PUB: Codhill Press - Chapbook Award 2010

2010 Codhill Poetry Chapbook Award

 

Prize: $1000 cash prize and fifty copies

Judge: Pauline Uchmanowicz

Manuscripts are judged anonymously. Codhill Press will consider all finalists for publication. Please see our Chapbook Award 2009 page for a list of last year's winner and finalists.

 

Guidelines

The competition is open to any poet who writes in English. Previously published poems with proper acknowledgement are acceptable. Translations and previously self-published books are not eligible.

Poets should submit twenty to thirty pages (no more than one poem per page) plus SASE for contest results and $25 reading fee. Manuscripts should be on good quality white paper, paginated consecutively, with a table of contents and acknowledgements and bound with a clip. Include two cover pages, one with the title of the manuscript alone, and a second with your name, address, phone number, and email address, together with the title. Your name must not appear anywhere else on the manuscript.

Entries must be postmarked by November 30, 2010.

No UPS or FedEx. You may include a SASE postcard for confirmation. Manuscripts will not be returned. Simultaneous submissions to other publishers are permitted, but Codhill Press must be notified immediately if the manuscript is accepted elsewhere.

Mail manuscript and entry fee to:

 

Pauline Uchmanowicz
Codhill Poetry Chapbook Award
P.O. Box 280
Bloomington, NY 12411-0280

 

Contest Procedures and Ethical Concerns.

Codhill Press is committed to safeguarding the integrity of its contest. You should not enter if you have studied with the judge or received her help in shaping a manuscript. Similarly, in order to avoid any impropriety, the judge is instructed to set aside any manuscript she has had a hand in creating. Codhill subscribes to the CLMP contest code of ethics, and agrees to

1. conduct our contest as ethically as possible and to address any unethical behavior on the part of our readers, judges, or editors;

2. provide clear and specific contest guidelines--defining conflict of interest for all parties involved; and

3. make the mechanics of the selection process available to the public.

 

Additional considerations.

Before you submit a manuscript to the Codhill competition, please read the work of the poets we publish. We publish a diversity of approaches, from the formal to the openly experimental. Codhill has published books by poets in academe and by poets having no connection to academics. We have published books that are accessible and ones that are abstract and demanding--and the range between. All publications rely on vivid language use, a musicality, technique, importance of content, and a willingness to take risks.

 

 

PUB: Orange Prize for Fiction: > show > feature > home > orange 2011 entry form and rules

  • Call for entries

    for the Orange Prize for Fiction 2011

  • Deadline for lists of books to be entered: 15 October 2010

    Books published between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2011 are eligible. Firstly please submit a list of the three books you intend to enter, plus any titles by previous shortlisted or winning authors, by 15 October 2010.

    Closing date for entries

    The final closing date for entries is 29 November 2010.

    orange arrowdownload full terms and conditions

    If you have any queries regarding entry or eligibility, please contact

    Sarah Jones
    orange arrowsarah.jones@booktrust.org.uk
    020 8516 2960

    Orange Award for New Writers

    The Orange Award for New Writers was launched in partnership with the Arts Council in 2005 to celebrate the 10th Anniversary of the Orange Prize for Fiction. Since 2005 a bursary of £10,000 has been awarded to six authors to assist them in the development of their careers. Orange and the Arts Council are immensely proud of the achievements of the award and the success of the winning writers.

    Orange has now announced new plans for the 2011 Orange Prize for Fiction which will focus on promoting the books across a wider range of digital platforms. As part of these plans, Orange confirmed it will be able to support a greater number of first time writers in a year long campaign, which will replace the current Orange Award for New Writers.

  • PUB: Welcome to Steel Toe Books - Submit

    Submit Your Manuscript
    to Steel Toe Books


    Open Reading Period for Sacred/Spiritual Poetry

    September 1, 2010-October 31, 2010

     

    Steel Toe Books is seeking to publish at least one single-author poetry collection consisting, at least in part, of poems on sacred/spiritual topics. We're intrigued by writers (such as Robert Graves in The White Goddess and Donald Revell in The Art of Attention) who see a deep, historic connection between religious practice and poetic ecstasy. We're seeking retellings of Biblical narratives, songs of Jacob-like angel wrestling, apocalyptic dreams -- a cross between John Milton and John Donne, a cross between Flannery O'Connor and Francis of Assisi, a cross between Brother Antoninus and Sister Madeline DeFrees. We're seeking something in the spirit of The Gospels in Our Image edited by David Curzon; American Religious Poems edited by Harold Bloom, or Technicians of the Sacred edited by Jerome Rothenberg.

     

    Each manuscript should be between 50-80 pages long, have a cover page with your name and contact information, and contain an acknowledgments page. Do not send a SASE; all manuscripts will be recycled. The results of the reading period will be posted on our webpage and Facebook page.

     

    There is no reading fee, but we ask everyone who submits to purchase one of our existing titles directly from us. Once you have selected a book, click on the "order" magnet on our online refrigerator, fill out an order form, print it out, and send it to us along with your manuscript and a check for $14.50. We'll send you a book right away.

     

    Steel Toe Books does not normally accept submissions outside of our advertised open reading periods. We are not reading any other types of manuscripts at this time.

     

    For information on the manuscripts selected in the last open reading period, or for more about what's going on at Steel Toe Books, click on our "news" magnet.

     

    PHOTO ESSAY: Chinese in Sudan > Pete Muller Photography

    Sep 302010

    The Beijing hotel is, without a doubt, the largest “prefab” I’ve ever seen. Its spacious lobby, grandiose theater, connecting hallways and dozens of rooms are constructed solely from plastic slats fastened together in a less than appealing aesthetic. Its entrance is decorated with plastic trees that, at night, glow an array of neon colors.

    Last Saturday evening, the Beijing Hotel appropriately hosted the celebration of the 61st anniversary of the People’s Republic of China. Sponsored by the Chinese National Petroleum Company and organized by the Chinese consulate, the event amounted to one of the strangest, albeit entertaining, that I have ever attended.

    It commenced with gorgeous Chinese dancers playing drums on a stage that looked prepared to host the Blue Man Group. Blue, orange, green and yellow lights illuminated the dancers as copious amounts of fake smoke gushed from machines on all corners of the stage. The drummers were followed by a team of predictably underage male gymnasts who, despite frequent mistakes in their act, finished every maneuver with a plastic, ear-to-ear smile. The gymnasts made way for a series of renowned Chinese, pop culture entertainers who performed acts ranging from magic, to brass instruments to comedic routines in Mandarin poking fun at Chinese celebrities that no one outside of China has ever heard of.

    In the middle of the event, a man from the consulate took the stage to say a few words about the People’s Republic and led the crowd in the Chinese national anthem. Unfortunately, neither he nor any of the other participants spoke a word of English. The presentation’s communication was left to a young, Chinese-American woman who served as the evening’s emcee. With a charming smile, and form fitting black dress she appeared between scenes to explain what would otherwise be lost.

    The event was a strong and interesting indication of China’s growing presence in resource-rich areas of Africa. Here in Sudan, China is heavily invested in petro-chemical extraction in the oil rich basins throughout south central areas of the country. When one drives through the oil fields of northern Upper Nile state, it is common to see busloads of Chinese oil workers traveling on out-of-place tarmac roads between processing facilities. There is, in fact, an international airport in the village of Paloich, a tiny speck in the middle of the Melut oil basin. While I do not know for sure, something tells me that the planes that fly in and out are likely destined for China.

    I am curious to see how the resource game between east and west unfolds here in Africa. As I watched these Chinese entertainers whose mission, at least in part, is to win popular favor among Sudanese, I could not help but think of the vast cultural gap between China and Africa. Western powers have been involved in Africa for centuries, leaving behind aspects of their customs, practices and languages. While large-scale cultural differences certainly exist between Africans and Westerners, most continental capitals bare the clear marks of past and current relationships with the West. The national powerbrokers in most countries share learned languages and customs with incoming French, Dutch and American investors. Watching a stereotypically Chinese entertainer play a trumpet into the face of a Sudanese parliamentarian seemed like a futile attempt at cultural persuasion.

    _MG_6145
    _MG_6163
    _MG_6654_MG_6194_MG_6254_MG_6262_MG_6348_MG_6469_MG_6543_MG_6578_MG_6634_MG_6666

    REVIEW + VIDEO: Film—Freakonomics [2010]

    Controversial Economics Best Seller Adapted to Screen

    Freakonomics

    Freakonomics [2010]

    Rated PG-13 for violence, sexuality, nudity, drug use and brief profanity.
    In English and Japanese with subtitles.
    Running time: 93 Minutes
    Distributor: Magnolia Pictures 

     

    Film Review by Kam Williams

    Very Good (3 stars)

    Freakonomics was a best-selling primer on Economics written by University of Chicago professor Steven Levitt in collaboration with journalist Stephen Dubner. Together, the talented twosome endeavored to make an inscrutable subject accessible for the average individual by breaking ghetto demographics and financial transactions down into layman’s terms even a street hustler could comprehend.

    For instance, they exploded the myth of selling drugs as a viable means of making it out of the ghetto by showing that the average dealer’s income is less than minimum wage. A more controversial conclusion arrived at by the authors and propagated by controversial pundits like conservative Bill Bennett was the notion that the U.S. crime rate could be significantly reduced by sterilizing all African-American females.

    Now, a film based on this incendiary tome has been brought to the screen by a half-dozen different directors, including Academy Award-winner Alex Gibney (for Taxi to the Dark Side), Oscar-nominees Morgan Spurlock (for Super Size Me), Rachel Grady (for Jesus Camp) and Heidi Ewing (also for Jesus Camp), along with Seth Gordon and Eugene Jarecki. They divvied up the chapters and structured the picture as a discrete series of vignettes recreating the assorted content.

     

     

    large image
    Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything

    Click to order via Amazon

    by Steven D. Levitt & Stephen J. Dubner

    • Which is more dangerous, a gun or a swimming pool?
    • What do schoolteachers and sumo wrestlers have in common?
    • How much do parents really matter?
    These may not sound like typical questions for an economist to ask. But Steven D. Levitt is not a typical economist. He studies the riddles of everyday life—from cheating and crime to parenting and sports—and reaches conclusions that turn conventional wisdom on its head.
    Unfortunately, I have to report that, as is usually the case with adaptations of books, the flick fails to measure up to the source material. However, that bad news is counterbalanced by the fact that it is still likely to be very well received by anyone unfamiliar with the print version.

    Among the topics addressed are the aforementioned correlation between black criminality and the abortion rate, as well as such intriguing questions as whether 9th graders can be bribed to get good grades, whether Japanese Sumo wrestling is fixed, whether government incentives work, and how Bernie Madoff, pedophile priests and other disgraced “pillars of the community” managed to mask their crimes for so long.

    An iconoclastic expose’ featuring fresh cultural slants apt to leave the average armchair economist reevaluating a lot of conventional wisdom they’vetaken for granted.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    INFO: Today's Tragedy in Abuja > naijablog

    Friday, October 01, 2010

    Today's Tragedy in Abuja

    Last night we had a group of friends round for dinner to celebrate my 41st birthday.  Without trying to sound smug, I am fortunate to count some keen minds as mates, who never fail to impress in their analysis of their beloved country, Nigeria.  But, just now, it seems that no one really knows what is going to happen – both with the elections, and more generally, with Project Nigeria.  After the party, at midnight, we headed down to the area near Millennium Tower, a half-completed building site near the National Mosque.  From behind razor wire, we looked on at the celebrations an invited few dignitaries were privileged to watch. I was filled with a sense of sadness that yet again, ordinary Nigerians were being excluded from the main event.

    At 10 this morning, still a little blurry from the night before, the alert came in on my Twitter client (from NEXT) that Jomo Gbomo, the mythical spokesman from MEND, had said that there would be bombs in and around Eagle Square at 10.30.  I retweeted the NEXT message.  A few others did the same. In the following few minutes, the general sense was that it was more hot air and blather from a weakened organisation.  I reminded myself at the same time that Henry Okah’s house in Jo’burg had been raided the day before by South African police on a tip off from Nigeria.  I speculated that the two events might be connected.  Then, I left it and went to make coffee.

    At 10.15, a friend called, and told me both the UK and US Embassies were issuing warnings to stay indoors among their staff and expats.  The message was that the threats were both real, specific and credible.  I decided to put off a jaunt into town to take pictures of Nigerians celebrating Independence.  The Twitterverse started to hot up.  I tweeted that there was a heightened security alert among the diplomatic corps.  Still there was scepticism that anything would happen.

    Then, around 10.30-10.40 I heard what I thought was a thunder-clap.  It had started to rain by then.  However, the sound wasn’t quite like thunder – it was more of a powdery boom from far away.  I suspect now that what I heard was the sound of the bomb – only a couple of miles from my house close by the Arcade Hotel on Shehu Shagari.  By this time, I had logged on to watching the official celebration online via live streaming from Eagle Square.

    I followed the tweets coming in commenting on the schoolchildren dancing, followed by a powerful show of military hardware.  We could all finally understand why Abuja has thrummed with the sound of helicopters and planes flying by in the past week. 

    And then, a tweet came through from my friend Egghead, who was somewhere outside Eagle Square.  There had been an explosion.  Tweets started to flood in, with Egghead cited as a “Reuters witness”.  Apparently a tear gas canister had been accidentally discharged in a corner of the square.  I tweeted that I hoped that this was the cause of the explosion story.  And then Egghead confirmed that there had been two car bombs.  He must have walked down from Eagle Square on Shehu Shagari in the direction of the Hilton.  In one particularly stark tweet a few minutes later, he mentioned that he was looking at dead bodies.

    As more information on Mend’s act of terrorism filtered through on Twitter and started to appear on the news wires, the celebration continued on in Eagle Square. It was hard to imagine that the security forces were not aware of what was going on barely 500 metres away.  President Goodluck gave a speech and awarded medals.  The day had taken on a surreal and tragic hue.  News then came in of a bus burning on Airport road.  Was this a multi-location terrorist attack?  A tweet came in that two ‘arab men’ had been seen on powerbikes just before the car bomb went off.  As usual with all things on twitter, it takes longer than traditional media to get confirmation.  As I write at 15.40, this witness report has yet to be confirmed and may not be true.  Awful images taken at the scene started to appear online, and the BBC published a video clip taken shortly after the explosion.  A confused man could be seen trying to crawl away from the site of the explosion.  It was hard to believe this was all happening in boring-old Abuja.

    It’s a bitter pill to swallow to consider this: MEND were far better prepared to ‘celebrate’ Nigeria’s 50th Independence Anniversary than anyone else.  There must have been months of planning involved to create a car bomb as powerful as this.  What is worrying is that it shows how easily Abuja can be infiltrated by terrorists – the area around Eagle Square must have been packed with security operatives and yet a huge car bomb exploded close by.  As I write, the terrorists are most likely still within the FCT, celebrating the success of their awful mission: the murder of innocent Nigerians.

    While many if not most Nigerians have deep sympathy for the conditions in which Niger-Deltans are forced to live, its very hard to see how this IRA-style act of terrorism on the nation’s capital is going to do Mend any favours in the short or the medium term.  The military response may well be heavy – we have now seen the helicopters and the fighter planes.  It adds a troubling new dimension to the stalling issue of the 2011 elections.  And it leaves many Nigerians wondering whether they should celebrate at all.  A tragic day for Nigeria.

    INFO: The Field: Coup Attempt in Ecuador Is a Result of Sec. Clinton's Cowardice in Honduras

    Coup Attempt in Ecuador Is a Result of Sec. Clinton's Cowardice in Honduras

    By Al Giordano

    Oh, crap. Another year, another coup in Latin America. And while today's attempt by police forces in Ecuador went so far as to fire tear gas at elected president Rafael Correa, the military brass in the South American country have sided with the democratic order - its top general is on TV right now strongly backing the elected government - and this one isn't likely to go as well for the anti-democracy forces as last year's did in Honduras.

    First, because the Ecuadorean people are far more advanced in social and community organization than their counterparts in Honduras were last year. Second, because the events last year in Honduras caused other center-left governments in the hemisphere to prepare for what everybody saw would be more coup attempts against them in more countries.

    Additionally, we can expect in the coming hours that the police leaders responsible for todays events - you don't need to understand Spanish to get a pretty good idea of what went down this morning by watching the above video - will be rounded up and brought to justice, as would happen in any other country, including the United States.

    But, kind reader, do you know why this is even happening? Because the same unholy alliance of Latin American oligarchs who can't stomach the rising wave of democracy in their countries - from the ex-Cubans of Miami to the ex-Venezuelans and others who have joined them in recent years - along with international crime organizations seeking new refuges and members of extreme rightist groups in the United States and elsewhere, saw their scheme work in 2009 in Honduras and took note of how quickly, after US President Barack Obama denounced the Honduras coup, his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton began playing both sides of it.

    It was this newspaper, through reporter Bill Conroy's investigations, that broke the story last August that the State Department-controlled Millennium Challenge Corporation had poured extraordinary amounts of money into Honduras in the months leading up to the June 29, 2009 coup d'etat. And in story after story, we demonstrated with documented fact how Clinton's Millennium Challenge Corporation went so far as to violate the ban on US aid to the Honduran coup regime. Clinton's later endorsement of farcical presidential elections and her over-reaching attempts to pretend nothing had happened in Honduras are precisely the signals that were received by today's coup plotters in Ecuador when they made a run at toppling the democratic government there.

    At present, thankfully, the coup in Ecuador seems more likely to fail than to succeed. And there will be hell to pay for those behind it. But it didn't have to get that far. That only happened because, last year, the US Secretary of State pulled off a kind of "silent coup" in US foreign policy while her commander in chief was buried with the urgent domestic tasks stemming off economic collapse and, as everyone knows, small nations get little attention almost always anyway.

    This time, the White House would do well to put a much shorter leash on its Secretary of State, because her horrendous and unforgivable anti-democratic behavior regarding the Honduras coup only fueled, and continues to fuel, understandable speculation that if the United States doesn't walk its talk about opposing coups d'etat, then it must have been an active participant in plotting it. The mishandling of the Honduras situation last year did lasting damage to President Obama's stated hopes to turn the page in US relations with its closest neighbors after decades of abuse and neglect. A single misstep by Secretary Clinton today and in the future regarding the events in Ecuador, like those she repeatedly made regarding Honduras, now that the hemispheric coup plotters have moved from Central America to larger South America, will further erode the cause of democracy in the entire hemisphere. I don't trust her. Nobody south of the border does. And nor should you, Mr. President.

    Update: Narco News has translated today's Statement from the Office of President Rafael Correa.

    Update II: If it holds, this will be the first time in the history of the hemisphere that the Armed Forces of a country stood up against a coup d'etat from the first moment. Now, that would be democracy at work.

    Update III: The situation in Ecuador today is further complicated by the disillusion that the very social forces that elected President Correa have with his actions in office. The CONAIE (Federation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador) is the leading national indigenous movement with strong alliances with labor and other social forces) held a press conference today to say that it is neither with the police forces nor with President Correa. The CONAIE and its hundreds of thousands of participants is not only responsible for Correa's election, but its mobilizations caused the rapid-fire resignations of previous presidents of Ecuador in this century.

    The situation thus also shines a light on the growing rift in the hemisphere between the statist left and the indigenous left and related autonomy and labor movements. The CONAIE is basically saying to Correa, "you want our support, then enact the agenda you were elected on." Whether one sees this as a dangerous game of brinkmanship or something that actually strengthens Correa's hand by placing him in the middle zone ideologically, it is worth seeing this at face value and beware of getting led astray by some of the usual suspect conspiracy theorists of the statist left who are predictably out there barking that the CONAIE is somehow an agent of imperialism, dropping rumors of US AID funding but never seeming to exhibit the hard evidence. Sigh. What Johnny-One-Notes! They wouldn't know nuance if it slapped them in the face. For them, you either line up lock-step with THE STATE (if it is "their" state) or you're a running dog of capitalism. That kind of Stalinist purge mentality should have died with the previous century.

    The CONAIE's grievances happen to be very legitimate. Of course, they do not justify a coup d'etat, but the CONAIE is not participating in or supporting the coup d'etat. It is saying to Correa; we'll have your back, when you have ours. This, like the Armed Forces support for Correa, is also a historical first in the region. And the plot thickens...

    Update IV: A boilerplate statement from the US State Department:

    We are closely following events in Ecuador. The United States deplores violence and lawlessness and we express our full support for President Rafael Correa, and the institutions of democratic government in that country.

    We urge all Ecuadorians to come together and to work within the framework of Ecuador’s democratic institutions to reach a rapid and peaceful restoration of order.

    Now let's see if they walk that talk...

    Update V: 9:30 p.m. Quito: Ecuadorean military troops have just rescued President Correa from the police hospital where he was sequestered all day. Looks like it was a pretty violent battle, but multiple media on the scene are reporting that the president is safe and the Armed Forces stuck with the democratic order.

     

    Comments

    a slight detour from your point: All I can glean today

    is the cover story for the police mobilization, described in some sources as the result of misinformation: a protest against planned cuts to salaries, benefits, and promotion timelines.  The military brass very quickly and publicly came out on Correa's side.  Correa miscalculated the response to his attempt to negotiate in person with the police forces, and got tear gassed as a result.  None of this adds up, at the moment, to an actual coup attempt, other than references to manipulation by the oligarchy, and the public response by other Latam admins.

    Things I would like to know:

    At what point did this have any legs as a coup attempt? 

    And, what's the transnat constituency for a coup, besides Ecuador's historically way-less-brazen-than-Honduras oligarchy?  Oil multinationals have been pretty happy with Correa.

    Any directions to authentic journos in Quito would be greatly appreciated ...

    And your actual point in this post -- that coupistas in the hemisphere can count on the US to at the very least let it happen thanks to Hillary -- is very well made and taken.

    @ Dominic

    Dom - Every time there has been a coup d'etat in this hemisphere - from Chile 1973 to Honduras 2009 - it has been designed for its proponents to say "oh, no, this is not a coup!"

    In what country do police forces shoot tear gas at their elected president unless they feel protected by much bigger forces. There is already a disinformation campaign throughout the Internet - similar to what happened with Venezuela 2002 and Honduras 2009 - to claim that this is only a "police protest." Use your common sense and instincts and knowledge of history. The same international gang of thieves that was behind the Honduras coup is now making its move to try to go after what it considers the "second slowest zebra" of the center-left governments in the hemisphere. Only this time, the zebra was fast enough and has the backing (so far) of the Armed Forces. But this is clearly an attempt at destabilization to make an elected government fall.

    Tragic... antidemocratic, but most likely not a coup...

    Sadly, taking control of buildings, bridges, etc. is an all too common form of protest in South America.  Miners did it in Bolivia.  Environmentalists and students did it in Argentina.  

    The leaders of this 'uprising' have said it is not a golpe and I think, given the context of social dissent in South America, we have to accept that.  The fact that these are members of the security forces certainly gives the impression of a golpe, but I doubt it will play out like one unless -- and this is very possible -- ALBA allies use it as a litmus test for imposing their own brand of imperialism.

    Kristin Bricker

    http://twitter.com/kristinbricker

    Kristin B's twitter feed is helping answer those and many other questions ... Lucio Gutierrez seems to be involved, and the police are apparently split on the coup question.

    No news, bad news...

    The President subcontracted SD to the Clinton Foundation; a Faustian deal à la "South America for my leisure, a cliff-hanger Presidency for the seizure". It's either Jane Hamsher or me. He picked fifth column over Front Page. If you're privileged or burdened with covering the Clinton Foundation's playground, pity the poor played souls, and leave it to Hillary to cast the death-spell of serendipity. A deal is a Deal.  

    posted K's twitterfeed before seeing yr response

    I'm with you Al, was just trying to figure out how coup planners (seems as though Gutierrez is a nexus for them) thought they could be successful without the backing of the military. 

    lets be realistic here

    ok I've lived in Ecuador for the last 3 years and am married to an Ecuadorian national.  Correa has made a many big promises but has done almost nothing.  He is arrogant.  When anyone challenges his ideas or policies he always says the same thing.  "You are ill-informed."  He is not open to anyone elses ideas but his own.  This riot is a culmination of years of simply ignoring everything the opposition has to say.  Not that I am condoning a "coup"  that is certainly not the way to go about it.  And this one doesn't really make too much sense. 

    Correa however has it coming to him.  He has shut down any media organization that opposes his policies and has even put in place a new constitution that allows him to dissolve the National congress if he wants to.  

    Also for decades the leaders of latin america have whined and moaned about how the US has been intervening in the region and how they don't want it anymore.  Obama did just this with the situation in Honduras.  He ignored it and allowed them to deal with it as well.  Secretary Clinton did the same thing.  So how do you want it?  Should they intervene or not?  I believe that the US has no business intervening in the matters of other countries that pose no direct threat to our national security.  This includes honduras, ecuador, cuba even Iraq.  We should simply let them deal with their own stuff.  And when we let them handle their own matters we should not be criticized for giving them what we want.

    The US has nothing to do with these countries matters and should not be brought into them only to be criticized once we are.  Clinton and Obamas isolationist strategy is exactly the right way to go about it. So quit whining and scapegoating the US for other countries issues.

    With all due respect...

    Dominic - With all due respect to Kristin (who worked here for various years, but has not been part of this project since March), she is simply retweeting and translating "reports" from other sources, some of which are true, but some of which are grossly inaccurate or knowingly false on the part of their originators. She doesn't have experience reporting from a country during a coup d'etat. She doesn't have experience reporting from or on South America. She doesn't know the region or its dynamics. I couldn't disagree more strongly with some of the rumor-mongering she is participating in today. Retweeting the over-the-top screeds of Eva Golinger is not reporting. It is merely spreading hyped up hit-count seeking rumors of which one has no way of separating what is true and what is not. Knee jerk shouting of slogans and retweeting of discredited sources is not authentic journalism. It is not even reporting. And with all she learned here, I'm surprised to see her take the easy path rather than put a more discerning eye on her Twitter tweets and journalism. Hopefully, with time, she'll self-correct on that. We all make our mistakes starting out in this trade. Hopefully we all learn from them.

    @ Andrew

    Andrew - What we urged during the Honduras coup was the very non-intervention you recommend here: that the US walk its talk and cease providing funds to sources backing the coup. Funding a regime is intervention. Endorsing its false elections is intervention. Barking orders at Honduran President Zelaya not to cross back into his own country, as Clinton did on July 23, 2009, was intervention. We agree totally on the point of intervention. We just might not interpret it the same way.

    Obama Suffers From A Typical American Syndrome

    I agree with Al that Clinton is a corrupt clown, but I think the President also suffers from that classic, basic ignorance of Latin America in general that many Americans, including Liberals, suffer from and so he makes the mistake of leaving issues in the region "to the experts." I don't know how many times I've bumped into San Francisco liberals who are very anti-Cuba or anti-Venezuela from just a basic lack of real interest or knowledge on the subjects.

    So far it does look like the Ecuadorian masses are on the streets, fighting back and defending their democracy.

    I'm not by any means

    I'm not by any means supporting the coup, but what "rising wave of democracy" would the ex-cubans be upset by?  The Democracy of a president who has been in power without holding elections for over five decades?  Are you serious? 

    @ Prom

    Prom - You're point is well taken, and legitimate. I probably should flesh out what I mean.

    The "ex-Cubans" I refer to aren't nostalgic for a democracy that didn't exist before the Cuban revolution either. They seek a return to the Battista era when oligarchs rules with an iron fist in alliance with organized crime to create an oasis for crime mafias. What they're upset about is the tide that began in Venezuela, where the left began winning legitimate elections and governs as democratically as the rest of the countries the western media calls democracies. I'm referring to guys like Otto Reich and crowd who used to run US policy in the region as an appendage of the Cold War; they're not pro-democracy, and the coups they've long backed are proof of that.

    What they want from Honduras, and now from Ecuador, is a place they can begin anew the Battista experiment. And they've got lots of narco and crime organizations in agreement: they, too, want a haven. And the support of the Miami ex-Cuban leaders - the same who protect the violent terrorist Luis Posada Carriles - have revealed that democracy is the last thing they want in their participation in supporting coups against democratically elected governments, in Venezuela 2002, in Honduras 2009 and now in Ecuador 2010.

    I certainly understand the position of those that don't consider Cuba a democracy. But nor can one consider its opposition to be small-d democrats. They've revealed very much to the contrary, year in, year out. And if they got in power again, the last thing Cuba would get is democracy.

    CONAIE And All Movements Need To Act Fast

    Just read the full statement by CONAIE and while their grievances make complete sense, they should still act fast to mobilize against the coup considering Correa remains trapped in that hospital. A lack of unity and real organization will just lead to another tragedy as in Honduras. And then CONAIE won't even have Correa to negotiate with, instead a brutal police state won't just clash with them as Correa has done, it will start killing them off as the fascist regime does in Honduras.

    Get your facts straight

    My situation is similar to that of Andrew, in that I'm a US citizen married to an Ecuadorian national. I've been living here in Ecuador for almost 4 years and I have seen, first hand what is happening here. However, unlike Andrew I've seen a courageous president Correa try to deal with the corruption that years of US intervention have created. Correa isn't arrogant, he's self confident and is doing what he considers best for the entire country. He's fighting the oligarchs on the one hand and the indegenous people on the other. Unfortunately, they both want the same thing - control of Ecuador's resources, and Ecuador and it's people be damned. 

    I can tell you first hand that the corruption is everywhere. We live in the countryside (100 km south of Quito) and the schools are a disaster (the teenagers in our barrio cannot do simple arithmetic), the police are useless and corrupt, the local governments are totally corrupt, and the indgenous people in the paramo above us are attempting to force the poor people here to pay for the water from the local river.  Without this natural resource these people who are barely subsisting can't water their crops, feed their livestock, or survive. This is what Correa is dealing with, and is being opposed at every step by those who only want what they can take. Correa wants to test the teachers for competency and they strike, close the schools, and complain that he's a dictator. The local governments demand kickbacks for all contracts, and complain that Correa is a dictator when he attempts to make them accountable. 

    The indigenous people supported Correa because they thought he was going to give them everything they demanded. When he turned out to be promoting policies that favored all Ecuadorians he was called a traitor by them. All you have to is look at the people they're supporting now to see how "just" is their cause. They now support Lucio Gutierrez, one of Ecuador's most corrupt ex-presidents in the hopes he will give them what they want. 

    You don't have to take my word for it. Do some research instead of just regurgitating the nonsense that comes from those who are trying to manipulate the events to achieve their own agendas. The facts are there, all you have to do is dig a little.

    our government is a bunch of

    our government is a bunch of scumbags. they know no morals whether democrat or republican. what do you expect. they are pigs. 

    "sin" drone

    "Obama Suffers From A Typical American Syndrome" Submitted September 30, 2010 - 9:19 pm by Max Do not overestimate American Democracy. Imperiled, fragile it is as it has never been in the past. GDR or DDR, Reichstag or the double D. If you launch a syndrome from a pleonasm, reality surmises a purposeful tautology. Obama tends to Democracy's first and last real line of defense: American Citizenry. Honduras, Cuba, Argentina, Ecuador, Mexico and kindreds' fates hang in a balancing acts of Executive restraints and deputized artistry. Hillary Clinton is a piece of roving art for the gentry's commodity. Let's put the syndrome where it belongs, the gentry's commodity market.

    Lanny Davis

    Lanny Davis must be cursing under his breath, he just lost a big client (the golpistas), lol.

    The boilerplate language from the State Dept. is so annoying. It's wishy-washy, and leaves things open for interpretation. Sec. Clinton shows more fortitude when it comes to dealing with North Korea, but when it comes to standing for democratic principles, she phones it in.

    But, kind reader, do you

    But, kind reader, do you know why this is even happening? Because the same unholy alliance of Latin American oligarchs who can't stomach the rising wave of democracy in their countries - from the ex-Cubans of Miami to the ex-Venezuelans and others who have joined them in recent years - along with international crime organizations seeking new refuges (...)

    All the aforementioned have such refuge currently in Panama, and they were all applauding the coup in Honduras last year. There's a growing Venezuelan "exile" community of people who are vehemently (and probably violently) anti-Chavez. While we have increased drug interdiction - to keep the Americans happy and prices up - massive money laundering is left alone or even protected. The treasurer of the president's political party - who also just happens to be his cousin - is in jail in Mexico on charges of money laundering for the Beltran Leyva cartel, our "tourism minister" features in a Colombian case file as an arms trafficker and so on.

    So I don't know - why create new refuges if they already have everything they need in Panama?

    Al, your reporting is priceless!

    A very pedestrian comment:

    should it not read:

    "And neither should you, Mr. President."

    So Glad This Ended Quickly

    Great to see Ecuadorans defeat this coup quickly. We won't have endure weeks of both inspiration and heartbreak like last year with Honduras, watching the people unite and rise up and yet unable to restore their elected government. At least we had another ray of hope here in Ecuador where the good guys did win!

    @ Tom Barich

    Tom

    You said things that certainly ring true for me. I've been thinking about moving to Ecuador for some time now and have been completely immersed in trying to find good political info. I expected to see some kind of movement against Correa. Given our past actions in SA it seemed inevitable.

    I've been trying to follow the events without being blinded not only by the controlled media but also by the controlled opposition. You say the facts are there, that we all we have to do is dig a little. It has been tough for me to find good reliable info. I would certainly appreciate any info and/or direction to these facts or their source.

    Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

     

    Thanks

    Al, talk about being wrong in this one

    Wow! Talk about a condescending article. No, not all events like the one that took place in Ecuador are the fault of the US. The entire article took Ecuador's political instability out of context in order to put the blame on Clinton. Ecuador has had 10 presidents in 10 years, well before Clinton was the Sec of State. In Ecuador violent uprisings are not uncommon.  Also, by placing the blame on the oligarchy also takes the country's history out of context. When the oligarchy was in power, leftists would stage protests WORSE than the ones lived these two days. The country has a healthy history of the population standing for what they believe is right. It doesn't really matter who is in power. The other side will bitch no matter what. Placing the blame on Clinton is condescending because it's based on the premise that those who revolted aren't able to make decisions on their own, but only react of US' actions.  Al, if you want to blame the US for this, please do but do your research first.

    Still don't get Honduras

    The left still doesn't understand what happened in Honduras.

    Clinton wasn't 'cowardly'.  Obama and the Democrats were complicit.

    The American left is so easily fooled that one little statement by Obama where he pretended to be against the coup is somehow obscuring that the US of A was always behind the Honduras coup in the first place.

    Even from the beginning, it was obvious that a bunch of officers in a military that was wholely dependent on US weapons and training, and that a bunch of businessmen in a country that does 70% of its trade with America, would never, ever stage a coup if they thought the USA didn't like the idea.

    Writers have identified the money from the usual suspects in the National Endowment for Democracy and the usual fronts for the Republican and Democratic parties that flowed to the coupsters ... beginning under Bush and then continuing uninterrupted under Obama.

    And most tellingly, one of the reasons for the 'soft-freeze' on US aid to Honduras, instead of the hard cut-off required by US law when a coup occurs, is that the US left a big loophole in its aid cut-off and let this money for 'democracy-promotion' continue to flow in the weeks after the coup.  Of course, US 'democracy-promotion' money does not flow to the people struggling and organizing for democracy.

    And of couse, the US openly oppsed the legitimate President returning to power, and instead supported the coupsters and their rigged elections held while the nation was under martial law and political opponents were under open threat of attack.

    Clinton wa not cowardly on Honduras.  Obama and Clinton were complicit.

    And, my first thought when hearing about this coup was to ask whether or not Obama and Clinton were behind this one too.  That's the key of understanding what really happened in Honduras. It lets one ask the right questions about the next coup that just happens to try to overturn a left-ist leaning leader that corporate America doesn't want in power.  Don't know if they were. That's the sort of info I was looking for when I came to NarcoNews.

    @ Marta, @ Samson

    To the both of you -

    Marta says I'm wrong because this was just another in the fourteen year series of rebellions that forced the resignations of ten presidents over that time, and the US can't possibly have any role in any of it.

    Samson says I'm wrong because the US government plotted and executed the Honduras coup and he comes to Narco News looking not for facts but for confirmation of his worldview which is that the US is obviously behind all coup attempts.

    Truth is, you obviously can't both be right!

    Truer is, neither of you are. You are simply making the same "I'll construct my own set of facts to confirm my worldview" argument, albeit from opposite sides of the spectrum.

    Let's talk about what just went down in Ecuador, Samson: Who saved the president and the democratic order? The Ecuadorean Armed Forces, that's who. And did you know that every year - let's take last year for a hard example - the US Defense Department gives $50 million US dollars directly to Ecuador's military?

    It's no secret. Its public record. You can read it right here:

    During Fiscal Year 2009 the U.S. USMILGP has provided the Armed Forces of Ecuador with a total of $50,715,111 in Security Cooperation funds. Our programs consist mainly of equipment deliveries, military training, professional exchanges, and humanitarian assistance.

    So do you want it both ways, now?

    In other words, you say, about Honduras, that "a bunch of officers in a military that was wholely dependent on US weapons and training, and that a bunch of businessmen in a country that does 70% of its trade with America, would never, ever stage a coup if they thought the USA didn't like the idea."

    Well then how do you explain that a military - this time in Ecuador - that also receives even more funding than that in Honduras from the Pentagon, suddenly became the first Armed Forces in the history of the continent to oppose a coup d'etat? According to your logic on Honduras, it would have to be because they were ordered by Washington to do so. Washington would therefore be, under your stated rules, complicit in the defense of democracy and the Correa government! But, see, I don't think that is the case either. There are simply more players on this field than the United States. (There are even more players in the United States than the United States government, such as exiled Bush and Reagan functionaries like Otto Reich or Senator Jim DeMint who work against Obama administration policy and for coups d'etat in Latin America. It would be simpleton to blame any government for what its opposition does.) Not everything is always so black and white.

    As for you, Samson, you seem to want it both ways. If you want Narco News to simply shout to you the latest anti-imperialist slogan, give you a lollipop and congratulate you that your presumptions were right all along, well, this isn't the doctor's office. We're journalists here. We seek out the facts and the truths behind them. There are plenty of pamphleteers and conspiracy theorists out there that will do that for you (albeit with less style and fun than here!).

    As for you, Marta, you seem to think that the very same police forces that repressed and attacked the rebellions by CONAIE and others all these years are suddenly one and the same as them! But the social forces responsible for those rebellions since 1996 were very clear to state yesterday that they don't back the mutinous cops, nor do they back Correa, who they consider to have betrayed their electoral support upon which he got voted in. The rebellions of recent years in Ecuador were not from different social forces each time: each and every one of them was from the same movements, those of the CONAIE and its well organized partners at the grassroots of indigenous, labor and other struggles. And those cops - they were always on the other side of those.

    Obviously the mutinous cops were in cohorts with other forces bigger than them. Much of that will now come out in the wash, too, when the trials begin. To say that it is in police officers' nature to follow orders and not to rebel is not condescending. That's what cops do! And the real protagonists of the authentic social movements in Ecuador see them the same as I do. This is not an outsider's presumption: this is what we have learned by listening to the Ecuadoreans who know them best.

     

    HAITI: Blue Haiti - NYTimes.com

    Op-Ed Contributor

    Shannon Freshwater

    Blue Haiti

     

    LOOKING out the window as the plane descended, I saw that Haiti had changed color. The familiar earthy brown tones of the mountains surrounding Port-au-Prince were no longer visible; instead, everything I could see was deep blue — the color of the thousands of tarpaulins covering the landscape.

    I had last seen my country one afternoon back in January, when I was evacuated four days after the earthquake. Returning last month for a four-week trip, I was afraid to see what I would find.

    A soft rain greeted me when I stepped off the plane, as if to wash away my anxiety. So did the energizing rhythm of a calypso band playing under a nearby canopy. Dancing post-earthquake, I thought, had to be indecent. Instead I rocked slightly to the beat, smiled at one musician and put some dollars in his hat. The airport had been partly destroyed, and there was no air-conditioning at baggage claim, but I was happy to be home.

    The traffic jam on the way to my house was an opportunity to slowly take in the changed neighborhoods, the camps, the rubble. I saw that the giant Caribbean supermarket I’d shopped at many times had collapsed and the small church of Ste. Thérèse, where I had attended funerals and weddings, was gone.

    But above the devastation, I was surprised to see billboards advertising concerts by Haiti’s best-known musicians, like T-Vice, Carimi and Tropicana. Perhaps, I realized, dancing wasn’t entirely out of the question. Several musicians have already written songs about the quake. Many people sing along to this one: “Under the tarps, you are being ignored/ Tents and sheets, they don’t want to see you./ Fissured homes are being ignored.”

    In many ways, Haitian art and folklore have begun to incorporate the earthquake that leveled Port-au-Prince as well as Jacmel, Petit-Goâve and Léogâne. In the art market of Pétionville, the hilly suburb that has become the de facto center of the capital since the earthquake reduced the city’s main square and shopping district to rubble, paintings of destruction scenes are for sale. They go for $50 to $400, depending on whether the buyer is foreign or Haitian and whether he knows how to bargain.

    Haitians have even invented their own name for the earthquake: “Goudou Goudou.” It’s an onomatopoeia; when the earth shook, the rumbling sounded something like that.

    But most of all, the earthquake has become the main theme of Haitian storytelling. I spent the month visiting friends, and all were eager to tell me about Goudou Goudou. All needed to say where they were when it happened, and what they had lost by the time it ended. Telling their stories was a way to affirm that they were still among the living, and not among the dead.

    Joe, an architect, lost his house, his aunt and uncle, and an overflowing file of drawings. He is lucky because he was able to move in with a sister.

    Évelyne also lost her home but went back the next day to search the rubble and found her passport and her cat.

    Pat lost both his parents and his family home, and Nono lost his bakery.

    Danielle slept in a tent in the parking lot of her office building for six months.

    Émile sleeps with his family in a tent in his backyard; they can still use the kitchen in their damaged house. He joked that their tent was as opulent as that used by the president of Libya, Muammar el-Qaddafi.

    Most cannot afford to rebuild, and even if they had the money, many are too traumatized to begin.

    Pat complains that his hands have been shaking uncontrollably ever since the earthquake.

    Marie told me about her cousin, who still cannot sleep in a regular bed. He had a home office, and when the earthquake hit, the office collapsed. His beloved secretary of 30 years was buried inside. He moved in with Marie, and every night since, he has put down a mattress in her kitchen to sleep. At first, her family laughed, but it has now been nearly nine months and the laughter has stopped. He is a grown man, a 60-year-old, and they are worried. She asked: What will it take for him to rebuild his confidence, his life, his business?

    Some people want to talk about what they can’t remember: Amnesia after severe shock is common. I had lunch with one friend just a few hours before the earthquake, and she didn’t remember a thing about the meal.

    Another had amnesia for several weeks after the quake. The last thing she could remember was the co-worker sitting to her right at a meeting dying instantly, and the man on her left, who survived, yelling, “Don’t leave me, don’t leave me.” Nothing else, not even that she walked nearly eight miles home from her office in high heels and a disheveled dress with her face decorated with mortar from the crumbling walls.

    After all this talk, I felt I needed to get out and see some familiar sights. The Rex Theater, where I saw concerts, plays and movies as a child, was still standing, but there were cracks all up and down its gray walls. Fanal, my favorite crafts store, was gone. The Sacré-Coeur church, where I had my first communion, was mostly destroyed, but the cross stood defiantly in the ruins.

    The country I knew has collapsed and a new one is growing in its place. On the outskirts of Port-au-Prince, a huge provisional city called Canaan is being constructed and populated. Wood poles hold up walls and roofs of blue tarpaulins. Some of the structures even have traditional terraces in front, like real houses. How provisional is this, I wondered? Will it become another slum like La Saline or Cité Soleil? How long will people stay?

    Then there are the tents — in the middle of residential streets, in soccer fields and parks, on the prime minister’s lawn. Some tent cities have restaurants, brothels, bars, beauty salons. Some offer medical clinics, latrines, water distribution, post-trauma counseling sessions. My friend Jeanine pointed out that, for many of the residents, it is the first time that they have ever had access to such services. I wondered if they might start to expect these things, to realize they have a right to shelter, medicine, sanitation and education, and that it is the government’s obligation to provide them.

    This is not to say that it is possible to find much good in those living conditions. The torrential rains are a menace, particularly when they come with strong winds that rip open the tents. Violence — including sexual violence — is an ever-present threat.

    A woman I know, Solène, told me she was attacked in her tent in the middle of the night by over 30 men and women with picks, guns, wooden planks and rocks. They had come with kerosene to burn her alive because she was accused of being a werewolf. A police unit rescued her; although her physical wounds healed in a month, she will never go back to her old neighborhood. The police weren’t much help: an officer said she really did look like a werewolf, and released the aggressors. She said she gets her energy and courage from God.

    I wish I had that faith. Right after the earthquake, many people, myself included, said that this was Haiti’s chance, that we could use the momentum of this suffering and solidarity to propel the country into the 21st century, and finally rid ourselves of that humiliating epithet, “poorest country in the Western Hemisphere.” But after my month home, I am not so sure.

    For all the vibrancy and resilience hidden under Haiti’s tents and tarps, the rebuilding — what my friends call the “refoundation” — has been slow. It is not hard to understand why.

    Just before I returned to the United States, I went to see Bartho, a friend and former colleague who lost three of his five children. He explained to me how each died, how he could not see their bodies. “Why did this happen?” he asked, his body fidgeting wildly, his voice cracking. I didn’t know what to say; all I could do was listen. For my friend, as with Haiti, the pain of the disaster remains as palpable — and debilitating — as it was on that January day nearly nine months ago.

     

    Monique Clesca is a novelist and a communication specialist for a development organization.

     

    VIDEO: HIDDEN HERSTORIES: AMY ASHWOOD GARVEY > WELL AND GOOD

    HIDDEN HERSTORIES: AMY ASHWOOD GARVEY

    "Hidden Herstories" is a vibrant documentary constructed by 20 young film-makers as part of a community initiative organised by the Octavia Foundation and funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund. Following the award-winning Grove Roots, "Hidden Herstories" details the social and political successes of four influential women, truly mavericks of their time.

    GO HERE TO VIEW 13-MINUTE DOCUMENTARY

     

    via wellandgoood.blogspot.com