EVENT: Online - Register Now — Next BagNewsSalon: March 20 – Assignment Egypt — BagNews


Assignment Egypt: Analyzing News Photos from the 18 Day Revolution

On Sunday, March 20th, BagNewsSalon is hosting an online panel looking at the media’s visual framing of the Egypt uprising. We encourage you to listen in, recommend the discussion to colleagues and also recommend  students to view this lively deconstruction of key media images.

When/Where

Date: Sunday, March 20th

Time: 10 am PST, 1 pm EST, 6 pm London, 8 pm Cairo (for 90 minutes)

Location: http://open-i.ning.com/events/live-webinar-with-bag-news

**Follow this link to register for the event NOW so you will receive updates and a reminder with the login link.

Participants

Nathan Stormer, moderator - Professor of Communications and Journalism/U. of Maine (moderator)

Michael Shaw, BagNews Editor

Paul Lowe, Course Director – MA Photojournalism and Documentary Photography, London College of Communications

David Campbell, Lecturer, Researcher, Producer, Multimedia and Photojournalism (http://www.david-campbell.org/photography/)

Michelle Woodward, Photo Editor, Middle East Report (http://www.mwoodward.com/)

David Degner, photographer, Cairo (http://www.incendiaryimage.com/)

Laura El-Tantawy, photographer, London and Cairo (http://www.lauraeltantawy.com/)

Loret Steinberg, Professor of Photojournalism and Documentary Photography/R.I.T. – BagNews Consultant

Ida C. Benedetto, BagNews Salon Producer

Spread the word

Facebook Event: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=146749512055495

Download the cool flyer: AssignmentEgyptPoster

Next BagNewsSalon: March 20 – Assignment Egypt

 

INFO: The Treatment of Bradley Manning Is Shameful and Stupid

Bradley Manning: 'Stripping me of all of my clothing is without justification'

Alleged WikiLeaks source cites demeaning routines and says he was 'punitively' placed on suicide watch

Bradley Manning protesters Demonstrators stage a protest outside the Quantico military base in Virginia where Bradley Manning is being held. Photograph: Astrid Riecken/EPA

Since the beginning of this month, Bradley Manning has been stripped naked every night and made to parade in front of his officers and guards in the nude. It started on 2 March when Manning was informed that his attempt to have his harsh treatment in prison ameliorated had been unsuccessful. This is an edited version of his description of what happened next:

 

Understandably frustrated by this decision after enduring over seven months of unduly harsh confinement conditions, I asked the brig operations officer, MSG Papakie, what I needed to do in order to be downgraded from maximum custody and prevention of injury status. MSG Papakie responded by telling me that there was nothing I could do to downgrade my detainee status and that the brig simply considered me a risk of self-harm.

Out of frustration, I responded that the PoI restrictions were absurd and sarcastically told him if I really wanted to harm myself, that I could conceivably do so with the elastic waistband of my underwear or with my flip-flops.

Later that same day, I was told that I would be stripped naked at night due to something that I had said to MSG Papakie. Shocked, I replied that I hadn't said anything. I had just pointed out the absurdity of my current confinement conditions.

Without consulting any brig mental health provider, chief warrant officer Denise Barnes used my sarcastic comment as justification to increase the restrictions imposed upon me under the guise of being concerned that I was a suicide risk.

I was not, however, placed under the designation of suicide risk. This is because suicide risk would have required a brig mental health provider's recommendation in order for the added restrictions to continue.

In response to this specific incident, the brig psychiatrist met with me. After speaking to me, he assessed me as "low risk and requiring only routine outpatient follow-up [with] no need for … closer clinical observation". In particular, he indicated that my statement about the waist band of my underwear was in no way prompted by "a psychiatric condition".

Since 2 March 2011, I have been stripped of all my clothing at night. I have been told that the PCF commander intends on continuing this practice indefinitely. Initially, after surrendering my clothing to the brig guards, I had no choice but to lay naked in my cold jail cell until the following morning.

The next morning I was told to get out of my bed for the morning duty brig supervisor (DBS) inspection. I was not given any of my clothing back. I got out of the bed and immediately started to shiver because of how cold it was in my cell. I walked towards the front of my cell with my hands covering my genitals. The guard told me to stand at parade rest, which required me to stand with my hands behind my back and my legs spaced shoulder width apart. I stood at "parade rest" for about three minutes until the DBS arrived. Once the DBS arrived, everyone was called to attention. The DBS and the other guards walked past my cell. The DBS looked at me, paused for a moment, and then continued to the next detainee's cell.

I was incredibly embarrassed at having all these people stare at me naked.

After the DBS completed his inspection, I was told to go and sit on my bed.

About 10 minutes later I was given my clothes and allowed to get dressed.

After apparent outside pressure on the brig due to my mistreatment, I was given a suicide prevention article of clothing called a "smock" by the guards. Although I am still required to strip naked in my cell at night, I am now given the "smock" to wear. At first, I did not want to wear this item of clothing due to how coarse it was and how uncomfortable it felt.

However, the brig now orders me to wear the "smock" at night.

Given the above circumstances, the decision to strip me of my clothing every night for an indefinite period of time is clearly punitive in nature.

There is no mental health justification for the decision. I am under 24-hour surveillance, with guards never being more than a few feet away from my cell. I am permitted to have my underwear and clothing during the day, with no apparent concern that I will harm myself during this time period.

The determination to strip me of all my clothing every night since 2 March 2011 is without justification and therefore constitutes unlawful pretrial punishment.

Under my current restrictions, in addition to being stripped at night, I am essentially held in solitary confinement. For 23 hours per day, I sit alone in my cell. The guards check on me every five minutes during the day by asking me if I am OK. I am required to respond in some affirmative manner.

At night, if the guards cannot see me clearly, because I have a blanket over my head or I am curled up towards the wall, they will wake me in order to ensure that I am OK. I receive each of my meals in my cell. I am not allowed to have a pillow or sheets. I am not allowed to have any personal items in my cell. I am only allowed to have one book or one magazine at a time to read. The book or magazine is taken from me at the end of the day before I go to sleep. I am prevented from exercising in my cell. If I attempt to do push-ups, sit-ups, or any other form of exercise I am forced to stop.

Finally, I receive only one hour of exercise outside of my cell daily. My exercise is usually limited to me walking figures of eight in an empty room.

 

__________________________

 

 

Stripped naked every night,

Bradley Manning tells of

prison ordeal

 

 

 


US soldier held on suspicion of leaking state secrets speaks out for first time about experience

'Stripping me of all of my clothing is without justification

 

Bradley ManningBradley Manning believes he was placed on suicide watch in retribution for a protest over his treatment held outside the prison. Photograph: AP

Bradley Manning, the US soldier being held in solitary confinement on suspicion of having released state secrets to WikiLeaks, has spoken out for the first time about what he claims is his punitive and unlawful treatment in military prison.

In an 11-page legal letter released by his lawyer, David Coombs, Manning sets out in his own words how he has been "left to languish under the unduly harsh conditions of max [security] custody" ever since he was brought from Kuwait to the military brig of Quantico marine base in Virginia in July last year. He describes how he was put on suicide watch in January, how he is currently being stripped naked every night, and how he is in general terms being subjected to what he calls "unlawful pre-trial punishment".

It is the first time Manning has spoken publicly about his treatment, having previously only been heard through the intermediaries of his lawyer and a friend. Details that have emerged up to now have inspired the UN to launch an inquiry into whether the conditions amount to torture, and have led to protests to the US government from Amnesty International.

The most graphic passage of the letter is Manning's description of how he was placed on suicide watch for three days from 18 January. "I was stripped of all clothing with the exception of my underwear. My prescription eyeglasses were taken away from me and I was forced to sit in essential blindness."

Manning writes that he believes the suicide watch was imposed not because he was a danger to himself but as retribution for a protest about his treatment held outside Quantico the day before. Immediately before the suicide watch started, he said guards verbally harassed him, taunting him with conflicting orders.

When he was told he was being put on suicide watch, he writes, "I became upset. Out of frustration, I clenched my hair with my fingers and yelled: 'Why are you doing this to me? Why am I being punished? I have done nothing wrong.'"

He also describes the experience of being stripped naked at night and made to stand for parade in the nude, a condition that continues to this day. "The guard told me to stand at parade rest, with my hands behind my back and my legs spaced shoulder-width apart. I stood at parade rest for about three minutes … The [brig supervisor] and the other guards walked past my cell. He looked at me, paused for a moment, then continued to the next cell. I was incredibly embarrassed at having all these people stare at me naked."

Manning has been charged with multiple counts relating to the leaking of hundreds of thousands of secret US government cables, videos and warlogs from Iraq and Afghanistan to WikiLeaks. The charges include "aiding the enemy", which can carry the death penalty.

The legal letter was addressed to the US military authorities and was drawn up in response to their recent decision to keep Manning on a restriction order called Prevention of Injury (PoI). It means he is kept in his cell alone for 23 hours a day and checked every five minutes by guards including, if necessary, through the night.

The letter contains excerpts from the observation records kept in the brig which consistently report that Manning is "respectful, courteous and well spoken" and "does not have any suicidal feelings at this time".

Sixteen separate entries made from 27 August until the records stop on 28 January show that Manning was evaluated by prison psychiatrists who found he was not a danger to himself and should be removed from the PoI order.

>via: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/11/stripped-naked-bradley-manning-pr...

 

__________________________

 

PJ Crowley: Bradley Manning's treatment by US 'stupid'

Bradley ManningPrivate First Class Manning is being held in solitary confinement in a military brig

The US treatment of the man accused of leaking secret cables to Wikileaks is "ridiculous and counterproductive and stupid", US state department spokesman PJ Crowley has said.

Mr Crowley made the remarks about Bradley Manning to an audience at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

"Nonetheless Bradley Manning is in the right place," Mr Crowley said.

Private Manning is being held in solitary confinement at a maximum security US military jail.

He is shackled at all times and has been on suicide watch at the Quantico marine base in Virginia.

Mr Crowley was asked whether his comments were on the record and replied, "sure".

President Barack Obama was questioned about whether he agreed with Mr Crowley's comments at a news conference on Friday.

He responded by saying he had asked the Pentagon directly if the terms of Pte Manning's confinement were "appropriate" and received assurances that they were.

Mr Obama added that some aspects of Pte Manning's treatment "has to do with his safety as well".

Mr Crowley could not immediately be reached by the BBC on Friday, but one US report carried a quote from him saying he was speaking in a purely personal capacity, not representing the views of the US government.

'Elephant in room'

Philippa Thomas, a BBC journalist on a student fellowship in Boston, was among about two dozen people gathered to hear Mr Crowley talk about "the benefits of new media as it relates to foreign policy", at an event organised by the Center for Future Civic Media.

After a wide-ranging discussion, one young man said he wanted to address "the elephant in the room" and asked Mr Crowley what he thought about Wikileaks and, in his words, "torturing a prisoner in a military brig"?

Mr Crowley did not address the issue of torture, but replied that what was being done to Pte Manning by colleagues at the Department of Defence was "ridiculous and counterproductive and stupid".

"None the less Bradley Manning is in the right place," he added, going on to say that in Washington's view "there is sometimes a need for secrets… for diplomatic progress to be made".

Stripped

Amnesty International has described the treatment of Pte Manning, whose mother is Welsh, as "unnecessarily harsh and punitive" and has called on the British government to intervene.

In a letter released by his lawyers, Pte Manning claims he is routinely stripped each night and his prescription glasses are confiscated, leaving him with limited vision.

Military officials have said this is standard procedure for people deemed a suicide risk.

David House, a spokesman with the Bradley Manning Advocacy Fund, said it was clear there was "no justification for Bradley's inhumane treatment".

He went on: "I agree with Mr Crowley that it's just stupid and unproductive."

Pte Manning has been charged on 34 counts, including illegally obtaining 250,000 secret US government cables and 380,000 records related to the Iraq war from a military database.

He has also been charged with aiding the enemy, a capital offence, but prosecutors have said they will not seek the death penalty.

>via: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12717275

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WOMEN: Rape - Is the Media Guilty Too?

Vicious Assault Shakes Texas Town

 

Michael Stravato for The New York Times

The exterior of an abandoned trailer where an 11-year-old girl was assaulted. Eighteen suspects were held.

CLEVELAND, Tex. — The police investigation began shortly afterThanksgiving, when an elementary school student alerted a teacher to a lurid cellphone video that included one of her classmates.

The video led the police to an abandoned trailer, more evidence and, eventually, to a roundup over the last month of 18 young men and teenage boys on charges of participating in the gang rape of an 11-year-old girl in the abandoned trailer home, the authorities said.

Five suspects are students at Cleveland High School, including two members of the basketball team. Another is the 21-year-old son of a school board member. A few of the others have criminal records, from selling drugs to robbery and, in one case, manslaughter. The suspects range in age from middle schoolers to a 27-year-old.

The case has rocked this East Texas community to its core and left many residents in the working-class neighborhood where the attack took place with unanswered questions. Among them is, if the allegations are proved, how could their young men have been drawn into such an act?

“It’s just destroyed our community,” said Sheila Harrison, 48, a hospital worker who says she knows several of the defendants. “These boys have to live with this the rest of their lives.”

The attack’s details remained unclear. The police have declined to discuss their inquiry because it is continuing. The whereabouts of the victim and her mother were not made public.

The allegations first came to light just after Thanksgiving, when a child who knows the victim told a teacher she had seen a videotape of the attack on a cellphone, said Stacey Gatlin, a spokeswoman for the Cleveland Independent School District.

The school district’s security department interviewed the girl, 11, who is a student at Cleveland Middle School, and her mother. The security department determined that a rape had taken place, but not on school property, and then handed the matter over to the police, Ms. Gatlin said.

On Dec. 9, the police obtained a search warrant to go through a house on Travis Street and a nearby trailer that had been abandoned for at least two years. An affidavit filed to support the search warrant said the girl had been forced to have sex with several men in both places on Nov. 28 and cited pictures and videos as proof, according to The Houston Chronicle.

The affidavit said the assault started after a 19-year-old boy invited the victim to ride around in his car. He took her to a house on Travis Street where one of the other men charged, also 19, lived. There the girl was ordered to disrobe and was sexually assaulted by several boys in the bedroom and bathroom. She was told she would be beaten if she did not comply, the affidavit said.

A relative of one of the suspects arrived, and the group fled through a back window. They then went to the abandoned mobile home, where the assaults continued. Some of those present recorded the sexual acts on their telephones, and these later were shown among students.

Residents in the neighborhood where the abandoned trailer stands — known as the Quarters — said the victim had been visiting various friends there for months. They said she dressed older than her age, wearing makeup and fashions more appropriate to a woman in her 20s. She would hang out with teenage boys at a playground, some said.

“Where was her mother? What was her mother thinking?” said Ms. Harrison, one of a handful of neighbors who would speak on the record. “How can you have an 11-year-old child missing down in the Quarters?”

Cleveland, a town of 9,000, lies about 50 miles northeast of Houston in the pine country, near the picturesque Sam Houston National Forest. The town’s economy has always rested on timber, cattle, farming and oil. But there are pockets of poverty, and in the neighborhood where the assault occurred, well-kept homes sit beside boarded-up houses and others with deteriorating facades.

The abandoned trailer where the assault took place is full of trash and has a blue tarp hanging from the front. Inside there is a filthy sofa, a disconnected stove in the middle of the living room, a broken stereo and some forlorn Christmas decorations. A copy of the search warrant was on a counter in the kitchen next to some abandoned family pictures.

The arrests have left many wondering who will be taken into custody next. Churches have held prayer services for the victim. The students who were arrested have not returned to school, and it is unclear if they ever will. Ms. Gatlin said the girl had been transferred to another district. “It’s devastating, and it’s really tearing our community apart,” she said. “I really wish that this could end in a better light.”

 

Mauricio Guerrero contributed reporting from Houston
.

 

__________________________

 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 9, 2011

How not to cover a gang rape.

By Liliana Segura

A lot of people are understandably up in arms today about this New York Timesstory, about the horrific gang rape of an 11-year-old girl in East Texas. The crime itself is outrageous and indefensible, of course, but to add insult to injury, the story is written like so many other stories about rape: with a slanted blame-the-victim mentality.

Residents in the neighborhood where the abandoned trailer stands — known as the Quarters — said the victim had been visiting various friends there for months. They said she dressed older than her age, wearing makeup and fashions more appropriate to a woman in her 20s. She would hang out with teenage boys at a playground, some said.

“Where was her mother? What was her mother thinking?” said Ms. Harrison, one of a handful of neighbors who would speak on the record. “How can you have an 11-year-old child missing down in the Quarters?”

As many have pointed out, this has long been a sexist hallmark of rape coverage, and it continues to be. But what I also find notable is how many people who have commented on the story found this quote to be just as outrageous:

“It’s just destroyed our community,” said Sheila Harrison, 48, a hospital worker who says she knows several of the defendants. “These boys have to live with this the rest of their lives.”

As the first quote in the piece, I can see how it would enrage people whose first response would be: What about the pain endured by the young child? In a post titled “Sympathy for the Rapist” (like “Sympathy for the Devil,” get it?), Jamelle Bouie of The American Prospect echoes the sentiments of many on Twitter by labeling this “pro-rapist sympathy” on the part of the Times. “In telling the story,” he writes, “the Times reserves most of its sympathy for the victim, which isn’t unusual. Unless, of course, your ‘victims’ are the rapists themselves.”

The (alleged) rapists are described by the Times reporter as ranging from “middle schoolers to a 27-year-old,” adding that “a few…have criminal records, from selling drugs to robbery and, in one case, manslaughter.” The reporter also poses the question, on behalf of the community, “how could their young men have been drawn into such an act?”

To be clear: I completely agree that the piece “reveals the ubiquity and casual acceptance of victim-blaming,” as Bouie puts it, and for that, the Timesdeserves criticism. I also agree that the piece was strangely lacking in quotes that expressed outrage, or even sensitivity, toward the horrendous suffering endured by the young child in question. But I do not agree that quoting a member of the community when she (rightfully) points out that the men and boys who committed this crime will have to “live with (it) for the rest of their lives” amounts to sympathy. Nor do I think that asking the question “how could they do such a thing?” betrays support for rapists. (Although phrasing it as something they were “drawn into” certainly heaps more blame on the victim.)

In a less offensive version of that article, those quotes might have reminded us that the people who committed this terrible crime are, well, people—most of them probably seemingly ordinary people, and part of a community that is now in turmoil because of their extraordinarily awful actions. For most of us, the fact that unfathomably cruel acts are committed by people rather than monsters (or devils) is a hard thing to accept. We do not like to be reminded of it. But for those who know the perpetrators of violent crimes—like the woman quoted by the Times—they have no choice but to ask the question “how could they do it?” and to think of the lifelong consequences for them (and for their families). If only monsters and devils committed such crimes, no one would consider such questions. But they don’t. Men and boys do. Why they do and what to do about it are questions worth discussing.

Unfortunately, by giving its piece such an obvious blame-the-victim frame, theTimes story completely obviated those questions, so that all we end up seeing are excuses on behalf of the alleged rapists. As one Slate blogger writes, “Any attempt to gain emotional distance on rape by transferring just a tiny portion, just one percent, of the blame onto the victim is an absolute moral wrong. It subtracts from the agency of the individual doing the raping.”

====

 

Liliana Segura

ABOUT

I'm an independent journalist and editor with a focus on social justice, prisons & harsh sentencing. This blog is a work in progress. 

Stories I've written
Some Facts About Me

 

>via: http://lilianasegura.com/post/3746476703/how-not-to-cover-a-gang-rape

__________________________

Tell the New York Times to Apologize for Blaming a Child for Her Gang Rape

Targeting: Public Editor, The New York Times (Arthur S. Brisbane), Executive Editor, The New York Times (Bill Keller), and Publisher, The New York Times (Arthur Sulzberger Jr)
Started by: Shelby Knox

On March 8th the New York Times published a story by James C. McKinley Jr. titled "Vicious Assault Shakes Texas Town." The assault it described was, indeed, heinous: an 11-year-old was gang raped in an abandoned trailer house by as many as 18 men, with suspects ranging in age from middle school students to a 27-year-old. The attack came to light because several of the suspects took cell phone video of the assault.

Also appalling was the way in which New York Times reporter James C. McKinley reported the victim blaming sentiments of members of the Texas community in which the rape occurred as truth. McKinley insinuated the young woman had it coming, writing, "They said she dressed older than her age, wearing makeup and fashions more appropriate to a woman in her 20s. She would hang out with teenage boys at a playground, some said."

Mr. McKinley also gave ink to community members who are more concerned about the impact raping a child will have on the suspects than being raped will have on the young victim. Mr. McKinley quoted Sheila Harrison as saying, "“These boys have to live with this the rest of their lives.”

1 in 4 American women will be sexually assaulted in their lifetime. A culture that blames victims for being raped - for what they were wearing, where they were, and who they were with - rather than blaming the rapist is a culture that tacitly condones rape. A society that is more concerned with how being held accountable for rape will impact the perpetrator than for the well being of the victim is a society that doesn't take rape seriously.

The New York Times contributed to this dangerous culture by publishing this article by Mr. McKinley without asking him to edit out his and community members' editorial victim blaming.

Tell the New York Times to issue a published apology for their coverage of this incident and publish an editorial from a victim's rights expert on how victim blaming in the media contributes to the prevalance of sexual assault. No one ever deserves to be raped and no victim should ever be told it was their fault. New York Times, we expect better. We demand better.

Sign the Petition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


A LUTA CONTINUA: Ivory Coast - Things Falling Apart

In February 2011, more than 40,000 Ivorians refugees fled post election violence and insecurity after two presidential candidates both claimed victory.  Liberians, who had been refugees in Ivory Coast just a couple of years earlier, are hosting many refugees in villages along the border and others are being relocated to camps by UNHCR.

More Ivorians are crossing into Liberia daily as violence intensifies and civil war becomes imminent.

Commissioned by UNHCR. See more photos at www.glennagordon.com.

ivorians ref01 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref02A My country has two presidents

ivorians ref03 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref04 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref05 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref07 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref08 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref09A My country has two presidents

ivorians ref10 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref11 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref12 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref13A My country has two presidents

ivorians ref14 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref15 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref16 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref17 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref18 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref19 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref20 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref21 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref22 My country has two presidents

ivorians ref23 My country has two presidents

    __________________________

    Ivory Coast's

    descent into 'madness'

    A ransacked house belonging to an Alassane Ouattara supporter
    The UN estimates more than 350,000 people have fled Abidjan

    By John James 
    BBC News, Abidjan

    A bitterly disputed election result in the Ivory Coast is pulling the country apart and has left the country divided.

    The thick mahogany doors of the mansion stand ajar as young children run in and out.

    A trail of odd junk litters the yard. A small upturned table here, papers there. The walls blackened by fire. A palatial home, ransacked earlier by youths.

    The police had been there already, eyewitnesses said - not to stop the theft, but to load up their vehicles with the loot.

    An estimated 20 homes belonging to government ministers and their supporters were attacked last weekend in Abidjan.

    The mistake these politicians made was to win November's election, and then to insist that winning a vote meant you get to take over.

    The former president did not like that. The new government may be able to shelter under UN protection at a lagoon-side hotel, but their homes, cars and families are fair game for the old government.

    Destructive rage

    This was a part of Africa that did not need handouts to develop, just a few decent politicians.

    A man shouts next to burning tires on the streets of Abidjan
    Anger is rife on the streets of Abidjan

    Instead it has seen a race to the bottom for power at any price, with the very real threat of a return to civil war.

    Ivorians witness the destruction with shock and incredulity.

    My friend Bernard's work is linked to the port. He has lost his job - as has everyone at his company - because almost nothing is being shipped anymore.

    Another friend, Aude, has lost her job running a restaurant - few people eat out any more, in what was once one of Africa's culinary capitals. The central bank closed a month and a half ago, private banks two weeks ago.

    The destructive rage is almost a madness.

    IVORY COAST CRISIS

    Attacking mosques in a country roughly divided half-and-half between Muslims and Christians who until now were living peacefully side by side.

    Emptying the army ammunition stores to hand out Kalashnikovs to unemployed youths whipped up into anger by their patrons' propaganda.

    Each side is using foreign mercenaries, then accusing the other side of using foreign support.

    At one of the city's many checkpoints, I am ordered out of the car as young men with guns search for weapons.

    They say they are doing their civic duty by blocking the flow of arms. But I have never heard of them finding any and the only civilians illegally carrying arms I have seen were the ones running the roadblocks.

    Both sides have burnt their victims alive. "You burn one, we'll burn 10," said one Gbagbo supporter at a barricade in Yopougon.

     A generation ago if you asked a West African to think of a country that meant stability and prosperity, the answer would have been Ivory Coast 

    In one chilling video, a pile of bodies writhe in pain after a beating. Burning tyres and tables are placed on top of them to form an evening bonfire. The police - clearly in shot, actually help out the crowd.

    Images of the violence, taken with mobile phone cameras, are everywhere.

    At the moment the internet offers up a daily collection of horrors from Ivory Coast - the families burned during an attack on their village, the women out protesting peacefully for change mown down by canon fire from a convoy of government vehicles leaving seven dead, armed youths threatening death to the other side.

    A map of the Ivory Coast

    Tens of thousands have fled Ivory Coast, as the pro-Ouattara forces in the north start to move south.

    In Abidjan, an armed group in the northern suburb of Abobo, nicknamed the "invisible commandos", has made the district a virtual no-go area for the national security forces, which are still publicly loyal to Laurent Gbagbo.

    This so-called "autonomous republic of Abobo" is a telling sign that - even with far superior weaponry - the pro-Gbagbo forces struggle to control their own main city.

    The UN says at least 200,000 have fled the district, many taking shelter with families elsewhere, others in churches and mosques.

    A generation ago if you asked a West African to think of a country that meant stability and prosperity, the answer would have been Ivory Coast.

    At one prayer meeting I hear a woman cry out to God for a return to the times when this was a land of hospitality and peace.

    This is the country where I work, but it is also now home. I have lived here for more than three years.

    My wife is Ivorian, and only recently I picked up my own Ivorian passport. At the same time I bought a house.

    This remains a place of friendly people, amazing fresh fruit, long and unspoilt tropical beaches, and, yes, it ought to have a bright future.

    But at the moment, the place is being held hostage, and there seem to be more atrocities committed every day. I wonder when my family should evacuate. The dark clouds seem to be gathering.

    Ivorians wanted one president but they got two, they wanted peace and they got war, they were promised debt relief, but instead the country defaulted on its debt, they wanted prosperity and the economy shut down.

    There is an important word here that I have never found the equivalent for in English - "Yako". It is a deeply-felt way of saying, "I'm so sorry".

    Ivory Coast, "Yako".

    >via: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/9420140.stm

    __________________________

     

    Ivory Coast crisis: 'Nearly 450,000 refugees'

    Woman cries after seeing her shot relative in AbidjanPro-Gbagbo forces have shot Abidjan protesters this week

    More than 450,000 people have fled their homes because of the crisis in Ivory Coast, the UN refugee agency says.

    Dead bodies were being eaten by dogs in the streets of the main city, Abidjan after recent fighting, a UNHCR spokeswoman told the BBC.

    Alassane Ouattara, widely recognised as the winner of last year's poll, has gone to regional powerhouse Nigeria to get help ousting his rival.

    Laurent Gbagbo refuses to cede power.

    There are growing fears that the situation could descend into civil war.

    Former rebel forces who support Mr Ouattara still control the north while most of the army remains loyal to Mr Gbagbo.

    Some 9,000 UN peacekeepers are in the country, monitoring a ceasefire line between the two forces.

    However, the UN envoy to Ivory Coast has suggested that Mr Gbagbo may be losing control of some of the security forces.

    Mr Ouattara flew to the Nigerian capital after the African Union endorsed him as the rightful winner of November's election.

    The AU suggestion he share power with Mr Gbagbo - an option vehemently rejected by Mr Gbagbo's allies.

    'Desolate scenes'

    Some 370,000 people have fled their homes in Abidjan, while a further 77,000 have crossed into neighbouring Liberia, according to the UNHCR.

    It said the "unfolding tragedy" in Ivory Coast had been overlooked while international attention has been focused on North Africa.

    "We're seeing a lot of desolate scenes like dead bodies still littering the streets of [Abidjan district] Abobo where's there's been a lot of violence for weeks," UNHCR spokeswoman Fatoumata Lejeune-Kaba told the BBC.

    map

    "The dead bodies [are] being eaten by dogs - these dogs are becoming dangerous so the humanitarian situation is really, really difficult right now," she said.

    Mr Gbagbo accuses the UN of being biased against him and has banned their aircraft from flying over territory he controls.

    This could make it difficult for Mr Ouattara to return to Abidjan when he leaves Nigeria.

    It is the first time Mr Ouattara has left the hotel since the results were declared in December.

    He has called for West African nations to take military action to oust Mr Gbagbo but there appears to be little appetite for this.

    Last year's long-delayed elections had been supposed to reunify the country - once the richest in West Africa - which has been divided since a 2002 civil war.

    The UN-backed electoral commission says Mr Ouattara won presidential elections in November, but the Constitutional Council overruled it, citing rigging in the north, where pro-Ouattara forces are in control.

    >via: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12718544

     

     

     

    VIDEO: Sona Jobarteh :: Female kora virtuoso « SCI-CULTURA

    Sona Jobarteh :: Female kora virtuoso

    Sona Jobarteh

    (ht loomnie)

     

     

    Sona Jobarteh hails from a long West African tradition of Griots and kora players; her grandfather was the master Griot Amadu Bansang Jobarteh (and cousin to the celebrated Kora maestro Toumani Diabaté).

    Creating her own history, she has broken from the male-dominated kora tradition to become the family’s first female virtuoso of the instrument.

    Here Sona Jobarteh performs the traditional Malian song, Jarabi, accompanied by Femi Temowo on guitar and percussionist Robert Fordjour.

     

    Breaking boundaries. Evolving cultures. Life is dynamic and continues to move, with or without us.

    Are you coming?

     

    More

     

    __________________________

     

      on Feb 28, 2011

    Sona Jobarteh hails from a long West African tradition of Griots and kora players; her grandfather was the master Griot Amadu Bansang Jobarteh.
    With a debut album and a film score already available, Sona is working on tracks for her second album release, Fasiya. She came to Bush House to perform a video session for BBC Network Africa. On this track Sona Jobarteh plays acoustic guitar and is accompanied by Femi Temowo on electric guitar and Robert Fordjour on percussion.

     

    >via: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muKYuDVs_kk

     

     

     

    VIDEO: Fashioning Faith: a documentary by Yasmin Moll on Vimeo

    Fashioning Faith

    At the intersections of faith and fashion, designers explore what it means to be young, female and Muslim in today’s America. 

    Synopsis:
    Muslim clothing designers in New York City struggle to combine high fashion with a high sense of piety. Their designs aim to stay true to Islamic principles of feminine modesty while attempting to break into a fashion scene marked more by exposed shoulders than covered hair. In the process these young women designers are redefining what it means to be a modern Muslim in contemporary America.

     

    PUB: Zone 3

    Zone 3 Press
    Creative Nonfiction Book Award
    Prize: $1,000 and Publication
     

    Guidelines:
    • One copy of your manuscript of 150-300 pages.
    • Two title pages: one with name, address, e-mail address, and phone number and one with title only.
    • An acknowledgments page may be included.
    • $25.00 reading fee made payable to Zone 3 Press. Reading fee includes a one-year subscription to ZONE 3 Journal.
    Deadline: May 1, 2011.

    Eligibility and Additional Considerations:
    •The competition is open to all authors writing original works in English. Manuscripts that embrace creative nonfiction’s potential by combining lyric exposition, researched reflection, travel dialogues, or creative criticism are encouraged. Memoir, personal narrative, essay collections, and literary nonfiction are also invited.
    • The final judge is Lia Purpura.
    • In order to ensure the integrity of this award, current and former students and faculty of APSU are not eligible to enter. In addition, Zone 3 Press will not accept manuscripts from contestants who have previously studied with, or have a personal relationship with the announced judge. Zone 3 Press is committed to providing an ethically responsible competition; as such, the editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that display any form of ethical impropriety.
    The winner will be notified by e-mail or telephone.
    • Please include a self-addressed, stamped postcard for confirmation of manuscript receipt.
    • For contest results, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope. Manuscripts will not be returned.
    • The judge may choose no winner if she finds no manuscript that, in her estimation, merits publication and the award.
    • Questions should be addressed to Amy Wright at wrighta@apsu.edu  or Susan Wallace at wallacess@apsu.edu.

    Send entries to:
    Amy Wright, Acquisitions Editor
    Zone 3 Press
    First Book Award for Poetry
    Austin Peay State University
    P.O. Box 4565
    Clarksville, Tennessee 37044 


    Zone 3 Press
    First Book Award for Poetry
    Prize: $1,000 and Publication

    Guidelines:
    One copy of your manuscript of 48-80 pages.
    • Two title pages: one with name, address, e-mail address, and phone number and one with title only.
    • An acknowledgments page may be included.$20.00 reading fee made payable to Zone 3 Press. Reading fee includes a one-year subscription to Zone 3.
    Deadline: May 1, 2012.

    Eligibility and Additional Considerations:
    Anyone who has not published a full-length collection of poems (48 pages or more) is eligible; those with chapbooks may participate.
    •The final judge will be announced.
    •In order to ensure the integrity of this award, current and former students and faculty of APSU are not eligible to enter. In addition, Zone 3 Press will not accept manuscripts from contestants who have previously studied with, or have a personal relationship with the announced judge. Zone 3 Press is committed to providing an ethically responsible competition; as such, the editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that display any form of ethical impropriety.
    •Winner will be notified by e-mail or telephone.
    • Please include a self-addressed, stamped postcard for confirmation of manuscript receipt.
    • For contest results, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope. Manuscripts will not be returned.

    •Questions should be addressed to Blas Falconer at falconerb@apsu.edu"> falconerb@apsu.edu or Susan Wallace at wallacess@apsu.

    Send entries to:
    Blas Falconer, Acquisitions Editor
    Zone 3 Press
    First Book Award for Poetry
    Austin Peay State University
    P.O. Box 4565
    Clarksville, Tennessee 37044 


    Zone 3 Nonfiction Prize

    Zone 3 is accepting submissions for its new nonfiction contest. Prize: $250.  Submit one essay with SASE and $10 entry fee to: Zone 3, APSU, P.O. Box 4565, Clarksville, TN 37044. No deadline.  All entrants will receive a one-year subscription.  The winner will be announced in the Fall 2011 issue of Zone 3.


    Zone 3 Fiction Award

    Zone 3 is now accepting submissions for its annual fiction award. Entry should include a cover page with your name, address, and the title of your story. The entry fee is $10 and includes a one-year subscription to Zone 3. No deadline. Please send to Zone 3, APSU, P.O. Box 4565, Clarksville, TN 37044. The winner will be announced in the Fall 2010 issue of Zone 3.

    Zone 3 is pleased to announce Valerie Vogrin as the winner of our tenth annual Zone 3 Fiction Award for her story “Expedient,” which was published in our Spring 2010 issue.  


    Zone 3 Poetry Awards

    ZONE 3 is now accepting submissions for its new Evelyn Scott Poetry Prize. Your entry should include a cover page with your name, address, and the title(s) of your poem(s). Entry fee is $10 and includes a one-year subscription to Zone 3. You may submit up to three poems (with SASE) to Zone 3, APSU, Box 4565, Clarksville, TN 37044. Postmark deadline is November 30, 2010. The winner will be announced in the Spring 2011 issue of Zone 3.  Prize: $500 and publication.

    ZONE 3 is pleased to announce George Looney as first place winner of our annual Zone 3 Poetry Awards competition for his poem “The Revision of Something Imagined,” which was published in our Spring 2010 issue. Second place goes to Tara Bray for “Several Mornings While Running the Dark Streets” and third to Peter Ramos for “A Landscape.” 

     

    PUB: Boston Review — Contest

    Fourteenth Annual Poetry Contest

     

    Deadline: June 1, 2011
    Judge: Tomaž Šalamun
    First Prize:
    $1,500

    Complete guidelines:
    The winning poet will receive $1,500 and have his or her work published in the November/December 2011 issue of Boston Review. Submit up to five unpublished poems, no more than 10 pages total. Any poet writing in English is eligible, unless he or she is a current student, former student, relative, or close personal friend of the judge. Mailed manuscripts must be submitted in duplicate, with a cover note listing the author’s name, address, email and phone number. No cover note is necessary for online submission. Names should not be on the poems themselves. Simultaneous submissions are not permitted, submissions will not be returned, and submissions may not be modified after entry. A non-refundable $20 entry fee, payable to Boston Review in the form of a check or money order or by credit card, must accompany all submissions. All submitters receive a complementary half-year subscription (3 issues) to Boston Review. Mailed submissions must be postmarked no later than June 1, 2011.

    The winner will be announced no later than November 1, 2011, on the Boston Review Web site. All poems submitted to the contest will be considered for publication in Boston Review.

    Please enter online using our contest entry manager. This requires payment using a credit card or Paypal.

    Or mail submissions to:

    Poetry Contest, Boston Review
    PO Box 425786
    Cambridge, MA 02142

    Read winning poems from past years:
    Anthony Caleshu (2010)
    John Gallaher (2009)
    Sarah Arvio (2008)
    Elizabeth Willis (2007)
    Marc Gaba (2006)
    Mike Perrow (2005)
    Michael Tod Edgerton [PDF] (2004)
    Susan Wheeler (2003)
    Max Winter (2002)
    D.A. Powell (2001)
    Christopher Edgar
    (2000)
    Stephanie Strickland (1999)
    Daniel Bosch (1998)

    For more poetry in Boston Review, click here.

     

    PUB: Tupelo Press — First/Second Book Award

    12th Annual Tupelo Press Award
    for a First or Second Book of Poetry

    January 1–April 15, 2011
    Judge’s Prize:
    $3,000, publication and national distribution

    Open to all poets who have not yet published a full-length collection of poetry and those who have published only one full-length book.

    The final judge will be D.A. Powell.

     

     

    Guidelines:

    This competition has historically been open to any poet writing in English who has not previously published a full-length collection of poetry. In 2011, in recognition of how difficult publishing a second book can be, we will also accept submission of manuscripts from poets who have previously published one full-length book of poems.
    Manuscript Requirements:
    Submit a previously unpublished, full-length poetry manuscript of between 48 and 88 pages (of poems). Include two cover pages: one with the title of the manuscript only, the other with title of manuscript, name, address, telephone number, and email address. Include a table of contents and, if applicable, an acknowledgments page for prior publications in periodicals or online venues. Cover letters or biography notes are optional; if included, these will not be read until the conclusion of the contest.
    • The First Book Award is open to anyone writing in the English language, whether living in the United States or abroad. Translations are not eligible for this prize.
    • In 2011, in recognition of the many difficulties of publishing a second book, this contest is open to submissions from those who have previously published one book of poems.
    • Individual poems in a contest manuscript may have been previously published in magazines, print or web journals, or anthologies, but the work as a whole must be unpublished (this includes previously self-published books).
    • Simultaneous submissions to other publishers or contests are permitted, as long as you notify Tupelo Press promptly if your manuscript is accepted elsewhere.
    • All finalists will also be considered for publication.
    • Tupelo Press endorses and abides by the Ethical Guidelines of the Council of Literary Magazines and Presses (CLMP), which can be reviewed here, along with more about Tupelo Press’s ethical considerations for literary contests.
    • Before you submit a manuscript to a Tupelo Press competition, please consider exploring the work of the poets we have published. We’re drawn to technical virtuosity combined with abundant imagination; memorable, vivid imagery and strikingly musical approaches to language; willingness to take risks; and penetrating insights into human experience.
    Terms:
    A reading fee of $25 (US) by check or Pay Pal must accompany each submission. If sending a check, please make this payable to Tupelo Press, Inc. Multiple submissions are accepted, so long as each submission is accompanied by a separate $25 reading fee.

    Why a reading fee? We are an independent, nonprofit literary press. Reading fees help defray, though they don’t fully cover, the cost of reviewing manuscripts and publishing the books we select through our competitions.

    Notification:
    If mailing your submission, you may include a stamped, self-addressed postcard for confirmation of your manuscript’s receipt. The online Submissions Manager (see below) automatically confirms receipt.

    If you like, enclose a stamped, self-addressed envelope (SASE) for notification of the winner. An email announcement will also be sent to all entrants. Do not enclose a SASE for return of manuscript; all manuscripts will be recycled at the conclusion of the competition, except those under consideration for future publication.

    Kindly refrain from requesting an individual response to confirm our receipt of your manuscript and/or payment. Both the electronic submission manager and the PayPal system offer automated confirmations. For those wishing acknowledgment of a paper manuscript, your self-addressed stamped postcard will serve this purpose. We receive thousands of manuscripts each year and cannot offer individual acknowledgments beyond these. Thank you for your understanding.

    Results will be announced in late July 2011.

    Online Submission
    Click here to submit electronically. The online submission system will be accepting First/Second Book Award manuscripts between January 1 and April 15, 2011.
    Online PayPal Payment
    Click below to pay the reading fee for online or postal mail submissions:

     

    Submission via Postal Mail
    We also accept manuscripts via postal mail. Please include a check or money-order for the $25 reading fee, payable to Tupelo Press, or utilize our online PayPal option and enclose a copy of the receipt with your printed submission.

    You may also include a self-addressed postcard for acknowledgment of receipt of your manuscript and a SASE for notification of the winner, who will also be announced by email.

    Mail your submission (and check or PayPal receipt) to:
    Tupelo Press First/Second Book Award
    PO Box 1767
    North Adams, MA 01247

    International submissions only:
    Tupelo Press First/Second Book Award
    243 Union Street, Eclipse Mill #305
    North Adams MA 01247 USA

    All entries must be postmarked or certified by our online Submissions Manager between January 1 and April 15, 2011.