HISTORY: The Brave Black Women Who Were Civil War Spies > Ms Magazine Blog

The Brave Black Women

Who Were Civil War Spies

 

February 28, 2011 by

 

From the field and slave cabin to the Confederate White House, black women took an active role in assisting the Union military in winning the Civil War. Contemporaries recognized their service, and on the occasion of the upcoming 150th anniversary of the start of the war (April 12) and the close of Black History Month today, it’s a good time for us to recall and recognize it as well.

A story appeared in the Northern journal Harper’s Weekly in 1864 describing how Southern blacks were assisting Union soldiers who escaped from prison camps. An illustration which accompanied the story featured a black woman hiding ragged, injured Union soldiers. Such Northern assertions were joined by those of Confederate General Robert E. Lee who declared that southern blacks were the “the chief source of information to the enemy.”

In fact, Southern black women operating as spies, scouts, couriers and guides were willing and able to offer enormous support to Union military personnel and operations. With a deep devotion to a war which they pushed to be one of emancipation, and often relying upon Southern prejudices which ignored the intelligence of black women, they were able to provide invaluable covert assistance to the Union military.

The activities of Harriet Tubman are a case in point. Tubman returned to the South early in the war to assist liberated slaves in Port Royal, South Carolina. By 1863, serving as a scout for the Union, she would don disguises and lead local blacks in dangerous missions behind enemy lines to gather information on rebel troop location, movements and strength. She even accompanied, and by some accounts led, troops under Colonel James Montgomery in daring raids into enemy territory which destroyed thousands of dollars worth of Southern property and liberated hundreds of blacks from plantations.

Other intelligence work involves black women working as domestics. The story of Mary Elizabeth Bowser [PDF], less well-documented than Tubman’s but no less intriguing, is a fascinating tale of a brilliant woman who worked with an urban spy ring in the Confederate capital said to be “the most productive espionage operation” in the Civil War.

Bowser is said to have had a photographic memory. When she assumed the identity of an illiterate slave women and found a place as a house servant in the Confederate White House, she was able to gain access to lists of troop movements, reports on the location of Union prisoners, military strategies and treasury reports. She passed the information along to Union forces until she was discovered and fled Richmond near the end of the war.

And finally, there was Mary Touvestre [PDF], a free black woman working for a Confederate engineer in Norfolk, Va., who overheard plans for building the C.S.S. Virginia. After obtaining a copy of the plans, she daringly crossed enemy lines to take this information to Secretary of the Navy, Gideon Welles, which caused the Union to crank up construction of its own ironclad warship, the U.S.S. Monitor.

After the war, the brave exploits of these black women spies were mostly forgotten, whether from prejudice, loss of records or desire for anonymity. They certainly don’t need to remain hidden any longer.

Image of Harriet Tubman with rescued slaves from Wikimedia Commons

 

VIDEO: Raul Midón: An Invisible Legend > The Revivalist

Raul Midón:

An Invisible Legend

Raul Midón is a rare breed: a true original with prominent connections.  Bill Withers, Herbie Hancock and Marcus Miller all have him on speed dial, requesting to lend his unique musicianship and his supple vocals to their recordings.  He’s created what he’s dubbed a “slap attack” guitar technique, allowing him to simultaneously play melody, harmony, bass and percussion, all while singing with dynamic, prodigious power. His 2005 album State of Mind, co-produced by the legendary Arif Mardin, is a crowning achievement of universally expressive songwriting in the young 21st century.  Its follow ups, 2007’s A World Within A World and 2010’s Synthesis, are testaments that he’s only getting better, following in a pathway dented by the footsteps of legends like Stevie Wonder and George Benson. So why haven’t you heard of him? Despite amassing an adoring, planet-spanning fan base, Midón remains in relative obscurity; an untouchable in the image-oriented caste system of the music industry.

Your father was an Argentinean dancer. Music must have been a sizeable presence in your home early in your life.

My first record was Santana (Abrarax).  When I was five years old, it was inside the cassette recorder that I got for Christmas. Santana and Jose Feliciano were the first two pieces of music I owned. Although, in our house, it was really more classical and jazz rather than popular music. I think I’m like most people; my dad is not a big pop music fan, so we didn’t have a whole bunch on Beatles records, tons of Stones records, tons of Steve Winwood records; it was all classical and jazz.  And then later, through the radio and other things, of course I got exposed to all that music.

At what age were you when you started to learn to play guitar?

I was about six. I was studying with a Flamenco teacher. I studied again formally until I was, about maybe 10 or 11, but I learned a lot from a lot of different people. I was pretty involved with the guitar even then, already. It was an everyday part of my life, from one extend or another.

How intricate were Santana and Feliciano’s guitar techniques in influencing your own playing?

Not that intricate. I think for me, I was more about Flamenco later, even though Santana is obviously a guitarist, and so is Jose Feliciano. I don’t remember it being that important. I was about the music more, and Santana’s combining of Latin and rock; that kind of fascinated me more than anything.

Your voice is a real throwback to the versatile soul singers of the 1970s. When did you first find your voice?

It’s hard to say. It happened so gradually, and I think it’s still happening. You start to incorporate the things that you love in music and I realized that, for me, I’ve always been interesting in improvisation. I was doing pop tunes but some more of what can be consideration jazz style improvising on them. That was the whole development of the kind of music I wanted to make. I grew up with Steely Dan, who went very, very far into the jazz idiom and yet they were rock and roll, yet it was very sophisticated rock and roll. I was very attracted to that because it was really good songwriting and also really interesting musically. That’s what led to me to the kind of things that I sing and the interest in improvisation, the interest in saying something meaningful, and yet having it be ‘pop,’ which I don’t know what that means anymore. I’m not interested in being a purely instrumental or purely jazz musician in the sense that they think of it in America.  I am interested in writing songs.

 

 

You attended the University of Miami to study jazz. What were your career aspirations once you graduated?

I was initially just trying to make a living in the music business. I ended up doing a lot of vocal sessions. The focus was really singing at that point, even though I was playing guitar. What I thought was the cooler thing was singing background sessions for all this big artists, like Julio Iglesias and Shakira, Enrique; there’s got to be hundreds of credits of me doing background vocals between 1991 and 2001. I was constantly in the studio doing that, as well as commercials.  In the meantime, I was playing guitar almost every night in different gig situations. But unlike New York, in South Florida, you get a gig at a restaurant, and you’re background music. There isn’t this whole scene where you’re playing original music and people are going to see that. I would get a gig playing cover tunes and slowly I would sneak in some original tunes. Basically I got bored. It seemed like we were doing the same thing on every record.

Your guitar playing is unlike anything I’ve heard before. You use an unorthodox variation of upward strums and fret tapping, which you’ve called “slap attack.” How and why did you develop it?

It started before I was conscious of it. It started with Flamenco, once again. I had a lot of training – classical training, Flamenco training and jazz training. I never really put it together in the way that I play now until I moved to New York. I mean, I was well into my 30’s before I played guitar the way you see me play guitar now. I was a guitar player, I played well. I played in all types of situations; I played in rock bands, but I was not one of those who developed my technique when I was 21, not at all. I started to have a lot of situations where I played solo and I wanted to try to command attention. There are a lot of guitar players in New York. What could I do to set myself apart? There was a conscious element to it. These were things I had been working with, but I hadn’t put them together until I, sort of, had to.

Tell me more about the New York experience and how it affected you as a musician.

I came there for a very specific reason: to move my career forward. When you realize that you’re in a veritable ocean of talent, you realized how monumental of a task it is when you go there.You’re not gonna be the faster guitar playing in the world, you’re not gonna be the cleanest. It’s a real perspective inducer. Then you say, ‘what am I?’ For me, Moving to New York was my solidification of my identity as a guitar player and as an artist. It forced me to put together the things that I had been working on, and before I knew it, I had this style of playing that was unlike what anybody else was doing. It was influenced by a lot of people, too.  Tuck Anders was a big influence, but that was really the culmination of it.

You have this astonishing ability to mimic a trumpet with your voice almost perfectly.  How did that become a part of your arsenal?

As I said, I’ve always been interested in improvisation. There was a particular trumpet player in South Florida, and he had this really warm tone, and I really tried to do it. His name was Pete Minger. I think he was in Count Basie’s band.  I never thought to it as a way to mesmerize the audience. That was not part of my thinking at that time. I realized it had that affect later, but it was a completely musical choice that I made; to use the voice as an independent instrument – independent of the guitar – and to explore vocal improvisation in the same way as I was exploring it instrumentally, which I think not a lot of singers actually do that. With scat [singers], maybe they’ll sing the blues, but to actually sit down and go over improvisation the way an instrumentalist does, to do scales and do patterns and actually negotiate changes, that’s something not a lot of singers do, and that’s something I’ve always been interested in.

You once rapped on a song “Get Together,” featured on a live EP. You rhymed with remarkable flow and command, before seamlessly moving back to singing! Was that another example of you exploring vocal improvisation?

Yeah, and I really haven’t done much of that, to tell you the truth, since then.  I was a real fan of the early hip-hop music. I’m talking Grandmaster Flash; I was a big fan of that. I just hate it now, mostly. I really enjoyed the journey that they took me on and I felt like what they were saying was real, they were really talking about stuff they did. When NWA and Dr. Dre and all that came along, that just seemed like such bullshit to me. But Gil Scott-Heron and the Last Poets, I was into that, and that was right before rap. So I always thought that could be a part of improvisation. I haven’t explored it to the same extent that I’ve explore musical improvisation – the freestyle idea of it – but it’s pretty fascinating and I love listening to it.

You’ve created this kind of music in which it sounds like there’re many people playing when it’s just you. Are consciously trying to give that feeling to your audience?

The importance of it for me is that I can create a sound vision of what I want people to hear, even the sense of using the guitar as an orchestra and using the guitar to create the illusion – well, it’s not really an illusion – using the guitar to play bass and chords at the same time. It’s not really some much of a technical feat. It is, but it’s more of a conceptual feat. Once you think of it, you can do it technically. Classical guitarists, in a sense, do it all the time because they play polyphonic music, so it’s a question of saying I’d like to take a reggae song and play the bass and play the chords at the same time. It’s very possible to do it, if you’re interested in putting in that kind of time to do it.  It really is about practice and repeating it so many times that you can do it in your sleep, so you can divide your brain into doing more than one thing. You don’t wanna be playing something and singing and phrasing exactly in the same way in order that you can play, which happens to singer/songwriters a lot; you’re doing a lot of things at once. You wanna get the different elements of it so automatic that when I sing over it, I can sing freely.

The role of the rhythm section when you’re accompanying a singer is to hold the groove down. So you don’t wanna have tons of variation in the rhythm section. I personally, as a singer, value the freedom and rhythmic freedom. It’s one of the things that I like about jazz. So I don’t want to sing it exactly the same way every night and in order to do that I really have to have the rhythm part of it down to the point where I don’t have to think about it.  “Bonnie’s Song,” from the last record, it’s in 11/8. There’re very few players in the world that can play and sing in 11/8 and do it in a way that’s free. It’s only because they don’t practice it; it’s not like it’s impossible to do.

One of the most beloved songs amongst your fans is the title track to State of Mind. What’s the history behind that song?

I was in New York and I was feeling pretty desperate, and wondering whether I should move. It was the classic how-am-I-gonna-pay-the-fucking-rent, that whole thing. Originally it was ‘Peace of Mind’ it was like “Man, I wanna be rich, so I can pay this fuckin’ rent.”  And then it evolved into what it became. What does that mean? I certainly did retain that whole thing; when I say “I wanna be rich,” I’m saying I want money, but I’m also saying, obviously, it’s a state of mind. Most of us live in relative luxury compare to most of the world. So, rich is relative. That song was almost a mantra or a power play, like if I say this in a song – and I think it sort of happened. I really believe that if you’re clear about what you want you can get it. It’s being clear that’s hard.  So I said “I wanna be rich/I wanna be happy.” Interestingly enough, that song almost didn’t get put on the record, because there were people at the record company that were reacting to that;  maybe that wasn’t the right message, just stupid shit you wouldn’t even believe. I can’t imagine State of Mind without “State of Mind” on it, but that almost happened. The only reason it didn’t happen was because Arif [Mardin] was so adamant and had such pull, he said not only is this going on the record, it’s going to be the first song on the record and fuck all of you. And Arif could say that and make it so.

 

 

You wrote a song on State of Mind, “Sitting in the Middle,” as a dedication to Donny Hathaway. What has he meant to you?

Donny Hathaway is, to me, a singular voice as a soul singer. It’s just so strong and more deep. Stevie Wonder had ten times the song success that Donny Hathaway had, a hundred times, and you can’t deny Stevie’s power, but just as a voice, as a singer, there’s something deep and strong about Donny Hathaway that I’ve never heard ever again in any other voice. It’s hard to describe, really. There’s something about the way he sang, and when it was put together right – like in “A Song For You,” “Someday We’ll All Be Free,” or even “He Ain’t Heavy” – there’s songs that he sings where the message is there and the voice is there and the arrangements are, and it’s unlike anything I’ve heard before or since. To me, he is the essential soul singer. There’s some inexhaustible depth to his voice.

 

 

I’ve seen footage of you playing bongos and guitar simultaneously during “Sunshine,” another standout track from State of Mind. When did you start doing that?

It’s a pretty recent thing. I started playing [percussion] on the body of guitar and thought maybe I could do that on the bongos. I have bongos here in my studio standing up, so I just started to do it. It’s taken a while to get it to where I’m really comfortable doing it. It’s like anything, you know, but it’s really gotten to be very comfortable now where I’m literally playing the bongos, the bass line on the guitar and then singing the song. A couple of years ago, I was touring and I lost my voice, which is a terrible position to be in when you’re on the stage solo.  So it was one of those things where I had to do something for the public. It kind of started from that, as well.

 

State of Mind’s strength lies from it just being you alone on most of the songs. In the following album, A World Within a World, musicians are layered in more. How do you think it turned out?

I frankly think that’s one the most underappreciated records. There’s no accounting what happens with records, but I really love that record. I think it was an evolution from a musical standpoint, and it was also a record that had a much bigger arc musically on it. You had songs like “All Because of You,” very R&B, to a song like “Tembererana” which is very based on Argentinean folk rhythms. There was a huge arc on that record.

Your latest album, Synthesis, utilizes a full band of session players like Dean Parks and Paulinho De Costa. How do you think it compares sonically with State of Mind?

I think from a pure writing standpoint, Synthesis is the best overall written album that I’ve done. I think my songwriting has gotten better; that’s my perception.  From an artistic, musical point of view, we may have gone a little into making the record that you make with those musicians as opposed to a record that is my particular artistic perception in terms of the sound of it. If I had to do Synthesis over, there are some things I’d do different in terms of the sound of it, because it goes a bit into the generic, because you have all these musicians and they play what they play. Even though my guitar playing is on it, it’s buried. I’d say for my next recordings, as far as the sound of it, it’s going to sound more like State of Mind than Synthesis, because that’s my sound, that’s my brand that I’ve created and that’s the sound that’ll get people prepared for what they’re going to hear on stage. With Synthesis, I’d never tour with a band like that. It was fun to make Synthesis and the mastering is really great, but I’m most proud of the songwriting.

After seeing how Synthesis turned out, is it safe to say that the story or the message of the song penetrates better when it’s just you and your guitar?

I think it tends to, only because of the limitations of sound and musicianship of musicians. A lot of times, musicians play too damn loud and you can’t hear; a lot of times the sound’s not properly balanced. With the guitar as the only instrument, those problems tend to go away. It doesn’t have to be that way, but it tends to be that way. Actually, playing with other musicians can even enhance what you’re saying, if they’re the right musicians.

Well, whether with a full band or all by yourself, most your songs have very memorable choruses. Is that an important element in your songwriting process?

I love good pop hooks. I love them. I think there’s a genius in it. There’s an art to it. That’s something that I love in the challenge of writing; taking an idea and putting it into a little package of power.

You don’t produce your own albums like many other one-man bands. Do you prefer having someone else producing you rather than yourself?

I think it’s very, very tricky, because producing really encompasses everything; what the lyrics are, to what the record sounds like, to what musicians are on it, to what stays and what goes, and if you have the right producer, it’s ideal, because it’s difficult to have a good perspective on your own music. It’s good to have that second person. Sometimes they hear something that you didn’t even hear. I’ll give you an example: When I was doing the Herbie Hancock Possibilities record, we were doing “I Just Called to Say I Love You.” I was singing it like a slow version of Stevie Wonder singing it. I just thought of it as a happy song, yet this version of it wasn’t really a happy song, and Joe [Mardin] was there and Joe said to me at one point, “Raul, this is ‘I Just Called to Say I Love You,’ and the girl’s not home.”  And I thought, “oh, shit!”  It complete changed the way I sang that song and that’s what you hear on the record.

You’ve worked with big names, you’ve performed on David Letterman, and you have great material, yet crossover success still seems to elude you. Do you think enough has been done to expose you to the public at large?

I think the marketing of me has been dismal, to tell you the truth. I think that the music industry is in such a shaken up state that most people in the music industry don’t think there’s any room in it for people like me because it’s too difficult. They’re looking for plug-in, take-out, American Idol, Sing-Off, all these fucking shows, and I think that’s what the mainstream music industry has become. What saves somebody like me is there’re a lot people who still want to hear real music and there’s lot of people who are willing to pay for it and thank God for the rest of the world, other than the United State of America. I am not certainly giving up, by any stretch of the imagination. I think there’s so much of an audience for what I do, and it’s across the board; it’s old people, it’s young people, it’s people who like R&B, it’s people who like jazz, it’s people who like songwriting. But it’s a bit of a challenge because I don’t fit neatly into a genre. I wish that I had more exposure, because I think more people would be fans if they knew I existed, but ultimately, if I’m going to get to super mainstream success, it’s going to be because of a song, not because I can play bongos and trumpet and guitar at the same time.

There are a great many other talented artists – like Aloe Blacc, José James or Sharon Jones – who also aren’t in the mainstream.  Do you think they’re experiencing the same struggle as you?

When something isn’t successful, the business blames the artist, always.  The song wasn’t good enough, whatever.  There’s so much great shit that never gets heard because the music business is full of mediocrity; of mediocre managers, mediocre agents, mediocre record labels.  If you can get through all of that somehow and be successful…some people just do it, some people are just lucky.

Raul Midón Online

Interview by Matthew Allen

 

PUB: Commonwealth Essay Competition 2012 (worldwide) > Writers Afrika

Commonwealth

Essay Competition 2012 (worldwide)

Deadline: 1 May 2012

STOP PRESS!

The Royal Commonwealth Society’s annual Young Commonwealth Competitions encourage young people to use writing, film and photography to respond creatively to global challenges.

2012 marks the Diamond Jubilee of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and her 60th year as Head of the Commonwealth. To celebrate this very special occasion, for one year only, all entries into our Young Commonwealth Competitions will become part of the world’s biggest history project, the Commonwealth Jubilee Time Capsule. Take part in our competitions in 2012 and your entry will join 22,000 others – one for each day that Her Majesty has been Head of the Commonwealth – in the Capsule. Your memories - the untold stories of millions of ordinary and extraordinary lives - are the story of the modern Commonwealth.

Young Commonwealth Competitions

In 2012, all our competitions will be based on the Commonwealth theme, ‘Connecting Cultures’. All entries must relate to a single day in the last 60 years since Her Majesty ascended to the throne on 6th February 1952. All entries must be your own original work. Every year, over 50,000 young people take part in this prestigious awards scheme. Our Young Commonwealth Competitions come with some great prizes, and in 2012 you’ll be eligible for Jubilee Time Capsule prizes too!

DEADLINE for all competitions: 1ST MAY 2012

Run by the RCS since 1883, this is the world’s oldest and largest schools’ writing competition. To enter, you must be aged 18 or under on 1st May 2012. You must also be a national of, or living in, a Commonwealth country. On the first page of your entry, please write your name, age, topic number and the date you have chosen to write about.

How do I enter? To enter the essay competition, you must pick a day between 6th February 1952 and the present. Then, using one of the topics in the grey box as your inspiration, tell us about what happened on that day. You might like to think about why that day was important to you, your family, or your community. The event must not be fictional, but we encourage you to be creative in the way you share the story.
commonwealth essay competition

Pick a day From 6th February 1952 to the present.

Then, using one of the topics below, tell us about what happened!

1. The day I wore my best clothes.
2. A feast or a festival.
3. An interview with an adult about a significant day in their life.
4. A day's journey.
5. A birth OR a wedding OR a funeral.
6. My response to an event that made the news headlines.
7. A sporting event.
8. The day I met my hero/heroine.

How long should my essay be? If you are aged between 14 and 18 on 1st May 2012, please write between 1,200 and 1,750 words. If you are aged under 14 on 1st May 2012, please write between 300 and 700 words.

PRIZES

Thousands of young people from around the world enter every year, but the winners are often those picking up a camera or putting pen to paper for the first time. What we look for is a creative spark, a unique insight or a bold idea.

In 2012, all essays, photos and films will be entered into the Jubilee Time Capsule. For one year only, your chance of winning a prize is doubled!

By entering the Young Commonwealth Competitions, you could:

• See your Jubilee Time Capsule entry presented to Her Majesty the Queen in 2012.
• Win a certificate, cash or photographic equipment.
• Win resources for your school.
• Be flown to London.
• Be invited to meet famous authors, film directors and photographers; take part in expert workshops to learn new skills; and do work experience at international organisations.
• See your entry exhibited around the Commonwealth and featured in worldwide media.

How to submit your entries

Online: Please upload your entries to www.thercs.org/youth/competitions

By post: Each postal entry must be accompanied by an entry form

Directly to us: FAO Young Commonwealth Competitions, 25 Northumberland Avenue, London, WC2N 5AP, UK

Americas/Caribbean: FAO Young Commonwealth Competitions, The British Council, 19 St. Clair Avenue, St. Clair, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago

Africa: FAO Young Commonwealth Competitions, Baobab College, PO Box 350099, Chilanga, Zambia. OR, FAO Young Commonwealth Competitions, The British High Commission, P.O Box 296, Accra, Ghana

Asia: FAO Young Commonwealth Competitions, The British High Commission, 185 Jalan Ampang, 50450 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Pacific: FAO Young Commonwealth Competitions, The British High, Commission, PO Box 1812, Wellington 6140, New Zealand

CONTACT INFORMATION:

For inquiries: youth@thercs.org

For submissions: click here

Website: http://www.thercs.org/

 

 

PUB: Audio Submission Guidelines - The Missouri Review Audio

The Missouri Review’s 

5th Annual Audio Contest

$1,000 first prize in each category!

Winners and select runners up will be featured on our website and on our iTunes podcast. Select runners up also receive cash prizes. All entrants receive a one-year, digital subscription to The Missouri Review.

Winners will be selected in collaboration with guest judge Julie Shapiro.

Check out last year’s winners here.

Postmark Deadline: March 15, 2012

Categories 

Poetry

Poets are encouraged to enter an original poem or collection of poems for this category. Entries should not exceed 10 minutes total and may be solely author-read or contain other voices, tracks of sound, or music. Entries that exceed the 10-minute limit may be disqualified.

Judging will be based on the following criteria: literary merit, technical proficiency, and how the author uses audio media to further the literary strength of his or her piece.

Time: 10 minutes or less.
First Prize: $1,000

Prose

Writers may enter a short story, narrative essay, or other form of literary prose. For this category we are not interested in academic essays or purely journalistic writing/reportage. Entries—not to exceed 10 minutes when read aloud—may be solely author-read or contain other voices, tracks of sound, or music. Entries that exceed the 10-minute limit may be disqualified.

Judging will be based on the following criteria: literary merit, technical proficiency, and how the author uses audio media to further the literary strength of his or her piece.

Time: 10 minutes or less.
First Prize: $1,000

Audio Documentary

Entries should be audio only (no video). We are interested in short documentaries on any subject. Documentaries can be presented in a variety of forms, including narrative, interview, or documentary play. Entries will be judged on strength of the script and subject, ability to meet their objective (stated or unstated, i.e. a comedic short that’s funny, or an artist interview that is informative, fresh and insightful), and technical facility (including sound, reporting, presenting and/or acting).

Time: 10 minutes or less. Entries that exceed the 10-minute limit may be disqualified.
First Prize: $1,000

 

 Contest Guidelines


Entry Fee: In an effort to expand our contest, entry fees (previously $20) are now payable by donation. We ask only that you contribute what you feel is fair, keeping in mind that literary journals, and contests, cost money to run and that your contribution includes a one-year, digital subscription to The Missouri Review. All of your donation money goes directly to support the continued production of The Missouri Review and its programs.

Postmark Deadline: March 15, 2012

Multiple entries are welcome, accompanied by separate payment for each title you wish to have considered.

Technical Requirements: Entries may be submitted electronically or sent by postal mail. Emailed submissions should be in MP3 format only. Mailed entries should be sent on CD only. CDs should not contain any audio other than entry material. Include a brief program synopsis and bio of the writer/producer.

Mailed Submissions Must Include

  • a completed entry form for each entry (download the entry form)
  • a copy of the entry on a CD, labeled with writer/ producer, title and length
  • a brief program synopsis and short writer/producer bio
  • a donation as entry fee (make checks out to The Missouri Review)

Send Entries To
The Missouri Review Audio Competition
357 McReynolds Hall
University of Missouri
Columbia, MO 65211

Emailed Submissions Must Include

  • a subject line with author last name, category, title of entry
  • a completed entry form as an email attachment (download the form, and save it to your computer).
  • an attached MP3 file, containing your contest entry. File should be saved in this format:

author last name_entry title

  •  a brief program synopsis and short writer/producer bio in body of email
  • a donation as entry fee. Click here to make online payment.
    • Type the amount (in U.S. dollars) that you wish to donate in the “Cost” field and then click update to confirm the amount. Once the amount has been updated, click submit to pay via credit card.
  • Please send a separate email for each entry submitted.

Send Entries To: TMR.Contest.Editor@gmail.com

For More Information: E-mail us at: MUTMRcontestquestion@missouri.edu

 

PUB: Call for Papers: African Literature Special Session (RMMLA Convention, CO) > Writers Afrika

Call for Papers:

African Literature Special Session

(RMMLA Convention, CO)

 

Deadline: 1 March 2012

For years, African writers such as Chinua Achebe, J. M. Coetzee, Athol Fugard, Ousmane Sembène, Ama Ata Aidoo and Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie have contributed a unique global perspective on diverse topics such as colonialism, oppression, and the cultural and historical identity of Africa.

This panel seeks papers which discuss the unique perceptions of these and other influential African authors, and how the authors’ views provide readers with an intimate, firsthand view of African living. Topics could include but are not limited to: postcolonialism, ethnicity and national identity, cultural studies and historical approaches and gender studies.

Please submit abstracts of 250-500 words to Keli Rowley (kelly.rowley.16@my.csun.edu) by March 1, 2012.

CONTACT INFORMATION:

For inquiries: kelly.rowley.16@my.csun.edu; keliayr@hotmail.com; kbrooks@usc.edu

For submissions: kelly.rowley.16@my.csun.edu; keliayr@hotmail.com; kbrooks@usc.edu

Website: http://rmmla.wsu.edu/

 

 

VIDEO: Ari Aster's "The Strange Thing About The Johnsons" Is Short Film Gold > Shadow and Act

Watch Now:

Ari Aster's

"The Strange Thing

About The Johnsons"

Is Short Film Gold

Features by Emmanuel Akitobi | November 20, 2011

 

I woke up early this morning and did my usual web surfing before I had to head out, just like I do most Sunday mornings.  Still somewhat sleepy, I wasn't looking for anything in particular; just something entertaining enough to provide a slight jolt of energy.  What I actually found (on WorldStarHipHop.com, of all places--shout out to them), writer/director Ari Aster's The Strange Thing About The Johnsons, woke me the hell up.

 

From what I've been able to gather, this film has traveled the festival circuit for a while now, so it may be old news to some readers.  But if you're like me, and this is brand new to you, I promise you that you're in for a somewhat uncomfortable, yet thrilling piece of cinematic mastery.  Billy Mayo, Angela Bullock, Brandon Greenhouse, Carlon Jeffery, and Daniele Watts all give impressive performances in the film's lead roles.

 

Without giving away too much of the short film's story, I'll say that The Strange Thing About The Johnsons deals with an undoubtedly, mostly unheard-of dynamic of contemporary-family life.

 

Neither the writer/director, nor the creative team behind the film, are black (from what I can tell), but it has an all-black cast.  What's significant about that, you might ask?  Well, unlike films of a similar artistic and creative make-up that have come before The Strange Thing About The Johnsons,  this one doesn't have any racial dynamics in its plot.  This is color-blind casting at its finest, if you ask me.

 

Take a look at the trailer for The Strange Thing About The Johnsons before watching the film.  Then watch the film to see if its story turns out to be what you thought it would be.

 

UPDATE: S&A contacted the director, Ari Aster, and he answered a few of the question many readers had after watching The Strange Thing About The Johnsons.  Read his response HERE.

The Johnsons are an attractive, well-to-do, upper-middle class family. Sidney, husband and father, is a famous poet, known and adored for his kindness and sensitivity. Joan, wife and mother, is a dutiful housewife, an obsessive homemaker and the life of every party. Their son, Isaiah, is a charismatic young man who has just gotten married to an equally appealing young woman. In fact, there is only thing that separates the Johnsons from their charming friends and neighbors: Isaiah, the son, has been molesting Sidney, the father, since he was twelve years old. And what's more, Sidney has written a memoir that chronicles, in great detail, the ins-and-outs of this unseemly father-son relationship. Will the manuscript ever see the light of day, or will young Isaiah have a thing or two to say about it? THE STRANGE THING ABOUT THE JOHNSONS is a dark satire of the domestic melodrama, which asks "What if...?" and then, for some reason, comes up with an answer.

 

VIDEO: The Daily Show‘s Wyatt Cenac Sues PETA On Behalf Of Exploited Animals > Mediaite

Meee-OW:

The Daily Show‘s

Wyatt Cenac

Sues PETA On Behalf Of

Exploited Animals

PETA, everyone’s favorite animal rights group, is launching a new initiative to bring attention to the plight of enslaved and exploited celebrity sea mammals, and The Daily Show‘s Wyatt Cenac is totally on board. The group has filed a lawsuit against SeaWorld on behalf of five plaintiffs — Tiilikum, Katina, Corky, Kasatka and Ulises — accusing the water park of holding the orcas as slaves and arguing that they should be freed under the 13th Amendment.

You know, just like black slaves were freed from slavery here in the U.S. under the 13th Amendment. In fact, the whole situation reminds Cenac of the old orca spiritual. You know the one: “UUUUoooorrruouououopupipiiioooorrrgh!”

Civil rights activist Elaine Brown has called PETA’s actions racist. “If there is animal cruelty,” she said of the situation, “we want to talk about checking animal cruelty. But animal cruelty does not rise to slavery. Part of the slave condition was that blacks were not really [considered] human beings.”

PETA’s strategy is to point out to the court that the 13th Amendment makes no reference to “people” or “person” in writing and, as such, could also apply to animals. Which is brilliant, as Cenac notes, because it’s not like the Constitution includes any sort of language to indicate that, you know, it only applies to We the People.

Cenac did point out that PETA’s senior VP of communications Lisa Lange isn’t free from criticism either. She keeps a dog as a pet. On a leash. In her home. Can you imagine? “So,” Cenac asked, attempting to make sense of this injustice, “orcas are like the field niggers, and dogs and cats are the house niggers.” And he did what any compassionate, right-thinking freedom fighter would do and, through his lawyer, served Lange a lawsuit on behalf of the animals PETA is exploiting without consent or pay in their campaigns.

BOOM / ARF

Check it out, from Comedy Central:

 

ECONOMICS: How did Rwanda cut poverty so much? > latimes.com

How did Rwanda

cut poverty so much?

Photo: A view of a village near Murambi Technical School in Rwanda in 2004. Credit: Francine Orr / Los Angeles Times

 

This post has been corrected. See the note at the bottom for details.

The small African nation of Rwanda recently announced that it had cut poverty by 12% in six years, from 57% of its population to 45%. That equals roughly a million Rwandans emerging from poverty -- one of the most stunning drops in the world.

It's a remarkable achievement for Rwanda, which has emerged from civil war and a bloody ethnic genocide in the 1990s. How did it happen? The Times quizzed Paul Collier, director of the Center for the Study of African Economies at Oxford University, about the  numbers.

Are there any doubts that the drop is real?

No doubts; I know the economics professor who did the data analysis, and he is highly experienced and painstaking, so it is genuine.

How did Rwanda cut its poverty so much?

There were one or two helpful events, notably the rise in world coffee prices, which pumped money into the rural economy, but, of course, overall the global economy since 2005 has not provided an easy environment for success. Hence, most of the achievement is likely due to domestic policies.

Rwanda is the nearest that Africa gets to an East Asian-style “developmental state,” where the government gets serious about trying to grow the economy and where the president runs a tight ship within government built on performance rather than patronage.

There were strong supporting policies for the rural poor -- the “one cow” program [that distributed cows to poor households free of charge], which spread assets, and the improvements in health programs.

Alongside this, the economy was well managed, with inflation kept low, and the business environment improved, both of which helped the main city, Kigali, to grow. Growth in Kigali then spread benefits to rural areas -- the most successful rural districts were those closest to Kigali.

When you say well managed, what do you mean? What choices did the government make that were signs of good management?

Basically, [President Paul] Kagame built a culture of performance at the top of the civil service. Ministers were well paid, but set targets. If they missed the targets there were consequences. Each year, the government holds a whole-of-government retreat where these performances are reviewed: good performance rewarded, and poor performers required to explain themselves.

An example is the strategy to improve Rwanda's rating on the World Bank's “Doing Business” annual rating, where over the course of six years the country moved from around 140th to 60th in the world rankings. Each component of the ratings was assigned each year to an appropriate minister. So over time, a cadre of government officials has been built up who believe in their ability not just to strategize but to get things done.

What changes can you see now in Rwanda?

Some changes are obvious to the eye -- houses that now have tin roofs instead of thatch. Thatch may look prettier, but the world over, a decent roof is one of the first changes people make when they start the ascent out of poverty. Some of the changes are psychological -- a sense that things really can improve, and a sense that individual families can do something about their circumstances.

What can other countries learn from Rwanda -- or is its story so unique that it can't be copied?

They can learn a lot. If Rwanda can do this well, with all its disadvantages -- landlocked, legacy of conflict, no natural resources -- other African countries should be able to do even better.

Do you think Rwanda can continue to reduce poverty at the same rate in the coming years?

The government has now set its sights on getting the country to middle-income levels. This will require a change in the growth strategy. So far, growth has come primarily from doing better the things that Rwanda is doing already. To reach middle income, new activities will need to be introduced and the economy diversified. Rwanda needs pioneer investors and aid to support them with public infrastructure; I hope that it gets them. If it does, then, yes, poverty can continue to fall fast.

[For the Record, 7:59 a.m., Feb. 16: In an earlier version of the post, the Rwandan capital of Kigali was incorrectly spelled as Kigale.”]

 

-- Emily Alpert in Los Angeles