INTERVIEW: Diahann Carroll: The Turner Classic Movies Interview > MovieMorlocks.com

Diahann Carroll:

The Turner Classic

Movies Interview


Our friend Steve Ryfle takes the wheel today in candid conversation with film and TV actress (and Turner Classic Movies fan) Diahann Carroll, which he offers to us as a Movie Morlocks exclusive…

Diahann Carroll (b. 1935) will always be thought of, first and foremost, as a groundbreaking actress on television, having been the first African-American woman to topline a network TV series in a non-stereotypical role, in the dramedy JULIA (1968-71, NBC). She also was the first African-American diva on a primetime soap, chewing much scenery as Dominique Deveraux in DYNASTY (1981-1989, ABC) in the 1980s. In a career spanning six decades, she’s done one-offs and recurring parts in innumerable series, hosted network variety specials, worked the talk show circuit. Carroll has done it all, from THE STAR WARS HOLIDAY SPECIAL (1978) to GREY’S ANATOMY (2005–, ABC); she was and is a television fixture.

Carroll has had an equally impressive, if less prolific, film career. She came from New York to Hollywood in 1954 and landed a small part in Otto Preminger’s CARMEN JONES (1954), the first of three pictures she would make with the hot-headed filmmaker. Preminger also gave Carroll a supporting part in his much-maligned, never-on-video adaptation of PORGY AND BESS (1959), in which she sang the Gershwin classic “Summertime,” and a starring role as a teacher confronting racist land barons in the Deep South in the Civil Rights-era misfire HURRY SUNDOWN (1967). But the film that showcased her acting ability more than any other was John Berry’s CLAUDINE (1974), which recently aired on TCM. The film saw this most sophisticated of ladies convincingly portraying a welfare mother struggling to raise her kids in Harlem. It was an Oscar-nominated performance and something of a crowning achievement, though her career continues today, nearly 40 years later.

Diahann Carroll spoke to Turner Classic Movies in 2009 during a publicity tour for her book THE LEGS ARE THE LAST TO GO. This is the first time this interview has been published.

STEVE RYFLE: Who were your inspirations on the big screen?

DIAHANN CARROLL: I loved the work of Bette Davis and I loved the work of Katharine Hepburn. There weren’t many black actresses for one to study. But those actresses, every time I saw them—and sometimes I’d see the movie three times or four times—each time there was something new I could gain from their work. They were wonderful on screen.

SR:  You were about 19 when you came out to Hollywood. How did you end up auditioning for Otto Preminger for the part in CARMEN JONES?

DC: He was auditioning everyone in the world who was a Black American and I flew out to audition. I met him because it was set up by my agent.

SR: Did you know anything about his now-legendary temper?

DC: I knew that he was supposed to be very, very mean. (Laughs.) But you see, I had heard that about my dad, and I knew a great deal about men who liked the reputation of being mean. As you say to them, “Oh stop it!” they recognize that someone has, as we used to say in the old neighborhood, pulled their coat. And as soon as Otto started screaming and yelling on the set, I thought, “Oh my God, he needs all of this in order to work.” He creates this atmosphere around him so that he can barrel in, and no one dares speak in his presence while he’s working. Which isn’t the way really to go about it, but what he’s trying to create on the set, that can be a wonderful atmosphere in which to create a scene—a tense, dramatic scene, or even a comedic scene. But I liked him very much and we got along. I had heard about him and was not worried about it, because I thought if you do your work and do what you’re supposed to do, if Otto says something you don’t like you can go back to the hotel, pack your bags, and go home. And he saw that in my face immediately.

SR:  You wrote wonderfully about your audition for Preminger. He asked you to read for the lead role of Carmen and you did a scene with James Edwards in the Harry Belafonte role, and he was painting your toenails, which made you very uncomfortable. Preminger sensed your discomfort and tried to psych you out by asking, “Whoever told you were sexy?” I love the way you handled the situation; it ended up becoming an icebreaker between the two of you.

DC: That’s right, and I said, “No one ever told me that I was sexy!” Which made Otto laugh. It was one of many icebreakers for Otto and myself. He allowed me to sit very near him on the set when we were doing CARMEN JONES. I had lots of questions, and he didn’t mind that. I think it was during a time when he saw how really unsophisticated and naive I was. I had only been away from my mom and dad for a short period of time. Pedicures were not a part of my life, and I didn’t want him to know that. So we came out of that smiling.

 But there’s another story I wanted to tell you, where Otto and I became, really, buddies when we did a film together called HURRY SUNDOWN (1967). I had spoken to him in New York and I had given him a recommendation for a hairdresser who could do every kind of hair known to man. And he became very upset. “I don’t allow anyone to tell me who to hire.” I said I’m not telling you, I’m asking you to do that and make sure we’re all taken care of equally while we’re working. So of course the day arrived when we were working on the set, and Otto was up on the crane, shooting. There was heavy, heavy mist in the air, and as we’re shooting this scene, he screams, “Hairdresser! Hairdresser!” And this very nice young man came over to me and he said, “I don’t know what to do, because the rain is affecting your hair and your hair is changing.” And I said, “If you have a problem with my hair, you’ll have to talk to Mr. Preminger.” So, he walked off the set.

Otto was furious. He yelled, “Where are you going? You’re fired!” Finally he came down off the crane, and he said to me, “What’s going on?” I said, “Remember in New York, when you said you wouldn’t allow anyone to tell you who to hire or fire? I was not asking you to hire anyone in particular, I was just asking that you find someone who could do every kind of hair, not just straight hair.” He said, “Is that what this is all about?” And he said, “Maybe I should call this a wrap [for the day] because it’s practically raining.” And I said yes, and if it rains my hair is going to change every 10 minutes. He said, “Maybe I should get a wig for you.” And I said yes, you can do that. So he called a wrap and we walked away, practically arm in arm. He said, “This is going to be a very expensive day for me.” Then later when we returned home after the filming I went to his house a few times for dinner. He was married to a very lovely lady, and we all became very good friends. Otto was the one who eventually said to me, “I’ve got to talk to you about your money.” He said, “I do hope that you sign your own checks. There’s no one that should sign your checks for you.” That was a very important piece of information that Otto Preminger gave me.

SR: At the time you came to Hollywood, there were so few African American actors doing roles that were substantial. Sidney Poitier, Harry Belafonte, Ruby Dee, Dorothy Dandridge and a few more. There weren’t many good roles for black actors at that time.

DC: There were none. There were none. And if a role did emerge, all the managers and agents—everybody knew about it immediately because there were no films where Black Americans were working.

SR: Was there camaraderie among actors and actresses, or was the competition too fierce for that?

DC: I must say that I found there was camaraderie among all actors because the business of being unemployed hits everyone from time to time, even Marlon Brando. So I found great camaraderie. They were definitely people who understood our plight because they had to make adjustments because of their own plight.

SR: I know you attended the High School of Music and Art in New York, and later studied with Lee Strasberg. Who most helped you shaped your acting craft?

DC:  You cannot study with Lee Strasberg without learning something. You may not take all of it away with you but you’re going to find new areas that you’re going to benefit from. I studied with several people, and eventually I had a drama coach, recommended to me by Harry Belafonte. I worked with her for years and she almost moved into my home in New York when we were doing CLAUDINE, because we worked practically around the clock on that film. She was so fabulous at taking who I am, and who the character was, and finding areas in there that I could meld one into the other in a positive way. I work with her from time to time even today. It’s good to have someone else’s point of view about a character.

SR: Were you able to get to know Dorothy Dandridge at all?

DC: Yes, I did. She was a very beautiful woman, a lovely woman, but she seemed unhappy.

SR: The tension between her and Otto Preminger on-set is legendary.

DC: I found it to be very real, and very high strung. Yes, it was a very difficult shoot. But she was just such a beautiful creature, standing there being very firm in her footsteps about her character of Carmen.

SR: You’re written about the importance of projecting a positive image on screen, rather than just doing your job. When did the content of a film or TV project become more important to you than simply landing a role?

DC: I think most of us come into the business with those hopes or dreams. Black or white, we want to do something that has some important texture to it. I did not want to do either CARMEN JONES or PORGY AND BESS. I think I make that clear in the book. I had seen musicals about the Black community, particularly about the poor and uneducated. PORGY AND BESS had beautiful music but I never liked the story. The music was so beautiful it made those films work, and the excitement of seeing beautiful Black people in color, but the story was not necessary, really.

SR: A lot of actors who appeared in PORGY AND BESS had tremendous misgivings about it.

DC: Yes, that’s true. It seemed unnecessary. We’d seen that same damn story 50 times. And it didn’t accomplish anything really, except to make our children feel that that was a primary part of our history, our legacy, and that’s not information we wanted to give to our children.

SR: You’ve written about an incident during the making of PORGY AND BESS, and I hoped you might talk about it a little. You were wearing a headscarf, and Otto Preminger told you, “Take that thing off. I can’t see you.” And Sam Goldwyn, the producer, got very upset about this; his concept of the film, and what it should represent, seemed rooted in another era.

DC: Well I don’t know about that. I really don’t know. I remained rather removed from the texture of the story, such as it was. And I did know that bandanas were very much a part of the daily life there. The decision to tell me to take off the bandana was of course made by my director. And when Sam Goldwyn sent for me, I explained to him that that was not my decision. He was really such a tyrant. I looked at him and said, “This is almost like making a movie, right here in this office.” We were saying a few words to each other, and that’s when I said to him, “Please, stop yelling at me, Mr. Goldwyn.” My father does not yell at me, why would I allow a business associate to yell at me? And luckily Preminger walked in at that moment. That’s with whom he should have had the conversation. There was no reason for him to send for any of the actors; the actors wouldn’t do anything other than what the director asked us to do. I think he knew that, but it was just a grandstand, very childish.

SR: I understand you first me Sidney Poitier while making PORGY AND BESS, and you write wonderfully about the meeting. You talked about the way he would walk into a room and people were drawn to him.

DC: He’s quite dignified, and I think a lot of that comes from his upbringing in the West Indies. And so many people who are from the islands have a very quiet dignity that is very special, and Sidney has that, in addition to the fact that as a young man he was breathtakingly beautiful. Age has done well by him, it really has. And when he walked into the room, everybody went, “Aaaah! There he is!” I was very pleased, and I am very pleased, that Sidney and I had a chance to know each other and I had a chance to be around him and observe the way he operated, going about building his career. He was very ambitious; his attitude about what he was doing was very strong. And he really had this innate pleasant part of him that could not be denied.

SR: Your relationship with Sidney lasted about nine years, and it coincided with the pinnacle of his fame. You write very candidly about the personal side of your relationship, but did you ever talk with him about the characters he played? He seemed to carry a tremendous burden, as if every role he played was interpreted as a political statement.

DC: That was a part of his life; this was not something he carried out only in his work. That’s who Sidney was; he was very much a part of the political scene at that time. As a matter of fact, in his own quiet way I bet he still is. But more than anything, I was very attracted to this very dignified young man, who learned how to speak English by listening to the radio. He was a very hard-working actor, and it was my joy to be able to share that part of my life with him.

SR: You co-starred with Sidney, as well as Paul Newman, in Martin Ritt’s PARIS BLUES (1961), a rather lovely little film.

DC: I think you’re right, it is a lovely little movie. Unfortunately I don’t know how pertinent it is to today, but I do like the characters that were drawn for that film, and I think we all had an immediate connection, a camaraderie, because we were all pretty much in the same boat in our personal lives at that time. I took a great deal away from watching Paul Newman, and his wife as well, a great talent. He was really quite a gentleman, and a kind man.

SR: You won a Tony for Best Actress in a Musical in 1963, for playing the lead in the Broadway play NO STRINGS. It was an inter-racial romance between your character and Richard Kiley’s But you were passed over for Nancy Kwan when a film version was in the works a few years later. The film was never made.

DC: Yes that’s right. I couldn’t believe that I would not play (the part) in the film. I was called by a columnist for the New York Post, who said he would like to interview me about that, and it was on the second page of the newspaper. I was very happy to do the article because I received so many calls; “You must feel jilted.” I felt that if they had cast a Black woman in the film version then I would have been able to take that a little more easily. But once we leave the color of my skin and we go to someone who is a different color, then the statement that I thought we were trying to make with NO STRINGS has been changed. Anyway, I have been told that decision was one of the reasons the film was never made.

SR: You testified at government hearings in the 1960s about the lack of roles and jobs for African-Americans in the industry.

DC: Yes I did. And that’s why I received a call from Hal Kanter, who created JULIA. And he explained that he’d gone to an NAACP luncheon and the speaker said that it was the responsibility of everyone in the room, particularly every creative person in the room, to do whatever they could possibly do to make sure that this barrier was lifted, changed, pushed in a direction that was more positive. So he went home and wrote JULIA. So yes, there was constant conversation in every community about the situation. And if it wasn’t there, we tried very hard to bring it to a new table, a new area, a new community, so that everyone was talking about the fact that we had to integrate television and film. And that’s during my most aware period, during the sixties. And I think it was my most active period, during the sixties, maybe the early seventies.

SR:  HURRY SUNDOWN was described by Otto Preminger as a pro-integration film. Interesting that it was shot in the Deep South, in Klan country.

DC: It certainly was Klan country! I don’t know if you’ve read about the filming in New Orleans, but we were warned that the Klan was coming to our set, and thank God we had the protection of the Teamsters. They brought all these cars to our rescue—”Get in immediately! Let’s leave the area because we’ve been threatened!” Some of us were lying on the floor of the car. It was a horrible, horrible experience. So we went through difficult racism when we were in New Orleans. Eventually the production learned that they had to take much greater precaution for our safety. It was really a very difficult time.

SR: Robert Hooks, who co-starred with you in that film, recalled that one day when the cast and crew were driving back to their hotel, shots were fired at their cars.

DC: I think that may have been the same incident.

SR: And when the African-American members of the cast went into town and couldn’t get seated in a restaurant, things like that.

DC: Yes, and we asked for one of the producers to be with us at all times, not just the protection of the Teamsters or police or whatever. And Otto did that. And then reservations were made by the production company, so we could eat.

SR: Do you remember shooting the “slap scene” with Jane Fonda? I understand that she didn’t want to hit you hard enough.

DC: Yes. And I didn’t want to hit her, either! Very often in the evening we were all together, so it was very difficult to meet on the set the next morning and think of one another as “that white woman” or “that black woman.” Particularly in light of the things we had discussed the night before. (Laughs) But I said to Jane, “I’ll steel myself. You’ve gotta give me a whack!” So we did it four or five times and finally she gave me a whack. I don’t remember now what it was all about…

SR: Well, your character is slapping some sense into her. I think of that scene as a parallel to the much more famous one in IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT, where Sidney Poitier slaps the white aristocrat. You can look at those two scenes as a turning point in the way African-Americans were portrayed on film, that they were finally standing up for themselves in a very direct and physical way.

DC: Yes. The thing I felt was my most important contribution to integrating the film and television industry was a film called CLAUDINE. My work was probably the best I’ve done to date, other than probably AGNES OF GOD on Broadway [in 1982-83]. The work is why people want to work with you, particularly if the project has a good script and is directed well. But the work is what breaks down the barriers, I think, in the long run.

SR: I understand you were friends with Diana Sands, who was originally cast as Claudine, from childhood. She is somebody who, because she died so young, has unfortunately not been recognized as much as she should be. She was amazing.

DC: Yes, we went to elementary school together. She was extraordinary. She did a production called THE OWL AND THE PUSSYCAT on Broadway, and I guess all of us saw it about a half dozen times each, just to watch her work. I thought she would have been given the film [Barbra Streisand played the role of Dora in the 1970 film version], but it didn’t happen. But those of us who were around know that that was some of the best work being done, by Diana Sands. She was quite a personality, and I knew that she was especially gifted. We all did. It’s very hard to define what there is about someone like that. You know, the moment you saw Brando you knew there was something extraordinary about that young man. Diana was the same.

SR: When she had to leave the production of CLAUDINE due to her health, she insisted that the role go to you.

DC: Yes she did. She said, “You must send for her,” and (the producers) said, “We don’t really want to do that,” but she insisted. Diana and I had worked together on my show, JULIA. My producer didn’t know who she was, which I couldn’t believe, but I said, “Send for her.” And we did four or five episodes together, and she was just a joy, a shot of B-12 for the writing staff, the director. It was wonderful having her around. Hal Kanter told me, “She’s a very gifted young lady. I really admire that you recommended her. What makes you think you are so important to me, young lady, that I won’t put Diana Sands as my star?” And I said, “Because that would be a different show!” (Laughs) “If you want to do that, I think you should write a show for her.” So he did. I said, “Don’t tell me anything about it, because I’ll be jealous. I’ll probably end up hating both of you, because I know it will be quite successful.” (Laughs)

SR: Did they film a pilot? What was it called?

DC: They did. I don’t remember what it was called. It didn’t quite work.

SR: It seems every African American actress in Hollywood auditioned for the role of Julia.

DC: I think every Black actress in the United States auditioned for JULIA.

SR: JULIA is tame by today’s standards, but it’s interesting how controversial it was at the time to have a Black woman starring in her own show.

DC: Yes. Listening today to the stories that separated us from the norm—it’s embarrassing, because Julia was a middle class woman, raising her son alone, working in an aeronautic plant, and had nothing to do with servitude. The Black community was very aware of how long they had put up with so many films that really only dealt with the Black community in terms of actors that were playing servants. And this brought to light, I suppose, that given the right scripts and the right cast—our ratings were excellent for a very long time—I think that was part of what was controversial. And a woman living alone, raising a child was a concept that had not been seen on film or on television. Her husband was killed in Vietnam.  I was raised around the Julias of the country, and that’s why I connected so with her. I’m horribly middle class (Laughs) and Julia was too. But yes, it had its groundbreaking aspects, absolutely.

SR: It’s interesting that you say you’re “horribly middle class,” because I don’t think many people would perceive you that way.

DC: You know something, I don’t know and I don’t care. We’re always putting name tags on things. I live the life I enjoy.

SR: You made one movie with Jim Brown, who could be a very intimidating presence, THE SPLIT (1968). What was it like working with him?

DC: Unusual. That’s the only word I can think of. I don’t think I ever worked with an actor like Jim Brown before. But I did like what he did on screen.

SR: Getting back to CLAUDINE for a moment, it’s a wonderful part and a lovely movie. What made you want to do this part so badly?

DC: Well, the range of it was something that had not been asked of me. I had not been asked to do a film with that kind of range for my character. And that’s always a treat for any actor. And the opportunity to work with James Earl Jones I just could not resist.

SR: You’ve written about filming your love scene with James Earl Jones, and you mention that many actresses didn’t want to do those kinds of scenes at the time, but for the two of you it was an icebreaker.

DC: Yes, I think that’s why the director set up our schedule in that manner. Because the very first day we met was our first scene in bed together. And James is a real actor—he wants to be exactly on the page, so he was nude! I wore some sort of bathing suit. But he did say one of the loveliest things I’ve ever heard from a fellow actor. The scene was quite a long scene, and at the end of the day he said, “Miss Carroll, let me say this to you. All day we’ve been working on this scene together and I never once thought of you as Diahann Carroll, not for one moment.” I cannot thank him enough for that. That’s incredible. I have to get rid of her as often as I possibly can, in order to do my work away from singing in nightclubs, television shows, so on and so forth. And it’s a big struggle with me to know where that line is drawn when I’m acting. It’s foremost in my mind, constantly. So it was important for him to say that to me, it meant a great deal.

SR: Thanks so very much for spending this time with us.

DC: Thank you. It’s been very interesting. By the way, I love Turner Classic Movies. I have a television that stays on Turner Classic Movies. It’s just a way of life that I cannot give up. I have to see old movies for the lighting, the makeup, as well as the scripts.

SR: I call it the free film school channel.

DC: That’s exactly right (Laughs).

SR: If I didn’t have to work for a living, I’d sit there all day, watching movies.

DC: I find that I’m very grateful when I have a cold. It’s a good excuse. (Laughs) I can very easily go from movie to movie. Sometimes I even have popcorn (Laughs).

SR: Thanks again.

DC: It’s been a joy to talk to you. Thank you very much.

Interview copyright Steve Ryfle, 2009.

 

EGYPT: What's Going On - Rantings of a Sandmonkey

Mahmoud Salem - aka Sandmonkey

Numbers

“Once and for all
the idea of glorious victories
won by the glorious army
must be wiped out
Neither side is glorious
On either side they’re just frightened men messing their pants
and they all want the same thing
Not to lie under the earth
but to walk upon it
without crutches”

(Roux, act 1, scene 19) Peter Weiss, The Persecution and Assassination of Jean-Paul Marat

 

8: 39 Pm Feb 1st

Was at a friend’s house, right after we had dinner where we contemplated the notion that the next day was the one year anniversary of the Camel Incident. One our friends receives a phone-call about thirty-something dead Ahly fans in the PortSaid stadium. We turn on the TV and we were greeted with horror. The Updates keep rolling in, the amount of dead, the number of injured, the parents who are calling TV shows and crying over their children that they cannot reach. Within 3 hours, the numbers death toll was released: 70-something dead, and hundreds injured. In a football match. The replayed footage showed the players getting endangered repeatedly before the attack, and the referee doing nothing. Then showed the storming of the stadium by the “Masry Fans”, with the police doing nothing to stop or block them. And then the camera goes dark.

Your brain doesn’t comprehend what happened immediately; all the while a split-screen shows Cairo Stadium with a huge fire behind it. You are informed that the Zamalek Ultras burned their banners in protest to what happened to their natural enemies & competitors, the Ahly Ultras. Natural enemies, Nemeses, in solidarity over the lives lost. Prayers and tears fill your timeline on every social network. Nobody has names, only numbers of victims. Categories. Statistics. Someone informs you that this is the second biggest disaster in football history, and the first of its kind when it comes to clashes inside the stadium. Your Brain can’t process this information, and doesn’t want to. Too many people have turned into numbers and statistics this year, and nobody has done anything about it. All you know is this: the numbers of the dead, they just keep piling up.

1: 30 am Feb 2nd    

I am stuck in a meeting with 40 different political parties & “Powers” that was called for at the Wafd HQ in order to take swift action to this disaster. The Muslim Brotherhood’s party, The FJP, is notably missing. Lots of talking and arguing over what to do, but a general direction started emerging of calling the SCAF into question in Parliament, remove trust in them, create a temporary National Salvation government that has full executive powers and start the presidential election process immediately. Everybody seemed to agree on those points, given that this was the straw that broke the camel’s back. After all, during the tenure of the SCAF, over 2000 protesters were killed, over 7000 were injured (hundreds maimed permanently), and 16000 were thrown in military prisons for year-long sentences without due process or adequate representation, and they were entrusted with “providing security” and “guiding the transition of Egypt to a democracy that respects civil rights”. Needless to say, their management of the country has been quite terrible, and it was time for them to be removed from Power.

And then, out of the blue, Hazem Salah Abu Ismael, the salafi presidential candidate, graces us with his presence, and has a suggestion of his own to resolve the issue: Lets remove the requirement of having 30 MP’s endorse the Presidential bid of anyone who wants to run, and thus we can jumpstart the Presidential election process in order to facilitate a speedy transfer of executive Power, claiming that anything else wouldn’t be supported. Useless discussion ensued, his suggestion rejected, and the process of writing the agreed upon points in a press release commences around 2:30 am. Suddenly, the words “hold the SCAF accountable by questioning them in parliament” is exchanged with the “more powerful” –according to them- words of “Trying whomever is responsible”, and “moving the executive powers from SCAF to a National Salvation government” got changed into “the creation of a National Unity government”, because, you see, with a National Unity government you can apparently change the Minister of Defense, who is the head of SCAF, so it’s a way of doing so clandestinely, apparently (although why you would do such a thing is beyond my comprehension). Protests over the final statement were drowned by the sound of the political leaders escaping the room to read the statement in front of the TV cameras. I took the backdoor out fuming, watching the historical moment & opportunity slip away.

(Next day, during an emergency parliamentary session, the Speaker of the Parliament Saad elKatatny, of the FJP, wanted to not have a televised session, curtailed efforts to question Tantawi or the Minister of Interior, and created a fact-finding committee to investigate the incident further, and ended the session early. The Political solution was lost, possibly forever.)

4 am Feb 2nd

The Ramsis train station, where I found myself alongside with thousands of Ahly fans and family members of those who went to Portsaid. I entered the station just as the train arrived. The moment the Ahly fans stepped off the train, they were greeted with applause, but there was no celebration. They were walking out crying, with looks of shock and sadness on their faces, and then you started seeing the injured as they were being gurney-ed away. You step away from the platform and you start seeing the family members, many screaming their sons’ names, many others crying as they realize that their children did not come back. I stood there and spoke with friends who were there, and they all confirmed the story as follows: The Police was not checking the Masry fans for weapons; the moment the second half started, suddenly they suddenly found the fans storming the playground holding weapons and knives without being stopped by the Police at all; Some were stabbed, others escaped to the top of the stadium where they had to jump from it to avoid the stabbing, and the rest who tried to escape the stadium through the passageway to the exit doors found the exit door locked, and people escaping those thugs with their lives ended up causing a stampede and pushing people to be suffocated in the small hallway. 79.. dead, many of them teens who just wanted to support their team in an important game.

I decided to head home, and on my way to the car, an old man just passed by me, talking to me, talking to anybody around him, crying that his son “Abdelrahman” had called him & said he was in Portsaid with his friends. He now can’t find him, and is wondering where he went. “He called me”, he kept repeating while crying. “He called me, and now his phone is off!”

7 PM Feb 2nd.

At Mohamed Mahmoud, again, with scores of young Ahly Ultras and fans, who were headed towards the Ministry of Interior to protest the death of their friends and colleagues. Earlier that day, the news kept rolling in: The National football league was suspended, Mohamed “the Saint” Abu Treika had announced his retirement from football, alongside with fellow soccer superstars Barakat and Meteb, and lead a demonstration where he chanted against military rule and for bringing justice to the dead fans, one of which died in his own arms, and people were marching to Tahrir. So far it was only people chanting, and then suddenly the teargas started. Two Canisters were fired, one at the frontlines, and the other landed next to my feet, forcing me to jump away and fall on the floor. The escaping crowds from the front started running to the back, and I almost got stampeded by the panicking crowd if it wasn’t for a stranger that pulled me up and saved my life. I cough back to the corner of Mohamed Mahmoud and Falaky street, when I hear the growl of the first motorcycle that drove through the crowd to get whomever was injured on the frontline. Suddenly we are back in time 3 months, and we are at the Battle of Mohamed Mahmoud again, and everyone knew their role: Young People upfront hurling rocks, Police shooting expired teargas on them, and first-aid motorcycles storming in and out of the pandemonium to carry the bodies of the injured. Déjà vu. The madness, all over again. And there is nothing any one can do to stop it.

5 pm Feb 3rd (last night)

At the Falaky street Field Hospital, located in a tiny alleyway right on the corner of Falaky and Mohamed Mahmoud, where tens of victims were being aided by an exhausted young medical staff until the ambulances or a first-aid motorcycles arrive. I had woken up and practiced that horrible tradition that we all do now: Check twitter on previous night’s events, and find out how many more people got killed while I was sleeping. That morning I had taken the decision that I no longer wanted to cover the battle taking place, nor was I interested in hurling rocks at the Police; I wanted to help save those kids, because I don’t want any more to die. I was sick of all the unnecessary deaths, of all the young people who lost their lives so a bunch of 70 year olds in shiny uniforms could continue to retain their powers. The situation had escalated dramatically over night, with the Police forces shooting the protesters with shotgun shells, and birdshot victims were arriving in the dozens. I would carry the wounded into the field hospital or to the ambulances, many of which are young boys who could not be older than 18, shot and bleeding in my arms, while teargas was relentlessly being sprayed at us. In the moments when things were calm, I would check what the field hospital there and on Tahrir street would need and tweet it, and people I’ve never met in my life would show up and bring the supplies. They too were sick of all the deaths, and wanted to do whatever was in their power to help stop it or at least contain the damage. Similar protests were taking place in Suez, where four protesters were shot to death that day and many others were injured.

5 hours I spent doing this, and I walked away with two images stuck on my mind: the first was the 16 year old, with birdshots in the chest and staring vacantly in space, whom I carried bleeding to a motorcycle across the barrier.

The second was of a man standing in the middle of the street crying and screaming to no one in particular: “Now what? Where is the solution? Where is the solution?”, and received no answer.

————————————————–

Eleven died in the clashes since Thursday. Six in Suez and Five in Cairo. 2532 injured over the killing of 79. All were people, and now they are numbers.

Many calls were made to stop the violence, to keep those youths from protesting, but all were ignored and unanswered, naturally, and more people than ever turned against the military rule. This was it, the turning point, and no one can blame them. A year ago the whole country was filled with dreams and hopes for the future, and within the year all of these hopes and dreams were burnt to cinders. They have seen their loved ones military tried, their friends maimed and their children killed. Their sense of security has all but vanished, the fact that no change or any kind of real reform took place has left them disillusioned and bitter. And then their one source of entertainment and distraction, Football, was taken away from them as well. They are plagued with news of bank robberies, tourist kidnappings, refugees getting their organs harvested, children being kidnapped and held for ransom and now they can’t even send their children to stadiums without them getting killed. The People are fed up, and all the excuses and conspiracy talk no longer holds the test of reality. The SCAF have finally earned the wrath of the Egyptian public, which means that their days are numbered and they know it. The Joker’s Country, no more.

But have no delusions here, there is no panacea or an easy way out. This is not the original 18 days, with its romantic and inspirational happy ending; this is the sequel, with gritty realism and seas of spilled blood. News of Death has become so commonplace, that people have accepted it as reality and the price they are willing to pay for their freedom, but they still refuse to be anything but peaceful, still refuse to carry arms, and only throw rocks on the police when they attack them first. The day before yesterday an officer abandoned a Central Security truck in the middle of Talaat Harb square near Tahrir, which had about 40 CS soldiers, and fled, probably thinking (or hoping) that the protesters would torch it and kill the soldiers in them. The Protesters protected the truck, and helped the soldiers escape the scene in ambulances. Hell, a whole year without any kind of police and people were shocked, shocked I tell you, that a Bank was robbed. Those are beautiful people, and they don’t deserve the nightmare that has been thrust on them by a bunch of old generals still clinging to Power. The SCAF will be overthrown, and they will fight to their bitter end by killing as many people as possible, and more people will turn into numbers in their quest for freedom; To be treated like human beings, to not get killed by their own government (whether by negligence or design) and see neither accountability nor Justice. It never had to be this way, but the unnecessary trail of blood and dead bodies they left behind them in their merciless attempts to abort this revolution has sealed their fate. It’s only a matter of time now.

Meanwhile, the revolutionaries are walking PTSD cases. We have endured more pain, injustice and deaths in the past year than we have ever expected or bargained for. We have seen our reputation maligned, our dream destroyed and our friends and loved ones kidnapped, tortured, jailed, and killed, sometimes in front of our own eyes. All we wanted was to live in a country that had a future, where we are treated like human beings, and even that was too much for us to ask. Our existential war for dignity and freedom became a real one, and many of us were driven to the edges of insanity with all the mayhem that our lives have turned into, careers lost, ties severed, relationships destroyed, and marriages turning into divorces. An entire generation traumatized, damaged, lost, psychologically scarred and filled with guilt over the horror that got unleashed on them for demanding not to live like animals. The only thing that’s not broken is their spirit. They waver, they backtrack and suffer long episodes of self doubt, but their will remains the same. They know they will most likely not walk away unharmed, but they have resigned themselves to the price they were destined to pay. Not because they are heroes, but because they are humans, and they fully understand what that word means. It may seem to you like it’s blood for blood, but they are the first ones to tell you that it has to stop one day, and they hope that day comes sooner than later. But until that day comes, they have resigned their fate to this battle, and they will not take the easy way out and leave like many others already did. This country, and its future, is their responsibility now, and they will do whatever it takes, even it destroys them inside and out. That’s their tragedy: that they get that the numbers used to be people one day, and they will not allow them to have died in vain.

But the true tragedy of this revolution was that we were willing to forgo and forgive anything the SCAF had done in the Mubarak years, had they kept their word, started us on the road of accountability and reform, and given up power back in September as they originally stated. They didn’t, and one year later, here we are. The inevitable conclusion. They could’ve been our heroes and they chose to be Bastards, and now they will pay.

 

HISTORY: How the FBI Sabotaged Black America - Documentary by Gil Noble

Gil Noble

HOW THE FBI SABOTAGED
BLACK AMERICA
Documentary by Gil Noble on the intentional destruction of Black America by the FBI using infiltration, counter-intelligence programs and drugs. From Marcus Garvey to Paul Robeson to Martin Luther King to Malcolm X to Fred Hampton, to the Black Panthers to heroin and crack, the FBI has worked to destroy black people. Includes interview with Darthard Perry, Ex-informer for the FBI.

The Complete Malcolm X on DVD: http://malcolmxfiles.blogspot.com/

 

AUDIO: D’Angelo – Recent Live show + Live Mixtape (Free Downloads)

If you haven’t heard by now, you clearly must have been living under a rock, but D’Angelo is back.  This past week, he resurfaced, doing his first live performances in over a decade.  Judging from the first couple shows on his European tour, his music is just as strong, performing old classics and debuting new music (yes, we finally have new music from D’Angelo).  The internet went into a frenzy this past week with visual evidence of D’Angelo’s return flooding YouTube and many music blogs.  When he first announced his comeback tour, I was cautiously optimistic a full audio recording may surface, and it didnt take long for our prayers to be answered.  Big thanks once again to the great folks at Funk It, here is the full audio of D’Angelo’s set @ Le Zenith in Paris from a few nights ago.  Setlist and download are after the jump, as well as a stream of one of the new songs.

 

Setlist:

  1. Playa Playa

  2. Feel Like Makin’ Love

  3. Ain’t That Easy

  4. Devil’s Pie

  5. Chicken Grease

  6. The Line  > The Root

  7. The Charade

  8. I’ve Been Watching You (Move Your Sexy Body)

  9. Shit, Damn, Motherfucker

  10. Solo medley (Brown Sugar, Jonz In My Bonz, Spanish Joint, Me and Those Dreamin’ Eyes of Mine, Cruisin’, Higher, One Mo’Gin, Untitled (How Does It Feel)

  11. Another Life

  12. Sugah Daddy

  13. Space Oddity

  14. Brown Sugar

DOWNLOAD LINK (Click “Low Speed Download” in the grey box, fill in the captcha code, hit “Submit” then look for “Start Downloading Now!” It can be confusing with all the cluttered ads.)

Here’s a sample of one of the new songs performed:

D’Angelo & The Testimony – Sugah Daddy – January 29, 2012 Paris, France – Le Zenith

 

Once again, big thanks to Funk It for coming through with the recording.  Check out their site for your daily fix of funk!

__________________________

 

Mixtape Mondays: Sam Champ x Okayplayer – D’Angelo Live! [Mixtape]


cover art by Jenn Kaye

UPDATE: this mix is now downloadable! Go crazy:

>>>Download

You may have noticed me using the header Mixtape Mondays on a few posts recently–something we intend to  make a semi-regular feature here at Okayplayer. We figured we would kick it off properly with an actual OKP mixtape; something official, something original, something exclusive. Something worthy to place alongside DJ Soul‘s incredible Best of Common and Dilla mixtapes. And then we was like, Hmm what’s happening the last monday in January that we could use as a theme? Superbowl? Newt Gingrich? Or MAYBE the phoenix-like reemergence of our beloved D’Angelo, who is currently spreading his fiery musical wings across the waters in Europe.

Accordingly, we asked super-thorough DJ/producer and Soulquarian obsessive Sam Champ (you may remember the tough remix of “Left & Right” from his remix LP) to cut together this official OKP D’Angelo Live mix for us. Most of these amazing live renditions of classic D’Angelo material have surfaced online in one form or the other before but Sam Champ has skillfully compiled them into one seamless blend to create the ultimate OKP fantasy concert for those of us not blessed enough to have been born Scandinavian. So without further ado, please find below one hour and twelve minutes (and some seconds) of streamable D’Angelo, recorded live on various stages across the world (and with a young Anthony Hamilton clearly audible on background vox in quite a few)–enough to keep all fly girls’ nipples and toes tingly with excitement until the arrival of a PURPORTED NEW D’ANGELO ALBUM SOMETIME LATER THIS YEAR. D’Angelo is back, baby. Mixtape Mondays is here. Get happy.

Tracklist:
1. Fantastic Intro
2. Brown Sugar
3. Devil’s Pie
4. Crisco
5. Left & Right
6. Chicken Grease
7. Lady
8. Left & Right (Reprise)
9. Feel Like Making Love
10. Can’t Hide Love
11. Things You Do (Fall in Love)
12. One Mo’ Gin
13. Me and Those Dreaming Eyes of Mine
14. S.D.M.
15. Untitled (How Does It Feel)

 

 

PUB: new south - contest

2012 New South Writing Contest


Contest Guidelines: 

The 2012 New South Writing Contest will be held from December 1, 2011 through March 5, 2012. (Entries must be received or postmarked by midnight on March 5, 2012). Each year, New South awards $1,000 to a first place winner, and $250 to a second place winner in the genres of poetry and prose. The 2012 New South Writing Contest will be be judged by Tom Hunley in the genre of poetry and Joshua Harmon in the genre of prose.

    Whether it is submitted online or via the mail, each entry must include:

    1) A reading fee of fifteen dollars ($15). Entry fee includes a copy of the Summer 2012 issue, which will contain the winning entries.

    2) The submitter's contact info, including telephone number, email, and mailing address, preferably contained within a formal cover letter.

    TO ENTER:

    • Visit Tell it Slant for online submissions. Payment accepted via PayPal.

    OR

  1. Paper manuscripts will also be accepted for the contest only. Manuscripts will not be returned, so please do not send your only copy. Send your manuscript, along with a check or money order for $15 made payable to Georgia State University, to:

    New South
    Campus Box 1894
    Georgia State University
    MSC 8R0322 Unit 8
    Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3083

  2. FURTHER GUIDELINES FOR POETRY:

    • Submit up to three (3) poems per document.

    FURTHER GUIDELINES FOR PROSE:

    • Non-fiction is welcomed and encouraged.
    • Submit one (1) short story or non-fiction piece per $15 Reading Fee.
    • Please limit your submissions to 9,000 words.

    While we take the greatest care in handling your entries, we assume no responsibility for lost manuscripts. Only unpublished work will be considered. Simultaneous submissions will be considered with notification. All rights revert to author after publication. Current students, staff, and faculty at Georgia State University are not eligible.

    New South publishes quality literary art promoting the work of emerging and established writers. New South holds no subject biases. The staff will select the best work regardless of style or genre. The final round of judging will be anonymous (the names will be removed from the manuscripts before the final judges see the entries). Judges from outside the staff will pick the winners from finalists selected by the New South staff.


    For questions ONLY (no submissions, please):

    newsouth@gsu.edu

     

    PUB: Kore Press Short Fiction Award

    KORE PRESS

    SHORT FICTION CHAPBOOK AWARD

     

    Our 2012 Short Fiction Chapbook Award is now Open!

    Update: We have extended our submissions period! We are accepting submissions from Oct. 1, 2011 through March 4, 2012.

    A prize of $1,000 plus chapbook publication by Kore Press
    will be given for a short story written in English.

     

     

     

    Eligibility

    This competition is open to any female-identified individual writing in English, regardless of nationality.

     

    How to Submit

    The contest is currently open. You can submit your manuscript and the $15 entry fee here. Please read through submission guidelines before submitting.

    Comment box should include:

    • daytime and evening telephone numbers
    • where you heard about the contest

    All entrants will be notified of results via email.

    Manuscripts must be:

    • NO DOCX FILES. ONLY DOC, PDF, AND RTF.

    a minimum of 4,000 words and a maximum of 12,000 words
    • double-spaced and paginated
    • ANONYMOUS (do not include your name anywhere on the manuscript, and please do not include a title page with names).
    • original fiction written by the applicant (translations are not eligible)

    • unpublished at the time of submission (if the story is accepted elsewhere during our deliberation process, please notify us immediately)

    acknowledgments unnecessary

    Ethics Statement

    We endorse and agree to comply with the following statement released by the Council of Literary Magazines and Presses:

    CLMP's community of independent literary publishers believes that ethical contests serve our shared goal: to connect writers and readers by publishing exceptional writing. We believe that intent to act ethically, clarity of guidelines, and transparency of process form the foundation of an ethical contest. To that end, we agree to:

    1) conduct our contests as ethically as possible and to address any unethical behavior on the part of our readers, judges, or editors;

    2) provide clear and specific contest guidelines -- defining conflict of interest for all parties involved; and

    3) make the mechanics of our selection process available to the public.

    This Code recognizes that different contest models produce different results, but that each model can be run ethically. We have adopted this Code to reinforce our integrity and dedication as a publishing community and to ensure that our contests contribute to a vibrant literary heritage.

     

    The Process

    Manuscripts are delivered to about 6 preliminary readers of diverse backgrounds and literary perspectives. Manuscripts selected by these preliminary readers are reviewed by a second reader. A group of approximately 20 semifinalists are then forwarded to our judge, who chooses 2 or 3 finalists and a winner.

     

    For more information e-mail us or call us at 520.327.2127.

     

    PUB: Omnidawn Poetry Contest: Chapbook Jan-Mar 15 2012

    Omnidawn Poetry Competition:

            Chapbook Competition (January–March 15, 2012)

            1st/2nd Book Competition (May–June, 2012)

            Open Book Poetry Competition (November–December, 2012)

    The winner of each of the three Omnidawn poetry book competitions wins either a $1,000 or a $3,000 cash prize, publication of the book with a full color cover by Omnidawn, 100 free copies of the winning book, and extensive display advertising and publicity, including prominent display ads in American Poetry Review, Poets & Writers Magazine, Rain Taxi Review of Books and other publications. All three Omnidawn poetry book contests have very similar guidelines and submission procedures, as completely described on this web page. The requirements that are the same for all contests include the following: Postal and online poetry contest submissions are accepted for all contests. Manuscript submissions for all contests must be original, in English, and previously unpublished, although individual poems in a manuscript are still eligible for this contest if they have been previously published in print or web magazines, journals, anthologies, or on a personal web site. Revisions are not allowed during the contests. Translations and manuscripts by more than one author are not eligible. All Omnidawn contests are blind, so you can submit manuscripts that contain identifying information, but please be aware that such information will be removed from manuscripts before they are passed on to our editors who select manuscripts to be sent to the judge. If we find a serious error in your entry we will either fix it or contact you to obtain a fix at no cost to you, so your error will not disqualify you. The only differences between Omnidawn poetry contests are the contest dates, the judge, the dollar amount of the prize, the reading fee, the manuscript page limit, an optional Omnidawn book offer, and for one contest only, the First/Second Book Poetry Contest, a limit on the number of previously published full-size books by a submitting poet. These differences are described immediately below, under the "Current Poetry Competition" and "Upcoming Poetry Competitions" headings.

    Current Poetry Competition

    2012 Chapbook Contest ($1,000 & Publication)     January 1–March 15, 2012            Judge: Joseph Lease

    (Note that the deadline has been extended to March 15, 2012.) Open to writers with no limitations on the amount of poetry a writer has published. Submissions should be 20–40 pages of poetry, not including front and back matter (so that this will fit in a 5.5 x 7 inch published chapbook of approximately 50 pages or less). Friends, colleagues and students of the judge, Joseph Lease, are not eligible. Postal and online poetry contest submissions accepted. Manuscripts must be received or postmarked between January 1 and March 15, 2012 at midnight Pacific Standard Time. Reading fee is $15 for the poetry chapbook contest. For $2 extra to cover shipping cost, entrants who provide a U.S. mailing address may choose to receive any Omnidawn chapbook or this chapbook competitions winning chapbook. The poetry chapbook contests winner will be announced to our email list and on this web page in August 2012, and we expect to publish the winning chapbook in December of 2012.

     

    All the essential information for the current chapbook contest is contained in the above two paragraphs.

     

    If you want to read helpful additional details, which are virtually identical for all Omnidawn contests, and then go to the submission procedures, you can:

             Click here for helpful additional details and the submission procedures.

    OR, if you want to skip the additional details and go directly to concise submission procedures, you can either:

             Go to the POSTAL submission procedure by clicking here.

             OR

             Go to the ONLINE submission web page by clicking here, or paste the following link into your browser:     www.omnidawn.net

     

    VIDEO: Denzel Washington Breaks Down His Sociopathic "Safe House" Character + New Footage > Shadow and Act

    Watch Denzel Washington

    Breaks Down His Sociopathic

    "Safe House" Character

    + New Footage

    News by Tambay | February 3, 2012

    I'm actually looking forward to this one; it opens next week Friday, but I'll be seeing it on Tuesday night, and will share my thoughts afterward. 

    In the first clip below, star Denzel Washington gives us an in-depth look at the character he plays in the film - Tobin Frost. The clip also includes a bit of footage from the film that I didn't see in the trailer. And the second 2 clips feature a press junket interview with Denzel Washington about the film, and a behind-the-scenes look at the it.