VIDEO: Ana Tijoux (Chile) > Friends We Love

Ana Tijoux

Shows We Love ::

Ana Tijoux, SOBs

 

Ana Tijoux is definitely one of or favorite MCs from 2010 and her SOBs, NYC show on August 1, is no ordinary show. She is joined by a full, live band, which we can’t wait to hear. The night also kicks off with a panel discussion led by Martha Diaz (a friend we love) of the Hip Hop Education Center at 6:30 and is followed by dope performances by fellow female MCs: Nitty Scott, Jasmine Solano, Genesis Be and Angel Haze.

In case you’re not familiar with this Grammy-nominated, Chilean wordsmith, check out the 120 Seconds we filmed with her below, a mixtape with Elefant and her hit song, 1977. Buy tickets here.

 


<p>Ana Tijoux from D58 Productions on Vimeo.</p>

 

PUB: Call for Papers: The African Women's Journal (July - December 2011 issue) > Writers Afrika

Call for Papers:

The African Women's Journal (July - December 2011 issue)

Deadline: 31 July 2011

As part of contributing to the African Women’s Decade (2010-2020) through provision of information on the themes of the Decade, the African Women’s Journal for July-December 2011 will focus on the theme: Women’s Education and Training in Africa.

Call for Papers: The African Women's Journal (July-December 2011)

THEME: Promoting Equal Opportunities for Women’s Access to Education and Training in Africa
The Beijing Platform for Action stresses that education is one of the most powerful and effective tool for women’s empowerment in Africa. However, limited access to quality education and training opportunities continues to hinder women’s equal participation in decision making, leadership and also in positively contributing to development in their countries. This is despite the fact that equal access to education is considered one of the fundamental human rights by the United Nations since it adopted the Right to education (Article 26) in 1949. Efforts to attain equal access to education and training for boys and girls; men and women have not yet resulted in gender parity at all levels including in adult education programmes.

As part of contributing to the African Women’s Decade (2010-2020) through provision of information on the themes of the Decade, the African Women’s Journal for July-December 2011 will focus on the theme: Women’s Education and Training in Africa.

The Journal articles will focus on any of the following sub-themes:-

· Strategies being used to attain equal access to education and training in African countries
· The untold stories in the African continent: some unique examples of literacy programmes and innovations that are transforming the lives of women, their families, communities and societies
· The role of adult and continuing education in boosting women’s empowerment and sustainable development in Africa
· Galvanizing African governments to allocate sufficient resources for and monitor the implementation of educational reforms
· From policy to practice: Expanding opportunities for women and girls’ education

Guidelines:

For those interested to submit articles, kindly send us an ABSTRACT of your article on or before 31st July, 2011. The abstract should be written in English or French and must not be more than 200 words.

You will be notified if your abstract has been approved. Only writers with selected abstracts will be asked to submit full article, which must be written in English or French and should be between 800 to 2,000 words. The article also needs to be well researched with clear referencing. A guideline for referencing will be provided. We will also require pictures relating to the article. (NB: The picture will have to be in Jpeg format). Including a brief biographical note, contact information with a JPEG mug shot picture of yourself in high resolution. Deadline for submission of FULL ARTICLE will be 30th August, 2011.

Please note the following key deadlines

  • Abstract should be submitted by 31st July, 2011
  • Full Article should be submitted by 30th August, 2011

Contact Information:

For inquiries: admin@femnet.or.ke or communication@femnet.or.ke

For submissions: admin@femnet.or.ke or communication@femnet.or.ke

Website: http://www.femnet.or.ke/

 

 

PUB: The £1,000 Cambridge University Press ESU New Writing Award for ELT (worldwide) > Writers Afrika

The £1,000 Cambridge University Press

ESU New Writing Award for ELT (worldwide)

Deadline: 22 July 2011

Win the chance to write for Cambridge University Press, along with a cash prize of £1000

Have you developed an innovative and engaging way to assess your learners' progress as they learn English? Have you successfully used this material in your classroom?

The inaugrual Cambridge ESU New Writing Award (2011) for ELT will focus on materials that help teachers and students assess their learning.

Each year, the award will focus on a different area of language learning. We are looking for evidence of applicants' writing style and capabilities, along with a demonstration of how the materials improve learning outcomes, with a view to inviting the winner to join our team of authors. Cambridge University Press will not necessarily publish the winning material itself.

We particularly welcome applications which show an understanding of how digital resources can help learning.

Applicants should submit the following:

1. An outline of your materials; what they are, howe they are to be used and how they use assesment to improve students' learning (Max 250 words)

2. A sample of the material (Max one double-page spread or equivalent)

Pleae note: Applicants do not have to be native speakers of English, nor do they have to be speakers of British English. An understanding of, and sympathy with, the globalization of English is an essential requirement. You should be able to work as part of an author team, and be confident at presenting your material to a variety of people.

Submit your entry, along with your contact details (name, address, email address and telephone number) to education@esu.org.

If you would prefer to submit your entry by post, please send all documentation to:

New Writing Award
Education Department
The English-Speaking Union
37 Charles Street
London W1J 5ED
United Kingdom

ESU New Writing Award: Competition Rules

1. This competition is run by the English-Speaking Union and is sponsored by Cambridge University Press.

2. The competition is open to entries from around the world. You do not need to be a native speaker of English, nor a speaker of British English.

3. Entrants should be at least 18 years old. Only one entry per person.

4. To enter please submit:

(i) an outline of your English Language Teaching materials (‘the Material’) (including information of what the Material is, how it is to be used, and how it uses assessment to improve students’ learning);

(ii) a sample of the Material (a maximum of one double-page spread or equivalent);

(iii) contact details, including name, email, address and contact number.

5. The deadline for entry to the competition is 22nd July 2011.

6. The winner will be selected by a panel of judges comprised of experts selected by Cambridge University press and the English-Speaking Union.

7. The winner will be contacted by the English-Speaking Union after the closing date. The winner will be publicly announced at the English-Speaking Union award ceremony.

8. The winner will receive a cash prize of £1,000, or payable in equivalent local currency at Cambridge’s sole discretion, and shall be given the opportunity to join the team of English Language Teaching authors working for Cambridge University Press, with the potential to author future English Language Teaching courses for Cambridge University Press, subject to any author contract and terms and conditions to be determined at the time.

9. The Material shall be original to you; shall not have been previously published; shall contain nothing that is in any way an infringement of any existing copyright or licence; and shall contain nothing libellous or unlawful.

10. Cambridge University Press and the English-Speaking Union will destroy all Material that is not selected as winning Material. Cambridge University Press will not be able to return any unsuccessful Material to you.

11. Cambridge University Press and the English-Speaking Union will not publish or make any other use of the Material without your prior consent.

12. Employees of Cambridge University Press, the English-Speaking Union and associated companies will not be eligible to participate.

13. By entering the competition you are permitting Cambridge University Press to contact you from time to time with details of other products and services that may be of interest to you in the subject of English Language Teaching.

14. By entering the competition you are permitting the English-Speaking Union to contact you from time to time with details of other products and services that may be of interest to you in the subject of English Language Teaching.

15. By entering the competition you are permitting Cambridge University Press to transfer your personal details to other Cambridge University Press branches throughout the world, namely Europe, America, Australia and Asia. You should be aware that some branches of Cambridge University Press are in countries which do not have data protection laws.

16. By entering the competition you are permitting other Cambridge University Press branches to contact you from time to time with details of other Cambridge products and services that may be of interest to you in the subject of English Language Teaching. However Cambridge University Press will only share your data with another branch if it best covers your normal place of residency (e.g. Europe, Americas).

17. Cambridge University Press will not sell your personal information to others or release it to others without your prior consent, and will only use your personal data as outlined in our privacy policy (see: http://www.cambridge.org/policy/privacy/ ).

18. The English-Speaking Union will not sell your personal information to others or release it to others without your prior consent, and will only use your personal data as outlined in its privacy policy.

19. Cambridge University Press reserves the right, at the discretion of its official representatives, to declare any competition null and void and stage another competition in its place.

20. Entry into this competition constitutes acceptance of these Terms and Conditions.

21. These terms and conditions are governed by the laws of England.

Contact Information:

For inquiries: education@esu.org

For submissions: education@esu.org

Website: http://www.cambridge.org/ph/elt/

 

 

PUB: Call for Papers: Woman and Film in Africa Conference (University of Westminister, UK)

Call for Papers:

Woman and Film in Africa Conference (University of Westminister, UK)

Deadline: 16 September 2011

Women and Film in Africa Conference: Overcoming Social Barriers, Conference organised by the Africa Media Centre, University of Westminster, Date: Saturday 19 and Sunday 20 November 2011, Venue: University of Westminster, Marylebone Campus 35 Marylebone Road, London, NW1 5LS

This is a 1st Call for Papers for a conference on the contemporary and historical role played by women in the film, television and video industries in Africa. From the Arab North Africa, West Africa, Central and East Africa, through to Southern Africa, women have emerged from the double oppression of patriarchy and colonialism to become the unsung heroines of the moving image as producers, directors,actresses, script writers, financiers, promoters, marketers and distributors of film, television and video in postcolonial Africa. Sadly, such immense contributions by women are underrepresented, both in industry debates and in academic research. There are now many cases in which African women in front of and behind the camera have overcome social barriers and yet this is sidelined. This conference invites students, practitioners, academics and researchers to debate how women have contributed to film, television and video markets in Africa from pre-colonial, colonial to postcolonial periods. Existing industry and academic work should also discuss the ways female audiences in Africa have engaged with film, television and video texts. The conference will include a session with leading female filmmakers. Papers may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following themes:

* The Influence of Feminism on African filmmakers;* Women in front and behind the camera in African film;* Women in the African feature film industry;* Women in technical roles in film, video and television in Africa;* Women documentary makers in Africa;* Gender and Representation of Women in African film;* Audiences for films by African women/Female audiences in Africa;* Case histories of leading African women film makers;* Women scriptwriters;* African women acting in video, film and television;* Censorship and the portrayal of African women in film and television;* The role of NGOs in commissioning women filmmakers and issue-based films;* How African governments have helped or hindered filmmaking by African women

DEADLINE FOR ABSTRACTS

The deadline for submission of abstracts is Friday 16 September, 2011. Successful applicants will be notified by Friday 23 September, 2011. Abstracts should be 200 words long. They must include the title of the conference, presenter’s name, affiliation, email and postal address,together with the title of the paper. Please ensure when saving your abstract that your name is part of the file name. Please email your abstract to Helen Cohen, Events Administrator at: (journalism@westminster.ac.uk).

PROGRAMME AND REGISTRATION

This two day conference will take place on Saturday 19 and Sunday 20 November, 2011. The fee for registration (which applies to all participants, including presenters) will be £135, with a concessionary rate of £55 for students, to cover all conference documentation, refreshments and administration costs. Registration will open in September 2011

Contact Information:

For inquiries: journalism@westminster.ac.uk

For submissions: journalism@westminster.ac.uk

Website: http://www.wmin.ac.uk/

 

 

REVIEW: Theatre—Toni Morrison's Desdemona delivers a haunting, powerful "re-membering" > Expatica Belgium

26/05/2011

 Toni Morrison's Desdemona


delivers a haunting, powerful

 

"re-membering"


Expatica editor Erin Russell Thiessen reviews the Desdemona project, calling it a timely revision of Shakespeare's text.

In response to Peter Sellar's 2009 production of Othello, Nobel Prize-winning novelist Toni Morrison and singer/song-writer Rokia Traore collaborate to create an intimate and profound conversation between Desdomona and her African nurse, Babary, from beyond the grave.

You may want to brush up on your Othello before watching this performance. The piece is, in essence, a dialogue with Shakespeare's original play. And, although writer Toni Morrison would not call herself a feminist, the result of this dialogue is a womanist revision of the play's characters and the norms set by the era in which they lived. Morrison's masterful tracing of sly, systemic modes of enslavement--of women, of Africans, of "others" and "villains"--is carefully brought to the fore through a series of monologues delivered by Desdemona (played by Elizabeth Marvel) in the afterlife. 

It is a project worthy of Morrison.

And project is indeed the right word for the production.  As Peter Sellars emphasizes in his introduction to the performance (he gives an opening talk each night), the piece is neither strictly theatre nor concert.  It is an ongoing project, a dialogue, and an exploration in which the audience are invited to take part.

Desdemona's dramatic monologues are interspersed with and layered over by Rokia Traore's haunting and very African music.  Rokia Traore, through her music and finally through direct dialogue, plays Desdemona's childhood nurse, the African Barbary.  And while the character is only given brief mention in Shakespeare, relating how she dies of a broken heart singing an epic tale of love and loss, Morrison gives her equal staging--and equal voice--with Desdemona in this project.

Barbary/Rokia and her three backup singers are needed by Desdemona in the strange afterlife she inhabits in the play, much as she was needed by Desdemona as a child when Barbary stood in as mother and best friend.  But now, in this "place of timelessness" (another important trope in Morrison's work), Barbary examines this "needfulness" in light of her servitude.

And yet Rokia Traore and the backup singers also provide an African sisterhood of sorts: encircling, comforting and guiding Desdomona as she sits at mourning "altars" spread intermittently across the stage.  In a manner reminiscent of African root-woman spirituality, Desdemona keens, wails, regrets, and "re-members" (puts together and recalls) at a series of altars made up of everyday found objects.

The staging is brilliant, sparse.

The women are barefoot; the men (stage left, inconspicuous) are not.

Elizabeth Marvel's acting is powerful and haunting, as ever.

This Brussels performance (it premiered 15 June in Vienna) was particularly impactful, being held in a theatre a short distance away from the European parliament where a commission is currently examining reinstating border checkpoints to keep out illegal North African immigrants.  In this production, as in Shakespeare's original play, Othello is a black African who has made his way to "Europe", and the top ranks of Venice's armies.  Now, at a time when Northern Africans are escaping to Italy and crossing Europe's Schengen borders and when parliament is debating closing these borders to such persons, this play becomes a commentary on very current affairs.  A timely revision of Shakespeare's text and a revisitation of how lies, political ambition and fearmongering lead to tragedy.

The performance runs from May 26-29 at the KVS theatre in coproduction with BOZAR theatre. After a short break, the piece will then run in Paris and Berlin in the Autumn. It will show in London in July 2012.

PRACTICAL INFORMATION

Desdemona

Dates and hours
26 > 29.05.2011 - 20:00 (Introduction by Peter Sellars - 19:00)

Location
KVS - Salle Bol

146 Rue de Laeken
1000 Brussels

Text Toni Morrison
Music Rokia Traoré
Musical Interpretation Rokia Traoré + Band & Chorus
Actor Elizabeth Marvel
Director Peter Sellars

Language
In English, surtitled in Dutch and French

Price
Catégorie I: € 36 / 30

Catégorie II: € 20 / 16

Info & tickets
BOZAR +32 (0)2 507 82 00 - www.bozar.be | KVS: T 02 210 11 12 - www.kvs.be

Coproduction: Wiener Festwochen ,Théâtre Nanterre - Amandiers, Cal Performances, Berkeley, California , Lincoln Center For The Performing Arts, New YorK, Spielzeit'europa I Berliner, Festspiele, Barbican, London, Arts, Council London and London 2012 Festival

Copresentation: BOZAR THEATRE | KVS

 

EVENT: Film Forward Kenya > African Digital Art

Sundance Institute Present:

Film Forward Kenya:

July 15th – July 24th

The Sundance Film Institute together with The US Embassy in Kenya and Film Aid International, Kenya are showing a selection of films to audiences in Kenya both in public spaces as well as cultural institutes In Nairobi, Mombasa, Kibera, Kakuma Refugee Camp and Dadaab Refugee Camp in North Eastern Province. There are a selection of refugee films alongside international films,workshops and screen writing programs provided and supported by Film Aid International who work with vulnerable communities helping them seek inspiration through film and story telling. Some of the Workshops are lead by Jennifer Arnold writer of Maid of Honour (1999) and Director & Producer of A Small Act (Documentary, 2010) and Taika Waititi Actor and Director most noted for the New Zealand Romantic Comedy: Eagle vs Shark who as well directed two episodes of Flight of The Concords.

See the full list of  Movies and Screening Times Here:

A Small Act, a Documentary about Chris Mburu a  student who gets funded and continues his studies and years later pays it forward with a similar scheme, will also screen in Kenya with a Q & A at some screenings by the Director Jennifer Arnold.


 

INTERVIEW + AUDIO: Robert Allen: Black America and Internal/Neo-Colonialism « I MiX What I Like!

An Interview with Robert Allen:

Black America and 

Internal/Neo-Colonialism

In COUP Radio, Internal Colonialism Theory on July 13, 2011 at 8:23 pm

We were able to have a brief discussion of the internal colonization of Black America with author Robert Allen* whose classic Black Awakening in Capitalist America celebrates its 40th anniversary this year.  The conversation, truncated, began with the (unheard) question of the comparison between the traditional colonialism and that held between Black America and the larger United States.  Allen is also an editor with The Black Scholar journal, also celebrating its 40th anniversary this year.

  

 

Download/Rebroadcast!

*Originally aired February 14, 2009

 

WAR + PHOTO ESSAY: Somalia, the CIA, and USA Foreign Policies - Is Obama Continuing Bush Policies?

Glenn Greenwald

How the U.S. government

uses its media servants

to attack real journalism

via salon.com

 

__________________________

Slide Show:

Tracking the CIA in Somalia

 


  • Jeremy Scahill in Mogadishu, Somalia

    A report from the front lines in Mogadishu by Jeremy Scahill(1 of 13)

    “In the eighteen years since the infamous ‘Black Hawk Down’ incident in Mogadishu,” The Nation’s Jeremy Scahill writes in an exclusive report in this week’s issue, “US policy on Somalia has been marked by neglect, miscalculation and failed attempts to use warlords to build indigenous counterterrorism capacity, many of which have backfired dramatically.” But now the US is intensifying its military and intelligence efforts in the country.

     

    According to Scahill’s on-the-ground investigation in Mogadishu, conducted with filmmaker Richard Rowley, the CIA has not only opened a new base in the capital city, but also uses a secret prison in the basement of Somalia’s National Security Agency.

     

    Credit: Richard Rowley, Big Noise Films 

  • Somali President Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed (2 of 13)

    It is unclear how much, if any, control Somali President Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed has over the CIA-backed counterterrorism forces in Mogadishu.

     

    Credit: Richard Rowley, Big Noise Films

  • A cathedral in central Mogadishu (3 of 13)

    Livestock eat trash near the ruins of a cathedral in central Mogadishu. The once-beautiful city has been devastated by two decades of war.

     

    Credit: Richard Rowley, Big Noise Films 

  • An African Union patrol in Mogadishu (4 of 13)

    African Union forces from Uganda and Burundi navigate the city in heavily armored mine-resistant vehicles.

     

    Credit: Richard Rowley, Big Noise Films 

  • On Mogadishu’s front lines (5 of 13)

    Militiamen fighting for the Somali government take up positions on the front lines of the government-controlled zone.

     

    Credit: Richard Rowley, Big Noise Films 

  • On Mogadishu’s front lines (6 of 13)

    Fighting between the government's militias and the Shabab, the Islamic militant group that controls much of Mogadishu, has cleared all civilians from the front lines, and whole neighborhoods now stand abandoned.

     

    Credit: Richard Rowley, Big Noise Films 

  • A militia in Mogadishu (7 of 13)

    Mogadishu's streets are patrolled by armed men with dozens of different affiliations—some uniformed, some in plain clothes.

     

    Credit: Richard Rowley, Big Noise Films 

  • A militia in Mogadishu (8 of 13)

    At times, largely because of abuses committed by Somali militias the CIA has supported, US policy has strengthened the hand of the very groups it purports to oppose and inadvertently aided the rise of militant groups, including the Shabab.

     

    Credit: Richard Rowley, Big Noise Films

  • A militia fighter walks through a former Shabab position (9 of 13)

    The Shabab constructed a honeycomb of underground tunnels in Mogadishu to move from building to building.

     

    Credit: Richard Rowley, Big Noise Films 

  • Inside the Shabab tunnels (10 of 13)

    By some accounts, the tunnels stretch continuously for miles.

     

    Credit: Richard Rowley, Big Noise Films 

  • Fortified fighting positions in the Shabab tunnels (11 of 13)

    “Pop-up” positions once used by Shabab snipers and guarded by sandbags are all that remain of guerrilla warfare positions.

     

    Credit: Richard Rowley, Big Noise Films 

  • Mogadishu’s Al Madina Hospital (12 of 13)

    Doctors at Al Madina Hospital—Mogadishu's only trauma hospital—struggle to save the life of a civilian victim of a bomb attack on an AU convoy. The roadside bomb missed its target and hit a passenger bus full of university students.

     

    Credit: Richard Rowley, Big Noise Films 

  • Somali militia member on the streets of Mogadishu (13 of 13)

    For more, read Jeremy Scahill’s article in this week’s issue, The CIA's Secret Sites in Somalia.

     

    Credit: Richard Rowley, Big Noise Films 

 

 

 

 

>via: http://www.thenation.com/slideshow/161939/slide-show-tracking-cia-somalia

__________________________

 

The CIA's Secret Sites in Somalia

Jeremy Scahill

Nestled in a back corner of Mogadishu’s Aden Adde International Airport is a sprawling walled compound run by the Central Intelligence Agency. Set on the coast of the Indian Ocean, the facility looks like a small gated community, with more than a dozen buildings behind large protective walls and secured by guard towers at each of its four corners. Adjacent to the compound are eight large metal hangars, and the CIA has its own aircraft at the airport. The site, which airport officials and Somali intelligence sources say was completed four months ago, is guarded by Somali soldiers, but the Americans control access. At the facility, the CIA runs a counterterrorism training program for Somali intelligence agents and operatives aimed at building an indigenous strike force capable of snatch operations and targeted “combat” operations against members of Al Shabab, an Islamic militant group with close ties to Al Qaeda.

The CIA presence in Mogadishu is part of Washington’s intensifying counterterrorism focus on Somalia, which includes targeted strikes by US Special Operations forces, drone attacks and expanded surveillance operations. The US agents “are here full time,” a senior Somali intelligence official told me. At times, he said, there are as many as thirty of them in Mogadishu, but he stressed that those working with the Somali NSA do not conduct operations; rather, they advise and train Somali agents. “In this environment, it’s very tricky. They want to help us, but the situation is not allowing them to do [it] however they want. They are not in control of the politics, they are not in control of the security,” he adds. “They are not controlling the environment like Afghanistan and Iraq. In Somalia, the situation is fluid, the situation is changing, personalities changing.”As part of its expanding counterterrorism program in Somalia, the CIA also uses a secret prison buried in the basement of Somalia’s National Security Agency (NSA) headquarters, where prisoners suspected of being Shabab members or of having links to the group are held. Some of the prisoners have been snatched off the streets of Kenya and rendered by plane to Mogadishu. While the underground prison is officially run by the Somali NSA, US intelligence personnel pay the salaries of intelligence agents and also directly interrogate prisoners. The existence of both facilities and the CIA role was uncovered by The Nation during an extensive on-the-ground investigation in Mogadishu. Among the sources who provided information for this story are senior Somali intelligence officials; senior members of Somalia’s Transitional Federal Government (TFG); former prisoners held at the underground prison; and several well-connected Somali analysts and militia leaders, some of whom have worked with US agents, including those from the CIA. A US official, who confirmed the existence of both sites, told The Nation, “It makes complete sense to have a strong counterterrorism partnership” with the Somali government.

'Essentially, the CIA seems to be operating, doing the foreign policy of the United States,' said a well-connected Somali analyst.

According to well-connected Somali sources, the CIA is reluctant to deal directly with Somali political leaders, who are regarded by US officials as corrupt and untrustworthy. Instead, the United States has Somali intelligence agents on its payroll. Somali sources with knowledge of the program described the agents as lining up to receive $200 monthly cash payments from Americans. “They support us in a big way financially,” says the senior Somali intelligence official. “They are the largest [funder] by far.”

According to former detainees, the underground prison, which is staffed by Somali guards, consists of a long corridor lined with filthy small cells infested with bedbugs and mosquitoes. One said that when he arrived in February, he saw two white men wearing military boots, combat trousers, gray tucked-in shirts and black sunglasses. The former prisoners described the cells as windowless and the air thick, moist and disgusting. Prisoners, they said, are not allowed outside. Many have developed rashes and scratch themselves incessantly. Some have been detained for a year or more. According to one former prisoner, inmates who had been there for long periods would pace around constantly, while others leaned against walls rocking.

A Somali who was arrested in Mogadishu and taken to the prison told The Nation that he was held in a windowless underground cell. Among the prisoners he met during his time there was a man who held a Western passport (he declined to identify the man’s nationality). Some of the prisoners told him they were picked up in Nairobi and rendered on small aircraft to Mogadishu, where they were handed over to Somali intelligence agents. Once in custody, according to the senior Somali intelligence official and former prisoners, some detainees are freely interrogated by US and French agents. “Our goal is to please our partners, so we get more [out] of them, like any relationship,” said the Somali intelligence official in describing the policy of allowing foreign agents, including from the CIA, to interrogate prisoners. The Americans, according to the Somali official, operate unilaterally in the country, while the French agents are embedded within the African Union force known as AMISOM.

Among the men believed to be held in the secret underground prison is Ahmed Abdullahi Hassan, a 25- or 26-year-old Kenyan citizen who disappeared from the congested Somali slum of Eastleigh in Nairobi around July 2009. After he went missing, Hassan’s family retained Mbugua Mureithi, a well-known Kenyan human rights lawyer, who filed a habeas petition on his behalf. The Kenyan government responded that Hassan was not being held in Kenya and said it had no knowledge of his whereabouts. His fate remained a mystery until this spring, when another man who had been held in the Mogadishu prison contacted Clara Gutteridge, a veteran human rights investigator with the British legal organization Reprieve, and told her he had met Hassan in the prison. Hassan, he said, had told him how Kenyan police had knocked down his door, snatched him and taken him to a secret location in Nairobi. The next night, Hassan had said, he was rendered to Mogadishu.

According to the former fellow prisoner, Hassan told him that his captors took him to Wilson Airport: “‘They put a bag on my head, Guantánamo style. They tied my hands behind my back and put me on a plane. In the early hours we landed in Mogadishu. The way I realized I was in Mogadishu was because of the smell of the sea—the runway is just next to the seashore. The plane lands and touches the sea. They took me to this prison, where I have been up to now. I have been here for one year, seven months. I have been interrogated so many times. Interrogated by Somali men and white men. Every day. New faces show up. They have nothing on me. I have never seen a lawyer, never seen an outsider. Only other prisoners, interrogators, guards. Here there is no court or tribunal.’”

After meeting the man who had spoken with Hassan in the underground prison, Gutteridge began working with Hassan’s Kenyan lawyers to determine his whereabouts. She says he has never been charged or brought before a court. “Hassan’s abduction from Nairobi and rendition to a secret prison in Somalia bears all the hallmarks of a classic US rendition operation,” she says. The US official interviewed for this article denied the CIA had rendered Hassan but said, “The United States provided information which helped get Hassan—a dangerous terrorist—off the street.” Human Rights Watch and Reprieve have documented that Kenyan security and intelligence forces have facilitated scores of renditions for the US and other governments, including eighty-five people rendered to Somalia in 2007 alone. Gutteridge says the director of the Mogadishu prison told one of her sources that Hassan had been targeted in Nairobi because of intelligence suggesting he was the “right-hand man” of Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan, at the time a leader of Al Qaeda in East Africa. Nabhan, a Kenyan citizen of Yemeni descent, was among the top suspects sought for questioning by US authorities over his alleged role in the coordinated 2002 attacks on a tourist hotel and an Israeli aircraft in Mombasa, Kenya, and possible links to the 1998 US Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania.

An intelligence report leaked by the Kenyan Anti-Terrorist Police Unit in October 2010 alleged that Hassan, a “former personal assistant to Nabhan…was injured while fighting near the presidential palace in Mogadishu in 2009.” The authenticity of the report cannot be independently confirmed, though Hassan did have a leg amputated below the knee, according to his former fellow prisoner in Mogadishu.

Two months after Hassan was allegedly rendered to the secret Mogadishu prison, Nabhan, the man believed to be his Al Qaeda boss, was killed in the first known targeted killing operation in Somalia authorized by President Obama. On September 14, 2009, a team from the elite US counterterrorism force, the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), took off by helicopters from a US Navy ship off Somalia’s coast and penetrated Somali airspace. In broad daylight, in an operation code-named Celestial Balance, they gunned down Nabhan’s convoy from the air. JSOC troops then landed and collected at least two of the bodies, including Nabhan’s.

Hassan’s lawyers are preparing to file a habeas petition on his behalf in US courts. “Hassan’s case suggests that the US may be involved in a decentralized, out-sourced Guantánamo Bay in central Mogadishu,” his legal team asserted in a statement to The Nation. “Mr. Hassan must be given the opportunity to challenge both his rendition and continued detention as a matter of urgency. The US must urgently confirm exactly what has been done to Mr. Hassan, why he is being held, and when he will be given a fair hearing.”

Gutteridge, who has worked extensively tracking the disappearances of terror suspects in Kenya, was deported from Kenya on May 11.

The underground prison where Hassan is allegedly being held is housed in the same building once occupied by Somalia’s infamous National Security Service (NSS) during the military regime of Siad Barre, who ruled from 1969 to 1991. The former prisoner who met Hassan there said he saw an old NSS sign outside. During Barre’s regime, the notorious basement prison and interrogation center, which sits behind the presidential palace in Mogadishu, was a staple of the state’s apparatus of repression. It was referred to as Godka, “The Hole.”

“The bunker is there, and that’s where the intelligence agency does interrogate people,” says Abdirahman “Aynte” Ali, a Somali analyst who has researched the Shabab and Somali security forces. “When CIA and other intelligence agencies—who actually are in Mogadishu—want to interrogate those people, they usually just do that.” Somali officials “start the interrogation, but then foreign intelligence agencies eventually do their own interrogation as well, the Americans and the French.” The US official said that US agents’ “debriefing” prisoners in the facility has “been done on only rare occasions” and always jointly with Somali agents.

Some prisoners, like Hassan, were allegedly rendered from Nairobi, while in other cases, according to Aynte, “the US and other intelligence agencies have notified the Somali intelligence agency that some people, some suspects, people who have been in contact with the leadership of Al Shabab, are on their way to Mogadishu on a [commercial] plane, and to essentially be at the airport for those people. Catch them, interrogate them.”

* * *

In the eighteen years since the infamous “Black Hawk Down” incident in Mogadishu, US policy on Somalia has been marked by neglect, miscalculation and failed attempts to use warlords to build indigenous counterterrorism capacity, many of which have backfired dramatically. At times, largely because of abuses committed by Somali militias the CIA has supported, US policy has strengthened the hand of the very groups it purports to oppose and inadvertently aided the rise of militant groups, including the Shabab. Many Somalis viewed the Islamic movement known as the Islamic Courts Union, which defeated the CIA’s warlords in Mogadishu in 2006, as a stabilizing, albeit ruthless, force. The ICU was dismantled in a US-backed Ethiopian invasion in 2007. Over the years, a series of weak Somali administrations have been recognized by the United States and other powers as Somalia’s legitimate government. Ironically, its current president is a former leader of the ICU.

Today, Somali government forces control roughly thirty square miles of territory in Mogadishu thanks in large part to the US-funded and -armed 9,000-member AMISOM force. Much of the rest of the city is under the control of the Shabab or warlords. Outgunned, the Shabab has increasingly relied on the linchpins of asymmetric warfare—suicide bombings, roadside bombs and targeted assassinations. The militant group has repeatedly shown that it can strike deep in the heart of its enemies’ territory. On June 9, in one of its most spectacular suicide attacks to date, the Shabab assassinated the Somali government’s minister of interior affairs and national security, Abdishakur Sheikh Hassan Farah, who was attacked in his residence by his niece. The girl, whom the minister was putting through university, blew herself up and fatally wounded her uncle. He died hours later in the hospital. Farah was the fifth Somali minister killed by the Shabab in the past two years and the seventeenth official assassinated since 2006. Among the suicide bombers the Shabab has deployed were at least three US citizens of Somali descent; at least seven other Americans have died fighting alongside the Shabab, a fact that has not gone unnoticed in Washington or Mogadishu.

During his confirmation hearings in June to become the head of the US Special Operations Command, Vice Admiral William McRaven said, “From my standpoint as a former JSOC commander, I can tell you we were looking very hard” at Somalia. McRaven said that in order to expand successful “kinetic strikes” there, the United States will have to increase its use of drones as well as on-the-ground intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance operations. “Any expansion of manpower is going to have to come with a commensurate expansion of the enablers,” McRaven declared. The expanding US counterterrorism program in Mogadishu appears to be part of that effort.

In an interview with The Nation in Mogadishu, Abdulkadir Moallin Noor, the minister of state for the presidency, confirmed that US agents “are working with our intelligence” and “giving them training.” Regarding the US counterterrorism effort, Noor said bluntly, “We need more; otherwise, the terrorists will take over the country.”

It is unclear how much control, if any, Somalia’s internationally recognized president, Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed, has over this counterterrorism force or if he is even fully briefed on its operations. The CIA personnel and other US intelligence agents “do not bother to be in touch with the political leadership of the country. And that says a lot about the intentions,” says Aynte. “Essentially, the CIA seems to be operating, doing the foreign policy of the United States. You should have had State Department people doing foreign policy, but the CIA seems to be doing it across the country.”

While the Somali officials interviewed for this story said the CIA is the lead US agency on the Mogadishu counterterrorism program, they also indicated that US military intelligence agents are at times involved. When asked if they are from JSOC or the Defense Intelligence Agency, the senior Somali intelligence official responded, “We don’t know. They don’t tell us.”

In April Ahmed Abdulkadir Warsame, a Somali man the United States alleged had links to the Shabab, was captured by JSOC forces in the Gulf of Aden. He was held incommunicado on a US Navy vessel for more than two months; in July he was transferred to New York and indicted on terrorism charges. Warsame’s case ignited a legal debate over the Obama administration’s policies on capturing and detaining terror suspects, particularly in light of the widening counterterrorism campaigns in Somalia and Yemen.

On June 23 the United States reportedly carried out a drone strike against alleged Shabab members near Kismayo, 300 miles from the Somali capital. As with the Nabhan operation, a JSOC team swooped in on helicopters and reportedly snatched the bodies of those killed and wounded. The men were taken to an undisclosed location. On July 6 three more US strikes reportedly targeted Shabab training camps in the same area. Somali analysts warned that if the US bombings cause civilian deaths, as they have in the past, they could increase support for the Shabab. Asked in an interview with The Nation in Mogadishu if US drone strikes strengthen or weaken his government, President Sharif replied, “Both at the same time. For our sovereignty, it’s not good to attack a sovereign country. That’s the negative part. The positive part is you’re targeting individuals who are criminals.”

A week after the June 23 strike, President Obama’s chief counterterrorism adviser, John Brennan, described an emerging US strategy that would focus not on “deploying large armies abroad but delivering targeted, surgical pressure to the groups that threaten us.” Brennan singled out the Shabab, saying, “From the territory it controls in Somalia, Al Shabab continues to call for strikes against the United States,” adding, “We cannot and we will not let down our guard. We will continue to pummel Al Qaeda and its ilk.”

While the United States appears to be ratcheting up both its rhetoric and its drone strikes against the Shabab, it has thus far been able to strike only in rural areas outside Mogadishu. These operations have been isolated and infrequent, and Somali analysts say they have failed to disrupt the Shabab’s core leadership, particularly in Mogadishu.

In a series of interviews in Mogadishu, several of the country’s recognized leaders, including President Sharif, called on the US government to quickly and dramatically increase its assistance to the Somali military in the form of training, equipment and weapons. Moreover, they argue that without viable civilian institutions, Somalia will remain ripe for terrorist groups that can further destabilize not only Somalia but the region. “I believe that the US should help the Somalis to establish a government that protects civilians and its people,” Sharif said.

In the battle against the Shabab, the United States does not, in fact, appear to have cast its lot with the Somali government. The emerging US strategy on Somalia—borne out in stated policy, expanded covert presence and funding plans—is two-pronged: On the one hand, the CIA is training, paying and at times directing Somali intelligence agents who are not firmly under the control of the Somali government, while JSOC conducts unilateral strikes without the prior knowledge of the government; on the other, the Pentagon is increasing its support for and arming of the counterterrorism operations of non-Somali African military forces.

A draft of a defense spending bill approved in late June by the Senate Armed Services Committee would authorize more than $75 million in US counterterrorism assistance aimed at fighting the Shabab and Al Qaeda in Somalia. The bill, however, did not authorize additional funding for Somalia’s military, as the country’s leaders have repeatedly asked. Instead, the aid package would dramatically increase US arming and financing of AMISOM’s forces, particularly from Uganda and Burundi, as well as the militaries of Djibouti, Kenya and Ethiopia. The Somali military, the committee asserted, is unable to “exercise control of its territory.”

That makes it all the more ironic that perhaps the greatest tactical victory won in recent years in Somalia was delivered not by AMISOM, the CIA or JSOC but by members of a Somali militia fighting as part of the government’s chaotic local military. And it was a pure accident.

Late in the evening on June 7, a man whose South African passport identified him as Daniel Robinson was in the passenger seat of a Toyota SUV driving on the outskirts of Mogadishu when his driver, a Kenyan national, missed a turn and headed straight toward a checkpoint manned by Somali forces. A firefight broke out, and the two men inside the car were killed. The Somali forces promptly looted the laptops, cellphones, documents, weapons and $40,000 in cash they found in the car, according to the senior Somali intelligence official.

Upon discovering that the men were foreigners, the Somali NSA launched an investigation and recovered the items that had been looted. “There was a lot of English and Arabic stuff, papers,” recalls the Somali intelligence official, containing “very tactical stuff” that appeared to be linked to Al Qaeda, including “two senior people communicating.” The Somali agents “realized it was an important man” and informed the CIA in Mogadishu. The men’s bodies were taken to the NSA. The Americans took DNA samples and fingerprints and flew them to Nairobi for processing.

Within hours, the United States confirmed that Robinson was in fact Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, a top leader of Al Qaeda in East Africa and its chief liaison with the Shabab. Fazul, a twenty-year veteran of Al Qaeda, had been indicted by the United States for his alleged role in the 1998 US Embassy bombings and was on the FBI’s “Most Wanted Terrorists” list. A JSOC attempt to kill him in a January 2007 airstrike resulted in the deaths of at least seventy nomads in rural Somalia, and he had been underground ever since. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called Fazul’s death “a significant blow to Al Qaeda, its extremist allies and its operations in East Africa. It is a just end for a terrorist who brought so much death and pain to so many innocents.”

At its facilities in Mogadishu, the CIA and its Somali NSA agents continue to pore over the materials recovered from Fazul’s car, which served as a mobile headquarters. Some deleted and encrypted files were recovered and decoded by US agents. The senior Somali intelligence official said that the intelligence may prove more valuable on a tactical level than the cache found in Osama bin Laden’s house in Pakistan, especially in light of the increasing US focus on East Africa. The Americans, he said, were “unbelievably grateful”; he hopes it means they will take Somalia’s forces more seriously and provide more support.

But the United States continues to wage its campaign against the Shabab primarily by funding the AMISOM forces, which are not conducting their mission with anything resembling surgical precision. Instead, over the past several months the AMISOM forces in Mogadishu have waged a merciless campaign of indiscriminate shelling of Shabab areas, some of which are heavily populated by civilians. While AMISOM regularly puts out press releases boasting of gains against the Shabab and the retaking of territory, the reality paints a far more complicated picture.

Throughout the areas AMISOM has retaken is a honeycomb of underground tunnels once used by Shabab fighters to move from building to building. By some accounts, the tunnels stretch continuously for miles. Leftover food, blankets and ammo cartridges lay scattered near “pop-up” positions once used by Shabab snipers and guarded by sandbags—all that remain of guerrilla warfare positions. Not only have the Shabab fighters been cleared from the aboveground areas; the civilians that once resided there have been cleared too. On several occasions in late June, AMISOM forces fired artillery from their airport base at the Bakaara market, where whole neighborhoods are totally abandoned. Houses lie in ruins and animals wander aimlessly, chewing trash. In some areas, bodies have been hastily buried in trenches with dirt barely masking the remains. On the side of the road in one former Shabab neighborhood, a decapitated corpse lay just meters from a new government checkpoint.

In late June the Pentagon approved plans to send $45 million worth of military equipment to Uganda and Burundi, the two major forces in the AMISOM operation. Among the new items are four small Raven surveillance drones, night-vision and communications equipment and other surveillance gear, all of which augur a more targeted campaign. Combined with the attempt to build an indigenous counterterrorism force at the Somali NSA, a new US counterterrorism strategy is emerging.

But according to the senior Somali intelligence official, who works directly with the US agents, the CIA-led program in Mogadishu has brought few tangible gains. “So far what we have not seen is the results in terms of the capacity of the [Somali] agency,” says the official. He conceded that neither US nor Somali forces have been able to conduct a single successful targeted mission in the Shabab’s areas in the capital. In late 2010, according to the official, US-trained Somali agents conducted an operation in a Shabab area that failed terribly and resulted in several of them being killed. “There was an attempt, but it was a haphazard one,” he recalls. They have not tried another targeted operation in Shabab-controlled territory since.

 

 

HAITI: What Is Wyclef Jean Trying to Save in Haiti? > NYTimes.com

The Would-Be Prince

of Port-au-Prince

Peter van Agtmael/Magnum, for The New York Times
By ANAND GIRIDHARADAS

Wyclef Jean was in a rare state: nervous. He was trying to stick to his new role of wonky Haitian statesman, but the road kept distracting him. We were driving through Port-au-Prince as dusk fell, and he would interrupt his own discourse on trade rules or egg imports to ask the driver why a fire was burning on the roadside or to complain that our headlights were tempting danger or to mumble that the police escort, which he suspected of working for the opposition, shouldn’t sound its sirens.

It was three days before Haiti’s presidential election, on March 20. Jean, a Haitian-born rapper, producer and star of the now-disbanded Fugees, had mounted his own run for the presidency but was disqualified from the race because he lives in the United States. When I went to Haiti to meet him, he was stumping for Michel Martelly, a musician who goes by the stage name Sweet Micky, has a well-known history of public nudity and has admitted to using crack cocaine. Martelly might have been the candidate, but with Jean performing at many campaign stops and making the longer speeches, it often seemed as if he were the one running. Jean’s role was to revive the support he had garnered during his own campaign and transfer it to a candidate who was a somewhat less famous version of himself. (It worked. Martelly would be inaugurated as president of Haiti in May.)

Martelly sought the presidency; Jean, something more elusive. Before the 2010 earthquake and more loudly since, he has spoken of wanting to save Haiti from its miseries: crime, corruption, cholera, anemic job growth, swarming tent cities, fruitless aid and deep mistrust of the state. With his pal ascending to power and a whiff of hope in the air, Jean finally has his chance. At 41, he is striving to become a man of influence. While Jean plainly wants to do something for Haiti, there is also, it seems, much that he wants Haiti to do for him.

From a whitewashed hotel in the hills, we descended toward Cité Soleil, Haiti’s most notorious shantytown. Along the route were houses and shops chewed on or swallowed whole by the earthquake 14 months ago. Darkness was coming, and the street life fell away as we approached. Jean now claimed to hear a report on the radio of threats to Martelly’s convoy made by supporters of the rival presidential campaign. “They’re saying our candidate can’t get into Cité Soleil,” he said, treating it more as dare than discouragement. “And I’m bringing him into Cité Soleil.”

All at once, a throng encircled us, climbing onto the vehicle. These men were on Sweet Micky’s side. Jean’s aides, thumbing their BlackBerrys, said shots had been fired in Cité Soleil. But this, apparently, was no reason to alter our plans. The bodyguards pried open the doors of our S.U.V. and told us to run toward a stage that had been set up in the middle of the shantytown. The crowd surged around us. We were enclosed by a ring of bodyguards, but I could feel hands searching deep into my pockets. The scent of sweat and rum and panted breath surrounded us.

We somehow made it to the stage. Below Sweet Micky and Jean was a sea of screaming faces. Martelly delivered his speech, promising a break from the past, leavening the message with a song. But he was merely the opener. Jean, wearing a blue plaid shirt, low-hanging jeans and black Timberlands, exhorted and sang in his raspy, quivering voice. If Haiti is to change, he thundered, it must begin with Cité Soleil.

A crazed man approached. Everyone ignored him except Jean, who bent all the way over to hear him. A slip or pull would have plunged him into that vast human crush, but Jean, who can be paranoid about Haitian officialdom, about its police and politicians, seemed the only one in the campaign not afraid of its crowds. This was, his brother, Sam, later speculated to me, because of something Wyclef perceived growing up in the bleak landscape of the Marlboro projects in Brooklyn, New York: when among Haitians — perhaps only among Haitians — you are safe.

As we returned to the S.U.V., a loud crackle punctured the night. The crowd dispersed. The security men, armed and protected by bulletproof vests, said it was semiautomatic gunfire.

Afterward, Jean continued his soliloquy. “How did I get in this situation?” he asked. “I’m just a rock star.” There were several other shantytowns on the evening’s itinerary. Jean put his hand on my shoulder: “Guess what? You with the right dude, you hear me? Nothing’s going to happen to us, baby, you feel me? We live for a reason, right? And we better die for the right reason.”

As a boy in the Marlboro projects, Jean said that his favored mode of breaking into a home was to pick the front-door lock, then exit through a window. His Haitian crew would arrange a stack of mattresses below to catch him. “My nickname in the ’hood used to be Speedy, you know what I’m saying?” Jean told me. “You know why they called me Speedy? I would get into your house, and I would get out in 30 to 31 seconds.”

He arrived in Brooklyn at age 9, the son of a Haitian garment worker who moonlighted as a Nazarene minister and named him after John Wycliffe, an early translator of the Bible into English. (His last name is pronounced “Jean, as in Jean Paul Gaultier, Jean-Paul Sartre, Jean-Jacques Rousseau,” his brother wrote in an e-mail.) Jean’s reception in America was full of taunts. “You know what HBO is?” his peers would ask. “Haitian Body Odor.” His brother, Sam, told me that the two of them were regularly mugged. But Wyclef soon made the leap from victim to aspiring thug. His solution to displacement, he told me, was to cleave to those who understood him “automatically.” He surrounded himself with a group of Haitians who protected one another.

Jean was shaped by the usual crosscurrents of immigrant life: speaking Creole at home and grappling with English in school; playing in his father’s church band and succumbing to less-lofty neighborhood temptations; realizing his good fortune in escaping Haiti yet clinging to his fellow Haitians in Brooklyn.

Inspired by the Sugarhill Gang and Grandmaster Flash and other rap artists, Jean began to freestyle. His father, Gesner Jean, loathed rap, but the elder’s influence was still present in the son’s music. Sam Jean recalled how his brother called himself the “preacher’s son” and used a preacher’s metaphors: “crucifying” opponents; slaying them without chance of “resurrection”; selling them as Joseph was sold into Egypt.

Meanwhile, he was regularly escorted home by the police or castigated by neighborhood elders for fighting and stealing and other activities that he hesitates to detail. When a young cousin was killed, his father tried to improve things by moving the family to New Jersey cities that were hardly more peaceful — first East Orange, then Newark. His mother’s response was more effective; she took note of his musical gifts. One day, according to family lore, the church’s accordion player fell sick, and Jean began to play the instrument, without prior experience. He is said also to have learned the organ, drums and trombone in this way. His mother bought him a guitar when he was in his early teens. “Replace the gun with this,” Jean recalls her saying.

Jean found in the instrument a power to command respect. “I just always remembered the hardest dudes, like, ‘Yo Clef, come play that Bob Marley tune you be playing’ — and this is in the ’hood,” he said. “I’m going make y’all respect the Haitians — by any means necessary.”

Before long he started the Fugees, with his close friend Pras Michel and the singer Lauryn Hill; then came his successful solo career and his work as a hit-making producer for Destiny’s Child, Whitney Houston, Shakira and others. But Jean decided he wanted to make his mark in Haiti. He had done philanthropic work there for years, but the 2010 earthquake, which the United States Agency for International Development said killed as many as 85,000 people, gave him a fresh sense of urgency. He began to see what his legacy might be: the singer who “lived in New York his whole life” and “did a few charity things,” as he put it. “No, it’s like, we have to find a way to push these people forward — even if it’s an inch forward.”

Jean has been trying to push people forward since 2005, when he founded the charity Yéle Haiti. But its reputation has been marred by accusations that range from incompetence to outright malfeasance. As donations poured in after the earthquake, experts began to scrutinize Yéle’s tax filings and found it difficult to tell where Jean’s aid to others ended and aid to himself and his associates began. The filings listed several activities with virtuous goals: feeding slum dwellers; underwriting scholarships; paying people to collect trash. But many details rang alarms. In some years the foundation’s expenditures were greater than the money it raised (2007 revenues: $79,129; 2007 expenses: $569,050), and it spent vast amounts on salaries, publicity and travel. Yéle repeatedly bought services from companies that Jean co-owns. It leased office space from one of his businesses, bought $250,000 in television time from another and even paid Jean for performing at a concert to benefit Yéle. The justification the charity gave in its I.R.S. form — “the fees paid for these services are substantially less than market value” — did not square with Jean’s declared willingness to sacrifice for his country of birth.

“Avoid this organization” is the simple advice of Ken Berger, chief executive of the philanthropic watchdog group Charity Navigator, when asked about Yéle. “What are the priorities of this organization? Is it really mission-driven, or is it more supporting the celebrity and financing him and his personal career?”

One of Haiti’s leading businessmen suggested to me that it might be a mix of the two. Maarten Boute, the Belgian-born chief executive of Digicel Haiti, a cellphone company that is among of the country’s largest enterprises, knows Jean socially, and the assessment he offered, equal parts admiring and critical, distilled much of what I had already heard. Boute cast Jean as a well-intentioned man who wants to bend Haiti’s trajectory but doesn’t quite know how. Boute praised Yéle’s relief work — for example, the distribution of rehydration kits during the cholera outbreak, which he witnessed. But, compared with the best charities, Boute said, Yéle’s work fails to “solve the problem at the roots”; it focuses too much on its own visibility. And when Boute sees Jean swirling through Port-au-Prince in a hulking S.U.V., surrounded by his boys, looking very much like a rapper en route to a bottle-service-only club, it leaves Boute wondering. “It’s quite difficult, even speaking to him,” he told me, “to really understand what are his real motivations.”

Peter van Agtmael/Magnum, for The New York Times / In May, Jean attended a ceremony at a Port-au-Prince hospital to celebrate the donation of a CT scanner by his charity, Yéle Haiti.

 

Last year, Jean tearfully acknowledged some of the poor accounting practices at Yéle. When he began his candidacy for president, he stepped down from Yéle’s board, but he remains deeply involved in its work, and he and those around him insist that his intentions are sincere. As his brother put it to me: “If Clef needed Yéle to make money, he’d be in big trouble.” Wyclef himself favors a language of martyrdom when speaking of his return to Haiti. Of his run for office, he asserted, “To be the president of Haiti is a sacrifice.” He ran, he says, because those in power were failing. And he points to the fact that even after being disqualified, he has remained involved: he speaks of wanting to spend more time in Haiti, to shape its trade policy, get laptops for its children, advise its new president, build a business in the country. “They probably assumed that, O.K., after they rejected me, I would move on,” Jean said. “But my mission for the country is deeper. You read books, and you see men that define times. Your date of birth is set; your death date is set. But there are moments where history splits — like how A.D. and B.C. split in the middle.”

I don’t know who sent those chicks, but they was off the hook!” a sideways-hatted young man said, striding into breakfast at the Karibe Hotel. He belonged to the entourage of the rapper Busta Rhymes, whom Jean had brought down to perform at a campaign rally for Martelly, after the visit to Cité Soleil. Busta had been robbed at his own concert the night before, but there seemed to be no hard feelings this morning, because someone had sent some Marabou women, a term for mixed-race Haitians, upstairs to meet the entourage. Now more members of the group came down, joined by one of the women — voluptuous and young, her eyes darting nervously about.

We were headed to Les Cayes, one of the largest cities in Haiti, 120 miles away. As we left Port-au-Prince, the brown earth turned green and caked riverbeds ceded to lush coast. The population thinned, as did the number of armed foreign peacekeepers. The bay was to one side, palm groves and paddies to the other. “This is more what the whole country should look like, you know what I mean?” Jean said, looking out of the window.

His thoughts switched to his daughter, Angelina. It was her sixth birthday. He felt guilty for missing it and was in charge of getting a white pony for her party. He was trying to reach his wife, Claudinette, to whom he has been married since 1994. At last, at 3 p.m., success: he sang “Happy Birthday” over the phone to his daughter back in New Jersey.

Driving through the countryside, he buzzed with ideas of all that he could do. When he saw machinery lying fallow, he cited it as proof that Haiti has equipment but needs more skills, and he made a mental note to work on vocational schools. “We have to be able to negotiate our national production at some kind of level,” he said, “like, we can’t be reduced to just dirt.” He asked me what I’d heard about the One Laptop Per Child project, an American initiative to provide cheap computers to developing countries. He and his driver debated the merits of build-operate-transfer project financing, in which governments grant concessions to private companies to improve infrastructure. The coastline appeared again, and seeing it reminded Jean of his commercial ambitions. He mused about building a massive hotel on the beach, called the W. J., that would pay him to perform monthly. “You know how Sinatra did Vegas?” he said. “So why can’t Wyclef do Haiti?” This led to another idea: he could build one of those much-needed vocational schools near the hotel to train Haitians in the hospitality industry.

Night fell over the highway to Les Cayes. We had spent the day much as we had the day before: making pit stops so that Jean and Martelly could get out of the car and wade fleetingly into the crowds; attending a rally or two, where speeches mingled with song; and, after dark, giving a concert. The mood in the convoy was festive; the concert tonight would officially conclude the campaign. But Jean was agitated, because photographs from his daughter’s birthday party had not yet arrived. Around 9 p.m., he called his wife again: “Send me pictures, send me pictures, send me pictures. Nothing. I didn’t get nothing, man.” He played for sympathy: “Can y’all send me pictures tonight, please? That’s the only thing I have. I’m in the middle of nowhere — please.”

We shared a pint or so of Roi des Coqs rum and went to the concert. An open square of the city was packed with thousands upon thousands of people, roaring as Jean, Martelly and others took turns performing. When the show ended, at midnight, several aggressive young men pushed past the bodyguards and onto the stage, grabbing T-shirts, wallets and rubber campaign bracelets. Typically, Jean’s instinct is to lean into the crowds, but this was too much even for him. He began to shout at the men. There was some pushing. And then Jean, arms violently flailing, began to spin around and around like a top, just like in kung fu movies. The thugs were stunned into retreat.

The following night, I was in my hotel room and noticed something peculiar on my laptop. I began to acquire a new Twitter follower every few minutes. I had been posting updates from Haiti, but why this sudden surge of interest? At midnight, I saw a message addressed to me: “Hey @AnandWrites is it true that Wyclef was shot?”

The next day, rumors circulated that Jean hadn’t been shot and had in fact been cut by glass. Before I left Haiti, Jean called to give me his version, which he said he hadn’t shared with the police because he didn’t trust them: He had been with a musician friend named FanFan and his driver. He got out of the car when someone needed a bladder break. He was on the phone, and “everything happened really, really fast,” he said. “When FanFan heard the pop pop, we couldn’t really make it out, you know what I’m saying? I looked at my hand, and my hand had blood in it, and my sneakers had blood in it. It still didn’t look crazy, because it was a graze.” He told the driver, “Let’s go to Karibe.”

Why the five-star hotel before the hospital?

“You know how I like to move in an entourage,” Jean told me.

Jean’s people eventually sent me what purported to be a medical report. It made matters even murkier. Splitting the difference between rival theories, it said that Jean was wounded by glass shattered by a projectile.

After the incident, Sam Jean made his brother promise that he would not return to Haiti for a while. Jean promised, then days later returned to Haiti anyway. He’s been back a few more times since. He can afford to dabble in a world of chaos and violence, Sam told me with resignation, because he himself has escaped it, because it is no longer really his.

“The Bible speaks of being in the world but not of it,” Sam said. “You can be in that world, but not be of it anymore.”

 

Anand Giridharadas is an online columnist for The Times and the author of "India Calling: An Intimate Portrait of a Nation's Remaking."

Editor: Sheila Glaser (s.glaser-MagGroup@nytimes.com)

 

VIDEO: John Coltrane Died Today… Watch “The World According To John Coltrane” Now > Shadow and Act

John Coltrane Died Today…

Watch “The World According

To John Coltrane” Now

Today in history… July 17, 1967, John William Coltrane died from liver cancer at Huntington Hospital in Long Island, NY.

He was just 40 years young.

Below, watch the hour-long 1990 documentary The World According To John Coltrane, which was made in cooperation with his then widow Alice Coltrane. And feel free to list your favorite John Coltrane moments/tracks.