OP-ED: The abortion debate « Fungai Neni

The abortion debate

When I was a little girl of just four, I remember the family maid calling me to the spare bedroom to play a game with her. The game, she explained, would entail her lying down on the spring base single bed and me jumping over her stomach.

Initially, I had concerns that such a game would cause her pain. But, in the way that only four-year olds can be convinced, she reassured me that the game would not hurt her at all and that it would instead be a good workout for her belly. Somewhere in my mind, I can still hear the sound of those springs squealing as I jumped away to my heart’s content.

Recounting the new game to my mother that evening however, put an end to it immediately.

It also put an abrupt end to Sisi Anna’s job.

A few months later, we heard that Anna had given birth to a healthy baby girl, thereby bringing unspeakable shame to her family who had already cast her off as a moral felon.

Her crime?

Anna was unmarried and the father of her child, who was apparently the married gardener from a few houses away, was refusing to take responsibility. I am still filled with abhorrence at the thought of the role that Anna had wished me to play as her abortionist. But with the passage of the years, I have grown to appreciate what levels of desperation and despair must have led her to approach a clueless little child to assist her in finding a way out of her predicament.

Make no mistake.

I don’t condone the measures that she took, especially since they involved an innocent party, myself. Rather, I am more open to understanding why she took such recourse.

Abortion is a topic that leaves a sour taste on many people’s tongues. Walk the streets of Harare and you will come across many metallic placards featuring messages against the act, even citing biblical scripture about the detestability of murder in God’s eyes. But just as we moralise and rationalise on end about whether or not sex work represents deviant behaviour, and whether or not it should be decriminalised, we go down the same torturous path when it comes to the abortion debate.

And the simple truth – as with sex work – is that regardless of the discourse and debates that take place, abortions continue to happen, whether sanctioned by the state, or deemed illegal. Every day, young women all over Africa are having abortions. According to research released by the Guttmacher Insitute last year, 5.6 million abortions were carried out in Africa in 2003. Only 100 000 of these were performed under safe conditions – that is, by individuals with the necessary skills, and in an environment that conformed to minimum medical standards.

And with only three African countries (Cape Verde, South Africa and Tunisia) giving unrestricted legal access to abortion to women, it would be safe to assume gross underreporting when it comes to figures pertaining to rates of abortion on the continent. I’ll give a practical example of why I believe this is so.

Some years ago, when I was in university and living in a hostel, one of my hostel mates had an unsafe abortion. She told no one about it until she was forced to. Having bled continuously for three weeks and in the process having exhausted her supply of sanitary ware at a time when this was a scarce commodity in Zimbabwe, she was forced to confide in a few of us that she needed help. It’s not that we couldn’t tell that she was unwell. She had stopped interacting with anyone and when she surfaced in the communal bathrooms she looked wan and weak.

But finally, she decided to break her silence and share that she’d visited an old woman who’d given her a tablet to take for her ‘condition’. This tablet, my hostel mate, confided, made her uterus burn with acid pain and soon, she began to bleed. She bled for all of a month and prohibited us from telling the matrons or even seeking medical assistance for her. All we could do was supply her with iron tablets, cotton wool and pads and eventually even mutton cloth to help her cope with the bleeding.

And that abortion, as well as many others, was not ever officially registered.

Why, you might ask, would women go to such desperate lengths to have an abortion?

For many young women, the cultural stigma of being an unwed mother is so strong that they feel they have to go to any length to avoid bringing shame and disgrace to their families in this way.

A few years ago, a family friend committed suicide because her boyfriend had disowned the five-month-old foetus burgeoning within her womb. In her note to her parents she stated that it would be better that she died than bring humiliation to their Christian name.

Inherent in this cultural stigma is often the desertion of the partner or male responsible for the pregnancy, thus relegating the woman to position of a single mother. And let’s not also forget that sometimes, a pregnancy is unexpected and unwanted and that the woman decides that she is simply not prepared for motherhood.

I doubt that this is ever an easy decision, but it is surely made more difficult not only by the lack of access to services such as hygienic abortions and counselling, but also by patriarchal hegemony that still prescribes the roles of women in society (ie. if you are unmarried you have no right to know anything about sex, let alone have a child). Also, I am sure that the social perception of contraceptives, particularly condoms( which research has shown diminish in levels of usage as a relationship grows) plays a large role in the frequency of unprotected sexual acts, thereby putting women at risk of unplanned pregnancy as well as a host of other sexual infections.

Culture is the cohesive glue that binds communities together, but for many women, it is the hangman’s noose on which their freedoms are choked. As I write, I wonder whatever became of Anna and her daughter; whether she grew to accept the child that separated her from her family; or whether her family ever took her back into their fold. It is indeed a tragedy that so many women have to sacrifice one thing or the other for the sake of saving face in society.

For us, freedom and parity are still but utopian concepts.


7 Responses to “The abortion debate”


  1. 1 Bongi
    May 3, 2010 at 9:53 am

    wow dude u just opened my mind on it.not so sure of what i think but maybe if i am also in that situation i may resolve of aborting because of a number of factors. the problem i think with society is that we are quick to judge both the unmarried mother who is pregnant and the unmarried mother who decides to abort. we have to come up witha solution that will not stereotype any one is we want to reduce the number of deaths from people trying to abort. look at the case of your maid. she tried to abort and when it failed her family turned her away . maybe if she had successfully aborted without her family knowing she would not have been sent away. its a hard topic really for debate

  2. May 3, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    This is quite an insightful piece, Fungai. Yes, it is easy to condemn and judge, especially if we are not in the shoes of these desperate women. You discover that while many moralist put up condemning posters on the wrongs of abortion, and condemnation been breathed down from pulpits, we often lose sight of the predicament these women find themselves in. Indeed, my Christian faith demands of me that I do not give a thumbs up for devotion, but at the same, time, it forbids me from condemning and judging.
    So, I would say that while it is wrong for women to abort, what we need to do is to reach out to them and show love, that we love them for who they are, not on the basis of what they have done or have not done.
    Look at what happened when the self -righteous Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught panties down to Jesus. They thought Jesus was going to condemn her on the basis of the law of Moses. But he asked the one who has not sinned to cast the first stone and they all disappeared! And Jesus told the woman that he’d not condemny her…’Go, and don’t sin anymore’.
    The role of the church is to teach society to reach out to people who are cast out, show them love and give them a new lease of life…This is The Gospel.

  3. May 3, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    The hurt and pain we bring to each other because of ignorance, prejudice and just plain meanness never ceases to amaze me. So unnecessary – how difficult is it to reach out to people? Yet these same ignoramus can justify hate and child sexual abuse – such hypocrisy.

  4. 4 nomakhosazana
    May 3, 2010 at 3:30 pm

    wow.this is very enlightening.a lot of women would have an abortion,if it was guaranteed that no one would ever find out..Frm an aerial view babies are nice.i have a lot of friends and relatives that have had children outside wedlock..They love them to bits.bt they resent themselves,they never forgive themselves for the mistakes they made,and whats even worse,their bodies wnt let them forget..Some are still struggling to lose the baby weight or re-perk their sagging breasts.this one friend says she will never be naked in front of a man in broaddaylight..It must be dark..sexually,she feels she has to pull out all the stops,to make up for the fact that she is a reject..Society has condemned her to inner turmoil.Our mothers smile and praise her for raising such a cute little boy or girl singlehandedly,bt behind her back,they warn us never to go down that route as she is a joke.Sadly these are not the horrors that men go thru wen they have kids out of wedlock..Even after 3 kids a man can still marry the village virgin.I am still to meet a man who was interogated for more than 30 minutes as to why he has,even 1 child of wedlock ,no woman is that bothered- bt i am still to meet a woman who didnt have to explain to a probable suitor at length as to jus wat,wen and why things went wrng. What is wrong with society? Society-i cant save your face if you cant save mine!

  5. 5 Bonnie
    May 3, 2010 at 6:41 pm

    One question…..What are women really afraid of which drives them to abort pregnancies????????///

 

GULF OIL SPILL: BP's Daily Tally: $17.5 Million for Gulf Oil Spill, $93 Million in Profits > from AOL News

BP's Daily Tally: $17.5M for Spill, $93M in Profits

Updated: 9 hours 39 minutes ago

Print Text Size

Paul Wachter

Paul Wachter Contributor

AOL News
(May 11) -- BP said Monday that it has spent $350 million on its cleanup efforts in the first 20 days of the oil spill that began when a rig it operated in the Gulf of Mexico exploded. That sounds like a lot -- $17.5 million per day -- until you consider the firm's profits over the same time period: In the first quarter of the year, BP's average daily profit was $93 million.

While the London-based company's stock has taken a 19 percent hit since the oil spill began, industry analysts believe the company, one of the world's five largest, will survive and even prosper. In fact, a Citigroup analyst group has advised people to buy BP stock, The Washington Post reported. "Reaction to the Gulf of Mexico oil leak is a buying opportunity," Citigroup advised.

BP officials appear at a hearing before a Senate panel on May 11, 2010, in Washington, D.C.
Mark Wilson, Getty Images
Lamar McKay, right, president and chairman of BP America Inc., and David Nagel, executive vice president of BP America, wait to testify Tuesday at a Senate panel hearing on the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. BP is expected to prosper despite the disaster.

This is not to suggest that BP will get away completely unscathed. The Deepwater spill comes at a time when Washington, taking a cue from public sentiment, is moving to hold companies accountable for their missteps. Last month, federal prosecutors launched a criminal investigation of Goldman Sachs. And after reports of Toyota's faulty-brake pedals causing accidents, the car company received a public flogging and federal fines.

But the damage caused by the alleged misdeeds of Wall Street and Toyota may pale next to the cost of the environmental devastation caused by the oil spill, which continues as BP struggles to stop the leak. Yet legislation passed in 1990 caps the damages BP can pay at $75 million, a figure that even BP executives believe is too low. "A $75 million liability is not where our head is at this moment," said executive vice president David Nagel.

Today, the Senate began grilling executives of BP and two other companies involved in the drilling at the Deepwater Horizon rig. Their prepared testimonies included numerous attempts to shift the blame. Lamar McKay, chairman of BP America, said that a 450-pound blowout protector failed to operate, and the protector was owned by Transocean Ltd., which also owns the rig. (BP was in charge of operating the rig.)

Meanwhile, Transocean CEO Steve Newman pointed his finger right back at BP. "Offshore oil and gas production projects begin and end with the operator, in this case BP," he said, adding that there was no reason to believe that the blowout protector wasn't operational. Newman also pointed to Halliburton, a subcontractor that encased the well pipe in cement. But a Halliburton executive defended his company's role, saying that it conducted the work according to BP's specifications and industry standards.

The oil spill, like the financial crisis and Toyota's faulty cars, was a man-made disaster. It is directly responsible for the deaths of 11 people, the rig workers who perished in the April 20 explosion. The financial damages will be staggering. "This is going to be protracted and consume years, and the liability will have to [be] measured in the billions of dollars. The only question is [is] it in the tens of billions or hundreds of billions," said David Kotok of Cumberland Advisors. And there's also the environmental damage to consider.

Democrats in Congress are now backing a bill that would raise the cap on economic damages related to oil spills to $10 billion in addition to the cleanup costs that the responsible party already must pay. Even it if it passes, though, recent history suggests BP will continue to thrive. After all, Goldman Sachs just announced that for the first time in its 140-year history, the firm finished a quarter without a single trading loss. And on Tuesday, Toyota announced that it made a $2.2 billion profit for the year.

INFO: SNCC’s 50th: Thoughts from Sue Thrasher « Publishing the Long Civil Rights Movement

SNCC’s 50th: Thoughts from Sue Thrasher

Many thanks to human rights activist and historian Sue Thrasher for sharing these thoughts on the recent SNCC conference. We have posted them with some photos taken by historian Patrick D. Jones. Take a look at Patrick’s album of SNCC reunion photos here. The site also has a great list of SNCC reading, both from a historical perspective and reflections on the conference.

Leah said, “Iron your blouse. . .  it’s like we are going to a family reunion!” And thus it started — four intense days of seeing old friends and repeated attempts of trying to “place” people (Did we meet during COFO summer? The SNCC office in Atlanta? Or simply passing through Nashville?). Nan (Orrock) said as we were leaving the conference that it would take a long time to process the event, and a full five days later, I am still remembering and thinking about certain things. Intense is the word I have used to describe it to friends here; certainly on Sunday night I felt both emotionally and physically drained. Leah (Wise) tells me it has been the same for her. I think we expended enough psychic energy in those four days to last a month.

My immediate response was one of feeling “at home” or as Casey Hayden used to say, with my tribe. I have always thought of the SNCC days as the moment when I became the person I am today. It was that particular time – a few short years – that shaped how I have lived my life, and I am eternally grateful. I suspect the same is true for many of the 1100 people gathered in Raleigh. It was celebratory, and comforting, to slip back into the fold.

I attended all of the conference sessions, which is to say, that I attended one session in each time slot. This was not the kind of conference one could easily kibbutz and move from one session to another. For one thing, the rooms were overflowing and late arrivals would find no place to sit or stand. So, it was best to make a difficult choice and commit.  I was never disappointed, but I imagine that any of the sessions would not have disappointed. One of my favorites was the one commenting on the impact of SNCC; the speakers were Charles Payne, author of I’ve Got the Light of Freedom; Taylor Branch of the King trilogy; Clay Carson, editor of the King papers and author of a book on SNCC; Tom Hayden, and Vincent Harding, author of There is a River. Nan took excellent notes on this session although she missed Payne’s presentation. I have to admit I just listened and soaked it in. The one nugget I took away, however, was Payne saying that we cannot tell young people how to organize now, but we can show them how to build a supportive culture for organizing. (I am mangling his eloquence, but hope the point is made.)

James Lawson reads from one of the Gandhi books that inspired his belief in nonviolence. Photo by Patrick D. Jones.

I was not happy with my presentation on the white organizing panel. Ten minutes means you go too fast and trip over yourself and in such cases, I am prone to get to the details but not the big picture. So, I’m afraid I only provided snatches of Highlander history and SSOC history. Ed did a much better job of talking about the white folks project as part of COFO summer and Candie Carawan gave a moving tribute to the West Virginia miners before talking about the work she and Guy have done with Highlander. Margaret Herring’s story of being arrested for sedition in eastern Kentucky was as riveting now as it was then. Sharlene Kranz’ presentation about her work in the Jewish community in Washington was amazing and inspiring. I also was glad that Bob Zellner could talk about the GROW project with pulpwood cutters and loved the fact that Hollis Watkins came forward to talk about the impact that work had in the black community.  But Bob’s lingering feelings about the split in SNCC when white organizers were asked to leave left some unsettled feelings on the floor. SNCC organizer, George Ware, made a lovely statement about the need for black SNCC workers to explore black identity and deal with the issue of black self-determination.

I heard that on one of the panels someone made the statement that we are dealing with the Tea Party today because white people in the movement did not go out and organize white people. That strikes me as an inch-deep analysis of the current political landscape and it also diminishes the legacy of SNCC. In addition to the white organizing represented on the panel, most of the white SNCC staff and the summer COFO volunteers went on to do incredible political organizing in the years to come. Mario Savio is one of the first examples, but the anti-Vietnam war movement, the women’s movement, the environmental movement, organized labor, and even the counter-cultural movement (which laid the groundwork for movements today around issues of local food and sustainability) are rooted in the freedom movement.

Julian Bond, Courtland Cox, and Ivanhoe Donaldson. Photo by Patrick D. Jones.

I was very moved by the session remembering those who have died. Dinky Romilly gave a brave and beautiful remembrance of Jim Forman, challenging us to do better at dealing with mental illness. There was a jarring moment when Charles Sherrod simply asked that someone from the audience come forward to talk about Howard Zinn. This clearly had not been planned. And beautiful Vincent Harding, who did come forward to talk about Howard, let his distress at this turn of events be known before proceeding. The slide show was clearly done very quickly and was not professional at all, but it was hauntingly beautiful to see pictures of Mrs. Baker, Stokely, Forman, Ralph Featherstone and others – all young and beautiful. Whoever put the slide show together had not been able to snag a picture of everyone and that was disappointing, but the names were there. Sam Shirah, so important in the early days of SSOC, was named but not pictured, as was Stanley Wise. Pictures of Sam appear in Danny Lyon’s pictorial history of SNCC and when I bought the book, Danny talked about how much he loved Sam and told me that he, Sam, and John Lewis had shared an Atlanta apartment.

The other session I found moving was Saturday morning when SNCC people introduced their children, followed by a panel of the young people. Each of the young people talked about what they are doing. Many of them are teachers or working in education. Zora Cobb talked about agriculture and food. Rita Marie Romaine was introduced by Karen Spellman and talked about the resegregation of the Wake County schools and her plans to run again for the school board. When I first saw Rita, I was completely flustered; I thought Anne Romaine was standing in front of me. James Forman, Jr. talked beautifully about his work with the Maya Angelou Charter School in DC that works with incarcerated youth. I was ambivalent about the short speech given by the daughter of James Bevel and Diane Nash Bevel, asking people to remember the good things about her father. She did not mention or acknowledge her mother, Diane, or her sisters who brought suit against their father for sexually molesting them. Samirra Wise was not able to come that morning, but one of the big highlights of the weekend for me was seeing Samirra, now a beautiful young mother. Looking at Samirra is to bring Stanley Wise back to life and watching her daughter, Devin, now two years old, it is evident she has inherited the feistiness of both her grandparents.

Bob Moses and John Doar. Photo by Patrick D. Jones.

The conference part of the gathering was incredibly well organized and the best evidence of that was that it didn’t break down at all in light of the massive numbers of people attending. With uncharacteristic discipline, I and the people I was staying with made sure to arrive early in order to find decent seats and be able to hear.  For the most part, I thought the presentations were better than the question and answer periods, because that, predictably, often turned into speech-making. I was told, though, that some of the sessions had excellent Q and As.

But even as I was enjoying the formal program of the conference, it was the personal reunions that I enjoyed the most. It was impossible not to run into old friends that I so wanted to see: Bernard Lafayette, a key member of the Nashville SNCC chapter, who had been at American Baptist Theological, along with John Lewis. McArthur Cotton and Willie Peacock, two of the local Mississippi young people (along with Hollis Watkins and Brenda Travis) who began working with Bob Moses when he first went to Mississippi. I have a great picture in my living room of Willie Peacock along with the Carawans, Hollis, Sweet Honey in the Rock, Pete Seeger, and Florence Reece (who wrote the song, “Which Side are you On” when she and husband, Sam, were fleeing gun thugs in 1930s Harlan County, Kentucky) singing at Highlander’s 50th anniversary reunion. Don Stone, whom I had known in Atlanta with the Black Workers Congress. Michael Simmons and Zoharah “Gwen” Simmons and their daughter, Aisha; I loved the fact that Michael was busy promoting his daughter’s film! Phyllis Cunningham who worked with the Medical Committee for Human Rights in Mississippi. Shirley Cooks. Dorie Ladner. Bob Mants. Bob Moses. Chuck Neblett. Len Chandler, still singing wonderfully. Cleve Sellers. Danny Lyons. Jane Bond. Howard Moore. Margaret Herring. Martha Prescod Norman. Fanny Rushing. Mildred Forman. Jean Wheeler Smith. Frank Smith. Walter Tillow, who helped put together the founding conference of SSOC. Kay Tillow who I first met when she was organizing the roving picket miners in Harlan County, Kentucky. These were people that I do not see often and do not know when I will see again.

Amiri Baraka and Donald Stone. Photo by Patrick D. Jones.

It was also good to see others that I see on a more regular basis: Judy Richardson, who has regularly come to Western Mass over the past few years to provide workshops for teachers on how to use the Eyes on the Prize series; Charlie Cobb, who came last year to talk about his new book, Julian Bond and Pam Horowitz, James Bond, Dottie Zellner. The SSOC crew – there were ten of us around the dinner table together: Ed Hamlett, Gene Guerrero, Tom Gardner, Nan Orrock, Dottie Burlage, Howard Romaine, Bruce Smith, Archie Allen. We were joined by Ed King, whose house at Tougaloo College was a safe haven for many of us. My “Deep in our Hearts” cohorts were also very present: Connie Curry, Joan Browning, Emmie Schraeder Adams, Penny Patch, Teresa del Pozzo (in addition to Dorothy Burlage and me).

I have listed the names here because I want to remember them all (and because I am already frustrated that I cannot summon images to mind).  I want to remember how they look now and try to remember how they looked then and what each of them brought into my life. I feel exceptionally lucky that I have been able to stay in touch with many of them and even work with them. Bill Strickland and I have served on the board of the National Priorities Project for many years; Nan came to speak at one of our annual dinners. Judy Richardson has been a mainstay in my efforts to figure out how to encourage teachers to teach about the civil rights movement. Charlie Cobb returned last year to the city where he graduated from high school to meet with students and teachers. Zohorrah, Howie Machtinger, Bob Zellner and I all re-connected last year in Chicago at a symposium organized by Charles Payne. It was there I met Fanny Rushing and learned about the Chicago Freedom Schools. Connecting present to past . . . remembering the SNCC touchstone and trying to pass it on.

Bob Brown and Cleveland Sellers. Photograph by Patrick D. Jones.

We managed to slip away from the conference on Friday night to have a mini-reunion with the folks involved in the early days of the Institute for Southern Studies/Southern Exposure. Julian and his wife Pam, Jacquelyn Hall (of the Southern Oral History Program) and Bob Korstad, Joe Pfister and his wife, Howard Romaine, Bob Hall, Chip Hughes, Leah Wise, and me. Bob and Julian told some funny stories about going to New York City to try to raise money for the Institute, “trying to get a foot in the door.”  The Institute never had much money and Southern Exposure was always published on a shoe string. We didn’t reminisce much, just enjoyed each other’s company and talked a little about what we are doing now. I had not seen Chip for a long time and loved hearing about his work with occupational health and safety through NIH and the unions. Bob Hall is doing incredible work with Democracy North Carolina and apparently figured largely in the state turnout for Obama. The Institute still lives through the work of Chris Kromm and Facing South – and that is rewarding. Southern Exposure issues populate libraries around the country and I am always grateful for that. Recently a friend of Reber Boult’s got in touch to donate a full collection (these eventually went to Vanderbilt).

The truth is that it was absolutely exhausting! With the exception of the people that I see frequently, I found that I had to see people’s name tags in order to recognize them. And with that recognition would come a flood of memories of where and how our paths had crossed and deep, deep pleasure in seeing someone again and re-connecting. There was never enough time for this.

Franklin McCain, one of the "Greensboro Four." Photo by Patrick D. Jones.

I was really happy to meet John Doar, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division under Bobby Kennedy.  It is no accident that Doar was there. He was always the most trusted of the Justice Department officials and many of us remember the picture of that riveting moment when he stepped between a line of policemen with guns drawn and the mourners in the march following Medgar Evers’s funeral. Dorie Ladner, one of the people arrested that day, took the microphone in the back of the Shaw Chapel and came down the center aisle to stand in front of John Doar and ask him to the tell the story of that day. He is now 88 years old and stayed for the entire conference. He was unassuming and humble about his role, yet clearly held in high regard by the SNCC organizers who kept his phone number in their pockets in Mississippi. I truly hope the man will write a book.

Harry Belafonte and Julie Prettyman. Photo by Patrick D. Jones.

I was reminded at this conference about the important role played by young Mississippi organizers. When Moses went into Mississippi to begin organizing for SNCC, in addition to Amzie Moore and Mr. Steptoe, he found Hollis Watkins, McArthur Cotton, Curtis Hayes (now Curtis Muhammed), Willie (Wazir) Peacock, and Brenda Travis. These select few were allowed to go into places like Amite County (McComb) and Natchez. I think I am right that no white COFO volunteers could go into SW Mississippi because it was simply too unsafe. I remember attending the first reunion of COFO on its 15th anniversary at Tougaloo, and even then, there was a sense that people had come and gone, forgetting Mississippi and the folks who were left there to continue the work. Mac Cotton now lives in Kosciusko, MS where the DeLaneys on my mother’s side of the family come from. Hollis, of course, has never stopped organizing. Active on the Highlander board, he is the founder of Southern ECHO and works with Leah Wise in the SE Regional Economic Justice Network. And one of the nicest reunions I had at the conference was re-connecting with “Little Hollis” who was in and out of Highlander during my time there, and is now a grown man working in education in North Carolina.

Donald Stone and Alan Haber. Photo by Patrick D. Jones.

It was fun to see Danny Glover. I don’t think he gave a very good speech, but I found it kinda sweet that he seemed a bit nervous and a little intimidated by the gathering. And I give him mucho credit for insisting on the making of Freedom Song. One of the Springfield teachers recently told me and Judy that this movie really grabbed the interest of her middle schoolers.  And I thought Harry Belafonte was as magnificent as ever. Belafonte was remembered for flying in to Mississippi on more than one occasion with $60K in cash in his pockets to get people out of jail. And he did give a great speech – challenging us to move beyond celebrating the past to the organizing that still needs to be done.

For the most part, I didn’t embarrass myself by crying at this reunion – but I regularly lost it when Bernice Reagon and the Freedom Singers were singing. The music was extraordinary. It was in those moments that the powerful memories – and sometimes sense of loss – would rise up and the tears come. Chuck Neblett, Rutha Harris, Len Chandler, Matthew Jones, Marshall Jones, Willie Peacock, Hollis, Betty Mae Fikes from Selma, Jamila from Montgomery and Birmingham, Guy and Candie singing the song that Guy wrote . . . . and an absolutely beautiful tribute to Cordell Reagon as part of the Saturday night concert. (This footage included some shots of Joy Reagon who was active in Nashville SNCC with her husband, Freddy Leonard when I was there. Eyes on the Prize includes a wonderful interview with Freddy.) Bernice closed the conference on Sunday morning and there could not have been a better way. I’ve never met anyone more eloquent or powerful than Bernice Johnson Reagon.

Karen Spellman and Freddie Green Biddle. Photo by Patrick D. Jones.

I have no criticism or regrets about this conference. I thought the planning committee did a good job and that it would have been impossible to please everyone. The fact that 1100 people showed up is really quite amazing. There are two things, however, that make me wish for a do-over. The first is personal. Diane Nash has long been a personal hero of mine. I barely missed knowing her as part of the Nashville SNCC movement. By the time I arrived in the fall of 1961, she and Jim Bevel had left Nashville and were working with SCLC. But her name was often on the lips of people like John Lewis and Lester McKinney, and I grew to understand that she had been absolutely fearless and brave. She elected not to give a speech at the conference and I am truly sorry for that. The SNCC leadership at the national level quickly became male, but in the very early dangerous days, Diane Nash was really something! Leah also told me that Tim Tyson was at the conference. I am reading Blood Done Sign My Name and I would like to have met him as well. He also wrote the book Radio Free Dixie at the point where Robert Williams was in danger or being forgotten. I suppose it is a quibble to wish I had met even more people, but it would have been nice to say thanks to both of them.

The second is really an observation. The conference/reunion felt strangely insular. In light of all I have said above about how wonderful it was to see old friends and the pervasive spirit of a family reunion, I think this is a little unfair even as I say it. SNCC’s impact on the country was enormous and it spawned many things (one of which was SSOC). But even as people were talking about the organizing that needs to be done now, I didn’t sense much connection to work that is being done. I think it was perfectly reasonable for SNCC to come together for purposes of a reunion and for documenting history (something that was ongoing throughout the conference). In fact, I would argue that the documentation alone was reason enough to come together. The Sunday morning discussion prior to Bernice’s closing did highlight the work of the Algebra Project and the Young People’s Project, and kudos to the organizers of that discussion for making it participatory. But I did feel there was too little acknowledgment of the great variety of cultural and political organizing that is taking place now. Its true there is no mass movement like the one we were lucky enough to be a part of and the country is not galvanized in the same way. But I think people have “dug in” and are attempting to make big changes in a myriad of ways.  And I see young people every day who are engaged in making change. But as I said earlier, these are the quibbles of an ingrate and I know that I am enormously blessed to have been a part of this historic event.

Joyce Ladner. Photo by Patrick D. Jones.

Will it be the last time we cross hands and sing We Shall Overcome? Perhaps. But being in Raleigh means that is okay .  . .  and for that I am very grateful.

1 Responses to “SNCC’s 50th: Thoughts from Sue Thrasher”


  • Sue, thank you so much for this summary. I didn’t get beyond a first paragraph about the first day. I’ve been sending the link to others who have been trying to codify (if you will) their feelings about the reunion & I’ve been sending it to people who couldn’t get there for a number of reasons (e.g., “really” CORE, illness, &c) but want to know how it rolled out.

    I too wished they’d included Danny’s photos of Sam. He loved to strike those Paul Newman as “Hud” poses & as I remember, Danny had one in “Memories of the Civil Rights Movement” that would have said it all.

VIDEO: 1965 – Santiago Alvarez Directs “Now” (Lena Horne Remembered) > from Shadow And Act + "Stormy Weather"

1965 – Santiago Alvarez Directs “Now”

(Lena Horne Remembered)

 

In 1964, Cuban filmmaker Santiago Alvarez made the below 5-minute film titled Now, about racial discrimination in Civil Rights-era USA, which includes a montage of related photos and newsreel clips, all set to the sounds of Lena Horne’s voice singing the title song. Expect more of these remembrances of lesser-known Lena Horne contributions throughout the week.

 LenaHorne

[NOTE: In 1985 I spent about eight days in Cuba working as a film critic at ICAIC (the Cuban film institute). "Now" was one of the movies we saw and discussed. That was the moment I began to seriously investigate and appreciate Lena Horne. —kalamu]

===============================

Lena Horne - Stormy Weather (1943)

MarkusRTK  January 27, 2008 — Here's the full version of a performance that can be found truncated elsewhere on YouTube -- from the 1943 film of the same name, the great Lena Horne delivers a sizzling performance of her signature song. (I wish I had the full dance that follows it, which includes some amazing ballet. If anyone has a full-length version, please post it or get in touch with me!)

 

>via: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCG3kJtQBKo&feature=player_embedded

 

VIDEO: Somi + Hugh Masekela

Somi | Hugh Masekela

 

Ugandan, Rwandan and American jazz vocalist and composer Somi performs songs from her chart-topping album If The Rains Come First.  Music giant Hugh Masekela talks with Somi about their shared musical influences and the connections between jazz and Africa.  As a special treat, Masekela will sit in with Somi as she performs her new work.

About the Artists:

Somi

A true multicultural woman, Somi was born in Illinois to immigrants from Rwanda and Uganda, then spent her early childhood in Zambia.


Encouraged by her mother’s love of song, Somi began singing herself, performing in church and eventually landing roles in her university’s musical theater productions. The African cultural legacy, always crucial to her sound, is as vital as ever in her current music, which Somi likes to call New African Soul, as well as the music she heard upon relocating to New York — American jazz singers like Nina Simone and Sarah Vaughan are as essential to her artistic development as are the legendary African female voices of Miriam Makeba, Cesaria Evora and Sade. In January 2010, Somi’s critically-acclaimed latest album, If the Rains Come First, was rated number two on World Billboard charts.

====================================

 

Hugh Masekela

Hugh Masekela is a celebrated trumpeter, flugelhornist, cornetist, composer, and singer from South Africa.  He has played primarily in jazz ensembles, with guest appearances on albums by The Byrds, and Paul Simon.  His song, “Soweto Blues,” sung by his former wife, Miriam Makeba, is a blues/jazz piece that mourns the carnage of the Soweto riots in 1976. In 1987, he had a hit single with “Bring Him Back Home” which became an anthem for the movement to free Nelson Mandela.


In the 1980s, he toured with Paul Simon in support of Simon’s album Graceland. In 2003, Masekela was featured in the documentary film Amandla!, and in 2004, he released his autobiography, Still Grazing: The Musical Journey of Hugh Masekela, co-authored with journalist D. Michael Cheers. His most recent recordings include Live at the Market Theatre (2007) and Phola (2009).

 

 

PUB: Spring 2010 Story Contest | Narrative Magazine

Spring 2010 Story Contest

Our spring contest is open to all fiction and nonfiction writers. We’re looking for short shorts, short stories, essays, memoirs, photo essays, graphic stories, all forms of literary nonfiction, and excerpts from longer works of both fiction and nonfiction. Entries must be previously unpublished, no longer than 15,000 words, and must not have been previously chosen as a winner, finalist, or honorable mention in another contest.

 

As always, we are looking for works with a strong narrative drive, with characters we can respond to as human beings, and with effects of language, situation, and insight that are intense and total. We look for works that have the ambition of enlarging our view of ourselves and the world.

 

We welcome and look forward to reading your pages.

 

Awards: First Prize is $3,250, Second Prize is $1,500, Third Prize is $750, and ten finalists will receive $100 each. All entries will be considered for publication.

 

 

Submission Fee: There is a $20 fee for each entry. And with your entry, you’ll receive three months of complimentary access to Narrative Backstage.

 

Timing:  The contest deadline is July 31, 2010, at midnight Pacific daylight time.

 

Judging:  The contest will be judged by the editors of the magazine. Winners and finalists will be announced to the public by September 1, 2010. All writers who enter will be notified by email of the judges’ decisions.

 

Submission Guidelines:  Please read our Submission Guidelines for manuscript formatting and other information.

 

Other Submission Categories: In addition to our contest, please review our other Submission Categories for areas that may interest you.

 

 

 

PUB: Literal Latte » Literary Contests

Contests

15 YEARS OF LAUNCHING CAREERS

Literal Latté currently offers five — count ‘em, FIVE — annual writing contests. The deadline dates given below apply every year, so there’s always a contest just around the corner.

All entries will be considered for publication.

The current reading fee for all contest entries is US $10.00, and there are discounts for multiple entries. Make sure to read the guidelines below for detailed information.

All reading fees — payable by check or money order — should be made out to Literal Latté and mailed to:

Literal Latté Awards

200 East 10th Street, Suite 240
New York, NY 10003
(212) 260-5532

 

Literal Latté Annual Contests

click contest name below for detailed guidelines

 

 

Contest
Prizes
Annual Deadline

$1000

$300

$200

Jan. 15th
$500
June 30th

$1000

$300

$200

July 15th

$1000

$300

$200

Sept. 15th
$500
Jan. 31st

Contest Guidelines

____________________

k. Margaret Grossman
Fiction Awards

First Prize
$1000

Second Prize
$300

Third Prize
$200

  1. Send unpublished stories, 8,000 words max. All subjects and styles welcome.
  2. Postmark by January 15th.
  3. Name, Address, Telephone Number, Email Address (optional) — on Cover Page only.
  4. Include Self Addressed Stamped Envelope or Email Address for reply.
  5. Include $10 Reading Fee per story — OR —
    $15 Reading Fee for two stories.

All entries considered for publication.

Literal Latté Short Shorts Contest

First Prize
$500

  1. Send unpublished shorts. 2,000 words max. All styles welcome.
  2. Postmark by June 30th.
  3. Name, Address, Telephone Number, Email Address (optional) — on Cover Page only.
  4. Include Self Addressed Stamped Envelope or Email Address for reply.
  5. Include $10 Reading Fee per set of up to 3 Shorts — OR —
    $15 Reading Fee per set of 6 Shorts.

All entries considered for publication.

 

 

 

____________________

Literal Latté Poetry Awards

First Prize
$1000

Second Prize
$300

Third Prize
$200

  1. Send unpublished poems, 2,000 words max. All styles welcome.
  2. Postmark by July 15th.
  3. Name, Address, Telephone Number, Email Address (optional) — on Cover Page only.
  4. Please put poem titles/first lines on Cover Page as well.
  5. Include Self Addressed Stamped Envelope or Email Address for reply.
  6. Include $10 Reading Fee per set of up to 6 poems — OR —
    $15 Reading Fee for set of 10 poems.

All entries considered for publication.

 

 

 

____________________

Literal Latté Essay Awards

First Prize
$1000

Second Prize
$300

Third Prize
$200

  1. Send unpublished personal essays. 8,000 words max. All topics.
  2. Postmark by September 15th.
  3. Name, Address, Telephone Number, Email Address (optional) — on Cover Page only.
  4. Include Self Addressed Stamped Envelope or Email Address for reply.
  5. Include $10 Reading Fee per essay — OR —
    $15 Reading Fee for two essays.

All entries considered for publication.

 

 

 

____________________

Literal Latté Food Verse Contest

First Prize
$500

  1. Send unpublished poems with food as an ingredient. 2,000 words max. All styles and subjects welcome.
  2. Postmark by January 31st.
  3. Name, Address, Telephone Number, Email Address (optional) — on Cover Page only.
  4. Please put poem titles/first lines on Cover Page as well.
  5. Include Self Addressed Stamped Envelope or Email Address for reply.
  6. Include $10 Reading Fee per set of up to 6 poems — OR —
    $15 Reading Fee for set of 12 poems.

 

 

 

 

____________________

All entries considered for publication.

All currency above given in US dollars.

Remember: email submissions are NOT accepted.

All reading fees (by check or money order)
should be made out to

Literal Latté
and mailed with entry manuscripts to

Literal Latté Awards

200 East 10th Street, Suite 240
New York, NY 10003
(212) 260-5532

 

PUB: Guidelines | Cash Prize, Enter Now! | Mad Hatters' Reviewl

Mad Hatters' Contest

THE FIRST MHR KNOCK OUR HATS OFF CONTEST

 

Mad Hatters’ Review will consider submissions in FICTION or POETRY commencing on MARCH 1ST, 2010 (12 a.m. USA EST) and ending on June 30th (11:59 p.m.).

First prize winners in both genres will receive $250 (each) plus publication of their entries in Issue 12. The winning works of 5 runners-up in each genre will also be published in Issue 12.

All winning entries will be published in a print anthology called “Knock Our Hats Off: A Little Book of Curious Delights.” Each winner will receive a copy of this deluxe collector’s item.

The terms “fiction” and “poetry”
may be interpreted broadly. Take a walk on the wild side through our pages. Take liberties. Governments are taking them away from us, so we’re giving them away free.

Our honorable judges:

Cris Mazza, Fiction
www.cris-mazza.com

Sheila E. Murphy, Poetry
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheila_Murphy


Our entry fee and modus operandi:
$12 per entry via PayPal to madhattersreview@gmail.com.
Poetry: 3 poems max per entry.
Fiction: 3000 words max per entry.
By all means, enter as many times as you wish.

All submissions must be sent to madhattersrev@yahoo.com with the following information in the subject line:

  • Your Name
  • Genre (Fiction or Poetry)
  • Title/s of submission
  • Word Count

Submitted works should be copied and pasted into the exquisite corpus of your email AND attached as an RTF Doc. If you’re submitting visual poetry or visual fiction, attach your entries as jpeg/s or gif/s. If you absolutely MUST, submit these offerings in PDF format.

Pages of texts should be titled, but your name should only appear on the subject line of your email, as submissions will be read blind. We’ll ask for your bio and optional pic if you’re a first place winner or runner-up.

Simultaneous submissions are expected. Just tell us immediately if some other lucky editor has grabbed your gem/s. But please realize that we won’t refund entry fees.

Winning entries will be announced by September 15th. Please address queries to madhattersrev@yahoo.com (subject line: QUERY).

 

VIDEO: “Waiting For “Superman”” (On The Public Education Crisis) > from Shadow And Act

“Waiting For “Superman”

(On The Public Education Crisis)

The first film to be acquired at the Sundance Film Festival this year – a documentary called Waiting For “Superman”, directed by Davis Guggenheim (An Inconvenient Truth) about the crisis in public education in the USA, featuring leaders in the field of education, including Bill Gates of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Geoffrey Canada, president and CEO of the Harlem Children’s Zone in Harlem, New York: and Michelle Rhee, chancellor of the Washington, D.C., public schools. In theatres in the fall (no specific date yet).

 Picture 1
122483-waiting_for_superman_341

 

INFO: Sea Breeze Journal of Contemporary Liberian Writings