VIDEO: The Identity The GOP Won't Claim This Week | Resurgence | Big Think

The Identity The GOP Won't Claim This Week

 

Youtubepdimage

One of the realities of being a member of a minority group in America is the lack illusions many of us have about the capacity for extreme depravity that exists within this nation's majority. One of the great fallacies of our time, an erroneous but popular notion that underlies much of the opinion pieces and editorial writing by our most prominent practitioners, is the fallacy of American reasonableness, a fantasy that obscures the violent and often contradictory actions of this country’s citizens and its government.

This instinctive rush by most in our media and many in our blogosphere over the last few days to claim an equal amount of culpability by both the political left and the political right in poisoning our political atmosphere with violent rhetoric is a desperate attempt to inject a sense of reasonableness into a debate about unreasonable behavior. But what is reasonable, or even sane, about a South Carolina gun accessories manufacturer who recently attempted to capitalize off the disrespectful outburst of Rep. Joe Wilson from the congressional gallery during President Barack Obama’s first State Of The Union address by emblazoning “you lie” on a limited edition supply of AR-15 semi-automatic rifles?

After seeing this story this morning, I clicked on a few links, following the trail of commentary about the gun accessories manufacturer’s tribute to Wilson to a Youtube video that pictured Alaska supporters for Republican Senate candidate Joe Miller marching in a parade earlier this year, their AR-15’s strapped to their backs. I got curious, and decided to type “Republican assault rifle”, “GOP assault rifle”, “Republican rifle” and “GOP rifle” into the Youtube search bar while I drank my morning coffee. These are some of the results below. 

 

Want this in the US Senate?

 

Nieves Calls Assault Rifle "Nancy Pelosi Special"

 

Candidate Christina Jeffrey, AK-47 In Hand, On The 2nd Amendment

 

I'm Dale Peterson, I'll name names and take no prisoners

 

Dead Aim - Joe Manchin for West Virginia TV Ad

 

Silver City, NM Assault rifle raffle, Grant County Republican Party

 

The rifle imagery in all of these videos is clear and unambiguous. This is the kind of thing a junior network production assistant could compile and edit into a 60 second medley before lunch without breaking a sweat. And if I can come up with these beauties, culled from a leisurely hour of web surfing, I would imagine a more dedicated team of researchers could come up with many, many more publicly available samples of the identity the Republican Party doesn't want to lay claim  to this week. But you won’t be seeing anything like this on your television today or any other day because your news media has too much invested in the mantra of false equivalency.

Bill O’Reilly can whine all he wants about how unfair these characterizations are. Rush Limbaugh can bellow like a bull moose about Democrat thuggery until his voice gives out. And Sarah Palin can bleat about blood libel through the microphone set up in her home studio for all the Facebook videos she can tape.  Try as they might, none of them or their cohorts can obscure this simple, if unscientific truth—if you transpose the word “Democrat” for “Republican” in the searches I did above, you will see the same thing I saw—very few videos that depict Democrats or their supporters waving around semi-automatic weapons.

 

Discuss

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register

 

Conor Dorgan

Joe Manchin being one example of a Democrat who has embraced the rifle rhetoric.

 

 

Anonymous Anonymous

There is no defense for the violent rhetoric of the right. Nor is there a defense for that of the left:

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=1039389n&tag=related;photovideo

http://bigthink.com/ideas/2628

 

 

vince rubino

South Korea overthrew a dictatorship with no guns. South Korea has technically been at war for 60 years. However, guns are still illegal for civilians to own to this day. There’s no lobby of individuals begging to own guns in Korea, yet we have a conservatives and liberals and people in between.

I think Mr. Broughton is correct that this obsession with owning weapons for the purpose of murdering other people is an American problem. And they really have no reasonable justification for this other than their own fantasies, hatred and desire to bully others. Usually, we resort to bullying and physical threats when we can’t get what we want by reason and discourse. And when we are fundamentally unreasonable, there really is no choice but to go straight to the bullying. US citizens, Republicans in particular, need to own this problem and start dealing with issues in a rational and proactive manner. If anyone is feeling the urge to grab a gun, scream out obscenities, or shout over others to solve a political conflict in the US, it should be their clue that deeper thought and a more intelligent approach is in order. Good luck, GOP.

 

VIDEO: Watch “The Man In The Glass Case” (Short Shouts) > Shadow And Act

Maxwell Addae


Watch “The Man In The Glass Case” (Short Shouts)

Today’s Short Shout comes from Maxwell Addae, titled The Man In The Glass Case, based on Albert Camus’ absurdist masterwork, The Stranger (L’Etranger). The 20-minute short film won the Best US Short award at the 2010 Rome International Film Festival, and the People’s Choice Award winner at the 2010 Arizona Black Film Festival:

__________________________

 

Director's Statement-

 

Albert Camus' The Stranger was the inspiration behind "The Man in the Glass

Case". I have an affinity for characters whose minds operate on a plane just this side

of normal. What fascinates me about James is how complex his character really is.

From one angle, James is a sociopath, a creepy killer who should be locked up

forever, but from another angle, James sees the world as it truly is: void of any value

aside from what we as humans have assigned to it Why should the death of a

person be any more significant than grabbing lunch with friends? They are both,

simply actions. While I personally do not hold such an extreme view of the world, I do

feel it is worth investigating as a method to reevaluate ideas such as normal,

classic, natural, truth, etc. I feel that James sees a side of the world that we fear

considering for a variety of reasons, but maybe on his side, our side can be observed

a little clearer.

 

                                                                            - Maxwell Addae

__________________________

 

[The Conversation] Maxwell Addae

Maxwell Addae is a young writer/director based in Los Angeles, CA who is finalizing his premiere short film “The Man in the Glass Case” for festival release. From acquiring his BFA in Film and through his personal projects, a wealth of information about budgeting time and money was learned. He takes that knowledge to each new project. His eye for subtle details and the study of human behavior has lent itself to this young man’s writing and the ability to bring his characters to life in an intriguing way. Also in the works, Maxwell is in development with his first feature film, a psychological character-driven drama titled “Mean World Theory”. We talked to Maxwell about his interests and his career.

TBBO: What movie influenced you most?
- City of God (Cidade de Deus) by Fernando Meirellesis is a film that contains a range of characters, humbling story (executed perfectly as a visual novel), naturalistic performances and the ability to find breathless beauty in the slums. While the subject matter was familiar, it overcame the limits generally imposed by the genre. I was transported to a world, knew the characters intimately, and they stayed with me long after the movie was over. As a filmmaker, this movie influenced my preconceived notion about what was required to tell a story with cinematic and artistic integrity. Here’s a film made with no celebrities, no Hollywood writers or directors, and no special effects and yet still managed to exhibit the power of film. It is a movie that grabbed me by the throat and refused to let go. This is a very important film to see.

TBBO: Who would play you in a biographical role?
- As of right now, my story could probably be told in a 3 minute internet video. So, taking into account what I plan to accomplish in my life and career, I’d tap the underestimated Mr. Nick Cannon. The reason he’d be a great choice is because I’m at a very early stage in my career and I feel that I have a lot of potential as a filmmaker/artist that only time will be able to accurately exhibit; I feel the same about Mr. Cannon’s dramatic acting career. Therefore, our predicted paths would equate to an actor and story worth merging.

TBBO: What movie would you love to star in?
- Toussaint L’ouverture, the Haitian revolutionary. His story of overcoming oppressors to free a society is a perfect example of triumph, perseverance, and the overthrowing of oppressive powers. He was able to accomplish so much with his life that it’s a great example of how one person can make a huge difference in the world. I find it hard to believe that this story has yet to be told on the epic scale which it deserves. I’m aware that Danny Glover has been attempting to get this heroic tale to the big screen, in the face of what seems like a strategic effort to block the film, but I look forward to one day seeing this movie made… even if I’m not in it.

TBBO: What is the worst movie you ever saw?
- Irreversible, a French film by Gaspar Noé pushed me to the limits on what I could tolerate. I’m a person who appreciates films with dark tones and subject matter, like Requiem for a Dream and Three Extremes. However, in this film in which I’m basically referring to two graphic scenes, one specifically being a nine minute rape scene, challenged my level of acceptance. But the combination of violent, realistic-imagery plus a well executed cinematic film and performances left me conflicted, shook, and drained…too drained!

TBBO: Favorite piece of modern technology?
- The internet, primarily because the way it has allowed various forms of media and communication to converge in ways never before available. Now, I watch TV whenever I want to online, I communicate in real time to long lost friends and family, and there’s practically no subject that I can’t learn about in a thorough summary, love that Wikipedia. It has helped and continues to revolutionize the world.

__________________________

 

INTERVIEW: Maxwell Addae

Written by Vy Pham

Local filmmaker Maxwell Addae has always had a love for creating stories and an equal love for movies. He talks to RAW about his new film and his work. Be sure to RSVP to see a special screening of "The Man in the Glass Case" at the next RAW showcase at Cinespace in Hollywood on Thursday, August 5th!

Tell us about yourself. 
I’m from a modest-sized city between Dallas and Fort Worth, Texas called Arlington. Creating stories has always been a skill that I would marvel at. From a coup led by GI Joe action figures over an evil robotic island, to the secret world of invisible gargoyles that protected me in my third grade class, I’ve always been interested in characters, fiction, and journeys. So, deciding to become a writer/director was an eventual no-brainer that I revel in. Watching some of the masters at their craft is great motivation. I hope to be able to challenge, confuse, entertain, and inspire for quite a long time.

How did you first get started in film? 
After an unfulfilled attempt at pursuing a biology major, I kicked my parents out of my room (and my head) and vowed to follow my passion. After months of meditation, I realized that I had always told stories as a young man. The ability to create entire lives from your mind and to have those characters and stories internalized by people forever was always something that fascinated me. Whether it was by toys, invisible friends, my younger brother, or reluctant neighborhood kids, I realized that my affinity to create stories and my love of movies lead me to this beautiful, frustrating, visceral, fickle, career as a filmmaker. 

Tell us about "The Man in the Glass Case.”
My short is about a very diligent warehouse employee named James who has a unique perspective about life. James sees most things in life as absurd, or pointless and he really operates on a essential needs basis. Food, sleep, companionship, work, etc. He does this so naturally and honestly that when he commits a violent act against a co-worker, he truly has no concept of its significance. This causes trouble when he is confronted and challenged about his morality by his employer. Albert Camus’ beautifully told story The Stranger was the inspiration behind my film and helped set the film’s tone.

Any other films you've produced?
Yes, but I’ve tucked those away in a very secluded and dark place never to be seen by human eyes as they were done while I was still in school, therefore the technical issues were not only obvious, but a character all its own.

From where do you draw inspiration for your work?
A little bit of everywhere, but lately, from different types of people. Noticing the way they talk, walk, dress, their background, ideas, their relationships and contradictions. 

Do you engage in, or draw inspiration from, any other forms of art? 
Photography has always been a great way to study composition, lighting and learning about the ability to tell an entire story in one shot. I think the freedom that literature allows leaves me in awe. And music’s influence over the entire vibe of anything is powerful. 

What does a typical film-making day look like for you? 
A complete and thorough meltdown, then a rebuilding of my entire being from the ground up (privately). After that, I go over shots with my cinematographer, go over the upcoming scenes with the actors and start shooting. I like doing a few days of rehearsing to flesh out ideas, so on the day of shooting I leave the performance up to the actors and I try to allow them the freedom to freely go where the scene takes them.

When you are not filming, how do you like to spend your time? 
Usually staring at walls, but I’ve tried to incorporate more film viewing, collaborating with other artists and discovering Los Angeles’ many hidden gems.

All time favorite film?
My all time favorite film has changed every few years, but currently I have to say City of God. The story, the characters, the politics, the energy, everything about this film reminded me about the power that film viewing experience can give. What added to the enjoyment was the lack of special effects and Hollywood actors. Here was a great film because it was a great film, every aspect of what makes a movie was first class. 

Are there any filmmakers, past or present, who strongly inform and influence your work? 
Alfonso Cuaron, Darren Aronofsky, Paul Thomas Anderson, Spike Lee, Quentin Tarantino, F. Gary Gray, Stanley Kubrick, Christopher Nolan, Martin Scorsese, Steven Soderbergh, Zack Snyder, Woody Allen, M. Night Shyamalan, Park Chan Wook, Takashi Miike, just to name a few.

Are there any specific reoccurring themes or subjects that you explore and deal with most in your work?
I’ve really been into the idea of mental illness or mental instability as an opportunity to discover new perspectives about life. From A Clockwork Orange to The Dark Knight’s the joker, I like views that may be considered “off” as a great base to redefine our world and how we perceive each other. I think it’s a form of rebellion against practically everything and story-wise, that rebellion can be explored from different angles.

Why showcase with RAW? 
RAW is the perfect venue to introduce my film to a diverse audience. At festivals, everyone attending is interested in the film medium, but at a RAW event, attendees know that they will be experiencing an array of different art forms. That audience may have a wider knowledge of art mediums to pull from when creating their opinion about my film, creating a more perceptive audience and one that I am excited to share my film with.

Any current rising stars within the genre that you would recommend we look out for?
A young student filmmaker from Little Rock, Arkansas named Julian Andrew Walker.

To learn more about filmmaker Maxwell Addae, visit: www.maxwelladdae.com

PUB: Entry Rules - The CZP / Rannu Fund

ChiZine Publications (CZP) is an independent publisher of weird, surreal, subtle, and disturbing dark literary fiction hand-picked by Brett Alexander Savory and Sandra Kasturi, Bram Stoker Award-winning editors of ChiZine: Treatments of Light and Shade in Words.

About the Rannu Fund

Founded July 8, 2008 by Sandra Kasturi and Brett Alexander Savory, co-publishers of ChiZine Publications and ChiZine: Treatments of Light and Shade in honour of the thirtieth wedding anniversary of Sandra's mother and step-father, and their contributions to the arts and education both in Canada and Estonia.

The Fund, brought to you in collaboration with ChiZine Publications, offers two awards per year of $500 CDN each, one for fiction, one for poetry, granted to two writers of speculative literature (i.e., science fiction, fantasy, horror, magic realism, surrealism, etc.), of any nationality/place of residence, at any stage of their career.

The next round of submissions for this award will be accepted between November 15, 2010 and (New extended deadline) January , 31 2011. The winners will be announced May 15, 2011.

 

Entry Rules

Submit entries WITHIN THE BODY OF YOUR E-MAIL to:
rannufund@gmail.com

ABSOLUTELY NO ATTACHMENTS. Your submission will be deleted unread.

PLEASE NOTE: All entries in both fiction and poetry MUST be "speculative literature" in content; in other words: science fiction, fantasy, horror, magic realism, alternate history, steampunk, etc. Non-genre entries will be automatically disqualified, and will not receive a refund.

All entries must be in English. If writing in a language other than English, please provide a translation.

Poetry Award: $500 prize

-submit up to 5 poems (unpublished work), not to exceed 10 pages
-single-spaced
-plain text format
- _underlines_ to mark bold or italics
-include name, address, telephone number and e-mail address
-include a one-paragraph biography

 Fiction Award: $500 prize

-submit one short story or a novel excerpt (unpublished work) of no more than 7,000 words
-double-spaced
-if submitting a novel excerpt, include a brief synopsis
-plain text format
- _underlines_ to mark bold or italics
-include name, address, telephone number and e-mail address
-include a one-paragraph biography

 

Two Honourable Mentions in each category will win $50.

PLEASE NOTE that all judging will be blind.

Submission period: November 15, 2010 - January 31, 2011

Winners announced: May 15, 2011

Payment:
$10.00 CDN or U.S. fee per entry.
$15.00 CDN or U.S. to enter both fiction and poetry categories.

 

Rannu Entrance Fee
Poetry Only $10.00 Fiction Only $10.00 Poetry and Fiction $15.00

 

PUB: The North Carolina Writers' Network

Submissions open for 2011 Doris Betts Fiction Prize PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Wednesday, 12 January 2011 16:59

The North Carolina Writers’ Network is now accepting submissions for its annual Doris Betts Fiction Prize, administered by the North Carolina Literary Review.

The Doris Betts Fiction Prize awards $250 and publication in the NCLR to the author of the winning short story, up to 6,000 words.  The contest is open to any writer who is a legal resident of North Carolina, a member of the North Carolina Writers’ Network, or a subscriber to the NCLR.

Robert Wallace of Durham won the 2010 Betts prize for his story “As Breaks the Wave Upon the Sea.”

Entries to the 2011 contest can be submitted through the NCLR’s online submission process at www.nclr.ecu.edu/submissions/submit-online.html.  Full submission guidelines, including entry fees, are listed below.

Doris Betts Fiction Prize
Postmark Deadline: February 15 (annual)
Submissions Accepted from January 1 – February 15

The Doris Betts Fiction Prize awards the first-prize winner $250 and publication in the North Carolina Literary Review. Finalists will also be considered for publication in the NCLR.

Eligibility and Guidelines

  • The competition is open to any writer who is a legal resident of North Carolina or a member of the North Carolina Writers’ Network. North Carolina Literary Review subscribers with North Carolina connections (lives or has lived in NC) are also eligible.
  • The competition is for short stories up to 6,000 words. One entry per writer. No novel excerpts.
  • Submit story electronically via the NCLR’s online submission process. For electronic submission instructions and to start the online submission process, go to: www.nclr.ecu.edu/submissions/submit-online.html.
>
  • Names should not appear in the Word file of the story; authors will register with the NCLR’s online submission system, which will collect contact information and connect it to story submission.
  • An entry fee must be mailed to the NCLR office (address below) by the postmark deadline (February 15 each year).
  • You may pay the Network member/NCLR subscriber entry fee if you join NCWN or subscribe to the NCLR with your submission:
  • $10/NCWN members and/or NCLR subscribers
    $20/nonmembers (must be a North Carolina resident)

    • Checks for submission fee and/or Network membership should be made PAYABLE TO the North Carolina Writers’ Network (separate checks payable to the NCLR only if purchasing a subscription).
    • Mail checks or money orders to:

    North Carolina Literary Review
    ECU Mailstop 555 English
    Greenville, NC 27858-4353

    The winner and finalists will be announced in May. Winning story and select finalists will be published in the next year’s issue of the North Carolina Literary Review.

    Questions may be directed to the North Carolina Literary Review, at NCLRSubmissions@ecu.eduThis e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

     
    Judge to Judge 2011 Thomas Wolfe Fiction Prize PDF Print E-mail
    Written by Administrator   
    Tuesday, 23 November 2010 21:45

    Acclaimed author Martin Clark, who serves as a circuit court judge when he is not writing best-selling novels, will now also judge the North Carolina Writers’ Network’s 2011 Thomas Wolfe Fiction Prize.

    The Thomas Wolfe Fiction Prize honors internationally celebrated North Carolina novelist Thomas Wolfe. The winner receives $1,000 and possible publication in the Thomas Wolfe Review.  Submissions for the Thomas Wolfe Fiction Prize are accepted from December 1 until the postmark deadline of January 30.

    Martin Clark is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Davidson College and a 1984 graduate of the University of Virginia School of Law.  In 1992 he was appointed as a juvenile and domestic relations judge for the Twenty-first Judicial Circuit and currently serves as a circuit court judge for the Virginia counties of Patrick and Henry and the city of Martinsville, Virginia.

    His first novel, The Many Aspects of Mobile Home Living, was a New York Times Notable Book for the year 2000 and a Book –of-the-Month Club selection. His second novel, Plain Heathen Mischief, appeared on both Amazon’s and Barnes and Noble’s Top 100 list for 2004.  His third book, The Legal Limit (2008), was praised by reviewers as “the new standard by which legal fiction should be judged” and “the best courtroom story ever.”  He lives in Stuart, Virginia, with his wife Deana.

    Entries for the 2011 Thomas Wolfe Fiction Prize must be no more than 12 double-spaced pages, and must be postmarked by January 30, 2011.  Checks must be made payable to the North Carolina Writers’ Network.  Submissions should be mailed to –

    Thomas Wolfe Fiction Prize
    c/o Tony Abbott
    PO Box 7096
    Davidson College
    Davidson, NC 28035

    The winner will be announced in April.  Please see below for complete guidelines.

    Thomas Wolfe Fiction Prize
    Postmark deadline: January 30 (annual)
    Submissions Accepted from December 1 – January 30

     

    Eligibility and Guidelines

    • The competition is open to all writers without regard to geographical region or previous publication.
    • Submit two copies of an unpublished fiction manuscript not to exceed 12 double-spaced pages.
    • Names should not appear on manuscripts but on separate cover sheet along with address, phone number, e-mail address, word count, and manuscript title.
    • An entry fee must accompany the manuscript: $15 NCWN for members, $25 for nonmembers. You may pay the member entry fee if you join the NCWN with your submission. Checks should be made payable to the North Carolina Writers’ Network.
    • Entries will not be returned.

    The winner is announced in April.

    Send submissions, indicating name of competition, to:
    Thomas Wolfe Fiction Prize
    c/o Tony Abbott
    PO Box 7096
    Davidson College
    Davidson, NC 28035

    Checks should be made payable to the North Carolina Writers’ Network.

     

    PUB: Guide to Literary Agents - 8th "Dear Lucky Agent" Contest: Literary Fiction

    8th "Dear Lucky Agent" Contest: Literary Fiction
    Posted by Chuck

    Welcome to the eighth (free!) "Dear Lucky Agent" Contest on the GLA blog. This will be a recurring online contest with agent judges and super-cool prizes. Here's the deal: With every contest, the details are essentially the same, but the niche itself changes—meaning each contest is focused around a specific category or two. So if you're writing a novel that's considered literary fiction, this eighth contest is for you!

     

    HOW TO SUBMIT

    E-mail entries to eighthagentcontest@gmail.com. Please paste everything. No attachments. 

    WHAT TO SUBMIT

    The first 150-200 words of your unpublished, book-length work of literary fiction . You must include a contact e-mail address with your entry and use your real name. Also, submit the title of the work and a logline (one-sentence description of the work) with your entry.

    Please note: To be eligible to submit, I ask that you do one of two things: 1) Mention and link to this contest twice through your social media—blogs, Twitter, Facebook; or 2) just mention this contest once and also add Guide to Literary Agents Blog (www.guidetoliteraryagents.com/blog) to your blogroll. Please provide link(s) so the judge and I can verify eligibility. Some previous entrants could not be considered because they skipped this step!

    CONTEST DETAILS

          1. This contest will be live for 14 days—from Jan. 9 through the end of Sunday, Jan. 23, 2011, EST. Winners notified by e-mail within three weeks of end of contest. Winners announced on the blog thereafter.
          2. To enter, submit the first 150-200 words of your book. Shorter or longer entries will not be considered. Keep it within word count range please.
          3. This contest is solely for completed book-length works of literary fiction. Literary fiction, defined, is fiction that falls outside the categories of genre fiction. Much fiction falls into the so-called popular commercial genres of romance, mystery, suspense, thriller, Western, horror, science fiction, and fantasy. Writing that falls in none of these categories is often called "literary."
          4. You can submit as many times as you wish. You can submit even if you submitted to other contests in the past, but please note that past winners cannot win again.
          5. The contest is open to everyone of all ages, save those employees, officers and directors of GLA's publisher, F+W Media.
          6. By e-mailing your entry, you are submitting an entry for consideration in this contest and thereby agreeing to the terms written here as well as any terms possibly added by me in the "Comments" section of this blog post. (If you have questions or concerns, write me personally at literaryagent@fwmedia.com. The Gmail account above is for submissions, not questions.)

    PRIZES!!!

    Top 3 winners all get: 1) A critique of the first 10 pages of your work, by your agent judge (priceless!). 2) A free one-year subscription to WritersMarket.com ($50 value).

    MEET YOUR (AWESOME) JUDGE!

     

     

    Lindsey Clemons is a literary agent
    at Larsen-Pomada Literary Agents in San Francisco.
     

    Awesome books represented by agents at LP Literary Agents include:

     

     

      Mad Skills, by Walter Greatshell (Ace; Dec. 2010)

    The Scalpel and the Soul: Encounters with Surgery, the Supernatural, and the Healing Power of Hope, by M.D., FACS, Allan J. Hamilton (March 2008, Tarcher)

    The Iron King, by Julie Kagawa (Feb. 2010, Harlequin Teen)

    Secrets of the Tudor Court, by D.L. Bogdan (Kensington; May 2010)

     


             

     

    Want more on this subject? 

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    ACTION: Oppose the Death Penalty for Troy Davis

    spacer

    Oppose the Death Penalty

    for Troy Davis

    Troy Davis has faced execution three times for a crime he may not have committed. In an unprecedented evidentiary hearing held in a federal district court in Savannah, Georgia in June, 2010, he was able to present evidence supporting his innocence claim. However, the standard for proving his innocence was “extraordinarily high”, especially given the lack of physical and scientific evidence in his case. The federal judge ruled that he did not meet the high standard, despite the fact that doubts about his guilt remain unresolved. While this ruling may be appealed, it is more important than ever that we continue to let Georgia authorities know that we oppose any effort to execute Troy Davis. Sign the petition today!

    » Learn more about World Day against the Death Penalty

    Message Recipients

     

    Customize Your Letter (optional)

    Subject Line:

    Dear [Recepient's Name],
    We, the UNDERSIGNED, call on Georgia authorities to take all steps necessary to ensure that Troy Anthony Davis does not face execution. Seven of the nine witnesses have changed their story and no physical evidence links Davis to the crime. No one should be executed, especially when there are so many doubts about guilt. This case has generated widespread attention because so many people in Georgia and throughout the world are disturbed by the thought of a man being executed when so much doubt about his guilt remains unresolved. Nothing can undermine public faith in a criminal justice system faster than an execution when there are still serious doubts about guilt. Georgia cannot afford to make such a mistake, and we urge Georgia officials to do everything in their power to prevent such an injustice from taking place.

    If you've taken action with use before, simply enter your email address below and hit SEND to take action now. Otherwise, fill out the form below.
    Email Address:

    Your Information

    First Name:*
    Last Name:*
    Email:*
    Address Line 1:*
    Address Line 2:
    City:*
    State:*Please make a selection Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming American Samoa Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Europe Armed Forces Pacific F.S. Micronesia Guam Marshall Islands Northern Mariana Islands Palau Puerto Rico Virgin Islands Not in USA
    ZIP/Postal Code:*
    Country:*Please make a selection Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthelemy Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

     

     

    Oppose the Death Penalty for Troy Davis

    Take Action On This Issue

    Troy Davis has faced execution three times for a crime he may not have committed. In an unprecedented evidentiary hearing held in a federal district court in Savannah, Georgia in June, 2010, he was able to present evidence supporting his innocence claim. However, the standard for proving his innocence was “extraordinarily high”, especially given the lack of physical and scientific evidence in his case. The federal judge ruled that he did not meet the high standard, despite the fact that doubts about his guilt remain unresolved. While this ruling may be appealed, it is more important than ever that we continue to let Georgia authorities know that we oppose any effort to execute Troy Davis. Sign the petition today!

    » Learn more about World Day against the Death Penalty

    Take Action

    Customizing the Message is required Customizing the Message is required
    We, the UNDERSIGNED, call on Georgia authorities to take all steps necessary to ensure that Troy Anthony Davis does not face execution. Seven of the nine witnesses have changed their story and no physical evidence links Davis to the crime. No one should be executed, especially when there are so many doubts about guilt. This case has generated widespread attention because so many people in Georgia and throughout the world are disturbed by the thought of a man being executed when so much doubt about his guilt remains unresolved. Nothing can undermine public faith in a criminal justice system faster than an execution when there are still serious doubts about guilt. Georgia cannot afford to make such a mistake, and we urge Georgia officials to do everything in their power to prevent such an injustice from taking place.



    You will receive an email confirming that your message was sent. Check the box if you would also like to receive a copy of this letter.

    Taken action before? Just enter your email address and click 'GO'. If not, please fill in the registration form below.

    Your email address:
    Click Submit Button:

     

    Your Information

    *Required Fields

    First Name*
    Last Name*
    Email*
    Address Line 1*
    Address Line 2
    City*
    State* Please make a selection Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming American Samoa Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Europe Armed Forces Pacific F.S. Micronesia Guam Marshall Islands Northern Mariana Islands Palau Puerto Rico Virgin Islands Not in USA
    ZIP/Postal Code*
    Country* Please make a selection Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthelemy Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe
    Phone
    (xxx xxx xxxx)

    Account Information

    Creating a username and password is not necessary to take action, but doing so will allow you to access your profile later and personalize the website.

    Login name
    Password
    Confirm Password
    Remember Me
     
    Click Submit Button:

     

    INFO: Underestimating MEND is Dangerous Gamble > The Trench

    January 10, 2011

    Underestimating MEND is Dangerous Gamble

    A prevailing belief had begun to rise above Nigeria’s fog of war. Not long ago the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) was considered little more than a loose assortment of rebels and bandits, neither ideologically driven nor strategically and technically competent. The government’s amnesty program had depleted MEND's forces and fractured its leadership, so Lagos hoped.

    Given the amnesty’s partial success in disarming MEND fighters, it’s possible that the group poses a lesser threat than before. The amnesty was intended not only to disarm low-level recruits and sow division in the leadership, but also to employ those who believe the Delta’s cause has been perverted by warlords and criminals. And Nigeria’s new president, Goodluck Jonathan, also plays a significant role through his heritage.

    A credible leader from the Delta to clean up the Delta, through dialogue or force.

    Except MEND, always a network of parts rather than a singular entity, continues to drive itself in one general direction as it wages insurgency against oil production in the Delta. The elements that refused amnesty viewed the offer with contempt, disavowing those who gave up and declaring that “real” soldiers will continue their struggle. With the government and Nigerian media belittling MEND holdouts for losing their cause, and MEND releasing statements through multiple email accounts, the Delta is flooded with disinformation. But how many events must past before forming a chain?

    In the time that MEND was supposed to be dying, the group has carried out a series of attacks on oil pipelines, shutting down rigs and limiting deliveries. Rather than dissolve, part of MEND is believed to have consolidated into the Niger Delta Liberation Front (NDLF), composed of die-hard MEND soldiers under rebel general John Togo. Togo’s kidnapping of 19 Exxon workers, supposedly masterminded by the captured Tamunotonye "Commander Obese" Kuna, prompted a JTF crackdown that Togo managed to escape.

    Other factions continue to operate as well, including one under the jailed Henry Okah.

    General Charles Omoregie, the Commander of the Joint Task Force in the Niger Delta (JTF), has brushed aside criticism that the amnesty is degenerating, considering those defecting fighters as petty criminals tricked by rich warlords. Though partially true, the government appears to have created a newer, harder version of MEND by removing its less-committed fighters. Nigerian troops payed for their underestimation when they raided Togo's camps, and the price extrapolates over the entire Delta.

    Omoregie continued to disparage
    MEND as bandits: “I want to say that they are operating on individual orientation. I think they want the government to believe that they have big network but they are criminals with evil intent. They want to lay credence to their activities to say they are big and well-organized organization. But, I do not think so, they are just pocket of criminals operating.”

    However, when his troops moved on MEND’s camps, "We were taken aback by the volume of fire that was brought to bear on the troops when we approached Ayakoromor on the way to John Togo's camp. Soldiers had to fight their way into the camp."

    The attack on Ayakoromor couldn’t have gone worse. Beyond the unspecified number of government casualties (between 13 and 25) inflicted by Togo’s ambushes, MEND and local leaders accused "Operation Restore Hope" of killing around 150 people, claims Nigerian officials vehemently deny as MEND propaganda. But the government’s actions are working against its narrative. Lagos spent the last three months discrediting MEND’s hardened core as bandits without their former cause, when they remain active, organized, and baiting the government into new atrocities.

    Ayakormor residents even condemned the government's prior amnesty of Togo, who was "ostracized in 2003 as a result of his nefarious activities."  Now the government has generated new hostility, playing into MEND’s ideology of government discrimination, exploitation, and oppression.

    Nigerian officials, including army chief of staff Onyeabo Ihejirika, are spending an inordinate amount of time convincing locals that the army "isn't here to kill you."

    The reality is that Nigeria’s amnesty served as a short-term fix to a long-term injury, and it’s falling apart in the absence of political and economic reform in the Delta. The Delta itself remains awash with arms, which the government has no present solution for. It simply tried to buy MEND’s fighters off with a monthly stipend of $500, instead of integrating them into society or redressing the grievances they claim to fight for. Though many would content themselves with education and sustainable employment, some Nigerians do fight for the Delta’s sanctity and against government corruption - problems that have intensified in recent months.

    A variety of reasons kept MEND on the downturn through 2010. Already under ceasefire with the government when Lagos introduced its amnesty program in July, MEND also had to sweat Nigeria’s political crisis over former president Umaru Musa Yar'Adua like everyone else. As a Delta native, MEND wanted to hear out Jonathan, Yar'Adua's replacement, if only to protect its political legitimacy. Although sporadically breaking its ceasefire, the group initially responded positively to Jonathan before relapsing.

    Togo continues to offer terms in exchange for his support.

    And MEND needed time to reconstitute itself after the amnesty program. The frequency of pipeline attacks, heavy arms captured in its camps, and the group’s mobility indicate that it’s transforming rather than dissipating. Okah warned from his cell in South Africa, where he's been denied bail, "There's a rearming of most groups in the delta now,” claiming the situation "is going to get much worse... There are thousands of people who are willing to fight and they'll continue to fight."

    As further proof of MEND’s potential, the government recently unlocked amnesty funds for another 6,000 fighters estimated to inhabit the Delta’s myriad creeks. Naturally MEND responded by accusing the government of robbing the state’s finances.

    "This desperate action shows a confused individual, bent on looting the nation's treasury."

    MEND has now reemerged in front of three main drivers. Very simply, MEND must prove its strength amid the doubts spread by the Nigerian government and its sympathizers. Fierce, organized resistance dispels the image of “bandits” and “criminals” without a military structure or purpose.

    Second, Nigeria’s narrative began to crest in MEND’s direction and it jumped on for the ride; November and December spawned an ideal environment to do battle. Although systematic attacks commenced in early November, before news broke of investigations into Royal Dutch Shell and Halliburton, MEND is peaking during Nigeria’s yearly oil scandal. Less than two weeks after the government’s Economic and Financial Crimes Commission opened investigations into Shell and Halliburton for “massive corruption,” a U.S. cable from WikiLeaks quoted Shell executive Ann Pickard as saying the company had “access to everything” in “all relevant ministries.”

    Then Nigerian prosecutors filed charges against former U.S. president and Halliburton CEO Dick Cheney. Christmas had come early for MEND.

    The ensuing drama played right into MEND’s narrative of resource exploitation and political corruption. The buildup itself stemmed from Nigeria’s reluctance to prosecute Shell, Halliburton, and its spin-off KBR; requests to speak with their officials followed two cases brought forward in America under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Among the charges against KBR and Halliburton: bribing Nigerian customs officials to shortcut bureaucracies and secure a $6 billion liquefied natural gas plant contract.

    KBR and Halliburton had already agreed to a $579 million bribery settlement with U.S. authorities in February 2009. Though eager to pay exorbitant sums, they also denied any wrongdoing.

    Thus few were surprised - and many nevertheless outraged - when Halliburton and Cheney quickly reached another $250 million settlement with the Nigerian government - and denied any wrongdoing. The scope of financial extortion inspires awe. A multiple offender and high-profile target, Cheney’s criminal case was settled out of court as a civil matter, which Nigerian legal advocates argue is illegal.

    Large pay-outs are also bound to aggravate Nigeria's corruption rather than resolve it. Clearly one massive fine from KBR and Halliburton wasn’t enough to satisfy voracious government and corporate officials. Like MEND’s incessant pricks on Nigeria’s oil pipelines, corruption and greed have drained tens, possibly hundreds of billions from Nigeria’s economy, which relies predominantly on oil exports (to America, of course).

    Few Nigerians expect any fines to benefit them, the majority of which earn less than $2 a day. Thus Halliburton is paying dividends to both the government and MEND. By reinforcing its platform of government corruption and foreign interference, Cheney just provided new legitimacy for MEND attacks on oil infrastructure.

    Nigeria’s headlines ring Soft on Corruption: “This is not justice. This is a business deal. The big boys get caught; they negotiate a price and walk away to continue their activities elsewhere... Everyone is smiling. The poor man in Nigeria has no means to negotiate and simply goes to jail for a very long time often for a petty crime.”

    MEND is undoubtedly riding this momentum into April’s presidential and parliamentary elections. Jonathan has made restoring stability to the Delta a key area of his campaign, if not the central pillar, leaving MEND no choice except to prove its own strength and devotion to the cause. The JTF’s ongoing operation will evolve MEND’s tactics and possibly restructure its command into a more defined hierarchy. Jonathan must realize that MEND cannot be deceived through hollow amnesty programs, that a cosmetic approach will only inflame the Delta and interfere with Nigeria’s elections.

    A firm response to Shell and Halliburton would have dealt far more damage to MEND than the JTF can. Okah confidently declared as he awaits trial, "The Nigerian Army should be prepared to fight forever unless the real issues in the delta are addressed."

     

     

    HAITI: Hard Truths Many Don't Want To Hear

    By Teymoor Nabili in on January 12th, 2011.

     

    It's open season on NGOs here in Haiti. One year on from the earthquake, the world's media are looking for someone to hold accountable, and they seem to have the aid organisations firmly in their sights.

    All week there's been a great deal of blame flung at the NGOs for not having rebuilt Haiti already.

    Even though it took five years to re-settle around 150,000 people in Aceh after the Asian tsunami, to name just one parallel, and despite the fact that most experts agree the Haiti situation is possibly the most challenging humanitarian disaster ever, the most common storyline is that more should have been done this past 12 months

    Now clearly there have been failings, and the complaints are well articulated by many, including the Disaster Accountability Project.

    The theme has also been adopted by politicans, by aid agencies themselves (all blaming the other agencies, of course) and even the general public has absorbed the message, and people are now re-gurgitating it on talk forums.

    But this search for accountability, confined as it is to endless probing of the events of the past 12 months, ignores the other major issue, which is the ugly history of why Haiti's government is such a mess. 

     For Professor Peter Hallward of Britain's Kingston University, the real problem is easily identified:

     [it] is the direct legacy of perhaps the most brutal system of colonial exploitation in world history, compounded by decades of systematic postcolonial oppression

    It is understandable in this week of reflection that politics should take second billing; the priority should be the earthquake and the people here. 

    But it's also worrying how many seem to be deliberately avoiding addressing the issues raised by people like Professor Hallward. 

    USAID has pulled out of a scheduled interview with Al Jazeera, as has the State Department. 

    The Organisation of Americans States is holding back release of its investigation into the the recent presidential elections, even though a leaked copy confirms what everybody knew, that the process was so flawed as to be worthless.

    And almost nobody has been reporting the complaints of the Haitian members of the Interim Haiti Reconstruction Commission, who say their opinions are completey bypassed by international donors and governments.

    The members of that commission will likely be even more depressed by this recent comment by Senator John Kerry:

     Haitians across society [...] have to realize that our concern for their welfare does not give them leverage to shun our demands for progress.

    __________________________

    Posted by: lisaparavisini | January 12, 2011

    January 12: Anniversary of Earthquake in Haiti

    It has been one year since the devastating earthquake that destroyed Port-au-Prince and left almost 300,000 people dead and nearly two million without home or shelter. That news, tragic as it was, was followed by even more painful news for the Haitian people, which included a cholera outbreak, an election fiasco, and political violence. Promised aid has not materialized, and the world seems indifferent to the continued plight of the population of Port-au-Prince. We honor them today through this gallery of photos by AP photographer Ramon Espinosa and ask you to keep them in your thoughts and prayers.

    Photos by Ramon Espinosa for the Associated Press

    __________________________

     

    Haiti a Year Later: Lots of 'Solutions,' Little Shelter

    Jan 11, 2011 – 9:43 PM
    Emily Troutman

    Emily TroutmanContributor

    PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti -- If people in L.A. all have a screenplay in their pockets, in Haiti, everyone's got a blueprint -- geodesic domes, Styrofoam cinder blocks, shipping container shacks. In the year since the earthquake, Haiti has become an architectural Eden, where no one has "plans" or "designs" -- just "solutions."

    There are 800,000 homeless people here, 180,000 houses damaged and $5.7 billion pledged. All two hours from Miami. American entrepreneurs appeared in Haiti just days, and sometimes, hours after the earthquake. But they weren't the only ones.

    Charities that never before set foot in Haiti appeared within hours -- photographers in tow and dollar signs in their eyes. Shelter is "sexy" humanitarian aid. Houses and tents are photographable. Try telling your donors, "We helped 100 people urinate in a toilet today!" or "The trash on the street is now in a pile!"

    But for most, the easy deal never materialized. Though more than $1 billion has been spent in Haiti since the quake hit a year ago Wednesday, only about 1,000 permanent houses to replace the ones that crumbled have actually been built here. And none in Port-au-Prince, according to the United Nations Human Settlements Program, which tracks the numbers. At this rate, Haiti will be "Built Back Better" by the year 2110.

    Land disputes, dysfunctional bureaucracies, battles over funding and fierce competition have made shelter the most clearly failed effort of the recovery in Haiti. The one key factor that keeps people from successfully building houses here? For the past year, I've found, no one has really tried.

    Shrouded in the myth of "reconstruction," major aid groups have focused on the quick fix. Ingenuity and ambition -- those American ideals -- are still at bay in Haiti.

    And at least one entrepreneur learned his lesson the hard way.

    Arriving Full of Ideas, Hope

    It's late July and I've just flashed my press badge and a smile to security at the airport. I've come to meet Ben Sandzer-Bell, a French-American businessman who is here to promote his bamboo eco-housing solution in Haiti.

    Haiti a Year Later: Lots of Solutions, Not Many New Houses
    Emily Troutman for AOL News
    Ben Sandzer-Bell, who directs the company CO2 Bambu, arrived in Haiti with big ambitions. After setbacks, he's now adapted his plans.
    Though we've never met, I spot him at the luggage carousel from 50 feet away -- the familiar dark glasses of an architect, fedora, worn leather bag that looks rained-on but probably cost him a paycheck. He sticks out among the missionaries and aid workers -- no cargo pants, no fanny pack.

    This is Sandzer-Bell's second trip to Haiti and he's arrived for a whirlwind week of meetings. First, he will meet with the Lutheran World Federation, with whom he's secured a small contract; then, the Spanish Red Cross, which "looks promising"; then, a mind-boggling mix of charities, private businesses and consultants.

    He's just one of hundreds who are trying to navigate the post-disaster market here. And if his ambitions can be ascertained from his schedule, he is awaited by a Herculean task -- get some contracts, convince them he needs the money up-front, figure out the whole customs thing, jump-start the bamboo industry, etc.

    He arrives with a small envelope of bamboo seeds, painstakingly cultivated, he says, "worth their weight in gold." He has a vision of bamboo forests lining the hillsides of Haiti. Others may have tried that before and failed, but they used the wrong kind of bamboo, he says.

    While I wait for Sandzer-Bell to find his bag, I chitchat with a group of young people who have arrived to Haiti in matching T-shirts. "Love Loud," the shirts say, with an icon of the cross, inside a map of Haiti, jutting, more or less, into the Gulf of Gonave.

    "We're hoping to build some houses," 18-year-old Zack Jones says. "And spread the gospel."

    His slow Texas drawl and sweet, Justin Bieber puppy eyes make everything seem possible. He travels with other young volunteers, including 20-year-old Mechelle Poche, who says her first trip abroad is going fine, "except I got a little dizzy when we first went up."

    She means the plane, I finally realize -- it's her first time flying. And she wouldn't be here at all except that her mother thought if she's "gonna go somewhere better to go with Pastor John." The Rev. John Babler, to those of us who don't frequent Birchman Baptist Church in Fort Worth.

    Sandzer-Bell arrives with his luggage and I follow him out of baggage claim. More accurately, I run ahead, eager to capture that one, timeless image: Traveling salesman meets Haiti.

    Haiti a Year Later: Lots of Solutions, Not Many New Houses
    Emily Troutman for AOL News
    Zack Jones, an 18-year-old missionary from Fort Worth, Texas, arrives at Haiti's airport for a one-week trip. Unlike many others with big plans here, he actually built a house.
    CO2 Bambu, based in Nicaragua, is what Sandzer-Bell calls a "triple bottom line" company -- affordable, good for the Earth, good for local populations. In this case, the local workers would be Nicaraguan, but no matter, once Haitians fall in love with bamboo, they'll want to grow it, too.

    "I know I sound like I have a, what's the word? ... Messianic vision," he says, by way of introduction. "But believe me, if you talk to anybody in bamboo right now that's how they sound."

    Well, not just the people in bamboo.

    Everybody Has a 'Solution'

    Officials with every aid organization admit that at least some of their days are spent answering surprise house calls and e-mails from salesmen. Soon after the earthquake, it became a problem worth complaining about.

    In an interview in July, U.N. Special Envoy Bill Clinton told Esquire magazine that he was bombarded with shelter "solution" e-mails. It seemed everyone in the world was suddenly an architect -- and a salesman. E-mails on humanitarian Listservs read like a Sears catalog.

    "Light weight, fire resistant, soundproof," wrote William Danshin of his product, from Canada.

    "Structural integrity, projected longevity, and sense of dignity," promised Sunit Doshi.

    "Stronger, cheaper and prettier," said Tommy Sanford.

    Pinecone, a company out of New Zealand, offered "The Turtle," as well as its variations, "Emergency Turtles," "Permanent Turtles" and "Enlarged Turtles."

    In March, officials with the U.N. tried to organize the chaos. They created an alternate shelter coordination website for for-profit companies, discretely named "Shelter Solutions."

    The objective of the new site was to push for-profits out of the game, not just because their products aren't "charitable," but also because they didn't know the rules. In the height of the disaster response, sales pitches seemed tacky. When they happened, it was in the language and culture of aid, not business.

    In general, in Haiti, there's a lot of money at play, but people don't talk about payment, they say "funding." Instead of products, they say "relief items." Instead of business plans, they say "strategies." Funders are "partners." Failures are "delays."

    The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) receives e-mails every day.

    Just weeks after the earthquake, a frustrated business owner posted this form-letter response: "When Congressional funds are allocated, [USAID] will certainly be looking for partner organizations. ... Please watch the activities of the Shelter Cluster to learn more as the situation evolves."

    It didn't take long for people to actually show up, looking for "partners."

    Preaching the Gospel of Bamboo

    It's day five of his journey and Ben Sandzer-Bell has just met with a representative from Save the Children. This is perhaps the 15th time he's given his 10-minute spiel on the benefits of bamboo, and the fifth time I've seen it.

    From his duffel bag, Sandzer-Bell pulls out squares of bamboo walls, like carpet samples, to show how sturdy, well insulated, pretty, green and affordable they are. Lightweight, right? But strong too!

    He reinforces the concept of the "triple bottom line." Then we watch a video about the bamboo forest he's growing in Nicaragua and at the end his humble staff stands in front of their product holding a Haitian flag. Someday, he says, this could be Haiti.

    Sandzer-Bell is getting better at his pitch. He laughs and tells me he feels like a vacuum cleaner salesman. He's lucky, because in the end, it's a nice product. Save the Children seems excited about the prospect of bamboo houses. But like many eco-solutions, the product is expensive, much more expensive than plywood. Charities, like any other business, want bang for their buck.

    Seven months after the earthquake, Save the Children tells Sandzer-Bell that it isn't in a position to talk about real houses. All the money is going to "transitional" schools. Like transitional houses, they are mostly made of plywood. Schools have been easier to build because land rights are less complicated.

    Haiti a Year Later: Lots of Solutions, Not Many New Houses
    Emily Troutman for AOL News
    In Haiti, Sandzer-Bell arrives at an appointment with a charity, dragging his duffel bag of bamboo samples. He says he feels like a vacuum cleaner salesman.
    "I thought we were in the walk, crawl, run stage," says Sandzer-Bell, speaking about what he's learned. "But really, it's the silence, silence, silence, oops we forgot about you, and as long as you're here you could probably give us a proposal on this ... stage."

    The entrepreneur made inroads via e-mail from Nicaragua, but it seems every time he makes a good connection, his contact leaves. Most organizations, including the U.N., did not have the capacity to immediately dispatch a bunch of people to Haiti.

    By the end of the meeting, Sandzer-Bell knows almost as much as he knew when it began. For now, Save the Children says, it will consider buying some of Sandzer-Bell's bamboo to insulate a transitional shelter. Actual houses are still a theory.

    He didn't realize before coming here, he says, that there was such a huge intermediate market in transitional buildings. He already has one container with the materials for one house en route to Haiti. But in retrospect, he wishes he had sent wall materials and dispensed with the idea of selling charities on the actual house.

    Sandzer-Bell assumed that with 1 million homeless people here, some of these charities would be building homes. Rookie mistake.

    To Fish or Not to Fish

    When entrepreneurs step off the plane in Port-au-Prince, whether they know it or not, they find themselves in the heart of an ages-old conflict in international assistance. It's the "teach a man to fish / give a man a fish" divide that has spurred decades of debate about the best way to serve people in need.

    The international "assistance" community is firmly divided into two groups. One is "aid" and the other is "development." The distinction between aid and development is not just theoretical. They operate from two different philosophies and mandates. They are also paid out of different pockets.

    "Aid" is focused on temporary relief from disaster and suffering -- for example, providing water or emergency doctors. "Development" is focused on long-term capacity building -- fixing the broken sewage system to provide clean water or training Haitian doctors to provide better services.

    Haiti a Year Later: Lots of Solutions, Not Many New Houses
    Emily Troutman for AOL News
    In Port-au-Prince, Haiti, one family was lucky enough to receive a transitional shelter. They are confused, they say, by the lack of a toilet and walls. Each of these shelters costs between $1,000 and $1,500, the cost to repair a home.
    Some organizations manage to do both very successfully. And, ultimately, both sets of needs are real and in some ways, different. People need clean water right away, but they also need clean water 10 years from now. Haiti, in particular, is considered a classic example of a country destroyed by aid and ignored by development.

    In other words, too many free fish.

    To address the immediate need for shelter in Haiti, the international aid community passed out 800,000 tarps. That took almost six months and cost about $40 million. About 98,000 tents also were passed out. That cost, on the low side, about $30 million.

    No one really knows, in total, how much any of this cost. There is no organization or group that calculates the figures, in part, because there is no regulatory responsibility for aid groups to transparently disclose the costs.

    But an analysis of the tents and tarps, conducted in May by Jon Ashmore, an independent consultant to the shelter coordination committee, provides some clues. Many organizations shared candid figures for his report and he published one actual budget from a charity on the ground. For a relatively cheap tent, one that cost about $100 in the U.S., the shipping, overhead and distribution costs added $150 more.

    Once the aid organizations were done with tarps, they began to build "transitional" shelters -- one-room shacks with tin roofs, some with plywood walls and some with walls of tarps. Since last year, they have built 31,656, according to the U.N.

    The shelters are temporary and will only last two to three years, theoretically, until people can build real houses. They cost about $1,000 to $1,500 each -- $1,500 is also, coincidentally, the exact amount that the Pan American Development Foundation says it costs to repair an earthquake-damaged house in Haiti.

    In the meantime, organizations are replacing the first batch of tarps, which fell apart after six months in the sun.

    Finding Reality on the Ground

    Sandzer-Bell's biggest challenge to entering the market, he discovers, is not the inconsistencies or the lack of transparency or the simple fact that no one is trying to build real houses.

    Even if he found someone who wanted to buy his bamboo house, his problem is the fierce competition over a set of fixed resources that is entirely monopolized by aid trucks, storage space and the slow process of customs approval.

    If he could get his product into Haiti, then maybe, just maybe, he could sell it. In the meantime, he faces what the experts call "a logistical nightmare."

    Haiti a Year Later: Lots of Solutions, Not Many New Houses
    Emily Troutman for AOL News
    In Cabaret, Haiti, Cheyenne, 2, stands outside a neighbor's house in a community that residents say was built by Food for the Poor in 1997 for the handicapped. It has fallen into disrepair. The community would like to fix the houses, but there are no jobs.
    With so many charities operating in Haiti now, there is no warehouse space left. Inflation is rampant. The prices for real estate, food and equipment have gone up 30 to 200 percent. Car dealerships are out of cars. The government is out of license plates. Experts -- in everything -- are in short supply.

    During his week in Haiti, Sandzer-Bell sets up a meeting with a logistics consultant. He's a chain-smoking, world-weary pro who has a reputation for getting things done. The expert says the docks are a mess -- the only way to get stuff in is through the Dominican Republic. And even then, it will cost.

    Organizations, he says, often make "donations" to the "charities" of customs employees to grease the wheels. But that's more of a tithe than a bribe, since it hardly works. Sandzer-Bell takes copious notes and, despite the grim news, is still buoyed by the prospect of progress.

    The whole enterprise, he says, appeals to him -- riding to meetings on the back of motorcycles through the dust and the sun, waiting for people who don't appear, sleuthing out the truth. It draws out equally, he says, his French side -- the charm, the laissez-faire; and his American side -- the businessman, the ambition.

    By December, however, Sandzer-Bell is less optimistic. By e-mail, he tells me, his containers never made it out of customs. Other home builders whose stories I followed echoed his experience.

    'I've Seen This Movie Before'

    People think this is the first time anyone's tried to Build Back Better in Haiti. When the earthquake first hit, I met with a friend in Washington, D.C. He's an ex-political operative and spent many years in Haiti.

    At the six-month anniversary of the quake, we met for coffee. I gave him the litany of events as I had witnessed them -- the white SUVs, the meetings about nothing, the rubble, the government stalling everything at the port, the money for aid but not development, the new fancy restaurants in town, tarps, transitional shelters, photo ops and more photo ops, mayors who do nothing but cause trouble.

    He just looked into his cup of coffee and said slowly, "Yeah, I've seen this movie before."

    Aid groups that claim to be building permanent shelters in Haiti are almost entirely addressing the needs that existed before the earthquake hit. They are building houses destroyed in 2004 and 2008, when hurricanes rocked the city of Gonaives.

    Haiti a Year Later: Lots of Solutions, Not Many New Houses
    Emily Troutman for AOL News
    Another eco-housing solution, this prototype sandbag house outside of Cabaret, Haiti, is an object of some mystery to nearby residents.
    They are building houses for poor people -- people who have been poor in Haiti since long before Americans decided to text in a billion dollars in aid. All over Haiti, if anyone took the time to look, there are endless examples of exactly the kind of rebuilding people now imagine for Haiti.

    Little neighborhoods built decades ago -- for the poor, the disabled -- are everywhere. And they are falling apart. Their residents have no money to repair them, no jobs to get the money.

    In July, the government of Haiti, the United Nations and the U.S. government universally declared an end to the "emergency phase" of the response.

    In an interview with National Public Radio, Haiti's president, Rene Preval, tempered the statement: "I said we are moving from the emergency phase into the reconstruction phase, but we are maintaining the emergency phase."

    Hugh Brennan, an international construction consultant working here in Haiti, acknowledges, "Even though we're calling them transitional shelters, since that's what we're getting funding for, they are effectively permanent. After the earthquake, you look at this country, you could see right away people are going to be living in those houses for the next 15 to 20 years."

    The goal of the international community is to build 125,000 transitional shelters by the end of next year. The grand total for these shelters? At least $125 million. The total to fix the 99,043 damaged houses? $148 million.

    No sign yet of when the "emergency phase" might actually end.

    Save the Children is still focusing on schools. Ben Sandzer-Bell is now pursuing micro-finance approaches to home building, which looks more promising. "I think we will sell bamboo houses," he says. But it will be around the non-profits, rather than through them.

    He says he's not discouraged. "While I realize it must be incredibly frustrating as a camp dweller, and while it makes for good journalistic coverage to complain about the lack of progress, I also believe, and have from day one, that Haiti's reconstruction will be a generation-long challenge. These are early days."

    Still, for now, Eden has not appeared. But at least the young people I met at the airport in July, Zack Jones and Mechelle Poche, actually built a house. They took a beat-up old school bus into the hills and laid down cinder blocks for a week.

    "We got all but the roof up," Zack says.

    INFO: South Sudan, Somaliland, and Border Changes in Africa « Sahel Blog

    __________________________

    Posted by: Alex Thurston | January 12, 2011

    South Sudan, Somaliland, and Border Changes in Africa

    Yesterday the BBC invited readers to a discussion on Facebook about the potential impact of South Sudanese secession on political configurations in Africa:

    If South Sudan gets independence, will it encourage splits in other African countries? A number of voices are suggesting that could happen as the vote takes place in the South. Could Nigeria, Ivory Coast, Congo, Angola and others break up too? Colonel Gaddafi described a divided Sudan as “the beginning of the crack in Africa’s map” … Would that be a good or bad thing for the continent?

    From what I know, border changes and the partition of nations occur relatively rarely. In Africa, you have Eritrean independence from Ethiopia in the early 1990s, but beyond that I am struggling to find an example of a country on the continent seceding from or joining another since the independence era (see Wikipedia’s list of border changes in Africa since World War I). So I think that South Sudan’s secession may inspire hope among secessionists elsewhere, but I do not think it will touch off a domino effect of splits.

    There is one other region in Africa that appears within reach of independent nationhood: Somaliland, which has claimed independence since 1991. Somaliland has its own government and enjoys a greater degree of stability than other regions of Somalia. Recently Somaliland successfully transferred power from one democratically elected leader to another, reinforcing democratic credentials that outshine those of many independent African nations. As crisis continues in southern and central Somalia, moreover, the US and other Western powers are showing greater willingness to consider recognizing Somaliland or at least treating it, de facto, as its own nation.

    Interestingly, given this discussion about South Sudan and Somaliland, The Economist recently interviewed Somaliland’s new president, Ahmed Mohamed Silanyo, and Somaliland’s foreign minister, Mohamed Abdullahi Omar, on the subject. The interview is worth reading in full, but here is one key quote:

    Baobab: What are the implications of the referendum in South Sudan for Somaliland’s quest for recognition?

    AS: If the international community accepts South Sudan’s independence, that opens the door for us as well. It would mean that the principle that African borders should remain where they were at the time of independence would change. It means that If Southern Sudan can go their way, that should open the door for Somaliland’s independence as well and that the international position that Somaliland not be recognised  separate from Somalia has changed.

    What do you think? Is recognition for Somaliland in sight?

    __________________________

     

    REPORTS AND THOUGHTS FROM SUDAN AND BEYOND

    © 2011 Pete Muller Photography

    A slow but steady day here in the capital. Lines and still long but things are moving smoothly.

    This vote is going to take ages!

    Southern Sudan ReferendumSouthern Sudan ReferendumSouthern Sudan ReferendumSouthern Sudan ReferendumSouthern Sudan Referendum_MG_9212

     

    >via: http://petemullerphotography.com/blog/?p=487

     

    GULF OIL DISASTER: Don't Believe The Hype—The Water's Not Safe Yet + It Could Happen Again

    The Tragic State of the Gulf of Mexico: Sampling Reveals Oil and Dispersants on Mississippi Coast

    by: Dahr Jamail and Erika Blumenfeld, t r u t h o u t | Report

    Dead fish and oiled marsh grass, Blood Beach, Ocean Springs, Mississippi. (Photo: Erika Blumenfeld)

    In October 2010, Truthout tested several water and soil samples from the Gulf of Mexico for chemicals in BP's crude oil and toxic dispersants. One sample of dead marine life was also tested.

    Truthout also obtained and had analyzed a sample of pure Corexit 9500, one of the toxic dispersants used to sink the crude oil. The dispersants BP has used in the Gulf of Mexico are banned in at least 19 other countries. BP has used at least 1.9 million gallons of the dispersants in the Gulf of Mexico to sink their 4.9 million barrels of crude oil.

    The samples were tested in a private lab via gas chromatography by an analyst who requested anonymity.

    Pass Christian Harbor at dusk. Photo: Erika Blumenfeld

    Pass Christian Harbor at dusk. (Photo: Erika Blumenfeld)

    Lab tests have confirmed oil and chemicals from the dispersants in the samples tested, which contradicts ongoing statements from both BP and the Obama administration that the Gulf of Mexico is safe from the effects of the BP oil disaster.

    Corexit 9500

    Lab tests with Corexit 9500, oil, and saltwater.

    Lab tests with Corexit 9500, oil, and saltwater. (Photo: Scientist who performed lab analysis)

    These two vials were filled with saltwater and a small amount of motor oil. Two drops of Corexit 9500 were added to the vial on the left and both vials were gently shaken for 30 seconds. Both samples then sat for one hour before this picture was taken.

    The milky color of the water in the vial on the left displays the manner in which the dispersant causes a portion of the oil to dissolve into the water. When crude oil in the Gulf is treated with dispersant, a large portion of the oil is also dissolved into the seawater, allowing harmful volatile contaminants to also dissolve into the water, which would have otherwise evaporated had the oil been sitting on the surface.

    This theory is nothing new, but this picture displays this phenomenon visually. After nine days, there was still no sign of any separation between the dissolved oil and water at all. In fact, it currently appears that the effect has only increased over time.

    The foam atop the vial containing the dispersed oil resembles foam that this writer, other journalists, BP cleanup workers and fishermen along the Gulf Coast have witnessed present in the wake of areas of oil having been sprayed with dispersants.

    Many of the chemicals present in the oil and dispersants are known to cause headaches; nausea; vomiting; kidney damage; altered renal functions; irritation of the digestive tract; lung damage; burning pain in the nose and throat; coughing; pulmonary edema; cancer; lack of muscle coordination; dizziness; confusion; irritation of the skin, eyes, nose, and throat; difficulty breathing; delayed reaction time; memory difficulties; stomach discomfort; liver and kidney damage; unconsciousness; tiredness/lethargy; irritation of the upper respiratory tract; and hematological disorders.

    Solid Samples

    Mississippi Gov. Hailey Barbour has claimed that Mississippi coastal waters are clear, the beaches clean and that the seafood caught in the Gulf is safe to eat.

    Yet, soil samples taken along the beach at Long Beach, Mississippi, on October 21, 2010, confirmed the presence of crude oil. One sand sample, from location 3012.45N, 8930.41W, contained 9.35 parts per million (ppm) of Oil Range Organic Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ORO), confirming the presence of crude oil. This sample also contained ethanol, which is a chemical in BP's dispersants.

    Another sand sample taken from the same area contained 160 ppm ORO.

    Samples with no oil or chemicals should test at 0 ppm.

    Foamy substance at Long Beach, Mississippi that contains oil and ethylene glycol.

    Foamy substance at Long Beach, Mississippi that contains oil and ethylene glycol. (Photo: Erika Blumenfeld)

    A third sample from the area, containing both sand and a brownish foam on the water that local residents and fishermen believe is the result of dispersed oil, contained 14.68 ppm ORO, confirming the presence of crude oil. This sample also contained ethylene glycol, a chemical in the dispersants.

    The US Coast Guard, federal government and BP claim that no dispersants have been used since mid-July.

    Black granular material at Long Beach, Mississippi that tested positive for crude oil.

    Black granular material at Long Beach, Mississippi that tested positive for crude oil. (Photo: Erika Blumenfeld)

    Another sample from the area taken from sand covered in what local residents described as "coffee grounds" contained 8.65 ppm ORO, confirming the presence of crude oil.

    Don’t miss a beat - get Truthout Daily Email Updates. Click here to sign up for free.

    A small inlet on the beach was filled with brown foam and oil sheen. A sample of sand covered with the foamy sheen contained 175 ppm ORO.

    Foamy substance along shoreline at Long Beach, Mississippi that tested positive for crude oil.

    Foamy substance along shoreline at Long Beach, Mississippi that tested positive for crude oil. (Photo: Erika Blumenfeld)

    On January 7, federal and Louisiana officials took a boat tour of an area in southern Louisiana that remains fouled with oil from the BP disaster. They found areas in Barataria Bay where oil continued to eat away at the fragile marshland, where no protective boom nor cleanup workers could be found. Affected areas were up to 100 feet wide in some sections.

    "This is the biggest cover-up in the history of America," Plaquemines Parish President Billy Nungesser told reporters.

    Nungesser was angered by claims by the Coast Guard and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) officials he was with, who said a plan was being developed to clean the area.

    "It's like you're in bed with BP," Nungesser told the officials. "Don't tell me I got a voice in the way you put together that crappy document," Nungesser said as WDSU TV filmed the altercation. "It ain't worth the paper it's printed on. That is bullshit." Nungesser then told one of the federal officials, "You cover up for BP."

    Marine Life

    A dead jellyfish found on Long Beach, Mississippi, nearby a large amount of the aforementioned thick, brown foam, was tested and found to contain 15 ppm of ethanol, one of the chemicals in the dispersants, along with low levels of n-Butanol, another chemical present in the dispersants that are manufactured by Nalco Holding Company.

    Nalco Holding Company has corporate ties to BP.

    Based on comparative analysis of Corexit 9500 and the sample collected, the sample appears to contain approximately 500 ppm of dispersant.

    Water

    A water sample in the same area, taken in an area covered in thick, brown foam, contained propylene glycol, one of the confirmed ingredients of Corexit 9500.

    Samples were also taken from a beach in Ocean Springs, Mississippi.

    Blood Beach in Ocean Springs, Mississippi.

    Blood Beach in Ocean Springs, Mississippi. (Photo: Erika Blumenfeld)

    A water sample at this area also contained ethelene glycol, as did a water sample taken from a fish pond in the front yard of a resident's home in Ocean Springs.

    Another water sample from the beach contained diethylene glycol BE.

    Dead sea turtle, Blood Beach, Ocean Springs, Mississippi.

    Dead sea turtle, Blood Beach, Ocean Springs, Mississippi. (Photo: Erika Blumenfeld)

    Additional Sampling and Conclusions

    Earlier this month, Louisiana Environmental Action Network, Lower Mississippi Riverkeeper, in conjunction with the Subra Company, released results of sampling in the coastal regions of Louisiana.

    Their press release states:

    "The wetlands and ecosystem soil/sediment from Atchafalaya Bay eastward to the Louisiana/Mississippi state line contained 6 to 89 individual Alkylated Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Oil Range Organic Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ORO) up to 11,600 mg/kg [ppm] (1.16%) which corresponded to the fingerprint of the BP Louisiana Sweet Crude."

    Sixty percent of the soil/sediment samples the groups tested contained up to 18 PAHs in excess of the marine sediment screening levels.

    The groups tested seafood and found, "Alkylated PAHs were and continue to be detected in aquatic seafood species from the wetlands and estuaries along the Louisiana coast from Atchafalaya Bay eastward to the Louisiana/Mississippi border."

    For example, they found oyster samples with up to 8,815 to 12,500 mg/kg (ppm) ORO, and blue crab samples containing up to 2,230 to 3,583 mg/kg (ppm) ORO.

    Shrimp, mussels, fish and snail samples also contained exceedingly high levels of ORO and PAHs.

    The press release concluded:

    "Wetlands and ecosystem soil/sediment samples and aquatic tissue samples from all areas sampled contained Alkylated PAHs and Oil Range Petroleum Hydrocarbons."

    Mississippi's Governor Barbour has said that Gulf seafood has been "tested more than any other food in the history of the universe."

    State health departments in Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama had issued swimming advisories while BP's well continued to gush oil into the Gulf of Mexico last summer. Since then, however, all three states have declared their beaches, waters and seafood safe from oil disaster related toxins.

    Florida never issued any advisories, despite many residents reporting illnesses they attribute to the oil disaster.

    US federal government agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency, Food and Drug Administration and the NOAA ,along with President Barack Obama himself, have declared the Gulf of Mexico, its waters, beaches and seafood, safe and open to the public.

    The testing conducted on the samples taken by this writer only represent a tiny part of the Gulf compared to the massive area that has been affected by BP's oil catastrophe. A comprehensive sampling regime across the Gulf, taken regularly over the years ahead by independent scientists, is clearly required in order to implement appropriate cleanup responses and take public safety precautions.

    ______________________________

    By John Terrett in on January 11th, 2011.

    Photo by Reuters
    The White House commission that's been looking into the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico has formally published its landmark report. 

    The final document looks just like a book and it's about the same size as a small novel.

    The report calls for urgent reform of the oil and gas industry as well as government practices to overhaul safety in US offshore drilling.

    Last week the commission's main findings were leaked to the media - a culture of cost-cutting and weak management was blamed.

    On Tuesday, the message that Deepwater Horizon could happen again - was reinforced by Commission co-chairman Bob Graham.

    "Our investigation found significant errors and misjudgements by three major oil drilling companies - BP, Halliburton and Transocean - these culminated in the disaster," he said.

    The commission's report also calls for a thorough overhaul of government oversight in the US oil industry citing Europe as an example of good practice where there's one death for every five in the Gulf of Mexico.

    Mr Graham said. "Our government let it happen, our regulators were consistently outmatched."

    The commission gave its main recommendations to stop another Deepwater Horizon from happening again.

    They include:

     1. The creation of an independent safety agency within the department of the interior.

    2. A safety institute to foster better practice and funded by the oil and gas industry.

    3. Drilling operators to be made more financially responsible for the consequences of failure.

    4. More consultation among federal agencies like the coastguard.

    5. A more prominent role for science. 

    Science has been virtually shut out of oil and gas drilling according to co-chair Bob Graham.

    "This is the time, as Three Mile Island was for the nuclear industry to say enough is enough we're going to set a new era of greater safety," he said.

    But many fear the Commission's report will gather dust in the halls of congress like many others. Commission co-chair William K. Reilly told me: "I would hope that given the platform of research here and the credibility that this report should win and has deserved they will pay attention to this."

    I said, "You're going to make a lot of noise?"

    "We're going to make some noise!" he laughed.

    Reilly's also recommending congress gives back 80 per cent of the fines paid following the disaster to the Gulf of Mexico region.

    So now the politicians know what happened and they have recommendations to stop it occuring again. 

    Meanwhile, in all five Gulf states there are thousands of people still picking up the pieces of their lives - lives wrecked by an accident the BP Oil Spill Commision report says the US oil and gas industry was unprepared for.