plea out? What if they all insisted on their Sixth Amendment right to trial? Couldn’t we bring the whole system to a halt just like that?”

The woman was Susan Burton, who knows a lot about being processed through the criminal justice system.

Her odyssey began when a Los Angeles police cruiser ran over and killed her 5-year-old son. Consumed with grief and without access to therapy or antidepressant medications, Susan became addicted to crack cocaine. She lived in an impoverished black community under siege in the “war on drugs,” and it was but a matter of time before she was arrested and offered the first of many plea deals that left her behind bars for a series of drug-related offenses. Every time she was released, she found herself trapped in an under-caste, subject to legal discrimination in employment and housing.

Fifteen years after her first arrest, Susan was finally admitted to a private drug treatment facility and given a job. After she was clean she dedicated her life to making sure no other woman would suffer what she had been through. Susan now runs five safe homes for formerly incarcerated women in Los Angeles. Her organization, A New Way of Life, supplies a lifeline for women released from prison. But it does much more: it is also helping to start a movement. With groups like All of Us or None, it is organizing formerly incarcerated people and encouraging them to demand restoration of their basic civil and human rights.

I was stunned by Susan’s question about plea bargains because she — of all people — knows the risks involved in forcing prosecutors to make cases against people who have been charged with crimes. Could she be serious about organizing people, on a large scale, to refuse to plea-bargain when charged with a crime?

“Yes, I’m serious,” she flatly replied.

I launched, predictably, into a lecture about what prosecutors would do to people if they actually tried to stand up for their rights. The Bill of Rights guarantees the accused basic safeguards, including the right to be informed of charges against them, to an impartial, fair and speedy jury trial, to cross-examine witnesses and to the assistance of counsel.

But in this era of mass incarceration — when our nation’s prison population has quintupled in a few decades partly as a result of the war on drugs and the “get tough” movement — these rights are, for the overwhelming majority of people hauled into courtrooms across America, theoretical. More than 90 percent of criminal cases are never tried before a jury. Most people charged with crimes forfeit their constitutional rights and plead guilty.

“The truth is that government officials have deliberately engineered the system to assure that the jury trial system established by the Constitution is seldom used,” said Timothy Lynch, director of the criminal justice project at the libertarian Cato Institute. In other words: the system is rigged.

In the race to incarcerate, politicians champion stiff sentences for nearly all crimes, including harsh mandatory minimum sentences and three-strikes laws; the result is a dramatic power shift, from judges to prosecutors.

The Supreme Court ruled in 1978 that threatening someone with life imprisonment for a minor crime in an effort to induce him to forfeit a jury trial did not violate his Sixth Amendment right to trial. Thirteen years later, in Harmelin v. Michigan, the court ruled that life imprisonment for a first-time drug offense did not violate the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

No wonder, then, that most people waive their rights. Take the case of Erma Faye Stewart, a single African-American mother of two who was arrested at age 30 in a drug sweep in Hearne, Tex., in 2000. In jail, with no one to care for her two young children, she began to panic. Though she maintained her innocence, her court-appointed lawyer told her to plead guilty, since the prosecutor offered probation. Ms. Stewart spent a month in jail, and then relented to a plea. She was sentenced to 10 years’ probation and ordered to pay a $1,000 fine. Then her real punishment began: upon her release, Ms. Stewart was saddled with a felony record; she was destitute, barred from food stamps and evicted from public housing. Once they were homeless, Ms. Stewart’s children were taken away and placed in foster care. In the end, she lost everything even though she took the deal.

On the phone, Susan said she knew exactly what was involved in asking people who have been charged with crimes to reject plea bargains, and press for trial. “Believe me, I know. I’m asking what we can do. Can we crash the system just by exercising our rights?”

The answer is yes. The system of mass incarceration depends almost entirely on the cooperation of those it seeks to control. If everyone charged with crimes suddenly exercised his constitutional rights, there would not be enough judges, lawyers or prison cells to deal with the ensuing tsunami of litigation. Not everyone would have to join for the revolt to have an impact; as the legal scholar Angela J. Davis noted, “if the number of people exercising their trial rights suddenly doubled or tripled in some jurisdictions, it would create chaos.”

Such chaos would force mass incarceration to the top of the agenda for politicians and policy makers, leaving them only two viable options: sharply scale back the number of criminal cases filed (for drug possession, for example) or amend the Constitution (or eviscerate it by judicial “emergency” fiat). Either action would create a crisis and the system would crash — it could no longer function as it had before. Mass protest would force a public conversation that, to date, we have been content to avoid.

In telling Susan that she was right, I found myself uneasy. “As a mother myself, I don’t think there’s anything I wouldn’t plead guilty to if a prosecutor told me that accepting a plea was the only way to get home to my children,” I said. “I truly can’t imagine risking life imprisonment, so how can I urge others to take that risk — even if it would send shock waves through a fundamentally immoral and unjust system?”

Susan, silent for a while, replied: “I’m not saying we should do it. I’m saying we ought to know that it’s an option. People should understand that simply exercising their rights would shake the foundations of our justice system which works only so long as we accept its terms. As you know, another brutal system of racial and social control once prevailed in this country, and it never would have ended if some people weren’t willing to risk their lives. It would be nice if reasoned argument would do, but as we’ve seen that’s just not the case. So maybe, just maybe, if we truly want to end this system, some of us will have to risk our lives.”

Michelle Alexander is the author of “The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness.”

 

CANADA: RCMP officer assaults handcuffed teenager

Abbotsford police

recommend

assault charge

against RCMP officer

after teen girl

beaten during arrest

Teenager Jamie Haller sustained injuries after an arrest by RCMP in Williams Lake in September. Abbotsford Police investigated and an assault charge is recommended against an RCMP officer.

Photograph by: Submitted , for the TIMES

Abbotsford Police have recommended an assault charge be laid against a Williams Lake RCMP officer who allegedly punched a handcuffed teenage girl repeatedly in the face while she was in the back of a police cruiser last year.

Jamie Haller, 17, was running in fear from a Williams Lake street gang on the night of Sept. 10 and asked a passerby to call 911.

Jamie managed to call her mother, Martina Jeff, who jumped into her car and went looking for Jamie - who had never been in trouble with the law before.

When Martina found her, Jamie was surrounded by police officers, on the ground in handcuffs, and in the midst of a panic attack.

Jeff said she saw the police handle Jamie roughly as they put her in the back of a cruiser, where she began kicking the window.

Jeff said she heard Const. Andy Yung threaten Jamie if she didn't stop kicking the window.

He then joined Jamie in the back, where, Jeff said, she saw Yung repeatedly punch her daughter in the face.

This is not the first time Const. Yung has been accused of bad behaviour.

According to newspaper reports, Yung was assigned to security detail at a conference of defence ministers in Banff in Sept. 2008.

He was off-duty on the night of Sept 5, when he got drunk and called his ex-girlfriend from his hotel room. The call left him in tears.

Yung then fired a shot from his service pistol into the ceiling of his room at the Banff Springs Hotel. He called 911 and said he had accidentally fired his handgun.

The Ottawa Citizen reports that Yung had been illegally using the national police database to keep tabs on his ex-girlfriend.

At his disciplinary hearing later that year, Yung received a reprimand for disgraceful conduct and was docked five days' pay. In subsequent criminal proceedings, Yung was given an absolute discharge.

Jeff said she's surprised Yung is still working as a police officer.

"It crosses my mind, why is he still on duty," Jeff told The Province on Wednesday.

Jeff, a single mom raising four teenagers, said Jamie "has been struggling" since the incident in the police car.

Jamie gave up her job at the local Dairy Queen and hasn't worked or been back to school since the assault, said Jeff.

"Her face swelled up" as a result of the attack in the back of the cruiser.

"She had braces and there was damage inside her mouth where the braces were," said Jeff.

Jamie needed work on her braces and Jeff has been forced to scrimp to pay for the dental bills.

"She tells me that she's scared of the police," said Jeff.

The gang members Jamie ran from that night "still harass us," said Jeff, who has moved her family to an undisclosed location out of concern for their safety.

"We've told [friends] not to let people know where we live."

Jeff, who still has trouble sleeping at night, said, "We're trying to get Jamie into a healing centre [on Vancouver Island] for six weeks of counselling."

Jeff said Insp. Warren Brown, commanding officer of the Williams Lake RCMP detachment, called her to reassure her the police will be there to help her if she needs it.

In a prepared statement Brown said "I am disappointed to learn that a charge of assault is recommended against one of my constables."

He added he commends his staff "for their high level of dedication and professionalism."

Because Yung has not yet been charged, the RCMP followed its normal policy of not releasing his name. He was has been placed on "non-operational duties," said the release.

David Eby, executive director of the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, said he was encouraged by the recommendation to lay charges against Yung.

"It's heartening for anyone who believes that police officers shouldn't be able to punch teenage girls while they're handcuffed," he said.

"I'm hopeful the RCMP will examine the conduct of this officer in light of this incident and his history, and evaluate whether he should be . . . wearing an RCMP uniform."

A LUTA CONTINUA: Black Policeman Shot 28 Times By 4 White Cops

Black Policeman

 

Shot 28 Times

 

by 4 White Chicago Cops

 

and Lived

  on Jan 27, 2012

Officer Howard Morgan was shot 28 TIMES by 4 white Chicago District 10 police officers at 19th and Lawndale, Chicago, IL on February 21, 2005. He was accused of going the wrong way on a one-way street. He was charged with 4 counts of first degree attempt murder and three counts of aggravated battery and one count of aggravated discharge of a firearm. Officer Morgan was shackled to his hospital bed for over 6 months. He was taken to Cook County Corrections where he slept on the floor until he was released on a 2 MILLION dollar bond. 

After his first trial he was found NOT GUILTY for FIRING HIS WEAPON and 2 counts of aggravated battery. 

Now the court is attempting to RETRY Officer Morgan AGAIN. But how can it be attempted murder if he is found NOT GUILTY for firing HIS GUN??????? The DOUBLE JEOPARDY LAW APPLIES!!! The story is trying to be hid from the public eye! We must get the word out!!! Help me STOP this INJUSTICE NOW because if it happen to him it can be easily happen to you!!!!

 

__________________________

 

bilt2tumble:

losguantesverdes:

atane:

This is a story that isn’t getting the traction in the press that it should. I posted the case about Howard Morgan not long ago here.

Morgan was a veteran police officer in Chicago. He is black. He was shot 28 times by 4 white officers. 21 of those shots were administered to the back of his body. Morgan never fired a weapon, and a witness corroborated that. In fact, one of the officers took Morgan’s weapon away from him. Morgan was acquitted of aggravated discharge of a weapon in 2007. 

Some key facts via this online petition

Howard Morgan’s van was crushed and destroyed without notice or cause before any forensic investigation could be done. 

The State only produced 3 of the 28 bullets shot into and taken from Howard Morgan’s body, whereby the rest of the 25 bullets could have shown whether or not the police officers who shot Mr. Morgan shot him with his own gun after taking it from him.

Howard Morgan was never tested for gun residue to confirm if he even fired a weapon on the morning in question. 

The State never produced the actual bullet proof vest worn by one of the officers who claimed to have allegedly taken a shot directly into the vest on the morning in question. The State only produced a replica.

Despite all this, and the fact that Morgan was earlier acquitted of firing his own weapon, Morgan was found guilty of attempted murder of the 4 white officers who shot him 28 times, with 21 of those shots having entry points on the back of his body. How does one not fire a weapon, get shot 28 times by four officers, and then be found guilty of attempted murder? It doesn’t make sense.

Morgan is set to be sentenced in April. More info here.

Nah, fuck the police. All day everyday. Fuck ‘um.

“it doesn’t happen all that often”

Really? Could post shit like THIS all day with NO repeats. Define ‘all that often’.

i’m glad there is a petition…. but what about a crowd of people stand behind this man…. how about we show up instead of just putting our name down on a piece of paper.

 

 

 

 

 

__________________________

 

Shot 28 times

by White cops,

Black officer still faces

decades in prison

 

Howard Morgan

Howard Morgan

The off-duty Black police officer miraculously surviving a fusillade of bullets fired by fellow officers, but still faces prison for attempted murder.

 

Posted: Friday, March 2, 2012 9:17 am | Updated: 9:45 pm, Sun Mar 4, 2012.

With his own sentencing delayed until early April, advocates for an off-duty Black policeman shot 28 times by fellow officers seven years ago are working furiously to free a man they say was falsely accused of attacking four members of the Chicago Police Department.

Supporters of Howard Morgan — who, amazingly, survived the 2005 shooting — packed a Cook County courthouse last month, as his attorneys won a delay in the sentencing hearing as they filed motions his behalf.

Judge Clayton Crane rescheduled the hearing for April 5 at 9 a.m. Morgan has been in custody since Jan. 27, after his $2 million bond was revoked when a jury convicted him on four counts of attempted first degree murder of a police officer and one count of aggravated battery with a firearm.

Morgan’s attorney, Herschella G. Conyers, said the delay was requested so they can review transcripts from the trial and make sure they can assert all of the appellate claims so as not to waive anything on appeal. She said her client agreed with the move. The basis of Conyers argument for a new trial is what she thinks were errors made by Judge Crane in which some evidence was allowed, which she believes helped prosecutors while other evidence they believe would help the defense was not allowed.

She also says prosecutors are trying her client on charges that he was acquitted of in a previous trial five years ago.

When originally tried in 2007, Morgan was charged with four counts of attempted first-degree murder, three counts of aggravated battery with a firearm and one count of aggravated discharge of a firearm. A jury acquitted Morgan of the two counts of aggravated battery as well as the count of aggravated discharge of a firearm. However, the jury was hung on the other five remaining counts; after which Judge Crane, the presiding judge in that trial, declared a mistrial.

“The prosecution will tell you they did a retrial, but one of our issues is the same conduct he was acquitted of they tried him for again and just called it something else,” Conyers said. “It’s our claim that this is double jeopardy.”

Morgan faces a sentence of up to 80 years when he returns to court in April. Last month the jury believed the prosecution’s case that Morgan was pulled over in the early morning hours of Feb. 21, 2005 a few blocks from his North Lawndale home after police spotted him driving without headlights down a one way street. After being ordered out of the car by officers, Morgan attacked the officers, according to prosecutors and pulled a weapon and began firing. That prompted the four officers to return fire. Morgan was struck 21 times in the back and seven times in the chest.

Amazingly he survived said his wife and supporter Rosalind Morgan. She believes her husband is being framed to cover up police misconduct. When the story first broke, Chicago police told members of the press Morgan was not a police officer. Then they had to reverse course two days later and admit publicly he indeed was an officer for Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad for 13 years.

“If you were found not guilty of shooting your gun and there were no other weapons found, according to the indictment, then what are we talking about here?” asked Mrs. Morgan. “The whole thing is ludicrous and I am just appalled.”

She supports her husband’s attorneys’ decision to file two motions: one for a new trial with bond and the other for acquittal. She said the seven-year proceedings have taken a toll on her husband’s health and added being held in Cook County Jail is not helping.   

“It’s deplorable and heartbreaking to see this happen to my husband when I know he is innocent,” she said. “Every day you are looking over your shoulder and you are limited in your actions as my husband is limited on the physical activities he can do. He was never a sit around the house kind of person. We would often go out to dinner or to the movies, but after all of this has happened, we haven’t done any of that.”

 

>via: http://www.newsinblack.com/cities/chicago/article_ab1ca9e8-648b-11e1-a27f-001...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACTION: Sign A Petition, Tell Your Friends—Don't Just Complain, Do Something!

Taking a Page from Kony 2012,

3 Ways You Can Help

Get Justice for Trayvon Martin

MONDAY MAR 19, 2012 – BY 


Over the weekend, I began to feel incredibly sad and hopeless about the case of Trayvon Martin’s murder. Although the facts seem extremely cut and dry, the fact that Trayvon’s killer, 28-year-old George Zimmerman, still remains free, not having even been arrested, made me angry.

I began thinking about all of the people who were–just a week ago–tweeting, Facebooking, and donating millions of dollars to find LRA leader Joseph Kony, and why they weren’t doing to same to bring Trayvon’s killer to justice.

I mean, I get it.

American black boys and girls aren’t an “exotic” enough cause for some, and when they come up murdered and missing no one but their families seem to care. Just as many don’t the names of Oscar Grant, Aiyana Jones, Danroy Henry, Ramarley Graham, and Jordan Miles, I’m not surprised that most still don’t know about Trayvon.

But instead of remaining helpless, I decided to act.

Faced with these emotions, I took a page from the Kony 2012 playbook. I felt that if more people knew about Trayvon’s story, we could apply pressure to Florida authorities to handle the case fairly. As I began to think of ways to spread the word, it clicked: Use social media.

I took to twitter Friday night and asked all of my followers to tweet their favorite celebrities and urge them spread the word about Trayvon. Although I have just over 1,700 Twitter followers, I figured, if we all spread the word we could potentially reach millions.

Friday night I feverishly tweeted, retweeted, and shared links and other information about Trayvon. With the help of my fellow tweeters, we began gaining traction and caught the eye (and retweets) of celebs like rappers Chuck D, David Banner, and Talib Kweli. Others like Boris Kodjoe, NFL player Dezmon Briscoe, Samuel L. Jackson and John Legend also began spreading the word.

I was amazed. Even though I’m one person, it was clear I can touch someone else and they can touch someone else until out reach grows exponentially.

Because of many in social media keeping Trayvon’s story alive, mainstream news outlets are now covering the case, and it has even gotten the attention of the White House.

So what does this mean for you?

Many of you, like me, were probably disturbed by this incident and inspired to act. But where do you get started? Whether you simply post about Trayvon on your Facebook page, tell people in your neighborhood or begin volunteering with organizations that combat violence, it all helps.

But in case you want more concrete ways to get involved, here’s 3 things you can do today to help get justice for Trayvon Martin:

Hit the tweets: Join me in urging celebs to sign and share the petition to get Florida officials to arrest and prosecute George Zimmerman. They have millions of followers and can quickly spread the word.

  • Tweet: Pls sign & RT the petition to bring #TrayvonMartin’s killer 2 justice. His family deserves answers http://chn.ge/xc4oze

Write a letter: Many around the web have decided to start a letter writing campaign, and some have even said they will send empty Skittles wrappers to Chef Bill Lee. Send a letter to Sanford police chef Bill Lee to express your concern about his department’s handling of the case.

Stay informed: Knowing the facts and educating others about them is key to continuing to spread the word about Trayvon Martin. Visit JusticeforTrayvon.com for more details.

Do you have ideas about how we can mobilize to get justice for Trayvon Martin and other victims? Share!

>via: http://www.clutchmagonline.com/2012/03/taking-a-page-from-kony-2012-3-ways-yo...

 

 

__________________________

 

CLICK BELOW TO SIGN PETITION

Change.org's petition calling for the state of Florida to prosecute George Zimmerman, who murdered 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in cold blood, needs 100,000 more signatures. Reblog and do what you can, Tumblr.

(Source: inothernews, via bilt2tumble)

 

 

__________________________

 Trayvon Martin's 911 Calls:

New Tapes Trace Teen's

Final Moments

 

BY MAURICE GARLAND

Mar 19th, 2012

 


Tapes are finally released, raising more questions ... and anger

After many requests, demands and media attention, 911 calls surrounding the tragic death of Trayvon Martin have finally been released.

One call has the shooter George Zimmerman calling the police to report a "suspicious" individual walking through his neighborhood, staring into houses. After being told not to follow Martin, you can hear Zimmerman saying "these assholes, they always get away" and whispering what sounds like "fucking coons" or "fucking goons" at the 1:52 mark. Zimmerman and dispatch end the call after he asks that police call him when they arrive to the scene.

A separate call has a female neighbor calling 911 after she hears cries for help coming from outside her window. While on the phone, gunshots are heard.

Another neighbor calls in to report that he saw two men wrestling on his back porch. He then sees Trayvon lying on the ground and goes "the guys dead out here, holy shit ..."

Then in perhaps the most dramatic call, another neighbor can barely talk as she becomes overwhelmed after she sees Trayvon's dead body.

The long-awaited release of these tapes have only added more anger and stress into a situation that threatens to ignite simmering tensions as the relationship between the police and the black community continues to deteriorate. A black militia group has vowed to go to Sanford, Florida to attempt a citizens arrest on Zimmerman who has yet to be arrested or charged with any crime. Attorneys for Martin's family have strongly urged against such actions.

"They want justice at the hands of authorities and nobody else," says Martin family attorney Benjamin Crump. "Everybody has a right to peacefully assemble but we certainly want to leave any kind of arrests ... to the authorities."

The always peaceful Russell Simmons tweeted, "Trayvon Martin didn't die so we can create a race war he died so we can promote better understanding. We must start honest dialogue..."

>via: http://www.loop21.com/life/trayvon-martin-911-calls-final-moments

 

__________________________

 

media.think – social justice:

Twitter Tidbits and News Links

Around The Internet on

#TrayvonMartin Blog-In Day


 

  Trayvon Martin, 17 yr old gunned down in Sanford, Florida by a neighborhood watchman. Seeking Justice!

 

Soledad O’Brien interviewed the parents of #TrayvonMartin and their attorney this morning on CNN’sStarting Point and here are my observations on Twitter:

“There’s something going on here that doesn’t pass the common sense test” – Benjamin Crump, attorney for the parents of #TrayvonMartin


I don’t have children yet I feel the pain for #TrayvonMartin‘s parents as I watch them reminisce about thr 17 yr old son and seek #Justice

@Soledad_OBrien interviewing #TrayvonMartin‘s parents on #CNN #StartingPoint this morning and be sure to join the @ForHarriet Blog-In 2day


GM! #BeThankful #BeActive, Join the Blogging Movement for#TrayvonMartin 2day! Chk @ForHarriet 4 details, #RaiseYourVoice@change


Also, here are a few articles and resources to help you follow and keep up with the #TrayvonMartin case:


Why Was Trayvon Martin Killed? – March 9 (BET)

http://www.bet.com/news/national/2012/03/09/why-was-trayvon-martin-killed.html


Trayvon Martin case moves to State Attorney General’s Office (Florida) – March 13 (WESH – Orlando)

http://www.wesh.com/r/30665705/detail.html


Trayvon Martin Case Salts Old Wounds And Racial Tension – March 14 (Huffington Post)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/14/trayvon-martin-sanford-florida_n_1345868.html


Sanford Police dispute eyewitness statement – March 15 (Orlando Sentinel)

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/seminole/os-trayvon-martin-witness-tv-report-20120315,0,559932.story


Trayvon Martin Case Exposes New Realities of Self Defense Laws – March 15 (CBS News)

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57398005-504083/the-trayvon-martin-case-exposes-the-realities-of-a-new-generation-of-self-defense-laws/


Witnesses in Trayvon Martin Case Heard Cries Before Shot – March 15 (Sun Sentinel)

http://southflorida.sun-sentinel.com/news/sfl-trayvon-martin-family-20120315,0,7477980.story?page=2&track=rss


#BEActive Online – Change.org

Also, be sure to sign the petition (http://www.change.org/petitions/prosecute-the-killer-of-17-year-old-trayvon-martin)  to bring Trayvon Martin’s shooter to justice brought to you by Change.org to prosecute the killer of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin


#BEActive – Contact the Sanford Police Department and The Florida State Attorney’s Office

Contact Bill Lee, Chief of Police, Sanford Police Department

815 W. 13th Street
Sanford , Florida 32771
Phone: 407.688.5070
Fax: 407.688.5071
Dispatch: 407.688.5199

Contact Norman Wolfinger, Florida’s 18th District State’s Attorney

State Attorney’s Office
Criminal Justice Center
101 Bush Boulevard
PO Box 8006
Sanford, Florida  32772-8006
(407) 665-6000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

HISTORY: 'Emancipating Lincoln': A Pragmatic Proclamation > NPR

'Emancipating Lincoln':

A Pragmatic Proclamation

Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863. The 150-year-old document has suffered damage from handling and light deterioration. You can learn more and get a closer look at the five-page proclamation at the National Archives website.

Alex Wong/AFP/Getty Images

 

Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863. The 150-year-old document has suffered damage from handling and light deterioration. You can learn more and get a closer look at the five-page proclamation at the National Archives website.


March 14, 2012

One hundred fifty years ago, in the summer of 1862, the Civil War was raging and President Abraham Lincoln was starting to scribble away at a document, an ultimatum to the rebellious states: Return to the Union, or your slaves will be freed.

Emancipation was a "military necessity," the president later confided to his Cabinet. Lincoln called it "absolutely essential to the preservation of the Union. We must free the slaves," Lincoln said, "or be ourselves subdued."

"He knew that emancipation would start the tidal wave of freedom and that it was irreversible once it started," says Lincoln scholar Harold Holzer, "but he also knew that more work would be required."

Holzer offers a rethinking of the Emancipation Proclamation in his new book, Emancipating Lincoln: The Proclamation in Text, Context, and Memory. It's his 42nd book on Lincoln and the Civil War.

Though revisionist critics now say the proclamation was weak — "delayed, insufficient, and insincere" — Holzer disagrees. He says Lincoln very carefully calibrated the timing and delivery of this act.

"He did things in this run-up that are perplexing, sometimes unattractive, sometimes scary — to prepare the country for what in his mind would be a revolutionary moment," Holzer says.

Remember: The country was at war. The intractable culture of racism made a pro-freedom policy a perilous idea. Lincoln knew it could bring down his administration and the Union. Holzer says Lincoln had to fear a virulent backlash from conservative Northern Democrats opposed to racial equality. And he risked triggering secession from the border states — the slave-owning states that had not joined the Confederacy: Maryland, Delaware, Missouri, and above all, his birth state, the crucially strategic Kentucky: "Lincoln worried that he wanted to have God on his side but he musthave Kentucky," Holzer says.

Emancipating Lincoln

 

Emancipating Lincoln

The Proclamation in Text, Context, and Memory

by Harold Holzer

Hardcover, 213 pages  

 

    So that was the context in August of 1862 when Lincoln hosted "a deputation of free Negroes" — prominent African-Americans — at the White House. His message to them? It was not, "you shall be free." It was: "It is better for us both ... to be separated."

    "He blames them for the war," Holzer explains. "[He] says, if it wasn't for your presence here — as if it was voluntary in the beginning — this wouldn't be happening. Go where the ban is not upon you, he tells them. Go to the Caribbean, go to Africa. Yeah, they're cruel words, they're harsh words, they're unfriendly."

    So how to understand this "bitter pill of prejudice," as Holzer calls it? Well, he says — it's telling that President Lincoln had summoned newspaper reporters to that meeting.

    "He wanted this message out," Holzer explains. "What's important to keep in mind is that he had written the Emancipation Proclamation. It was languishing in a drawer or burning a hole in his pocket. He knew he was going to do this, but he wanted Northern Americans who were dubious about marching toward racial equality to be assured that he was not doing this for the black race. He was doing this for the Union, to reunite the country, to defeat the rebellion, and he had no concern about blacks, their feelings, their resonance. He does have his finger in the wind."

    Lincoln was trying to mold public opinion, to make the proclamation palatable. And, Holzer says, the president was waiting for the right moment: a Union victory on the battlefield — which finally came at Antietam.

    Within a week of that victory, Lincoln ordered the rebellious states to obey this ultimatum within 100 days: "Either return to your legal balance with the Union, end this rebellion, or your slaves will be then, henceforward and forever free."

    There was an immediate backlash: Lincoln's Republican Party was punished at the polls in the 1862 elections. Then, on Jan. 1, 1863, Lincoln was to issue the final decree at the White House.

    "It was New Year's Day and by tradition there was a party," Holzer says. "And Lincoln went downstairs early and began receiving guests, and the afternoon comes and goes and African-Americans are gathered in churches, telegraph operators are already keyed up to bring the glorious news to the church whenever it arrived, and nothing happens."

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    More On Lincoln

     

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

     

     

    So why the delay? As Holzer tells it, Lincoln had found a mistake in the handwritten document brought for his signature. The whole thing had to be redone. Back it went to the scribe. It took hours. When the proclamation document finally came back to Lincoln, something strange happened: He picked up his pen and put it down several times. People in the room started to wonder if perhaps he wasn't going to go through with it after all. Then he began rubbing the fingers on his right hand. As Holzer explains:

    "He said, I've been shaking hands for hours and my hand is almost paralyzed. If I sign the proclamation in a quaking hand even though my whole heart is in it, people will look at my signature in 100 years and think, he hesitated."

    Lincoln massaged his hand a bit longer and then picked up the pen and signed his full name, as he did on official documents.

    "Then he looked at the signature — Abraham Lincoln — very proudly and said, 'There, that will do,' " Holzer says. "He had said right before that, if my name ever goes into history it will be for this act. He sensed immediately that he had become one of the immortals."

    One misconception about the Emancipation Proclamation is that once it was signed, immediately all the slaves were free. But that was far from the truth. Some areas of the South that had already fallen under Union control were not covered by the proclamation. Also exempt were the four border states that owned slaves but had not seceded, so nearly half a million people remained enslaved there. In fact, Delaware and Kentucky only freed their slaves after the war, in December 1865, when the 13th Amendment went into effect. And in the Confederate states, freedom came only as the Union soldiers advanced.

    "Soldiers were armed with these tiny reproductions of the Emancipation Proclamation," Holzer says. "Lincoln had ordered hundreds of thousands of them printed. Suppose an officer gets to a plantation owner that might not understand what he had to sacrifice: 'Here it is. These guys are free. You've got to pay them or let them go.' And that's how it worked, mile by mile in Southern territory. It's a long, slow process. At the end of the war, in 1865, for example, slavery had never ended in Texas."

    This 1865 drawing by L. Hollis, engraved by John Chester Buttre, depicts Abraham Lincoln as he enters Richmond, Va., in April 1865. Scroll down to learn more about this image and other artistic works inspired by the Emancipation Proclamation.
     Courtesy Harold Holzer
    This 1865 drawing by L. Hollis, engraved by John Chester Buttre, depicts Abraham Lincoln as he enters Richmond, Va., in April 1865. Scroll down to learn more about this image and other artistic works inspired by the Emancipation Proclamation.

     

    On the cover of Holzer's book is an engraving that shows a scene from April 4, 1865. It's President Lincoln, holding the hand of his young son Tad, as he enters Richmond, Va., just two days after Confederate forces had fled their capital.

    Jubilant African-Americans toss their hats in the air as they greet him:

    "They rushed over to him and cheered and knelt," Holzer says. "And Lincoln famously said — and there were witnesses there — 'Please don't kneel to me. You must kneel only to God and thank Him for your freedom.' ... This was Lincoln's real emancipation moment. This was a moment when the Union troops were occupying the capital of the Confederacy. And these black workers were actually, that moment, free under the terms of the proclamation.

    "Here is the Emancipation Proclamation in action. ... This was Lincoln acknowledging, after all those years of struggle, with the end finally in sight, that this was going to be a different society, a society of mutual respect and not subjugation."

    But that moment of quiet triumph was fleeting. Just 10 days later, Lincoln was assassinated.


    Images Of Emancipation

    The Emancipation Proclamation has been depicted in paintings, engravings, woodcuts and sculptures. Author Harold Holzer shares his research on some of the renderings of the historic event.


    The First Reading of the Emancipation Proclamation Before the Cabinet 
    Engraving by Alexander Hay Ritchie, painting by Francis Bicknell Carpenter, 1864
     

    The first reading of the Emancipation Proclamation before the Cabinet, on July 22, 1862. Painted by F.B. Carpenter, engraved by A.H. Ritchie.
    The Library of Congress

     

     

    "[Artist Francis Bicknell Carpenter] decided that he wanted to paint the moment at which Abraham Lincoln first told the Cabinet that he was determined to issue a proclamation. It's a pretty famous painting; it hangs in the Capitol, in the Senate stairway.

    "... It looks to us today like just a group of old white guys sitting around a table. It's not the most inspiring picture in the world, but it had great power in its day. It was reproduced as an engraving [as shown above]. It became one of the best-selling engravings of the 19th century. ...

    "The little regional irony here is that it actually doesn't show the moment when Lincoln was reading the proclamation. He set it in his lap. It shows Secretary of State [William H.] Seward [seated in front of the table, facing Lincoln] gesturing rather grandly. So it's really the moment when Seward tells him not to issue the proclamation: The timing isn't right. So why on earth did Carpenter do this? ... Well, Carpenter is from the suburbs of Auburn, N.Y., and William Seward is the hero of Auburn. So, you've got to get your local hero, your pride of place in this picture."

     

     Proclamation of Emancipation
    Woodcut engraving by Richardson (first name unknown), 1865

    Richardson's 1865 woodcut Proclamation Emancipation
    Courtesy Harold Holzer

     

     

    "There are many engravings and lithographs that are issued in the years to come, all of them showing Lincoln in this new guise. He's no longer the rail splitter; he's no longer the frontiersman. He is the statesman holding the document in his hands which had liberated a race, or begun the process. But, again, the artists get to dramatize things in ways that are not really measured in reality.

    "Here is the most exaggerated of all ... a wonderful depiction of Lincoln supposedly manifesting in a black church. The worshippers are on their knees, they're praying; and Lincoln is holding his scroll, reaching toward the heavens. And as a useful echo, the hand of God appears, holding biblical passages. It says 'Holy Bible,' no doubt Deuteronomy, 'Let all the inhabitants be free.' And there is God and Lincoln acting together. And in case you need some enforcement, a soldier on horseback seems to be coming into the church as well — on a white horse, of course, a heroic white horse — to hand the document to a black soldier to get him to spread the word.

    "... And if you are wondering what the impact of the proclamation will be, there's a little side vignette image of two African-American children reading a book. That's an important message, because one of the important aftereffects and promises of freedom is that it was going to educate people who were denied the right for years and generations to learn to read."

    Vinnie Ream's statue of Abraham Lincoln
    Courtesy Harold Holzer

     

    Abraham Lincoln
    Statue by Vinnie Ream, 1871

     

    "The proclamation is also seen in public sculpture. ... One is by a very young woman named Vinnie Ream. She's only 16 years old or so when she gets the opportunity to sculpt Lincoln from life. And then before Lincoln dies, she gets the commission to turn the bust portrait that she made into a statue for the Capitol. She has a lot of Senate friends; she's made busts of [Charles] Sumner and others, and she's fairly proficient."

     

    "During the debate over whether she should get the appropriation ... Mary Lincoln — who didn't like young, pretty women hanging around her husband — found out that Vinnie had gone in the Senate gallery to watch the debate and wore a low-cut dress, and leaned over the Senate gallery rail provocatively. So, Mary Lincoln said, 'This woman has obviously won this commission by exposing her busts to the public.' ... A little play on words. Well, she got the commission."


    Emancipation Memorial
    Statue by Thomas Ball, 1871 

    Lincoln Statue, Lincoln Park, Washington, D.C., circa 1920
    The Library of Congress

     

    "[Emancipation Memorial] is probably the most famous and the most controversial. It's the statue that Thomas Ball was commissioned to create for a park in Washington, D.C. It was entirely paid for by freed African-Americans — literally with pennies, nickels and dimes. The depiction was of Lincoln as a liberator raising a kneeling slave from bondage — literally freeing him, breaking the bonds of slavery. So this is the emancipation moment that never was. ..."

    "Ulysses S. Grant unveiled it, but Frederick Douglass gave the dedicatory address. And it's probably the most famous speech ever pronounced about Abraham Lincoln and the proclamation. What [Douglass] says is: ... Whites were Abraham Lincoln's children; [African-Americans] were at best his stepchildren. We should honor him, but we should remember that what he did basically was to restore the Union, and we should take him at his word. And many times ... African-Americans thought he was slow, reluctant and coldhearted. But we should also remember that based on the overwhelming majority of the white people of his time, he was speedy, earnest and devoted to the cause of freedom.

    "So that speech and that statue have remained controversial ever since. It's politically incorrect today, but it's still there in Washington."


    Abraham Lincoln Entering Richmond
    Drawing by L. Hollis, engraving by John Chester Buttre, 1865

    Abraham Lincoln Entering Richmond, 1865
    Courtesy Harold Holzer

     

    "When [Lincoln] walked onto the shores of Richmond, he was either recognized by a group of African-American workers on this very hot April day, or someone in the party went over and said, 'Do you know who that is? That's your emancipator.' They rushed over to him and cheered and knelt. And Lincoln famously said — and there were witnesses there — 'Please don't kneel to me. You must kneel only to God and thank Him for your freedom.' ...

    "This was Lincoln's real emancipation moment. This was a moment when the Union troops were occupying the capital of the Confederacy. And these black workers were actually, that moment, free under the terms of the proclamation. Here is the Emancipation Proclamation in action.

    "We know also that one particularly wizened old man who was working on the dock was wearing a big straw hat — his reaction to Lincoln when he saw him was to doff his cap in this very grand way and bow to Lincoln. Lincoln took his cap off and tipped his hat to the black man. There were white women mostly — the men had fled — hiding behind curtains on the second floor of the homes surrounding the shoreline who were reported to have been looking on with horror at this simple, but deeply moving and meaningful gesture. This was Lincoln acknowledging, after all those years of struggle, with the end finally in sight, that this was going to be a different society, a society of mutual respect and not subjugation."

    >via: http://www.npr.org/2012/03/14/148520024/emancipating-lincoln-a-pragmatic-proc...