INTERVIEW + VIDEO: Spike Lee - Interview, Rant & Review

Interview: SPIKE LEE

Spike Lee sat down with The Hollywood Reporter during his stay in L.A., where he's getting ready for the premiere of his highly anticipated next film Red Hook Summer, which we've talked about on this site quite a few times. Red Hook Summer, about a young man from Atlanta who stays with his preacher grandfather in Brooklyn for the summer, is Lee's first Sundance Film Fest premiere of any of his films; the film screens in a couple of days on January 22nd.

Lee spoke about the problem of Hollywood studios not greenlighting films with mostly black casts, the state of independent black cinema and black cinema in general (topics we've talked about on the site ad nauseam), and his projects in the horizon, which include an adaptation of the Korean thriller OldBoy and a first time collaboration with Eddie Murphy.

The biggest problem of Hollywood not greenlighting black films as far as Lee is concerned? Well, there's no people of color with a greenlight vote!

As for Spike Lee's favorite film of year?? The honor goes to the much talked about sex addiction drama Shame by Steve McQueen.:-)

Here's the full interview below:

THE HOLLYWOOD REPORTER: So this is your first trip to Sundance as a feature director but not your first time with a film in the festival?
Spike Lee: Yes. I came for the first time with the Broadway musical film Passing Strange in 2009. I had a really good conversation with Robert Redford that year. He was 100 percent cool.

THR: What was the genesis of Red Hook?
Lee: [Co-writer and novelist] James McBride and I are dear friends. We worked together on Miracle at St. Anna. And we had breakfast one morning at Viand, the best coffee shop in New York, at 61st and Madison, across from Barneys. We were talking about the state of cinema, the state of black cinema, how frustrated I was that I couldn't get the sequel to Inside Man made -- my biggest hit ever.

THR: Why couldn't you get the sequel made?
Lee: You'd have to speak to some other people about that. Anyway, I'd just bought this Sony camera, an F3, and I said, "We've got the means and ways and have to make do. We have to make it happen." We just started talking about stories we wanted to tell. He's from Brooklyn too -- Red Hook, in fact -- so we co-wrote the script.

THR: Is the film autobiographical for either of you?
Lee: A little. The church where we filmed is the one James' parents founded, the New Brown Memorial Baptist Church.

THR: Aside from Clarke Peters, who has appeared on The Wire and Treme, the cast is made up of mostly unknowns. How did you go about assembling the talent?
Lee: I got the best people I could find. I auditioned all over New York City. Also, there is a school in my old Fort Green neighborhood called Ronald Edmonds. I went there, same junior high, but the name has  been changed. And there is an acting teacher there, Edward Robinson, a great teacher -- they always have great kids. I started hanging out in the class. That's where I first saw Jules Brown, who plays Flick, and Toni Lysaith, who plays Chaz.

THR: In terms of the budget, you're revealing only that it was "SAG Low Budget Agreement" (which per 2011 standards  puts it between $625,000 and 937,500). What was the most difficult part of making the film?
Lee: I financed it myself, so we had to do it for a price.  I just went to the bank, made some draws and wrote some checks! It was very hard, but we made the movie we wanted to make.

THR: Is the film, as many are saying, a return to your roots after more commercial projects like Inside Man and St. Anna?
Lee: I am trying to stay away from this position of me "returning to my roots." As if my roots are that I'm only comfortable working on low-budget, small films. That's not the case at all. I think if people looked at my body of work, they'd see a great breadth of work. (Long pause.) But the fact remains that Hollywood does sequels and prequels. What was it, Mission: Impossible 5 just now?

THR: Four.
Lee: Right, four. So it was inconceivable to me that we couldn't get a sequel made to Inside Man. I don't blame Hollywood -- I was naive. Forgive me, I was naive. It was my biggest hit. And we couldn't get a sequel made? I was f--ing naive. It was like it didn't even happen.

THR: But who specifically made the decision not to move forward with a sequel?
Lee: Brian Grazer at Imagine? Donna Langley at Universal? You'd have to do some research. Look, I'm not crying over spilt milk or pointing fingers or playing the blame game. We are all grown-ups here. You asked me questions, and I can't speak for other people. [Editor's note: Calls placed to Grazer's office were referred to Universal, which did not immediately return a request for comment.]

THR: OK, on to another topic. There have been a few standout offerings from black filmmakers in the past year, Dee Rees' Pariah and Steve McQueen's Shame among them. Do you think opportunities for black directors have improved or worsened since you started making movies in the 1980s?
Lee: Shame is a great film; it's my favorite film of the year. And Dee was a student of mine at NYU graduate film school. I'm an executive producer of Pariah. Anyway, I think there have been some improvements and some steps taken back. But overall, the variety of films being offered to African-American audiences is not where it was 10, 15 years ago. It's very narrow.

THR: But doesn't Tyler Perry's huge commercial success suggest that at least a good portion of that audience is being served?
Lee: It's not the same. I just feel the audience doesn't have as many choices as it did back in the day.

THR: Do you think it's more that the content is not being written, or it's simply not being greenlighted, or both?
Lee: Look, take away the big stars -- Will Smith and Denzel -- and look at the people who have a greenlight vote. Where are the people of color? That's what it comes down to. How many people, when they have those meetings and vote on what movies get made, how many people of color are in those meetings? That's not to say that's the only way to get a film made, but you're talking about Hollywood specifically here. And if you want to get a Hollywood film made, it has to get greenlit. And I want someone to tell me: Who is a person of color who has a greenlight vote in this industry today? Some can argue, "Will Smith doesn't need the vote." Well, if Will wants to do the phone book, they still have to vote on it! He's not writing the check. Someone still has to write the check for what Will wants to do. I'm talking about the people sitting in the room who have read the script -- looking at the full package, who's in it, how much is it going to cost, how much is it going to make. The people who have that vote, there are no people of color who have that. And people are going to be in trouble. The U.S. Census has said white Americans are going to be a minority in this country by 2040. I just think it's good business sense to plan for that! The country is changing, and some people just don't want to understand that. I don't know how you can't take that into account. The smart people are going to take that number into account of how they do business.

THR: Hollywood has a tough time looking more than a few years out.
Lee: Yeah, it does. Look, I'm not using this interview to slam Hollywood. I'm just saying, I want to know: Who is a black person in Hollywood who has that vote? If you ask a studio, they aren't going to tell you.

THR: The only black executive I can think of offhand with definitive power in the film business is Vanessa Murchison at Fox Animation.
Lee: Let's leave animation out of it. (Laughs.) Let's stick to live action. Forgive me, I do know her, and she does have great power at Fox, though. But I'm talking about live-action features.

THR: George Lucas appeared Jan. 9 on The Daily Show to promote his Tuskegee Airmen action-drama Red Tails and said the studios he approached had no clue how to market a "black action movie." How do you feel about this?
Lee: Yeah, I was at the premiere. Here's the thing: One of the reasons the studios don't know how to market the film is that they have no black people in the marketing departments! At least any people with say-so. Again, this is bigger than just a marketing problem. What about the greenlight committee? That's the bigger issue. That's the heart of the matter. This is not a revelation; this is truth.

THR: Well, it was certainly novel that a white person in Hollywood, especially someone of Lucas' stature, would be so public on this particular topic.
Lee: Well, George Lucas got "f-- you" money. (Laughs.) They're not going to mess with him. In any case, I watch football, and the Red Tails commercials are hot. The commercials are definitely running on TV.

THR: Looking at the most successful movie of the year to feature black talent, The Help, why do you think the film was able to transcend racial boundaries and be both a commercial and critical hit?
Lee: OK, let me ask you a question: Why did Driving Miss Daisy win best picture in 1989? That's my answer.

THR: So you're saying they're both period films in which the black actors portray servants?
Lee: Stacey, Stacey, Stacey. That's my answer [above]. I don't need to elaborate.

THR: Besides Shame, are there other movies or TV shows you've seen recently that blew you away?
Lee: Yeah, I loved Attack the Block; it's a British indie film starring John Boyega, who is also the lead in this pilot I shot for HBO: The Brick, with Doug Ellin from Entourage.

THR: You're also slated to direct HBO's film about former D.C. Mayor Marion Barry with Eddie Murphy. How is it that you and Eddie have never worked together?
Lee: I know. Never! We've talked about it for many years. We were never able to come up with something we both could agree on. Hanging out together is going to be a motherf--er! (Laughs.)

THR: You've never shied away from politics in your films. How does the current landscape make you feel about being black in America?
Lee: Look, I support the president. In fact, my wife [attorney Tonya Lewis Lee] and I are having a fund-raising dinner [on Jan. 19] for Obama at our house on the Upper East Side. We got the call directly from the White House.

THR: Back to Red Hook Summer. How long was your shoot?
Lee: Nineteen days. Roughly three six-day weeks.

THR: That's fast. Was the schedule the toughest part of the production?
Lee: She's Gotta Have It was 12 days. (Laughs.) So, no.

THR: Do you prefer that guerrilla pace of filmmaking?
Lee: One of the great things about African-Americans is that we've always had this attitude: We make do with what we got. It comes from our ancestors being slaves. You can't bitch and moan about what you don't got. It's, "What can you do with what you got?" I've got a minimum amount of money; that dictates the shooting days. And James and I wrote the script. It takes place in Red Hook, and we shot everything within a 10-block radius. We gotta make do with what we got.

THR: Is it true that you reprise your role of Mookie from Do the Right Thing in Red Hook?
Lee: Yeah, but he's not the focus.

THR: So it's present-day Mookie as an older man?
Lee: Yes, much older. (Laughs.) 

THR: How has your storytelling style changed since you made Do the Right Thing?
Lee: Hopefully I'm better.

THR: What do you think is your signature as a filmmaker?
Lee: Well, I have a signature shot. I like people to look like they're floating. But as a filmmaker? I think it's easy to look at Do the Right ThingMalcolm XJungle Fever and say, "Spike only deals with themes of race." And I think that's just from someone who's lazy, who hasn't seen the films or gone to IMDb to look at the body of work! It takes 10 seconds.

THR: On the subject of the Web, how much, if at all, do you use social media to promote yourself?
Lee: I'm on Twitter. It's fun.

THR: What have you learned about your fans from being on the site?
Lee: They're waiting for the next movie. I have 150,000 followers. I started tweeting on my birthday last year, March 20.

THR: Do you find you get criticized as much as praised?
Lee: Oh yeah. "Spike! The Knicks f--ing suck! Yankees suck! New York sucks! You suck the big one, Spike!" But I just block those people.

THR: You're now working on an English-language version of the Korean thriller Oldboy, starring Josh Brolin and Clive Owen. Is there another project you're hoping to tackle someday?
Lee: I'd love to do a musical with Prince, Stevie Wonder or Kanye [West]. That wouldn't all be one movie! They're my dream collaborators.

THR: Is there anything else you'd like to add about Red Hook Summer before Sundance?
Lee: We're looking forward to sharing something with the world. And if God is willing and the creek don't rise, we'll have a distributor and a summer release. As the great Jets linebacker Bart Scott has been quoted as saying, "Can't wait."

 

__________________________

 

 

 

Watch Spike Lee's

Infamous Rant At Sundance


VIDEO BY SERGIO | JANUARY 25, 2012

 

 

Well this sure has been Spike Lee Week this week on S & A hasn't it?

The other day I posted an item about Spike Lee's notorious angry rant after the screening of Red Hook Summer at Sundance that has gotten a lot of attention by media, and has been the buzz on Twitter or Facebook everywhere. Even Spike yesterday publicly apologized for the rant even saying that his wife was furious at him.

But someone at the event taped the whole 20 minute Q and A (and in HD too) so you can see for yourself and decide if it was all the big shocking event that it was claimed to be.

 

>via: http://blogs.indiewire.com/shadowandact/watch-spike-lees-infamous-rant-at-sun...

 

__________________________

 

 

James McBride

(Co-Writer Of "Red Hook Summer")

Pens Open Letter Addressing

Spike Lee/Sundance Fuss


FEATURESBY TAMBAY | JANUARY 26, 2012

Several people, including the folks at 40 Acres, sent this to me this morning; and I've since noticed that it's been traveling the web, usually with lots of "hoo-hah" accompanying it by those sharing it, as well as within the comments that follow.

Spike Lee's co-writer of Red Hook SummerJames McBride (who also penned the script for Miracle At St Anna) took it upon himself to address critical reactions to Red Hook Summer, as well as Spike's post-screening premiere *chat* that's also been passed around quite a bit.

McBride wrote a letter to Hollywood, and I suppose the rest of us titled “Being a Maid," in which he essentially decries the state of things in Hollywood where black people are concerned, and the challenges Spike faced in gettingRed Hook Summer made, comparisons to George Lucas and Red Tails, and more.

In it, he says things that we've already talked about ad naseam on S&A, notably the same old Hollywood doesn't care about black people lament that we've heard over and over and over again; and to which I always respond, over and over and over again, so what do we do now?

McBride also addresses the attention black people gave to George Lucas's statement about Hollywood not wanting to fund the movie because of its all-black cast, and all the "support Red Tails or black cinema will die" chants we all read and heard leading up to the film's release. McBride compares that to reactions to when Spike makes similar comments and isn't met with a similar fervent reaction.

If you recall my post, Yes, Support Red Tails; Just Don't Forget Spike Lee, AFFRM & The Black Indie Film Movement, you'll remember that I pretty much made a similar case, wondering whether Red Hook Summer would get a similar push, since Spike also funded the movie himself, much like Lucas did for Red Tails; and in my review of the film, I made the following statement addressing Lucas' comment about Hollywood not financing the movie because of its all-black cast: "Maybe because it came from the mouth of a white man, and we all somehow felt like our plight had been validated - like that would make much of a difference in that plight anyway." My point being that we (black people) have been saying that shit for decades now, but it's never really been followed with as much excitment as there was over Lucas' statement.

McBride also throws a few grenades, like taking a swipe at folks like us here on S&A, saying "Within minutes, the internet lit up with burning personal criticism of him stitched into negative reviews of “Red Hook Summer” by so-called film critics and tweeters." Maybe he wasn't speaking to S&A directly (my review of the film certainly didn't contain any of what he called "burning personal criticism," although it was a negative review; it was actually more like a plea to Spike to talk about what his intentions were for the film), but I'd say it's a bit presumptuous of McBride to jab the same people he probably expects will help his open letter reach readers (after all, 40 Acres, where the letter resides, sent it out to blog editors to read and share with their readers).

But I'll let you read the letter and judge for yourselves (or not).

Here are 2 of the more incendiary paragraphs from the piece:

But this kind of cultural war puts minority storytellers – Blacks, Asians, Latinos and people of color – at a distinct disadvantage. My friend Spike Lee is a clear example. Three days ago, at the premiere of Red Hook Summer at The Sundance Film Festival, Spike, usually a cool and widely accepting soul whose professional life is as racially diverse as any American I know– lost his cool for 30 seconds. When prompted by a question from Chris Rock who was seated in the audience, he blurted out a small, clear truth: He said one reason we did Red Hook Summer independently was because he could not get Hollywood to green light the follow-up to “Inside Man” – which cost only $45 million to make and grossed a whopping $184,376,240 million domestically and worldwide – plus another $37 million domestically on DVD sales. Within minutes, the internet lit up with burning personal criticism of him stitched into negative reviews of “Red Hook Summer” by so-called film critics and tweeters. I don’t mind negative reviews. That’s life in the big leagues. But it’s the same old double standard. The recent success of “Red Tails” which depicts the story of the all black Tuskegee Airmen, is a clear example. Our last film, “Miracle At St. Anna,” which paid homage to the all-black 92nd Division, which fought on the ground in Italy, was blasted before it even got out the gate. Maybe it’s a terrible film. Maybe it deserved to bomb. The difference is this: When George Lucas complained publicly about the fact that he had to finance his own film because Hollywood executives told him they didn’t know how to market a black film, no one called him a fanatic. But when Spike Lee says it, he’s a racist militant and a malcontent. Spike’s been saying the same thing for 25 years. And he had to go to Italy to raise money for a film that honors American soldiers, because unlike Lucas, he’s not a billionaire. He couldn’t reach in his pocket to create, produce, market, and promote his film like Lucas did with “Red Tails.”

But there’s a deeper, even more critical element here , because it’s the same old story: Nothing in this world happens unless white folks says it happens. And therein lies the problem of being a professional black storyteller– writer, musician, filmmaker. Being black is like serving as Hoke, the driver in “Driving Miss Daisy,” except it’s a kind of TV series lasts the rest of your life: You get to drive the well-meaning boss to and fro, you love that boss, your lives are stitched together, but only when the boss decides your story intersects with his or her life is your story valid. Because you’re a kind of cultural maid. You serve up the music, the life, the pain, the spirituality. You clean house. Take the kids to school. You serve the eggs and pour the coffee. And for your efforts the white folks thank you. They pay you a little. They ask about your kids. Then they jump into the swimming pool and you go home to your life on the outside, whatever it is. And if lucky you get to be the wise old black sage that drops pearls of wisdom, the wise old poet or bluesman who says ‘I been buked and scorned,’ and you heal the white folks, when in fact you can’t heal anybody. In fact, you’re actually as dumb as they are, dumber maybe, because you played into the whole business. Robbing a character of their full dimension, be it in fiction or non fiction, hurts everyone the world over. Need proof? Ask any Native American, Asian, Latino, Gay American, or so called white “hillbilly.” As if hillbillies don’t read books, and Asians don’t rap, and Muslims don’t argue about the cost of a brake job.

[...]

It was terrible lesson for a young man fresh out of college and I did my best to forget it. But I understand it then and I understand it now: This is what happens when you walk through a supermarket and hear muzak playing ninth chords borrowed from your history; when you see instructions books made from the very harmonic innovations you created, and in my case, when you spend a lifetime watching films that spoof your community. Your entire culture is boiled down to greasy gut bucket jokester films, pornographic bling-rap, or poverty porn.

So there ya have it; my question is still the same: so now what?

I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that I didn't get to talk to Spike, or the film's cast at Sundance this week while I was there; I never got an invite to RSVP for a slot to interview cast and/or crew (others apparently did); but I did get an invite to cover the red carpet premiere... but just the red carpet - you know, take pictures of the celebrities as they walk into the theater, and asked them superficial questions. I passed. I don't do red carpet. I don't see the point. But obviously I was good enough to cover the red carpet for S&A, but S&A obviously isn't good enough to get time with the film's cast and crew, even though other indieWIRE sites apparently did. The one site within the indieWIRE network that focuses on *black cinema* didn't get to talk to the black filmmaker and black cast of one of the most anticipated films (black films) screening at the festival.

Why? I don't know. I wasn't given a reason. Maybe I didn't make my request early enough? I don't know. So I'm just left to speculate.

I think we've been fair and balanced in our coverage of Spike and his films. There's been criticism certainly, but there's also beein praise; lots of it actually. And my review of Red Hook Summer was probably one of the least virulent.

But my request still stands; if Spike Lee (I'd rather get it directly from him) would be so kind to grant S&A an interview about Red Hook Summer, I'd love to talk to him about the film, the biz, the challenges he's faced, etc, etc, etc. 

In the meantime, you can read McBride's entire piece HERE.

 

__________________________

Spike Lee's 'Red Hook Summer'

Screened At Sundance

Offers A Nuanced Overview

Of African American Christianity

Spike Lee Red Hook Summer

By Dick Staub
Religion News Service

PARK CITY, Utah (RNS) I have a confession to make.

The only real reason I saw Spike Lee's new film at the Sundance Film Festival here is because it is set in the Red Hook section of Brooklyn, where my oldest daughter started her career in an elementary school with Teach for America.

Even though I think and write about religion for a living, I didn't attend "Red Hook Summer" because the program guide describes it as the story of a "firebrand preacher bent on getting (his grandson) to accept Jesus Christ as his personal savior."

After all, why would anyone expect a nuanced, respectful exploration of the black church in America from Spike Lee? Let's face it, the words "Spike Lee" and "theologian" don't roll off the tongue very easily, if at all.

So imagine my surprise when "Red Hook Summer" delivered a humorous, honest look at the vibrancy, complexity, sincerity and messiness of African-American Christianity.

The story begins with Flik, a teenager who attends a private school in Atlanta and enjoys the finer things of life. His life is turned upside down when his mother sends him off to Brooklyn for the summer to stay with his preacher grandfather, Enoch.

Flik is certainly unprepared for life in the projects, but is even less prepared for working every day at his grandfather's Little Piece of Heaven church. The only upside is meeting Chazz, a sassy teen who has learned to negotiate life on the streets of Red Hook with her life in the church.

She's a believer but not stuffy about it, and helps Flik get through the Sunday worship service, which is punctuated by Enoch's theatrical rants, the spirited "Amens!" of the congregation and the melodramatic sounds of the Hammond organ.

The heart of this film is grandpa Enoch. As the story begins we get hints that Enoch is a man with a past, and it reaches its dramatic climax when we realize that though Enoch is done with his past, his past is not done with him.

Clarke Peters (Det. Lester Freamon from "The Wire") in the role of Enoch delivers a textured, multi-layered performance that does for the role of a black pastor what Robert Duvall did for revivalists in "The Apostle." These characters are believable, complicated and likable.

At the Q&A following the film, it was obvious that I wasn't the only one surprised that Lee delivered a thoughtful, respectful and savvy film about religion. The first audience question was about Lee's personal religious background. He never attended church as a boy in Brooklyn, he explained, although some summers he was sent to stay with relatives in Atlanta who made sure he did.

Suffice it to say that church and religion have not played a central role in Lee's life.

So what is the source of the film's religious content? To answer that question, Lee introduced his co-author on the script, James McBride, and the richness of the film immediately made complete sense.

I interviewed McBride in Chicago in the 1990's about his best-selling book "The Color of Water." It was an autobiographical account of his Jewish mother who converted to Christianity and, with her husband, founded the church where "Red Hook Summer" was filmed.

McBride talked about his belief in God and Jesus, and said his faith was renewed and strengthened during the writing and making of the film. He also talked about spirited debates with Lee about certain scenes where McBride's desire to respect religion collided with Lee's determination to keep it gritty and real. It was a productive tension, and it worked.

I still find it fascinating that Lee would make a film about religion, and that he teamed up with McBride to do it. Sundance is all about telling stories, and "Red Hook Summer" tells a center-stage story about the importance of religion.

(Dick Staub is author of "About You: Fully Human and Fully Alive" and the host of The Kindlings Muse (www.thekindlings.com). His blog can be read at www.dickstaub.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VIDEO: The Top 7 American Writers of the 20th Century > Blog of AALBC.com's Founder & Webmaster

The Top 7 American Writers

of the 20th Century

AALBC.com Founder, Troy Johnson on James Baldwin

I had the pleasure of speaking in a couple of the short video biographies, on American novelists, created by Bio.com, which is part of the  A+E Television Networks.  I spoke briefly about James Baldwin and Langston Hughes.

There were several more videos created.  I’ve posted a seven of them below — hence the title of this article.

James Baldwin
http://www.aalbc.com/authors/james.htm

James Baldwin’s written works made him an important spokesman of the Civil Rights Movement. His essays explored the black experience in America and his novel,”Giovanni’s Room,” was one of the first to tackle homosexuality.

Langston Hughes
http://www.aalbc.com/authors/james.htm

Langston Hughes was the leading voice of the Harlem Renaissance, showcasing the dignity and the beauty in ordinary black life. The hours he spent in Harlem clubs affected his work, making him one of the innovators of Jazz Poetry.

Toni Morrison
http://www.aalbc.com/authors/toni.htm

Toni Morrison is the first woman to receive the Nobel Prize in Literature. Her novels include “The Bluest Eye,” “Sula,” and “Beloved.”

Harper Lee
http://aalbc.com/reviews/hey_boo.html

In 1961, Harper Lee became the only author to win the Pulitzer Prize for her first and only novel, “To Kill a Mockingbird.”

Jack Kerouac

As a writer and pioneer of the Beat Generation, Jack Kerouac epitomized the era of sex, drugs, and jazz. His novel “On the Road,” which he wrote in a three-week bender of writing frenzy, became the bible of the countercultural generation.

John Steinbeck

John Steinbeck gave voice to working class America. In 1939, he reported on migrant farm workers for the San Francisco Chronicle, providing the basis for his Pulitzer Prize-winning novel, “The Grapes of Wrath.”

Kurt Vonnegut

Kurt Vonnegut’s blend of black comedy and wild imagination in works such as “Slaughterhouse-Five” and “Cat’s Cradle” made him one of the most loved writers of all time.

All of the videos are posted here are provided courtesy of A+E Television Networks, LLC.  © 2012 All Rights Reserved.

via aalbc.com

 

LITERATURE: VIVA CHE

Book Parties

Viva la Book Party!

A Soiree for Che

By Emily Witt

In 1995, Michael Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, filed a Freedom of Information Act request for documents about the C.I.A.’s involvement in the death of Che Guevara in Bolivia. Years passed — 16 of them — and Mr. Ratner forgot that he had ever sent the letter. But he was still living in the same apartment and one day some documents from the government began trickling in through the mail. With new information he now says definitively dispels “the myth that the United States was not involved in the order to kill Che,” Mr. Ratner decided to write a small book, joining forces with another attorney, Michael Steven Smith, to produce Who Killed Che? How the C.I.A. Got Away with Murder.

On Thursday night their publisher, independent outfit OR Books, held a party to celebrate the book’s publication at the somewhat unusual venue of the Cuban Mission to the United Nations. Guests passed by a giant portrait of Fidel and a smaller photograph of Che speaking at the United Nations on their way to check their coats. Upstairs in a capacious event space, bartenders served mojitos to a soundtrack of Cuban jazz.

OR Books co-founder Colin Robinson had hand-painted a banner that read “Free the Cuban Five” himself. “This is independent publishing!” he said, proudly surveying his work. He acknowledged that it was now, technically, the Cuban Four (one of the accused spies was recently released from jail). “But he’s still trapped in Florida,” he explained. Mr. Robinson recalled the last time he had a party at the mission, on the occasion of celebrating Fidel Castro’s autobiography, My Life, published while he was still an editor at Scribner.

Michaels Ratner and Smith were jubilant about their reception, which came only one day after a paradigm-changing new law in Cuba that allows the sale of private property. Indeed, even C.I.A. assassinations have changed since the covert days of “plausible deniability” during the Cold War. “Now they brag about them,” lamented Mr. Ratner.

After a short speech by the Cuban ambassador and an amplified phone call from Ricardo Alarcón, the president of the Cuban National Assembly (who also wrote an introduction for the book) the authors took a moment to thank their guests.

“We came here straight from Zuccotti Park,” said Michael Steven Smith. “It’s like going from one free territory in America to another.”

“As we say in Havana,” said Michael Ratner, “Venceremos!”

__________________________

 

Who Killed Che?

HOW THE CIA GOT AWAY WITH MURDER

Michael Ratner and Michael Steven Smith

With an Introduction by Ricardo Alarcón, President of the Cuban National Assembly

“Ratner and Smith cut through the lies and distortions to provide a riveting and thoroughly documented history of the murder of Che Guevara. In an era when ‘targeted assassinations’ and ‘capture and kill operations’ have become routine, and are routinely glorified by the mainstream U.S. press, their examination of the U.S. role in Che Guevara’s death could not be more timely.” —Amy Goodman, host and executive producer, Democracy Now!/democracynow.org

BUY THIS BOOK

paperback: $16/£11
ebook: $10/£7
print + ebook: $20/£14

ABOUT THE BOOK

In compelling detail two leading U.S. civil rights attorneys recount the extraordinary life and deliberate killing of the world’s most storied revolutionary: Ernesto Che Guevara. Michael Ratner and Michael Steven Smith survey the extraordinary trajectory of Che’s career, from an early politicization recounted in theMotorcycle Diaries, through meetings with his compañero Fidel Castro in Mexico, his vital role in the Cuban revolution, and his expeditions abroad to Africa and Latin America. But their focus is on Che’s final days in Bolivia where, after months of struggle to spread the revolution begun in Havana, Che is wounded, captured and, soon after, executed. Bound and helpless, Che’s last words to his killer, a soldier in the Bolivian Army, are “Remember, you are killing a man.”

 

Referencing internal U.S. government documentation, much of it never before published, Ratner and Smith bring their forensic skills as attorneys to analyze the evidence and present an irrefutable case that the CIA not only knew of and approved the execution, but was instrumental in making it happen. Cables from the agency disavowing any U.S. role in the murder were merely attempts to provide plausible deniability for the Johnson administration.

 

The spirit of Che Guevara, as an icon and an inspiration, is as vibrant today as it ever was. News photographs of democracy protestors in the Middle East carrying his image have circulated the world in recent months. For anyone drawn to his remarkable life and its violent, unlawful end, Who Killed Che ? will engage, anger and educate.

 

Publication November 15th 2011 • 160 pages with b/w illustration throughout
paperback ISBN 978-1-935928-49-2 • ebook ISBN 978-1-935928-50-8

 

 

 

 

WOMEN: Audre Lorde

My hero:

Audre Lorde

by Jackie Kay


 

'Lorde was openly lesbian before the gay movement existed. Her wise words often seem eerily prescient'

 

 

BY JACKIE KAY

 

guardian.co.uk, Friday 18 November 2011

    Refusal to be defined by single categories: Lorde in 1983. Photograph: Robert Alexander/Getty Images

     

    Audre Lorde dropped the y from Audrey when she was still a child so she could be Audre Lorde. She liked the symmetry of the es at the end. She was born in New York City in 1934 to immigrants from Grenada. She didn't talk till she was four and was so short-sighted she was legally blind. She wrote her first poem in eighth grade. The Black Unicorn, her most unified collection of poems, partly describes a tricky relationship with her mother. "My mother had two faces and a frying pot / where she cooked up her daughters / into girls … My mother had two faces / and a broken pot /where she hid out a perfect daughter /who was not me."

    Lorde was openly lesbian before the gay movement existed. Her wise words often seem eerily prescient. "Sometimes we are blessed with being able to choose the time and the arena, and the manner of our revolutions, but more usually we must do battle where we are standing." Back in the 70s and 80s Lorde's was an important and singular voice: "I began to ask each time: 'What's the worst that could happen to me if I tell this truth?' Unlike women in other countries, our breaking silence is unlikely to have us jailed, 'disappeared' or run off the road at night … our speaking out will permit other women to speak, until laws are changed and lives are saved and the world is altered for ever."

    I first met Audre in 1984, when I was 22. She told me her grandfather had been Scottish, and that I didn't need to choose between being Scottish and being black. "You can be both. You can call yourself an Afro Scot," she said in her New York drawl. Lorde was Whitman-like in her refusal to be confined to single categories. She was large. She contained multitudes.

    After her mastectomy, she chose not to have prosthesis, opting for asymmetry instead, and wore one dangling earring and one stud for unequal measure. From the little girl who loved those matching es, she'd come not exactly full circle but a revolution and a half.

     

    __________________________

     

    Berlinale 2012 Preview


    "Audre Lorde -


    The Berlin Years 1984 to 1992"

     


     

    FESTIVALS BY TAMBAY | JANUARY 26, 2012

     

     

    Scheduled to make its world premiere in the Panorama Documentary section is Dagmar Shultz's Audre Lorde - The Berlin Years 1984 to 1992 is an untold chapter (the Berlin years) of the late writer, poet and activist, Caribbean child of immigrants from Grenada, who died rather young at 58 years old in 1992.

    Specifically, the film will focus on...

    Audre Lorde's years in Berlin in which she catalyzed the first movement of Black Germans to claim their identity as Afro-Germans with pride. As she was inspiring Afro-Germans she was also encouraging the White German feminists to look at their own racism

    The film will serve as a historical document for future generations of Germans, which profiles and highlights, from the roots, the African presence in Germany, and the origins of the anti-racist movement before and after the German reunification, as well as facillitates an analysis and an understanding of present debates on identity and racism in Germany.

    The film can be considered a companion piece to the1994 documentary A Litany for Survival: The Life and Work of Audre Lorde by Ada Gray Griffin and Michelle Parkerson, which also screened at the Berlin Film Festival.

     

    No footage to look at yet though; but it's on my watch list.

     >via: http://blogs.indiewire.com/shadowandact/berlinale-2012-preview-audre-lorde-th... 

     

     

     

     

    INTERVIEW + PHOTO ESSAY: Happy Birthday Angela Davis

    Classic Material:

    Happy Birthday Angela Davis

     

    Barry Callaghan Interviews Angela Davis in California Prison, 1970.

     

    __________________________

    HAPPY BIRTHDAY ANGELA

     

    blokkmovement:

    Happy Bday Angela!

    Activist, Scholar, Writer, Professor and FBI’s most wanted

    When Angela Davis strode on the political stage with her fist raised high and her iconic Afro standing higher, people noticed. She is a rebel and a revolutionary, a bookish philosopher who has lived out her theories with action and purpose.

    Smart, stylish, eloquent and fearless, Davis never lets her style get in the way of the substance. Her life’s work has been built around issues of race, community and the criminal justice system. In the 70s, she was involved with The Black Panthers, but much of her energy was focused on what she termed the Prison-Industrial Complex, the systematic privatization of prisons as profit-making machines. This means the more people in prison, the more lucrative the business. Hence, the absurd increase in men (mostly poor, young, black) sent to U.S prisons in the last two decades.

    Davis herself was on the run from the law in the 70s, following the murder of a California judge. Innocent, she went into hiding, which sparked a nationwide search and worldwide media attention, propelling her to the FBI’s most wanted list. Two months later, she was arrested in a motel in midtown Manhattan. Despite pressure from famous rightwing fear-mongers – Richard Nixon (who branded Davis a “terrorist”), the then California governor Ronald Reagan and rat-bag FBI director J Edgar Hoover – Davis became an international cause celebre. A global campaign called for her release and Aretha Franklin offered to post quarter of a million dollars in bail. She was acquitted in the end.

    Angela Davis inspired people all over the world, including John Lennon and Yoko Ono, who recorded their song “Angela” on their 1972 album, Some Time in New York City. The Rolling Stones also wrote about Davis, recording the song “Sweet Black Angel” on their 1972 album, Exile on Main Street.

    Davis is now a retired professor with the History of Consciousness Department at the University of California, Santa Cruz and is the former director of the university’s Feminist Studies Department. She is also the founder of Critical Resistance, an organization working against the Prison-Industrial Complex.

    (via blackculture)

    >via: http://smallrevolutionary.tumblr.com/post/16526988431/blokkmovement-happy-bda...

    __________________________

    Angela Davis

    Born January 26, 1944 - Birmingham, Alabama

     

     

    VIDEO + FREE AUDIO DOWNLOAD: The POWA Mixtape > Where Were We?

    Tumi

    The POWA Mixtape

    This is the latest Tumi and the volume offering and, trying hard not to be biased, I gotta say, it's something else. It plays out like a dysfunctional musical, revolving around an episode as told by a girl named Akona. Her testimonial is nerve recking and that's what instigated Tumi to put together a bunch of folks to help him build this project. Easier said than done, but here it is.

     
    It's important to add that this whole endeavor was made to support the POWA initiative.

     
    I'm not even going to put a listening sample here and I'm not going to spend time describing it. Get it!

     
    You can download it with all the tracks and testimonial mixed together into a 44 minute marathon or you can download the actual album featuring 21 individual tracks.

    Download POWA Mixtape Uncut

    Download POWA Mixtape Split into 21 tracks

    There's also a Video that was made for the Mixtape. You can watch it on youTube

     

    PUB: Poetry Manuscript Contest - Georgetown Review Georgetown CollegeGeorgetown Review

    Poetry Manuscript Contest

    Submission Guidelines

    The guidelines for paper submissions are below. For electronic submissions, please visit our online submission manager.

    We will consider only original collections of poems written in English. (You may include individual poems that have appeared elsewhere.) Students, colleagues, and close friends of Bob Hicok (the 2012 judge), and current students and employees of Georgetown College are not eligible.

    One winning manuscript will be awarded a $1000 prize, publication of the book, and 20 author’s copies.

    The guidelines for paper submissions are below. For electronic submissions, please visit our online submission manager.

    Paper Submission Guidelines:

    Manuscripts should be typewritten, single-spaced, and between 48 and 80 pages long. No more than one poem should appear on a page. A clean and legible manuscript is recommended. Do not send your only copy of the manuscript since manuscripts are not returned. We assume no responsibility for damaged or lost manuscripts. All submissions must be accompanied by a $20 entry fee. Please make your check out to “Georgetown College.”

    Submit two title pages for the collection. The author’s name, address, daytime phone number, and email address should appear on the first title page only, along with an acknowledgment listing poems published elsewhere. The author’s name should appear nowhere else in the manuscript. The second title page should only include the title of the collection.

    ALL ENTRIES MUST BE POSTMARKED BY FEBRUARY 15, 2012. (USPS Priority Mail is preferred.)

    Please address entries to:

    Georgetown Review Poetry Manuscript Contest
    Georgetown College
    PO Box 227
    Georgetown KY 40324

    Include a self-addressed, stamped envelope for notification of contest results. Manuscripts may be under consideration elsewhere, but the series editor must be informed immediately if a collection is accepted for publication.

    -

    2011 Georgetown Review Press Winner

    The winner of the 2011 Georgetown Review Press poetry manuscript winner is
    Laurie MacDiarmid’s Consolation Prize.  It was chosen from 236 manuscripts.

    Other finalists were:
    Gregory Loselle  – The Very Rich Hours
    Marcia Popp  – War from the Back Seat
    Mark Wisniewski – Come August

    In Consolation Prize, Laurie MacDiarmid, with compassion and grace, presents a frightening extended family.  The series of poems chronicles a young speaker who copes with death, illness, disruption, relocation, and alcoholism.  The dangers of domestic life are rendered with tenderness and precision.  Consolation Prize builds in momentum, each poem well plotted, emotionally adept, energetic, and full of music.

    - Denise Duhamel

    Consolation Prize idles high and accelerates quickly. Laurie MacDiarmid writes tight, sharp poems fueled by mercy and grudge and survival. Everything is hard-earned, with no clear resolutions, no easy heroes or villains. In the hands of a lesser writer, these family dramas could have been distorted or exploited, but MacDiarmid gives us the clear, frank, emotional truths—never sentimental, never hysterical.  Like the best poets, she knows when to hold back and when to let go.

    - Jim Daniels

     

    PUB: Specter Magazine Submission Manager

    Special Issue: Hip-Hop

    (pdf, doc, docx, jpg, gif, png)

    Deadline: April 30, 2012.

    There's no backstory as to why we've decided to focus on Hip-Hop. No narrative to share, no personal enlightenment to explain. I love hip-hop; I love literature: I want to see my two creative joys intersect here at Specter Magazine.

    Submissions for Specter's first theme issue, The Hip-Hop Issue, are now open. We're looking for fiction, poetry, non-fiction, and art/photography which embodies a hip-hop aesthetic.

    The Hip-Hop issue is scheduled for a June 4th, 2012 release (subject to change).

    Submissions will be selected by guest editor Rion Amilcar Scott, who appeared in previous issues of Specter, including his Pushcart Prize nominated story, "A Friendly Game." Rion has contributed to PANK, Fiction International and Confrontation, among others. Raised in Silver Spring, Maryland, he earned an MFA at George Mason University and presently teaches English at Bowie State University.

    I'm thrilled to have Rion on board to edit this issue. Hip-Hop has infiltrated almost every part of the globe, from music (obviously) to dance to fashion to--now--literature.

    mensah demary
    editor-in-chief

    Submit to Specter

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    PUB: Stone Telling: The Magazine of Boundary-crossing Poetry

    STONE TELLING is looking for literary speculative poems with a strong emotional core. We focus on fantasy, science fiction, surrealism, and slipstream, but would consider outstanding science poetry and non-speculative poetry that fits the flavor of the magazine. Please note that we are not a mainstream literary poetry market, and non-speculative poetry will be an extremely hard sell.

    While we are open to all speculative poetry, we are especially interested in seeing work that is multi-cultural and boundary-crossing, work that deals with othering and Others, work that considers race, gender, sexuality, identity, and disability issues in nontrivial and evocative ways. We’d love to see multilingual poetry, though that can sometimes be tricky. Try us!

    There are no style limitations, but rhymed poetry will be a hard sell. Please try us with visual poetry, prose poetry, and other genre-bending forms. We will consider experimental poetry, but please remember that not all experimental poems are easy to represent in an e-zine format.

     

    UPCOMING READING PERIODS :

    • September 23 - November 27: Issue 6 (Science and Science Fiction)
    • December 25 - February 20: Issue 7 (queer-themed)

     

    SUMBISSION PARTICULARS:

    • Length: We will consider poems of any length, but very short poetry (under 10 lines) and very long poetry (over 200 lines) will be a hard sell.
    • You can submit up to THREE poems per submission.
    • We prefer to receive poetry in the body of the email, but if your poem has non-standard formatting, you can send an attachment in .doc, .docx or .rtf format.
    • Please put SUBMISSION: Author's name in the subject line.
    • Please supply a short cover letter with your submission. List your latest credits, if applicable - if you are unpublished, that's fine too.
    • Stone Telling does not accept simultaneous submissions.
    • Response time is within 60 days. Please do not query before 60 days have passed. However, if you have not heard from us after 60 days, please query immediately.
    • Editorial address is poetry at stonetelling dot com

     

    REPRINTS: We are NOT looking for unsolicited reprints, but if you have a reprint that you feel is especially appropriate for publication at Stone Telling, please query.

    RIGHTS: If accepted, you will be granting Stone Telling first North American serial, promotional, non-exclusive anthology, and archival rights. Copyright will revert to the author upon publication. If the piece is subsequently published in another venue, we ask that you source Stone Telling as first publication.

    PAYMENT: $5(US) per unsolicited poem, upon publication. Payment by Paypal or check.

     


    Queer issue
    - call for submissions
    We're now open to submissions, and reading for the Queer issue. We want poems with the queer content explicit, rather than implicit; we want to see queer identities or relationships. A few examples from past issues of Stone Telling:

    Persephone in Hel, Sonya Taaffe
    A Masquerade in Four Voices, Alexandra Seidel
    The Changeling's Lament, Shira Lipkin
    Terrunform, Tori Truslow

    The queer issue is here because we want to see more queer poetry. Since the inception of ST, we've published some amazing queer poems, but we keep taking about queer poetry because a) it matters to us, b) it's cool, c) there's not enough of it. What is "enough"? Well, when I was putting together the Moment of Change, for example, I had to look really, really hard for queer poems. I asked editors, who pointed me at some poems with G and L identities, some of which I reprinted, but I never felt like there was a whole lot of it. Bi, trans*, genderqueer and genderfluid poems proved really, really elusive. Lately, people have been sending excellent LGBTQ stuff to us because we are a queer-friendly market and we constantly talk about it, and we publish it, but now we want more, we want to put together a whole issue of it. 

    We want to see your LGBTQ stuff.  In fact, for this issue, we will consider any treatment of sexuality and gender that does not fall under the heteronormative paradigm. When in doubt, please just send it along. (also when in doubt, please comment and ask!)

    We want poetry in any speculative genre. If you have  a literary (nonspec) poem that you feel will fit the magazine, please just send it along.

    In case you wondered: we are not interested in homophobic poetry. Yes, it is nominally about queer issues, but we are not interested. This should go without saying, but people *have* sent us such material in the past. Please desist. 

    You do not have to identify as queer, in a queer relationship, or out of the closet, to write or read queer poetry.