PUB: Writers’ workshop encourages new Caribbean literary voices > The Trinidad Guardian Newspaper

Writers’ workshop encourages

new Caribbean literary voices

Published: 
Wednesday, January 18, 2012

The seventh Caribbean Creative Writers’ Residential Workshop sponsored by The Cropper Foundation and organised in partnership with the Department of Creative and Festival Arts and the Department of Liberal Arts, The University of the West Indies (UWI), St Augustine, will take place from July 8 to 19 in T&T. Ten writers who have not as yet published a novel or collection of short stories, poems or plays, will be chosen from across the Caribbean to join this year’s residential workshops. The 2012 workshop will focus on fiction, playwriting and poetry and will be facilitated by Professor Funso Aiyejina and Dr Merle Hodge at a secluded writing-inducing setting location somewhere in Trinidad.  


Support for Caribbean writing is an ongoing programme of The Cropper Foundation that seeks to contribute to the development of the Caribbean, on many levels and in different areas of interest. The writers’ workshop is part of the foundation’s effort to encourage new Caribbean literary voices by providing practical advice on the craft of writing. More than 80 writers from Antigua, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, British Virgin Islands, Commonwealth of Dominica, Guyana, Jamaica, Montserrat, T&T, and the Caribbean diaspora (Canada, USA, France and UK), have competed to take part in these workshops held so far in Grand Riviere and Balanadra on the eastern end of Trinidad’s north coast, on Gasparee Island off Trinidad’s northwest peninsula and in Tobago.


From the participants of this workshop series: Barbara Jenkins (T&T); Lelawattee Manoo-Rahming (Bahamas); and Lenworth Burke (Jamaica) went on to win the Commonwealth Short Story Competition and the Jamaica Observer’s Annual Fiction Award respectively. Ruel Johnson (Guyana) has won the Guyana Literature Prize 2003; Krishna Ramsumair (T&T) has published a number of short stories in local and international journals; Robert Clarke (T&T) received a Trinidad Guardian Writer of the Month award, as well as an EMA 2003 Green Leaf Award for journalism; and Tiphanie Yanique has now published her second book and is an editor with Calabash and Story Quarterly. For this year’s workshop, a maximum of ten participants will be selected from entries only from the Caribbean.


The moderators will be novelist Dr Merle Hodge (Crick, Crack Monkey and For the Life of Laetitia) and poet and short story writer Professor Funso Aiyejina, winner of the 2000 Commonwealth Writers Prize (Africa) for The Legend of the Rockhills and Other Stories. They are both lecturers at UWI, St Augustine, in the Faculty of Humanities and Education. Participants will engage with published authors and professionals from the publishing industry, as well as speakers from a variety of other disciplines including history, culture and political science.


The workshop fee, which includes full vegetarian room and board is US$400 and applicants, 20 years and above, who are Caribbean nationals residing in the Caribbean, are invited to submit application forms and samples of their writing (five pages only) no later than January 25, to the following address: Writers Workshop, Department of Creative & Festival Arts, The University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad. Works of prose fiction, playwriting or poetry, either published or unpublished, will be considered for this workshop.

 

• For application forms and further information, please call Marissa Brooks (868) 645-1955 or 663-2141 at The University of the West Indies, or email: MarissaUWI@gmail.com

 

PUB: Writers’ workshop encourages new Caribbean literary voices « Repeating Islands

Writers’ workshop encourages new Caribbean literary voices

The seventh Caribbean Creative Writers’ Residential Workshop sponsored by The Cropper Foundation and organised in partnership with the Department of Creative and Festival Arts and the Department of Liberal Arts, The University of the West Indies (UWI), St Augustine, will take place from July 8 to 19 in T&T. Ten writers who have not as yet published a novel or collection of short stories, poems or plays, will be chosen from across the Caribbean to join this year’s residential workshops. The 2012 workshop will focus on fiction, playwriting and poetry and will be facilitated by Professor Funso Aiyejina and Dr Merle Hodge at a secluded writing-inducing setting location somewhere in Trinidad.  

Support for Caribbean writing is an ongoing programme of The Cropper Foundation that seeks to contribute to the development of the Caribbean, on many levels and in different areas of interest. The writers’ workshop is part of the foundation’s effort to encourage new Caribbean literary voices by providing practical advice on the craft of writing. More than 80 writers from Antigua, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, British Virgin Islands, Commonwealth of Dominica, Guyana, Jamaica, Montserrat, T&T, and the Caribbean diaspora (Canada, USA, France and UK), have competed to take part in these workshops held so far in Grand Riviere and Balanadra on the eastern end of Trinidad’s north coast, on Gasparee Island off Trinidad’s northwest peninsula and in Tobago.

From the participants of this workshop series: Barbara Jenkins (T&T); Lelawattee Manoo-Rahming (Bahamas); and Lenworth Burke (Jamaica) went on to win the Commonwealth Short Story Competition and the Jamaica Observer’s Annual Fiction Award respectively. Ruel Johnson (Guyana) has won the Guyana Literature Prize 2003; Krishna Ramsumair (T&T) has published a number of short stories in local and international journals; Robert Clarke (T&T) received a Trinidad Guardian Writer of the Month award, as well as an EMA 2003 Green Leaf Award for journalism; and Tiphanie Yanique has now published her second book and is an editor with Calabash and Story Quarterly. For this year’s workshop, a maximum of ten participants will be selected from entries only from the Caribbean.

The moderators will be novelist Dr Merle Hodge (Crick, Crack Monkey and For the Life of Laetitia) and poet and short story writer Professor Funso Aiyejina, winner of the 2000 Commonwealth Writers Prize (Africa) for The Legend of the Rockhills and Other Stories. They are both lecturers at UWI, St Augustine, in the Faculty of Humanities and Education. Participants will engage with published authors and professionals from the publishing industry, as well as speakers from a variety of other disciplines including history, culture and political science.

The workshop fee, which includes full vegetarian room and board is US$400 and applicants, 20 years and above, who are Caribbean nationals residing in the Caribbean, are invited to submit application forms and samples of their writing (five pages only) no later than January 25, to the following address: Writers Workshop, Department of Creative & Festival Arts, The University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad. Works of prose fiction, playwriting or poetry, either published or unpublished, will be considered for this workshop.

• For application forms and further information, please call Marissa Brooks (868) 645-1955 or 663-2141 at The University of the West Indies, or email: MarissaUWI@gmail.com

For the original report go to http://www.guardian.co.tt/lifestyle/wednesday-january-18-2012/writers%E2%80%99-workshop-encourages-new-caribbean-literary-voices

VIDEO: "Wilmington On Fire," A Documentary Unveiling Major Massacre Of Black Township In NC With Pete Chatmon Producing, Needs Your Help > Shadow and Act

"Wilmington On Fire,"

A Documentary

Unveiling Major Massacre

Of Black Township In NC

With Pete Chatmon Producing,

Needs Your Help

Blogs by Cynthia Reid | January 19, 2012

Every now and then, I come across projects that send me on a fervent Google search for info and that was the case with filmmaker Christopher Everett's Wilmington On Fire, a documentary in development detailing a little-known, bloody massacre that took place in North Carolina in 1898.

The project, which has Pete Chatmon attached as an executive producer, is a feature-length documentary that will give a historical and present day look at the Wilmington Massacre of 1898 and how the descendants of the victims of the event are asking for legal action in regards to compensation / reparations.

So what exactly happened during this massacre?  On November 10, 1898 in the port city of Wilmington, North Carolina, a heavily armed white mob attacked and killed members of the black-majority city.  The event is not just considered a race riot but a coup d'etat since it's the only instance of a municipal government being overthrown in US history.

Most folks are familiar with massacres that took place in Tulsa and Rosewood regarding US history but not Wilmington.  Everett and Chatmon hope to enlighten the public regarding this historical event as stated on the Indiegogo page..."The purpose of the film is to educate and bring awareness to people of all racial, cultural and economic backgrounds on the importance, significance of this event in history and to present the story from an African-American perspective. This incident is barely mentioned and has been omitted from most history books. It was not until 2006, after the North Carolina General Assembly published a report on it, that the tragedy become known to the public. It was supposed to be a secret, and it was for over 100 years. The film features interviews from historians, authors, activists and actual descendants of the victims of the Wilmington Massacre of 1898."

Right now, they're fundraising to cover production cost such as film crew travel expenses and are looking to raise $3100.  You can help by donating to the project HERE as well as joining the Facebook page HERE.

Below is a teaser trailer.

 

CULTURE: Gil Scott-Heron: More Than a Revolution > Pitchfork

Gil Scott-Heron:

More Than a Revolution

A full picture of the late poet, novelist, singer, satirist, and father of four.

By Andrew Nosnitsky, January 18, 2012

When Gil Scott-Heron passed away last May, the flurry of obits, essays, and think pieces that followed principally presented him in two specific lights-- as the man behind the much-quoted (and misquoted) catchphrase "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised" and a presage of hip-hop. He was 62 years old when he died and had recorded 15 studio albums and written two novels; his postumous memoir, The Last Holiday, was released this week. Gil was a poet, a novelist, a singer, a songwriter, a pianist, a satirist, a father of four. In revisiting his catalog and talking to the people closest to him, it doesn't take long to see past the catchphrase and recognize him as a much more complex artist and human.

Well before his journey as an entertainer began, Gil's biography was a fascinating one. He was born in Chicago; his mother, Bobbie Scott-Heron, sung with the New York Oratorio Society and his father was a Jamaica-born professional soccer player. His parents separated when Gil was two and moved him to Tenneesse, where he was raised by his grandmother. There, he was one of the first black children to be integrated into the state's school system.

By 12 he moved north to live with his mother in New York, where he would befriend classmate and budding hoop legend Kareem Abdul-Jabbar as a teen. (They remained friends for the decades that followed, with Kareem serving as best man in Gil's wedding to actress Brenda Sykes. When Gil passed, Kareem penned a brief but heartfelt eulogy on his blog entitled "Goodbye Gil Scott-Heron".) After graduating high school, Gil attended the HBCU Lincoln-- alma mater to luminaries such as Langston Hughes-- but dropped out to finish his first novel, The Vulture, which established him as a talent with both politically charged impulses and a knack for writing in the then-hip voice of the streets.


Larry McDonald, percussionist: There are two Americans I could listen to talk forever: Gil and Richard Pryor. The way they used "black English"-- they could curse and swear and say the most outrageous things, and it didn't seem obscene because it was totally in context.

Lurma Rackley, girlfriend and mother of Gil's son Rumel: Coming on the heels of the civil rights movement, everybody was open to the realities that each person had to do something and be involved. All across the country and the world people were paying attention to the huge shifts that were going on-- the end of segregation, the efforts to end Apartheid, the focus on nuclear energy, the whole Nixon debacle. There were powerful political happenings and he was so brilliant about tapping into them in a way that people could understand. He was tapped into the energy of the time and he made extraordinary commentary on the major issues of his time. The commentary is still valid today.


For all the power in his message, Gil frequently struggled with the reductionist assumption that he was just a political firebrand.

"I don't know if I was as angry as much as I was misunderstood.
A lot of the things we did contained a lot of humor that went over people's heads."

McDonald: One day he said to me, "Man, I don't like how they have me as this black spokesman. When they do that, they're setting you up so they can shoot you down. I've got too many skeletons in my closet. I don't even want to be bothered by that." So I said, "Why do you go down this road?" He said, "I saw some shit that needed to be spoken on and nobody was speaking on it. So I just said it."

Gary Price, housemate: Everybody talks about "The Bottle" and "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised" and "Angel Dust", but some of the more emotional pieces like "Song for Bobby Smith" were my favorites. That song has no social or political things going on at all-- it's just a beautiful song.

Rackley: He had a soft side, too, and a lot of people were attracted to him. He talked about his grandmother a lot and her connection to the earth and to doing what's right. I think that infected his approach to the world in a positive way. He also had a pretty deep belief in the spirit world, he even named one of his albums Spirits. He felt that his ancestors who had gone on before him were still available emotionally and spiritually.

Gil, BBC's "Hard Talk", 2000: I don't know if I was as angry as I was misunderstood. I think that a lot of the things we did contained a lot of humor that went over people's heads. We were clearly coming from a small southern town in Tennessee and we didn't estimate what effect we'd have on national and international governments. We were trying to represent our community and speak about the things there. If people don't understand the humor then it's angry, but if people see the juxtaposition of the ideas then they understand where we're coming from. Langston Hughes and Paul Lawrence Dunbar and people of that nature always felt that humor was the best way to see a point of view.


Much of Gil's catalog is dripping with sarcasm and subtly deadpanned double speak, even in his most harrowing moments. He also had an obvious love for slapstick verbal puns and could bend language in all different directions almost as a natural tic. (This sort of wordplay might be one of his more blatant predictions of hip-hop.)


Rackley: People who saw his shows would get a taste of that because he would start off with a monologue and it was always so funny. Like when he goes into the "H20gate Blues" and he talks about the different shades of the blues-- the "I ain't go no money blues," the "I ain't got me no money blues," and the "I ain't go no woman and I ain't got me no money blues, which is the double blues." He was able to find humor in almost everything.

Gil, Mediawave Festival, 2010: I think everybody has six senses, and the sixth one is your sense of humor. And that's my most valuable one. I can imagine myself without the other five, but I can't imagine myself without my sense of humor.


These popular misconceptions might have to do with his biggest hit. For all of its impact, "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised" had the side effect of narrowing the memory of Gil's work. That tiny string of words wasn't a mission statement, just one small fragment of his message. And a tongue-in-cheek one, as well. The poem was heavy with bluster but weighted with wordplay. In it, Gil critiqued crass sloganeering, mocking everything from Agnew to Ajax campaigns. The bitter irony, of course, is that it became a slogan itself. "He was commercialized by the [current] generation," says Leon Collins, who lived with Gil in D.C. throughout the 60s and 70s. "That's been co-opted and exploited a billion different ways." As time passed Gil himself seemed mostly indifferent to these developments, though quick to clarify his original intent.

"[The revolution] is not all about fighting and going to war-- it's about going to war with a problem and deciding how you can affect that problem."

Gil, Mediawave Festival, 2010: I was saying the revolution takes place in your mind. Once you change your mind and decide that there's something wrong that you want to affect, that's when the revolution takes place. First you have to look at things and decide what you can do. That's when you become revolutionary-- when you see that something's wrong and [you] have to do something about it. It's not all about fighting, it's not all about going to war-- it's about going to war with a problem and deciding how you can affect that problem.

"Revolution" was first recorded as the opening cut on Gil's 1970 debut LP, Small Talk at 125th and Lenox. But before that it appeared in the pages of his self-released book of the same name. This was the collection that Gil slipped legendary jazz producer Bob Thiele when he and Brian Jackson were looking for songwriting opportunities. Thiele passed at the time, though, telling Gil, "If you make any money [with poetry], maybe we can get some money together and do an album of music."

Small Talk was recorded live on stage with two percussionists. Gil sung and played piano on the record's three fully formed songs and the rest of record was made up of straightforward and mostly intense spoken word in the vein of contemporaries like the Last Poets. (A 1971 Billboard review half-dismissed "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised" as "a solid soundalike" of the Harlem collective.) Much of the album orbits a similar tone, but in the same space Gil tends to pull back from anything resembling rage to instead offer a panoramic view of the urban landscape. The songs that follow are all sung in Gil's now-trademark fragile intonation and mostly lean personal rather than political. It's a starkly honest affair with Gil both digging deep inside his own story and drawing out the stories of those around him. His eye for detail is unmatched, as on the title track, where he plays silent observer to conversations at the titular intersection, from dope deals to complaints: "I don't know if the riots is wrong/ But whitey been kicking my ass for too long." There's an underlying hum of concern for the larger societal issues of the day, but Gil tends to focus more specifically on how humans internalize and overcome these struggles.

"A good poet feels what his community feels.
Like if you stub your toe, the rest of your body hurts."

Gil, Jet, 1979: There is a long history of black artists who have not separated their art from their lives. They use their art and their talent as an extension of the community, to reflect the mood, the sensitivity, the circumstances.

Gil, Mediawave Festival, 2010: All of those poems don't just represent me, they represent the people I know and see. Some of them were angry, some of them were upset, some of them were parents, some of them were in love with their children, some of them were trying to get jobs, some of them were working with their jobs, some of them had problems with their women. "Pieces of a Man" is about a son seeing his father who just lost his job. I never saw that [personally], but I saw a friend of mine whose father went a little berserk when he lost his job. "Your Daddy Loves You" is not about anger and hellraising, it's about the fact that sometimes men have so many things on their mind they forget to say, "I love you." You have to show the normalcy of your community to show the humanity of your community. A good poet feels what his community feels. Like if you stub your toe, the rest of your body hurts.


Small Talk made enough money to satisfy Thiele, and for its follow-up Gil returned to the studio to cut Pieces of a Man with a stacked lineup that included heavyweight jazz sessioners Ron Carter, Hubert Laws, and Bernard Purdie as well famed arranger Johnny Pate.

It also served as a full-scale coming-out party for Gil the Singer. While his spoken voice was a powerful vehicle for both the language and political bluster of his time, there's a stark fragility to Gil's singing. Echoing near-contemporaneous Chicagoan influences like Lou Rawls, Oscar Brown Jr., and Terry Callier, Gil delivered his lyrics in a carefully tempered and often melismatic baritone. This is most apparent on 1974's Winter in America, his sparsest collection. Most tracks are backed by little more than hauntingly tinkled solo piano, either acoustic or electric; the record makes a strong case for Gil's voice as the single greatest accompaniment to the Fender Rhodes. As he aged, his instrument turned raspier and even more frail in a way that only magnified his intensity.

Pieces once again opens with "The Revolution", but this time blown out to funk proportions. This would become a common approach for Gil-- his catalog covers a striking amount of ground musically, with songs and styles that would expand and contract over time.

McDonald: He had two main bands. I was part of the Amnesia Express, which he put together when the Midnight Band broke up. We were playing the same songs that the Midnight Band played, but we had a different kind of energy. It was amazing to see how instead of shutting us down, he'd let us play and adopt [our ideas]. When we performed "Angel Dust", it could take up to 40 minutes. It became a performance piece. "Home Is Where the Hatred Is" became "The Other Side", which is a three-part thing on the Spirits album. I was playing "The Other Side" for a couple of years and then one day I went up to my brother and he had a 45 of "The Bottle" and he flipped it over and halfway through the song I said, "Wait a minute, that sounds familiar." It was "Home Is Where the Hatred Is." I had never heard [the studio version of] that song before we started playing it! And we was killing it! He gave us freedom to play.

Price: Everybody talks about Gil, and Gil was half of it. But Brian [Jackson, Gil's principle collaborator in the first decade of his career] was also the music. Gil was very limited in terms of his musical ability; he could play three chords on the piano. Brian always gets put in the shadows. Had it not been for a lot of Brian's music, I don't know if Gil's work would've been as far reaching-- he reached the jazz community, the R&B community, and then in later years he was a hip-hop influence.


While the hip-hop world, particularly those artists residing on its "conscious rap" shores, embraced Gil Scott-Heron that relationship was not without certain misconceptions, either. It's difficult to find any press from the past 20 years that doesn't explicitly frame Gil as a progenitor to hip-hop. It's equally difficult to find many conversations where he then doesn't explicitly rebuke those comparisons, though usually in good humor.


Gil, BBC's "Hard Talk", 2000: I generally try to put credit where credit is due. For those viewers that go around boom-box bashing-- I am not the one that's responsible. [laughs] For others, I think we came along at a time where there was a transition going on in terms of poetry and music and we were one of the first groups to combine the two... and for that reason I think a lot of people picked up and decided we were the ones who had originated it.


There were parallels to be sure, but to exaggerate them to influence is to overlook the differences of influence. Hip-hop's roots stemmed more directly from radio jocks and reggae toasters, while Gil drew his primary influence from the pages of Harlem Renaissance literature. Gil self-identified as a poet first and foremost (or pianist or "bluesologist"); rapping was simply one of his vehicles. He was a godfather of a bastard child by circumstance. Of course, the parallels helped sustain Gil's later career as many of young listeners (this writer included) came to his music through hip-hop sample sources and incessant name drops, but it's strange and maybe a little disrespectful that someone who was so powerful in his own time is now defined primarily by what came after. Presumably, this is the curse of being ahead of the curve, but this was just one of the many curves he rode along in his career.

Some were more tumultuous than others. 1971's "Home Is Where the Hatred Is", a tale of a struggling heroin addict who describes withdrawal as "turn[ing] your sick soul inside out so that the world can watch you die." The track eerily predicted his own problems with cocaine later in life. Esther Phillips, a recovering heroin addict herself, would later cover the song. In a 1997 interview with Vibe, Gil recalled the songstress' initial response to the record: "She said I knew too much about junkies not to be one." At the time she was wrong, but in the last three decades of his life he would succumb to those very demons. His struggles with substance abuse during this time are well documented, maybe even over-documented-- notably, he smoked crack in front of a New Yorker reporter in 2010.

He didn't record much in this time, effectively retiring after Moving Target in 1982, producing only 1994's inconsistent Spirits and 2010's considerably more consistent Richard Russell-assisted second comeback I'm New Here in the years since. He toured with some regularity during his studio lapses, usually to mixed reviews.

Photo by Mischa Richter

McDonald: In the later years when he wasn't showing up [to shows], I think he thought that by [then] somebody should've come along to pick up [where he left off]. He had carried it all through the 70s and 80s. I guess he just wanted to hang out and do what he wanted to do, but he couldn't get away with it. He was too major. When I joined him he had like 20 albums out! You couldn't really expect someone to operate at that level of excellence for the next 20 or 30 years. He'd burn out. Whatever happened to him or whatever he became, he gave up the office. He didn't want to be bothered talking about all the stuff that was happening today. I figured people needed to leave him alone more than they did. But that was hard because he was so charismatic. It's not that I didn't see his faults; it was just worth it more for me to hang with him and not harass him about that stuff because I was always learning from him.

Leon Collins, housemate: When I look at entertainers in general, most of them are vulnerable, sensitive, compassionate. When trauma impacts them they're emotionally damaged and a lot of them have broken hearts. They self-medicate. That's the history of all music, black music in particular. Michael Jackson's another sensitive soul who was traumatized. I look at Gil as a cultural activist warrior who spoke truth to power and paid a price for it. The demons that chased Gil, he earned them. They were real but I don't think he asked for them.

 

ECONOMICS: What it Means to Stash Money in Cayman Islands > PRI's The World

What it Means to

Stash Money in

Cayman Islands

US dollars (Photo: Tracy O/Flickr)

Play Play

The World provides a brief explanation on what it means to stash money in Cayman Islands.

Read More
  • Romney’s investments in Cayman Islands raise new questions about GOP candidate’s fortune
  • Romney IRA’s Offshore Investments: Helping His Tax Bill?
  •  

    NIGERIA: Occupy Nigeria—An End or A Beginning

    image

    David Osagie’s Occupy Nigeria

    BY AFRICAN DIGITAL ART|JANUARY 19TH, 2012

     

    A few weeks ago Nigeria joined the Occupy movement as Nigierian political leaders decided to go against reforms to distribute Nigeria’s oil rich economy to their citizens. Like many movements throughout Africa for the past 18months portfolio’s are now reflecting the political climate around creatives in Africa and the globe. David Osagieis a Nigerian digital artist whose work features art pieces stained in grunge and deep African style. His most recent work has been influenced by the occupy movement in Nigeria.

     

    >via: http://www.africandigitalart.com/2012/01/david-osagies-occupy-nigeria/

    __________________________

     

     

    Nigeria’s General Strike

    Called Off

    People in Nigeria protest against fuel prices. (Photo: BBC)

    People in Nigeria protest against fuel prices. (Photo: BBC)

    Play Play

    Trade unions in Nigeria suspended their nation-wide strike Monday.

    The unions began the strike last week to protest against the government’s decision to end a fuel subsidy on January 1, which doubled the fuel prices there.

    Now, President Goodluck Jonathan has agreed to restore part of the subsidy, cutting the prices by a third.

    Anchor Marco Werman talks to the BBC’s Tomi Oladipo, who is in Lagos, Nigeria.

     

    __________________________

     

     

    Okayafrica TV:

    Nneka Speaks Out

    About #OccupyNigeria.mov

     

     

    Uploaded by  on Jan 19, 2012

    We met with Nigerian songstress Nneka on a sunny rooftop in midtown Manhattan yesterday where she joined other Naija superstars in speaking out about #OccupyNigeria. The recent removal of fuel subsidies byGoodluck Jonathan‘s government sent gas prices through the roof at the start of this year. Nigerians immediately took to the streets to protest the government’s actions. Under pressure from the people, Jonathan has since lowered prices but the issue speaks to a broader discontent with a corrupt government. Nneka tells us that this is an awakening of the people she “feels positive” about. Nneka’s Soul Is Heavy LP is out Feb 28 in the U.S. via Decon Records.

    Video shot by Myo Campbell.

     

     

    >via: http://www.okayafrica.com/2012/01/19/okayafrica-tv-nneka-speaks-out-about-occ...

     

     

    __________________________

     

    Is This The End of

    The Nigerian Revolution?

     

     

    by EMMANUEL IDUMA on JANUARY 17, 2012

    Something dies in you. You feel disconnected from your dream of a glorious aftermath. For the first time in your life you felt whole, framed within a bigger picture. You spoke, chanted, demanded. You were a witness, you and a million others. You were a revolutionary. Now things have returned to normal. Normal because there are moving cars, stores are open; the street is calloused, as before, by the movement and the people. And the normalcy. You hate that things are normal. This was not what you dreamed of. At all.

    But what did you dream?

    The horizon of your dream was of a better life, a different form of existence, a tangible and measurable difference. You saw that the debate about fuel subsidy removal was the opportunity to dream of change, because this was a protest above all protests, because this protest seemed naturally logical. But you forgot that in dreaming one does not feel, the night happens so fast, and very soon you are awake.

    Are you awake, now?

    Do you see that things have really, really, returned to normal? These normal things are the fact of your Nigerianness. All your life, the normal has remained normal, the abuse and the ineptness and the status quo and the cabal. The shift that you thought could happen is an abnormal. It takes a lot to make the abnormal happen.

    Didn’t you know?

    When you stood at Ojota chanting, what did you think? It was a dream, yes. But what did you think? Try. Remember. What did you think? When you posted on Facebook about Goodluck Jonathan, Ngozi, Madueke, the Great Nigerian Cabal, what did you think? You were aggrieved, yes. Did you, honestly, see a change in sight?

    What did you think would happen? Fuel would be sold again at 65 naira? The president would announce a further 25 percent cut in his allowances, that henceforth he would eat in a buka? Or were you caught in a mantra, within collective language?

    Perhaps you failed to see that all of this, this ad hoc revolution, was simply the beginning of ashift of consciousness. It takes a lot, you should know, to transcribe the language of a dream into the spoken word of reality. True, all dreams are translatable, all dreams are reality. But within the terrain of the dream and the terrain of reality lie shadows.

    What you did was tell the shadows you are beginning to reclaim your reality. Do not feel undermined, betrayed, or normal. There is no such thing as normalcy; there is change lurking everywhere and those mountebanks from the other side know it. They have seen the rise ofreality; they have seen, yes. And they know that it is only a matter of time before they are overtaken, overridden, outpoured.

    The danger is that you might normalize. Because the corruptible have seen that your reality is within your grasp, they introduce elements of normalcy, they end their strike, they compromise. And they claim it is on your behalf, for the sake of security. They might be named ‘Labour’, ‘organized labour’, ‘government’ or whatever other nomenclature they can muster. Do not be fooled. You must not normalize.

    Your soul can fly while your feet are on the ground. Know this: there’s no one telling you to stop your flight. They can force you away from the street. But your body must not triumph over your soul, your body must not be accustomed to return. The real protest is the protest that happens when you are caught between the shadows and your reality. And that protest happens in a nameless place, where no eyes can see, that moment when you decide that enough is enough.

    You have engineered your dream. It is time to engineer your reality.

    They will come to you in 2015 again, and say, vote, vote, PDP. Or ACN, CPC, or whatever other conception their destructive ingeniousness has moulded. That is when you will exercise your real power. You will demand for a real leader, one from your ranks, one who will not migrate to outer space like they have done, one who will not become insensitive to cogent earthly matters.

    Because this is not the end of the Nigerian revolution.

    Because a revolution does not end.

    A revolution only begins.

     

     

     

     

    HISTORY: Shoes in African history, a comparison « curiosity killed the eccentric yoruba

    Shoes in African history,
    a comparison
    January 18, 2012

    Something happened in November 2011 that I don’t think I’m ever going to forget. I’m also probably going to keep on bringing it up over and over again. Usually when I hear people talking nonsense about the lack of achievement of my African ancestors, I firmly school them. When I start going on about Abyssinia or ancient Ghana and how one too many Africans today have chronic cases of colonial mentality, the haters usually have the grace to shut up.

    However in November, I met a fellow Nigerian, Yoruba lady who caused me to see red. I don’t recall what we were discussing beforehand but I remember her words exactly, she called our African ancestors ‘heathen’ and implied that she was happy that Europeans and missionaries came to free us from our devil-worshipping days with Christianity and Western education. She openly said that she did not believe any Nigerian or African had achieved ANYTHING before the kind Europeans came to save us all. She knew this because her grandmother said so! I was speechless for a second then I started talking. I talked, kept on talking for about an hour (I just went on the history of people of colour and why colonial mentality has people like that lady thinking that we were/are nothing without Western intervention). She ended up walking out on me, while I was talking, with this repentant look on her face.

    Encountering her has reminded me that there are people who truly disdain anything African in this world, whether it is our religions, cultures, histories, or customs. I tend to keep myself in safe spaces but I believe that people who view my ancestors as ‘devil-worshipping heathens’ are in the multitude.

    It is legitimate to worry that any attempt at humanising Africans through our history will always be put down. We must always have been running around in the jungle (never mind that the continent’s geography is diverse, there are Africans that have not seen any damned jungles) sleeping on tree branches, dancing naked around fires and waiting for white skinned people to come and teach us civilisation.

    Anyway this post is about shoes, or their lack thereof in African history. A lot of folks, Africans included, believe that our ancestors never wore shoes, that shoes were introduced to the continent by the British. Now I’m not trying to argue as to whether wearing shoes or not denotes civilisation, but when applied to African history, I view this as another attempt to dehumanise Africans.

    Now imagine you ran a search on footwear in African history and came across this,

    “The available evidence about ancient African cultures suggests that most Africans did not wear shoes for much of their early history. Although many northern tribes had contact with people who wore sandals and shoes, including the ancient Egyptians and Greeks, and later Arabs and Persians (from present-day Iran), a complete record of when or how Africans adopted foot coverings does not exist. The most common depictions of Africans from statues, artwork, and examples of traditional dress still worn by groups throughout the continent suggest that bare feet were most common.

    Footwear is now worn in Africa. When Europeans established trade routes with Africa in the fifteenth century, European products, including shoes, entered Africa and many Africans began wearing Western style foot coverings. Africans also created their own slippers and leather sandals modeled on Western examples. But whether imported or made nearby, shoes were available mainly to the wealthiest Africans. Although many present-day Africans wear Western style shoes, sandals, and boots, not all Africans wear or can afford shoes and several aid organizations ship shoes, among other things, to Africa.”

    This must certainly be the truth, you know because today people send their old shoes to AFRICA because people over there cannot afford shoes. Why should they have been wearing shoes in the past? Note that the above seems to have academic references, so it must be the truth. Also note how ancient Egyptians and Greeks are grouped together, the civilised North.

    If you were lucky with that ‘footwear in African history’ search you may come across this,

    “Due to the hot climate, most Africans in the past did not wear shoes. When foot coverings are donned, open sandals are preferred, which allow the circulation of air, as in the bowl-shaped oval sandals from Uganda or the flat, wide sandals worn by the Hausa in Western Africa.

    Leather and rawhide are the most common materials used in making footwear, although shoes of other materials are occasionally employed for reasons of status or ceremony, including wooden toe-knob sandals from Zaire, and cast metal shoes from Cameroon.

    Ashanti ceremonies abound with references to the shoe. As the king’s feet are never to touch the ground, his footwear is a symbol of his special status. Boots worn by the Yoruban elite provide a wide canvas for dazzling beadwork, which can cover the entire surface of the boot. Thigh-length boots embellished with finely-woven leather strips are worn by the Hausa, and provide protection while riding camels.”

    image of African footwear

    The latter gives a reason for most Africans in the past not wearing shoes, and it was not because they were waiting for the British to introduce the concept. I don’t get why I’m still going on about Africans wearing shoes in the past, before European context. These things should be a given! Instead we’ve argued about whether Africans had bloody two story buildings before the Europeans showed us how it was done, we’ve argued about whether Africans understood the concept of love before the Europeans came and taught us that there is an emotion called love, and it just goes on. How frustrating.

    It gets even more frustrating when evidence to the historical achievement of African gets ignored so that people can continue believing nonsense.

     

    AUDIO: Busted Rhymes – Africa is a Country

    Busted Rhymes

    Gebaste Rhymes sent us a link to his single ‘Kaap issie Bom’ [translated: Cape is the Bomb], the first single off One Day Vol. 1. The full album (or audio hip-hopumentary) will be out later in 2012 and “forms part of a larger alternative education initiative.” Gebaste Rhymes describes himself as “a Cape born artist whose audacious style matches his name” and explains that “the song captures a distinctly Cape sense of humour while producer Hybrit Pettens and DJ e-20 laces it with that classic boombap sound.” We have a suspicion who Gebaste Rhymes is. Take a listen.

    * Still image from the new documentary film “Manenberg

     

    PUB: The Mary McCarthy Prize « Sarabande Books

    The Mary McCarthy Prize in Short Fiction includes a $2,000 cash award, publication of a collection of short stories, novellas, or a short novel, and a standard royalty contract. Our contest begins January 1st and ends February 15th. See below for page requirements. Also, please note our entry fee ($27) and P.O. Box number below.

    Eligibility

    Contest is open to any writer of English who is a citizen of the United States. Employees and board members of Sarabande Books, Inc. are not eligible. Submissions may include a collection of short stories, one or more novellas, or a short novel. All manuscripts are required to be a minimum of 150 pages and are not to exceed 250 pages. Works that have previously appeared in magazines or in anthologies may be included. Translations and previously self-published collections are not eligible. To avoid conflict of interest, students in a degree-granting program or close friends of a judge are ineligible to enter the contest in the genre for which their friend or teacher is serving as judge.

    Manuscript Format

    * Please submit one copy of the manuscript and our required entry form.

    * Manuscript must be:

    • Anonymous—the author’s name or address must not appear anywhere on the manuscript (your title page should contain the title only).
    • Between 150-250 pages.
    • Typed on standard white paper, one side of the page only.
    • Paginated consecutively with a table of contents and acknowledgements page (a list of publications in which stories or sections of the manuscript appeared).
    • Bound with a spring clip or placed in a plain file folder. No paper clips or staples, please.

    * Also, please keep the following in mind:

    • Retain a copy of your manuscript. We cannot return manuscripts.
    • Submission of more that one manuscript is permissible if each manuscript is accompanied by an entry form and handling fee.
    • Once submitted, manuscripts cannot be altered. Winner will be given the opportunity to make changes before publication.
    • Simultaneous submissions to other publishers are permitted, but Sarabande Books must be notified immediately if manuscript is accepted elsewhere.
    • Finalists will be asked to send additional copies of the work. Winner will be notified in early July. Sarabande Books will consider all finalists for publication.

    All manuscripts must be accompanied by our entry form which contains all the necessary identifying information. Do not send your manuscript without this form.

    Submission Information

    This Summer we are increasing the prices for our submission periods; please see specific periods for the corresponding increase. We so appreciate your continued participation and support.

    Electronic Submissions

    Sarabande will accept manuscripts submitted online through our Submishmash software. Manuscripts submitted electronically must conform to the same guidelines as print manuscripts, although you do not need to attach the standard entry form to your online submission. Instructions and FAQs are located at the Submission Manager page,

    http://sarabandebooks.submishmash.com/Submit

    Physical Manuscripts

    * Manuscripts must be postmarked between and including January 1 and February 15.
    * Include a self-addressed, stamped postcard for notification that manuscript has been received.
    * Include a self-addressed, stamped, regular business-sized envelope for contest results.
    * Please send your manuscript in a plain or padded envelope. No boxes please.
    * No Federal Express, Overnight Mail, or UPS.
    * We strongly advise that you send your manuscript first class.
    * There is a $27 handling fee, check made payable to Sarabande Books, Inc.

    Please send entries to:

    The Mary McCarthy Prize in Short Fiction
    Sarabande Books, Inc.
    PO Box 4456
    Louisville KY 40204