VIDEO: Taylor McFerrin (Yes, Bobby McFerrin is his father.)

Taylor McFerrin & Adam Matta::Indigenous Percussion::

 

Bless..Bless..Bless..I never grow weary of Taylor McFerrin...his genius is so ill and inherited honestly...In this clip, he connects with Adam Matta, who is a master in his own right..circa 2005...There was a Beatbox competition held in NYC a couple of weeks ago and for some reason, as skilled as folks were..it didn't evoke the feeling that one gets when watching this...Spirits walk with, through, and for us...Be kind vessels and magic will come forward..effortlessly...Enjoy....

 

 

_____________________________________

Performance Taylor McFerrin and his dad, Bobby Music Instinct PBS

 

_____________________________________

TAYLOR MCFERRIN

VIDEO: The Last Angel Of History - Introduction



The Last Angel Of History - Introduction


A 1995 documentary directed by John Akomfrah discussing all things afrofuturistic. Features interviews with George Clinton, Derrick May, Kodwo Eshun, Stephen R. Delany, Nichelle Nichols, Juan Atkins, DJ Spooky, Goldie and many others. The film makes mention to Sun Ra, whose work centers around the return of blacks to outer space in his own Mothership. Produced in 1995.

This is just a brief section of the documentary. An introduction so to speak.

 

PUB: Contest | Redstone Science Fiction

Redstone Science Fiction

Random header image... Refresh for more!

Contest

Towards an Accessible Future

We are open to contest submissions, but we will close August 15th, get them in now! (Don’t forget: $300 prize.)

Redstone Science Fiction is calling for contest submissions that incorporate the values discussed in the essay The Future Imperfect by Sarah Einstein.

What does a world, or space station, or whatever look like when it has been designed to be accessible to everyone and how would people live together there?

The submissions should portray disability as a simple fact, not as something to be overcome or something to explain why a character is evil. The submissions should also incorporate the portrayal of disability in a world where universal access is a shared cultural value. (Sarah discusses more issues about dealing with the setting of such a story in her July essay.)

The story chosen by Sarah Einstein and our editors will be published in our September issue.

Specifics:
The contest will be open from June 15th until August 15th.
The maximum word limit will be 5000 words.
The winner will be awarded $300 (at least 6 cents/word).

Use the manuscript formatting as outlined by William Shunn:
- Double spaced
- 12 pt. Courier New (or Times New Roman)
- 1″ borders
- Name, contact info, and word count at the top of page one
- Name, title, page number in header for the rest of the story

The email:
- in the subject line include: your full name and story title
- in the body include: your name, contact info, word count, and a short cover letter listing your publication history
- attach your story to the email in Rich Text Format (.rtf) or Microsoft Word (.doc) format

Submit to: accessible-future@redstonesciencefiction.com

Editors Update: There has been substantial discussion online about the story contest, at io9 and other sites. Sarah addressed some of the questions raised by the essay in a comment at io9 and we reprint that here:

Hello. I am the author of the call for stories, and I am hoping I can clear up some of the concern–though I also acknowledge that some of it is very valid, and that this is a fraught topic.

The goal of the contest is to get entries which are focused specifically on universal design and the possibilities for creating enabling environments with future tech. The winning story could, indeed, have no people with visible disabilities as a result of a truly well-realized version of U.D., though that would be masterful to do without erasing the issues of embodiment and disability. I don’t believe I could write that story, but am open to the possibility that someone else could. It could also include one or many characters who very much still experience pain, limitation, and/or issues performing daily living skills even in a largely U.D. environment–in fact, the U.D. could free the writer to explore issues of disability that are wholly embodied and not culturally determined, which would be very interesting indeed in the hands of someone very skilled and with enough personal insight into those issues to put a whole lot of truth into the fiction.

Here is what we aren’t looking for:
–stories in which the character(s)’ heroism or villainy is explained by disability. They can be heroes or villains, but their motivation must come be something other than being either what Robert McRuer calls a “supercrip” or the equally difficult “evil guy who is bitter because of his disability” trope.
–stories about bionics or cybernetics that don’t also include changes to the environment. Instead, we want stories that alter shared space–rather than simply individual embodiment–as a way to create fully inclusive communities. Characters can, of course, use a variety of future tech assistive devices, but it shouldn’t be the whole of the way future tech accommodates a wider variety of embodies experiences than current tech.
–stories in which accommodations and/or assistive technologies are only granted to the particularly heroic or diabolical. (See the problematic issue of rewarding promise with disembodiment and slavery in The Ship Who Sang for an example of this.) If the future tech is unevenly distributed, it should be for more likely reasons–the availability of expensive technology only to the very wealthy, the very politically connected, or some other example that demonstrates the current inequity of accommodating technologies.
–stories which fail, themselves, to embrace the ideals of Universal Design and use disability to signify anything other than disability.

I hope this helps, though it is always a fraught process to encourage people to think about only one aspect of an issue, and I fully acknowledge that this contest does that. But any additional constraints on the content seemed to me to limit the authors’ who enter from creating possible futures that I am unable to see.

To answer timetowakeup’s question, which I hope will answer many similar questions, we are not looking for stories which ERASE disability, we are looking for ones which ACCOMMODATE it. The characters may still experience limits, may have to do things in alternate ways, may deal with pain and limitations that are not created by culturally defined barriers.

I hope this helps, and I will be happy to address any other questions and/or suggestions.

Sarah Einstein

We are proud to have Sarah’s essay and contest here at Redstone Science Fiction and we are looking forward to accepting submissions. Feel free to comment on the essay, The Future Imperfect, if you have any questions.

Submit to: accessible-future@redstonesciencefiction.com

 

PUB: Bloodroot Literary Magazine publishing poetry, short fiction and creative nonfiction

POETRY CONTEST

 

Three prizes of $200, $100, $50, three honorable mentions and publication in 2011 Bloodroot Literary Magazine edition.

CONTEST GUIDELINES:

  • * The competition is open to any poet who writes in English.
    * Manuscripts should be typewritten or computer-printed on white 8-1/2" X 11" paper.
  • * We can only accept hard copies. 
  • * Electronic submissions will not be accepted.
    * Submit original, unpublished, free verse, 10 lines to 2 pages.
    * Entry fee: $15.00 for three poems, $5.00 each additional poem.
    * Final judge: Claudia McIsaac
    * Your name must not appear on the manuscript.
    * Please provide name, address, email address, titles of poems in a cover letter.
    * You may include SASE for results and SAS postcard for confirmation (Optional).
    * Entries must be postmarked no later than September 15, 2010.
    * Manuscripts cannot be returned.
    * Please no simultaneous submission to other publications.

Mail manuscript and entry fee to:
The Editors
Bloodroot Literary Magazine
PO Box 322
Thetford Center, VT 05075

 

PUB: The Other Voices Semi-Annual Contest - Other Voices Magazine in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

issue cover

Other Voices Contest

Think your story or poem is worth more than a couple brag copies and a pen? Why not submit it for a contest?

Other Voices Contest Schedule

Type Will Appear In Deadline (Midnight)
Fiction Issue 23.1 April 25, 2010
Poetry Issue 23.2 September 21, 2010

Contest Regulations

  • The entry fee is $25 for one story (5,000 words max) or up to five poems. Additional entries are $5. Cheque or money order payable to Other Voices Publishing Society. ALL contest participants receive a one-year subscription to the magazine.
  • Entries must be original and unpublished. No simultaneous submissions.
  • Blind judging: submit the contest cover sheet along with your piece(s).
  • Pieces must be received (not postmarked) by the contest deadline.

Prizes

$250.00 for the winning entry. Honourable Mentions will receive the choice of an Other Voices tote bag, travel mug or t-shirt.

How To Submit

There are two ways to submit to the Other Voices writing contest: By regular ‘ol snail mail, and our new online submission form.

Option #1 · Submit By Mail

Your standard mail submission must include the following:

  1. The Contest Cover Sheet
  2. Your submission as per the above parameters
  3. Your cheque or money order for the appropriate amount ($25.00 for one story – 5000 words max – or up to five poems. $5.00 for each additional entry)

Note: Your submission must be received by the deadline, NOTpostmarked by the deadline.

Option #2 · Submit Online

USE OUR ONLINE SUBMISSION FORM →

 

 

 

REVIEW: 2 Books—Colfax Massacre - A Dangerous Stir

LeeAnna Keith. Colfax Massacre: The Untold Story of Black Power, White Terror, and the Death of Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 240 pp. $15.95 (paper), ISBN 978-0-19-539308-8.

 

Mark Wahlgren Summers. A Dangerous Stir: Fear, Paranoia, and the Making of Reconstruction. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2009. Illustrations. 329 pp. $39.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8078-3304-9.

Reviewed by Court Carney (Stephen F. Austin State University)
Published on H-CivWar (May, 2010)
Commissioned by Martin Johnson

Fear and Loathing during Reconstruction

In a cartoon published in Harper’s Weekly in the fall of 1868, several weeks before the presidential election, Thomas Nast portrayed the Democratic Party as a crooked triumvirate of former Confederates, immigrant Irish, and northeastern bankers. At their feet, a black Union soldier seeks in vain to cast his vote. Nast amended the cartoon with a quotation from the 1868 Democratic platform: “We regard the Reconstruction Acts (so called) of Congress as usurpations, and unconstitutional, revolutionary, and void.” In this one cartoon, Nast ably summarized at least one perspective of Reconstruction with its racial intimidation, threats of violence, and political opportunism. The cartoon also underscores the point that, though many historians emphasize the public memory of the Civil War, it is Reconstruction that has really defined the nation’s image of that period. What LeeAnna Keith and Mark Wahlgren Summers, in their respective books on Reconstruction, remind us is just how violent, turbulent, and ultimately uncertain this entire period was for many Americans. Taken together, these two books refract the complexity and confusion of Reconstruction attitudes captured in Nast’s scene with a careful, if wary, eye on the ominous dagger marked “Lost Cause” held aloft at the center.

In The Colfax Massacre, Keith attempts to provide a compelling context for the 1873 massacre while making a strong case for the bloody event as a potent symbol of the tragedy of Reconstruction. Overall, Keith strives to recover “the lost history of the Colfax Massacre, pursuing origins, characters, and legacies in the fragmented documentary record of events” (p. xviii). Keith begins her book with the disconcerting strangeness of bones uncovered accidentally and terms blurred purposefully. From the onset, Keith works to highlight both the historical account of the Colfax Massacre as well as the tortured narrative of its legacy. Throughout the first chapters of the book, Keith capably sets up her story with a careful eye for detail and an engaging writing style. Her early section on the Alabama Fever, for example, is an engrossing yet concise study of slavery, wealth, land speculation, and general Red River ridiculousness. Likewise, her section on William Calhoun’s “brief, unhappy career in politics” and the various ways his life became entwined with “Radical” Reconstruction parses a convoluted tale in a succinct manner (p. 53). An ambitious former slave owner with unpopular racial and social views, Calhoun (described by Keith as a “hunchbacked, misfit, peripatetic scalawag”) plays a central role in much of this book and provides a fascinating glimpse at the complexities of life in postwar Louisiana (p. 61).

The last part of Keith’s book focuses, of course, on the massacre itself as well as its controversial political and legal aftermath. Again, Keith skillfully navigates the local, state, and national scenes and provides a nicely detailed tableau of a shattered landscape. “Louisiana,” as Keith summarizes this period, “had distinguished itself as the most difficult and disappointing state in the seething wreckage of the former Confederacy” (p. 134). Keith appends her story of Colfax with an overview of U.S. v. Cruikshank et al. (1876), the post-Fourteenth Amendment Supreme Court decision that would have a major impact on black southerners in the years after the Civil War. Although Charles Lane’s The Day Freedom Died: The Colfax Massacre, the Supreme Court, and the Betrayal of Reconstruction (published within months of Keith’s own book) is focused more specifically on Cruikshank, Keith’s commentary provides a good segue between the massacre and the issues surrounding its legacy. The last part of Keith’s book is a quick summary of the local monument that sought to redefine the Colfax Massacre as the Colfax Riot and distinguish white participants of the event simply as “heroes.” “Half-remembered,” Keith concludes, “the history of the Colfax Massacre remained a subject for the citizens of Colfax, whose pride in the era of war and Reconstruction came to substitute for prosperity and wholesome community in the 20th century” (p. 169).

Taking a much wider perspective than Keith, Summers focuses on the role played by fear and paranoia in defining the political climate of the nation after the Civil War. Summers’s premise is an intriguing one and his book maintains a feeling of uncertainly, even though the story is well known. Summers organizes A Dangerous Stir around a two-part argument that brings together a discussion of the role fear played in establishing Reconstruction policy with a study of the various ways Americans desperately avoided a “second American Revolution.” “Reconstruction policy,” Summers argues, “was shaped not simply from politics, principles, and prejudices, but also from fears, often unreasonable, phantasms of conspiracy, dreads and hopes of renewed civil war, and a widespread sense that four years of war had thrown the normal constitutional process dangerously out of kilter” (p. 2). “Indeed,” Summers writes regarding the second point, “it seems to me possible that a ‘second revolution’ was precisely what most white southerners and many northerners of both parties were anxious to avoid” (p. 5). At once an argumentative take on a complex period as well as summary of the larger context of nineteenth-century politics, Summers’s book provides an intelligently sketched take on, in his words, “misconstruction” (p. 3). Summers opens with a nicely compact overview of the party system and the numerous conspiracies that defined the antebellum period from the Locofocos through the secessionist crisis. These early sections of the book help establish his larger theme of the impact of misinformation and disinformation on public policy. Once he gets to Reconstruction, Summers’s chapters unfortunately tend to be a mixed bag with some sections being simply too selective while other chapters are quite strong. More important, the book’s use as a fresh survey of the period is diminished by a limited bibliography that includes little recent scholarship.

One of the tantalizing aspects of A Dangerous Stir is the use of images and cartoons (and University of North Carolina Press deserves praise for producing another attractive and well-designed monograph); but Summers uses these images, many by Nast, as window dressing rather than as fully integrated elements of his argument. Despite discussions of media and the uses of propaganda, the book remains too rooted to the political narrative to allow room for Nast (who is never mentioned in the text itself). The strengths of the book relate to Summers’s experienced political eye, but the inclusion of larger themes of cultural history would have enriched his argument. Even in one of the stronger chapters of the book, in his discussion of the fading gasps of Reconstruction, entitled “The Wolf Who Cried Wolf,” there are some missed opportunities. More of an emphasis, for example, on Matt Morgan--the English counterpart of sorts to Nast, and whose brutal 1872 cartoon, “Too Thin, Massa Grant,” is included--would have been a welcome addition, especially as it resonates so strongly with Summers’s larger point. To be clear, Summers did not set out to write a cultural history of the period, and the book is at its best when he plays to his strengths.

Today, 130 years after its conclusion, the echoes of Reconstruction still reverberate across the modern era with its racialized crush of politics, promises, and perfidy. From our current vantage point, that period still seems strange and implausible, and yet thoroughly and sadly believable. By focusing so clearly on the violence, fear, and paranoia of this period, Keith and Summers have crafted very different books that help underscore the twisted unpredictability of Reconstruction as well as the moral and political costs that leached out from the period. Using fear and violence to define this era of course is not new, and observers in the 1860s and 1870s emphasized repeatedly these very themes. Nast’s aforementioned 1868 cartoon for Harper’s, for example, serves as a visual foil to both books. Amid the burning buildings and political stereotypes, Nast placed the focus on the dagger clutched (in a crucial detail) by Nathan Bedford Forrest, a man used repeatedly by Nast to represent the brutal and unrepentant South. As both Keith and Summers remind us, the backdrop behind that blade is as important as the knife itself, and in many ways the gnarled contortion of fear, loathing, and violence represents the most identifiable legacy of Reconstruction.

If there is additional discussion of this review, you may access it through the list discussion logs at: http://h-net.msu.edu/cgi-bin/logbrowse.pl.

Citation: Court Carney. Review of Keith, LeeAnna, Colfax Massacre: The Untold Story of Black Power, White Terror, and the Death of Reconstruction. and Summers, Mark Wahlgren, A Dangerous Stir: Fear, Paranoia, and the Making of Reconstruction. H-CivWar, H-Net Reviews. May, 2010.
URL: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=26163

 

INTERVIEW: Dany Laferriere—“The Work of Art” by Marianne Ackerman | The Walrus

The Work of Art

Dany Laferrière once yearned to be well known. Some twenty books later, he’d rather be widely read

by Marianne Ackerman
| Photograph by Pedro Ruiz
Books | From the September 2010 issue of The Walrus
Dany Laferrière in May 2009
Dany Laferrière in May 2009

Still life bathed in warm light: a porcelain bathtub with claw feet, sumptuous white towels draped over the edge, a table set with a stack of books and a glass of red wine. A Monday night in May, and 400 people fill the darkness of Montreal’s Place des Arts’ Cinquième Salle, waiting for Dany Laferrière. He seems to glide onstage, slim, tall, impeccably dressed in a dark suit and a white shirt open at the neck — a gentleman writer or, as the French are saying, un grand écrivain.

Instant applause. They know him well, maybe too well. How as a penniless refugee from Haiti, he chucked his menial job to write a novel about a penniless Haitian refugee writing a novel about himself. A mythical summer in a sweltering apartment on rue St-Denis, drinking, womanizing, reading, writing about the meaning of it all, sure it would lift him out of poverty and obscurity. He took the manuscript first to Jacques Lanctôt, the former FLQ activist turned publisher, warning him to expect a bomb. And he was right.

To the monoculture of Quebec, caught up in the sovereignty debate, Comment faire l’amour avec un Nègre sans se fatiguer offered an exhilarating mix of provocation and humour. Politics, too, but nothing to do with local obsessions. “In the scope of Western values,” the narrator announced, “white woman is inferior to white man, but superior to black man. That’s why she can’t get off except with a Negro. It’s obvious why: she can go as far as she wants with him. The only true sexual relation is between unequals.” 

Published in 1985, it was an instant bestseller in Quebec. The translation by David Homel, How to Make Love to a Negro, came out a year later, drawing delirious reviews across Canada as well as in the UK and the US. And, as in the novel, life obeyed art. The author was invited on Denise Bombardier’s popular Radio-Canada TV show, leading to an avalanche of publicity, which he parlayed into a media career spanning the gamut from TV weatherman (a job he famously once performed naked) to talk show regular, literary columnist, and filmmaker. His second book, éroshima, found the author reading the Japanese poet Basho and enjoying sex with Japanese girls. A new book followed every year or so, always first person, in the same pithy style and often very funny — a chronicle of the life and times of a narrator everybody figured must be Dany Laferrière.

“I like to read in the bath,” he says, grinning, as he steps into the tub at Place des Arts. A wink to a recurring scene in his books, the action draws faint laughter. Maybe it’s the suit, or that the stunt seems out of sync with the auth-ors he has chosen to present: Borges, Thucydides, Juan Rulfo, Virginia Woolf, and Michael Ondaatje, names plucked from the highbrow reaches of his personal library. No sign of Bukowski, and not a whiff of Henry Miller, though he surely owes them a debt.

Clowning around has always been Laferrière’s forte, but it’s not what readers expect from a recipient of the Prix Médicis. Presented annually in Paris to a young French writer whose work shows innovation in style and tone, the award bestows enormous prestige. Only one other Quebecer has won it: Marie-Claire Blais, in 1966. She was twenty-seven years old.

At fifty-seven, with almost twenty books to his credit, Laferrière is hardly a young writer, and certainly not unknown on the international literary scene. Nor does he meet the Médicis’ informal requirement of being “an author whose fame does not yet match his talent.” In fact, until recently, some would have argued the reverse. Says La Presse columnist and long-time friend Nathalie Petrowski, “A new book would come out, he’d talk about it on TV, be everywhere, and people would think they didn’t have to read it.”

But L’énigme du retour, the 2009 book for which he was awarded the Médicis, has changed all that, propelling him into the pantheon of world writers whose moral authority dignifies the appointments of global culture. The guy who once begged bookstore owners to stack his books in their windows, threatening to cry if they didn’t, and who paid for a poster featuring a ceiling-high erection covered with a bedsheet and plastered it around town himself, is finally fading into his much-mythologized past.

Born April 13, 1953, in Port-au-Prince, Windsor Klébert Laferrière was named after his father, a politician forced into exile for opposing dictator François “Papa Doc” Duvalier. The young wife he left behind gave her four-year-old son a new name, Dany, to hide his identity, and sent him to live with her parents in the coastal village of Petit-Goâve. He was educated in schools run by Québécois missionaries and, after high school, worked as a journalist. In 1976, a close friend was assassinated by supporters of Duvalier’s son and successor, Baby Doc, while another was thrown in jail. Fearing for his life, Laferrière took the next flight to Montreal, telling no one but his mother.

His early years in the city are vividly recalled in 1994’s Chronique de la dérive douce (A Drifting Year, 1997) as a drudgery of factory work made bearable by reading and readily available girls: “I wrote to my mother at the beginning of February and asked her to imagine a refrigerator in which six million people live.” As an immigrant, he started at the bottom of Montreal’s sizable Haitian community, a status made all the more painful by the visible success of so many educated Haitians in the city’s professions.

Yet that kind of success wasn’t what he had in mind. “I wanted to be a writer and to be read,” he recalls. “But even more, I wanted to be known.” Mission accomplished. To the Haitian taxi drivers of Montreal (who dominate the industry), he’s a hero, his first book still a marvel. Is it accurate, though? The question inevitably draws laughter. They swear white women melt for Haitian men. “Ask our women,” one driver advised me. “Everything he wrote is true!”

Speaking to a Montreal audience earlier this year, Laferrière claimed to have only one quality: “I can adapt to anything, even happiness.” A typical Danyism worthy of Wilde, yet the quality more often mentioned by those who know him is loyalty. He has a circle of close friends from many phases of his life. He keeps in touch. And although his public image as a ladies’ man rivals Leonard Cohen’s, he has been married to Maggie Berrouet, a nurse, for some thirty years (they have three grown daughters). Petrowski says at one point she started to doubt the existence of a wife and insisted he bring her over for dinner. He did. “She’s nice,” the hostess recalls. “She likes to mock him.”

His professional loyalties also run deep. Pascal Assathiany, general manager of Quebec publishing powerhouse Les éditions du Boréal, says Laferrière could have jumped to a larger publishing house years ago, but came to him only when Jacques Lanctôt sold VLB in 2005; and approached Grasset in France only after Le Serpent à Plumes went bankrupt. Assathiany points to a convergence of factors behind Laferrière’s international breakthrough, but admits Boréal did set out to reposition its writer. “He came to me and said, ‘I’m very famous, but not many people read me.’ So we tried to direct him toward more literary events. Perhaps he isn’t as funny as he used to be, but he’s going inside himself more, back to his roots. Dany really is an intellectual writer; he knows what he’s doing.”

The first Boréal/Grasset publication was Vers le sud (2006), the “comma” in his literary career, suggests Assathiany. Published last year in English as Heading South, the collection of stories was adapted from a film by French director Laurent Cantet, best known for serious social commentary. He, in turn, had pulled from some of the writer’s earlier work for his screenplay and cast Charlotte Rampling as a steely-eyed cougar in 1970s Haiti, who is reluctantly forced to share her black lover with a Valium-popping American who has fallen in love with him. The subject is vintage Laferrière, but the more solemn tone points in a new direction.

Next came I Am a Japanese Writer — translated by David Homel and scheduled for publication this fall by Douglas & McIntyre — a return to both the spirit and the location of his first novel, yet the message is a complete contrast. Badgered by his publisher for a new book, a writer (who lives in a tiny room on rue St-Denis) is blocked, and to stall him blurts out a provocative title: Je suis un écrivain japonais. Since he’s black, some people don’t believe him; others are furious. During the months that follow, while he seduces Japanese women, reads Basho, and hangs out in cafés, rumours of the book’s existence create a literary storm.

Says Homel, “The novel is quite obviously a send-up of identity politics, of who you are as a writer and who you are allowed to be in Quebec. It’s a critique of nationalism, especially as it operates in the cultural sector here. But as always with Dany, the point is oblique. He could also be talking about nationalism anywhere.” Or, more personally, how he played the game early on.

With a nod to The Enigma of Arrival, Nobel Prize winner V. S. Naipaul’s autobiographical novel about a young Trinidadian’s youthful discovery of England,L’énigme du retour is cool and elegant, a patrician vision of the established writer’s return to his country of origin, where he might take his place as moral leader and great writer. This time, the narrator has shed his childhood nickname and reverted to Windsor. Awoken by a phone call announcing his long-absent father’s death, he first takes a trip through Quebec, saying goodbye to friends, then swings by New York, where the old man has lived for decades, alone and in poverty. A briefcase left in a bank vault may or may not be important; missing the combination, he elects to leave it behind.

Arriving in Haiti for the funeral (without a body), he stays in a hotel, reconnects with old friends, and has long conversations with his young nephew, Dany, an aspiring writer. The story isn’t about the death of his father, which actually occurred a year before his first novel was published and which he explored in subsequent books. Rather, it’s about stepping into a father’s shoes; about looking at a ravaged nation not as the guilt-ridden son who left, but as a successful patriarch, ready to lend a hand.

Laferrière has visited Haiti more frequently than have the protagonists of his novels. He was there last January for a literary festival when the earthquake hit, and was unable to make contact with his wife in Montreal for days. Close friends lost their lives. He recorded the experience in a notebook as it happened, and a few weeks later published Tout bouge autour de moi (“Everything around me moved”).

A small book written as he criss-crossed the globe, Laferrière’s first-hand testament is vivid, perceptive: sleeping under the stars that first night, knowing that whoever else was alive must be outside, too; holding a rescued baby in his arms; trekking up a hill to find the aged poet Frankétienne still alive and, across the road, his eighty-year-old mother and her sister. And, most tellingly perhaps, walking into a literary event in Brussels shortly afterward, realizing he was not just the famous writer, but Haiti incarnate.

At one point during the days following the earthquake, his nephew notices he’s been taking notes and asks him not to write a novel about it. “I can’t make that promise,” Laferrière quotes himself. “A classical novel that takes place in one location (Port-au-Prince), in one time (4:53 pm), and took as many lives as a war. For that, you need a Tolstoy.”

Which one of them — the boy or his uncle — will be Haiti’s Tolstoy is an open question. In the meantime, Dany Sr. is left to slog it out as an internationally acclaimed writer, attending back-to-back promotional gigs and literary events. By the time I finally catch up with him, at the end of yet another festival where he has presided as the guest of honour, I’ve read so much about and by him, the inevitable interview seems almost redundant. The omnipotent “I” is ringing in my ears; he’s exhausted. Having every reason to beg off, he slumps into a chair in the bar of a downtown Montreal hotel and smiles politely. I open my notebook.

Q: Tell me something about yourself that isn’t in your books.

A: (laughter) I can’t do that. My publisher would be furious. I have to save it.

Q: Is the Dany Laferrière we know from your books a mask?

A: If he is, then I’ve become him. I am my books.

Q: All right, then, tell me: how do you make love to a black guy without getting tired?

(He smiles, then sighs.)

A: Let him do all the work.
Marianne Ackerman published her third novel, Piers’ Desire, in May. She is the founder of The Rover, an online arts magazine.

 

INFO: Iraq inquiry: Former UN inspector Blix says war illegal > from BBC News

Iraq inquiry: Former UN inspector Blix says war illegal

The UN's former chief weapons inspector Hans Blix has said it is his "firm view" that the Iraq war was illegal.

Hans Blix: "They should have drawn the conclusion that their sources were poor"

Dr Blix told the Iraq inquiry the UK had sought to go down the "UN route" to deal with Saddam Hussein but failed.

Ex-Attorney General Lord Goldsmith, who advised the war was lawful on the basis of existing UN resolutions, "wriggled about" in his arguments, he suggested.

Dr Blix said his team of inspectors had visited 500 sites but found no evidence of weapons of mass destruction.

As head of the UN's Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) between 1999 and 2003, Dr Blix was a key figure in the run-up to the March 2003 invasion as he sought to determine the extent of Saddam's weapons programme.

'No smoking gun'

Asked about the inspections he oversaw between November 2002 and 18 March 2003 - when his team was forced to pull out of Iraq on the eve of the war - he said he was "looking for smoking guns" but did not find any.

________________________________

 

While his team discovered prohibited items such as missiles beyond the permitted range, missile engines and a stash of undeclared documents, he said these were "fragments" and not "very important" in the bigger picture.

"We carried out about six inspections per day over a long period of time.

"All in all, we carried out about 700 inspections at different 500 sites and, in no case, did we find any weapons of mass destruction."

Although Iraq failed to comply with some of its disarmament obligations, he added it "was very hard for them to declare any weapons when they did not have any".

Legal explanation

He criticised decisions that led to the war, saying existing UN resolutions on Iraq did not contain the authority needed, contrary to the case put by the UK government.

________________________________

Some people maintain that Iraq was legal. I am, of the firm view, that it was an illegal war”

    —Hans Blix

________________________________

 

"Eventually they had to come with, I think, a very constrained legal explanation," he said. "You see how Lord Goldsmith wriggled about and how he, himself, very much doubted it was adequate."

Lord Goldsmith has acknowledged his views on the necessity of a further UN resolution mandating military action changed in the months before the invasion and that the concluded military action was justified on the basis of Iraq breaching disarmament obligations dating back to 1991.

But Dr Blix said most international lawyers believed these arguments would not stand up at an international tribunal.

"Some people maintain that Iraq was legal. I am of the firm view that it was an illegal war. There can be cases where it is doubtful, maybe it was permissible to go to war, but Iraq was, in my view, not one of those."

He said he agreed with France and Russia, who argued that further UN authorisation was needed for military action.

"It was clear that a second resolution was required," he said.

In the run-up to war, he said the US government was "high on" the idea of pre-emptive military action as a solution to international crises.

"They thought they could get away with it and therefore it was desirable to do so."

'Judgement questioned'

While he believed Iraq "unilaterally" destroyed its weapons of mass destruction after the 1991 Gulf War, Dr Blix said he never "excluded" the prospect that it had begun to revive some form of chemical and biological capabilities.

________________________________

Analysis

At the age of 82, Hans Blix retains considerable stamina.

He came out of retirement a decade ago to lead the ultimately futile search for Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.

On Tuesday, he gave evidence to the Iraq inquiry for three hours, before heading off to conduct a round of TV interviews.

The inquiry panel wanted to know what this mild-mannered former Swedish diplomat had made of Saddam Hussein's behaviour.

"I never met him", replied Dr Blix, "but I saw him as someone who wanted to be like Emperor Nebuchadnezzar.... utterly ruthless.... and he misjudged it at the end".

Dr Blix trod a neutral path during the build-up to the Iraq conflict, but, in his evidence, he repeated much of what he has said on different occasions since 2003.

Crucially, he had serious doubts about the intelligence that lay behind the move to go to war.

In September 2002, he said he told Tony Blair privately that he believed Iraq "retained" some WMD, noting CIA reports that Iraq may hold some anthrax.

However, he said he began to become suspicious of US intelligence on Iraq following claims in late 2002 that Iraq had purchased raw uranium from Niger, which he always said he thought was flawed.

Since the war, Dr Blix has accused the UK and US of "over-interpreting" intelligence on weapons to bolster the case for war but he said the government's controversial September 2002 dossier on Iraqi weapons seemed "plausible" at the time.

He stressed that Tony Blair never put any "pressure" on him over his search for weapons in Iraq and did not question that the prime minister and President Bush believed in "good faith" that Iraq was a serious threat.

"I certainly felt that he [Tony Blair] was absolutely sincere in his belief.

"What I question was the good judgement, particularly of President Bush but also in Tony Blair's judgement."

Inspection timetable

Critics of the war believe that had inspectors been allowed to continue their work they would have proved beyond doubt that Iraq did not have active weapons of mass destruction capability - as was discovered after the invasion.

Dr Blix said the military momentum towards the invasion - which he said was "almost unstoppable" by early March - did not "permit" more inspections and the UK was a "prisoner on this train".

If he had been able to conduct more inspections, he said he believed they would have begun to "undermine" US-UK intelligence on Iraq's alleged weapons and made the basis for the invasion harder.

The US and UK have always maintained that Saddam Hussein failed to co-operate fully with the inspections process and was continuing to breach UN disarmament resolutions dating back to 1991.

In his evidence in January, former foreign secretary Jack Straw said the regime had only started complying in the final period before the invasion "because a very large military force was at their gates".

The inquiry, headed by Sir John Chilcot, is coming towards the end of its public hearings, with a report expected to be published around the end of the year.

 

INFO: Unforgotten Faces - Celebrating Black Womyn of South Africa

Unforgotten Faces – Acknowledging Black Womyn of South Africa

by Zanele Muholi on August 6, 2010

in African LGBTI, African Women, Photography, South Africa

Busisiwe Sigasa

For Artscape Women’s Festival 2010, Zanele Muholi and Ellen Eisenman have produced a collection of photographs that celebrate women’s lives. They recognize and honor the living as well as those who have left the planet. And they question, why does society allow some to be taken away so early and with such violence? These are Unforgotten Faces.

The artists’ collaboration began in 2008, as they began to share ideas, images, questions, and challenges. Included in the exhibit are portraits of women; in addition, Muholi and Eisenman have together created a series of stamps, acknowledging Black Womyn of South Africa, especially in honor of Busi Sigasa, Nosizwe Cekiso, Eudy Simelane, and Penny Fish . Zanele and Ellen hope that their work stimulates a discussion about hidden histories–unexamined stories that so influence many women’s daily lives. In order to honor life, let us see all of life, and to question the brutality of how many lesbians are dying.

About her portraits, Zanele Muholi has said,

“In the face of all the challenges our community encounters daily, I embarked on a journey of visual activism to ensure that there is black queer visibility. It is important to mark, map and preserve our mo(ve)ments through visual histories for reference and posterity so that future generations will note that we were here.

In my portraits, I present our existence and resistance through positive imagery of black queers (especially lesbians) in South African society and beyond. I show our aesthetics through portraiture. Historically, portraits serve as memorable records for lovers, family and friends.

“The viewer is invited to contemplate questions such as: what does an African lesbian look like? Is there a lesbian aesthetic or do we express our gendered, racialised and classed selves in rich and diverse ways? Is this lesbian more ‘authentic’ than that lesbian because she wears a tie and the other does not? Is this a man or a woman? Is this a transman? Can you identify a rape survivor by the clothes she wears?

“These portraits present an insider’s perspective that both commemorates and celebrates the lives of the black queers I have met in my journeys. Some of their stories gave me sleepless nights as I tried to process the struggles that were told to me. Many of the women I met had been violated and I endeavoured not to exploit them further through my work. I set out to establish relationships with them based on a mutual understanding of what it means to be female, lesbian and black today. “


Ellen Eisenman’s portraits are tributes to cultural workers–people who have committed a large part of their lives to working for progressive social and cultural change. They are from various walks of life and take up many different issues, from leading community groups to practicing the arts for social change, from organizing demonstrations to supporting youth groups. This multi-year project began in South Africa in 2009, and continues in the U.S.The goal of the work is to contribute to a larger understanding of social change and of the many different people who live their lives working for change.

At the core of any democratic society must be engaged citizens who organize politically in their own communities and who willingly and boldly cross the cultural borders that set us against each other. Otherwise, these borders between races, classes, sexualities, national boundaries, and gender expressions will increasingly fragment us into ever-smaller communities. It seems that the forces of division and against progressive social change are growing stronger and isolating us from one another. Now more than ever, we need to recognize and support those cultural workers who are deeply committed to progressive social change and who work against these dominant trends.

Text and Photographs by Zanele Muholi and Ellen Eisenman ©2010

INFO: 8 Surprising Facts About The Shrinking Middle Class From 'Third World America' (PHOTOS)

8 Surprising Facts About The Shrinking Middle Class From 'Third World America' (PHOTOS)

Huffington Post   |  Hallie Seegal First Posted: 08- 9-10 01:19 PM   |   Updated: 08-10-10 09:59 AM


The American dream may in fact be slipping away. The white picket fence, Social Security, sending your children to college -- what was once an attainable reality has become increasingly hard to achieve.

The harsh reality for today's middle class is that many of them go to work just to get by. Arianna Huffington's new book, "Third World America", sheds light on many of the crucial ways in which it has been short-changed. From our failing education system to the runaway greed of the financial services sector, America's middle class is facing on onslaught from all sides.

Below, we've compiled eight surprising and disturbing facts about America's shrinking middle class from Arianna's book:

 

Income Inquality Is Soaring
1 of 9

 

In 2005, the bottom 20 percent of household earners had an average income of $10,655 while households in the top 20 percent made nearly 160,000 – a disparity of 1,500 percent, the highest gap ever recorded, Arianna notes in Third World America.

(This chart, from UC-Berkley professor Emmanuel Saez, shows income inequality is at an all-time high.)

_______________________________________________

 

 

Cash-Strapped States Are Cutting Crucial Services
2 of 9
"According to a report by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, at least twenty-nine states have made cuts to public health programs, twenty-four states have cut programs for the elderly and disabled, twenty-nine states have cut aid to K–12 education, and thirty-nine states have cut assistance to public colleges and universities.

America’s states faced a cumulative budget gap of $166 billion for fiscal 2010. Total shortfalls through fiscal 2011 are estimated at $380 billion—and could be even higher depending on what happens to unemployment. These are massive numbers. But when you remember that we spent $182 billion to bail out AIG ($12.9 billion of which went straight to Goldman Sachs), you realize that this amount alone would be more than enough to close the 2010 budget gap in every state in the Union. Toss in the $45 billion we gave to now-making-a-profit Bank of America and the $45 billion we gave to now-making-a-profit Citigroup, and we would be well on the way to ensuring that no state’s vital services are cut through 2011."
-Arianna Huffington, Third World America
_______________________________________________
Corporations Are Skipping Out On Taxes
3 of 9
"According to the White House, in 2004, the last year data on this was compiled, U.S. multinational corporations paid roughly $16 billion in taxes on $700 billion in foreign active earnings— putting their tax rate at around 2.3 percent. Know many middle-class Americans getting off that easy at tax time?" - Arianna Huffington, Third World America
_______________________________________________
America's Infrastructure Is Crumbling
4 of 9
"In studying car crashes across the country, the Transportation Construction coalition determined that badly maintained or managed roads are responsible for $217 billion in car crashes annually – far more than headline-grabbing alcohol-related accidents ($130 billion) and speed-related pile-ups ($97 billion)", Arianna writes in Third World America

But Americans are paying an even higher price for our deteriorating roads. Of the 42,000 road fatalities each year, 53% are at least partially the result of poor road conditions. "We are currently spending $70 billion annually on improving our highways, but that’s nowhere near the $186 billion a year that is needed. It's a collision of need versus resources; for far too many of us, it can be fatal," she adds.
_______________________________________________
America's Education System Is In Crisis
5 of 9
America's educational system is failing: "Eight years ago, amid much fanfare, the D.C. establishment passed No Child Left Behind...but it turned out to be reform in name only," Arianna explains Third World America . "Despite a goal of 100 percent proficiency in reading and math, eight years later we are not even close. In Alabama, only 20 percent of eighth graders are proficient in math. In California, it’s just 23 percent. In New York, it’s 34 percent."
_______________________________________________
The Foreclosure Crisis Is Not Abating
6 of 9
“Barry Bosworth and Rosanna Smart of the Brookings Institution found that the catastrophic collapse of the 2008 sub-prime mortgage market resulted in the disappearance of $13 trillion in American household wealth between mid-2007 and March 2009... on average, U.S. households lost one quarter of their wealth in that period," cites Huffington. She continues, “We are facing nothing less than a national emergency: 2.8 million homes faced foreclosure in 2009, and an estimated 3 million more are expected to be foreclosed on in 2010. If there was ever a middle-class Katrina, this is it." - Arianna Huffington, Third World America.
_______________________________________________
The Financial Services Sector Is Dominating Our Economy
7 of 9
"As MIT professor Simon Johnson recounted in the Atlantic, between 1973 and 1985, the financial industry’s share of domestic corporate profits topped out at 16 percent. In the 1990s, it spanned between 21 percent and 30 percent. Just before the financial crisis hit, it stood at 41 percent. The share of our economy devoted to making things of value is shrinking, while the share devoted to valuing made-up things (credit-swap derivatives, anyone?) is expanding. It’s the financialization of our economy." - Arianna Huffington, Third World America
_______________________________________________
Health Care Costs Are Sending Americans To The Poorhouse
8 of 9
"The vast majority of people who file for bankruptcy are middle-class folks who can’t pay their bills because they’ve lost their jobs or been hit with high medical bills. In fact, a 2009 study by researchers at Harvard and Ohio University showed that health-care problems were the root cause of 62 percent of all personal bankruptcies in America in 2007. When the same researchers did this study across five states in 2001, health-care problems caused only 50 percent of bankruptcy filings. According to the American Bankruptcy Institute, America had 1.4 million personal bankruptcies in 2009, a 32 percent increase over the previous year. Put another way: Every thirty seconds, someone in this country files for bankruptcy in the wake of a serious illness." - Arianna Huffington, Third World America.
_______________________________________________