Learn more and order the book on the OR Books website.
K’Naan – “Wavin’ Flag” | Live MTV Session
June 26, 2010 by Tahirah Edwards Byfield
K’Naan performs a dope, stripped back and ardent rendition of his sporting anthem in this live MTV session. This is definitely the best of the World Cup songs out at the moment.
Contest
Seeking sponsorships for our series of seniors events
Contests are coming to MaturityMatters.netEverybody likes to win and get some recognition for their efforts. Seniors have lots of stories about life, love, and their adventures. We know they would love to tell their friends that their story was chosen as the Grand Prize Winner by a panel of experts.
Starting in March, 2010, MaturityMatters.net will be holding a series of contests. The initial set of contests are for the best stories on various aspects of senior living.
We are currently seeking sponsors for prizes. Are you, or do you know someone, looking to gain publicity and increase business and help create some fun for our seniors?
All sponsors will receive:
- Sponsorship name promotion for the contest you sponsor
- Ongoing promotion/placement in our contest winners archive
- As an EXTRA BONUS: a 12 month free listing in our services directory.
Our deadline for prize submissions is February 21st.
Please email stan@maturitymatters.net for more information, or call 908-857-0271 to discuss the contests.
We are looking forward your participation in these fun events.
Stan
Stan Cohen
Founder - MaturityMatters.net-->
My Favorite Grandkid Story - Our first Seniors Story Contest begins April 1st, 2010!
Most seniors who have grandkids love to talk about them. We are giving you the opportunity to send us your favorite grandkid story and win a Canon digital camera with movie capabilities. Capture those moments with your grandkids for posterity when your story wins our kickoff contest.
Your Senior mom or dad may not like to write, however you can do it for them, Just get them to tell you their story. What a great way to spend time with your folks, getting them to talk and who knows, maybe picked the winner of the contest, getting the story published and taking home a nice prize to boot.
_____________________________________________________________
Story Contest Official Rules
No purchase necessary. Void where prohibited. Some restrictions apply. One qualifier per household. You need not be present to win.
The sweepstakes: From 04/01/10 through 06/30/10, MaturityMatters.net will promote, by means of Social Media / Networking and at via our Website the opportunity to submit entries to win a grand prize as detailed herein. Print advertising may also be used to promote the sweepstakes beginning 04/01/10 through 06/21/10
Eligibility: In order to submit entries, you must be over the age of 55 and may only submit 1 entry per contest. Any individuals (including but not limited to employees, consultants, independent contractors, and interns) who have, within the past six months, performed services for MaturityMatters.net or ChiForliving, LLC or any organizations responsible for sponsoring, fulfilling, administering, advertising or promoting the contest or supplying the prize, and/or their respective parent, subsidiary, affiliated and successor companies, and immediate family and household members of such individuals, are not eligible to enter or play. "Immediate family members" shall mean parents, stepparents, children, stepchildren, siblings, stepsiblings, or spouses. "Household members" shall mean people who share the same residence at least three months in one calendar year.
How to enter:
(I) Email your Grandkid story, 500 words maximum length, as a Microsoft Word document, other text document or email text on or before 06/21/10 or (ii) include requested information by MaturityMatters.net on a plain 8½" by 11" piece of paper. Entries must be mailed to MaturityMatters Seniors / Boomers Essay Contest, c/o MaturityMatters, PO Box 182, Port Murray, NJ 07865. All sweepstakes entries become the property of MaturityMatters.net and will not be returned. All entries may be used by MaturityMatters.net for any purpose and in any media in perpetuity.
How to win:
The Grand Prize winner will be selected in a random drawing conducted from all qualified entries on or about 07/21/10. In the event that the original Grand Prize winner does not meet Official Rules or eligibility requirements, or he/she or parent or legal guardian forfeits the Grand Prize, MaturityMatters.net will award prize to first alternate.
Process will continue until Grand Prize is awarded. All entries must be received on or before 06/30/10. The selection will be held the week of 07/21/10.
Decision of the judges and MaturityMatters.net is final. The grand Prize winner will be notified by phone and/or mail and must meet all eligibility requirements.
By entering, each contestant agrees to be bound by the rules. MaturityMatters.net, its promotional agents and sweepstakes co-sponsors are not responsible for illegible, lost, delayed or misdirected mail, errors in faxes or shipments, busy phone signals, or incomplete entries.
Grand Prize:
Our Grand Prize winner will receive a Canon SX120IS Digital Camera valued at $250.00
There are no other prizes. The Grand Prize is non-transferable. There may be no cash or other substitutions of prizes by winner. However,
MaturityMatters.net reserves the right to substitute similar prizes of equal or greater value in the event the above prize is unavailable for any reason. Individual, parent or legal guardian of winner is solely responsible for all applicable federal, state and local taxes with respect to entire prize.
Winner of Grand Prize winner must sign an Affidavit of Eligibility, Release and Indemnification Form ("the Form") that : a) releases, indemnifyies and holds harmless MaturityMatters.net its parent, affiliated, subsidiary and successor companies, and its respective officers, directors, employees, agents, and representatives, advertising agencies and promotional sponsors (collectively the "Release") from and against any and all harm, expense, liability or injury that may be sustained relating to or arising from participation in the sweepstakes or acceptance or use of the prize; and b) authorizes the Releasee to use the winners' names, likenesses, photographs, voices and biographical data for any purpose, in any media, unless prohibited by law.
Prize will not be released until MaturityMatters.net receives all required documents. Failure of Grand Prize winner to return the Forms within the required timeframe will result in automatic forfeiture of any prizes and all such prizes shall be awarded to an alternate winner. In the event of a prize forfeiture, the winner or parent or legal guardian of the winner forfeiting prize will sign a Prize Forfeit Form and return to MaturityMatters.net within ten (10) days of receiving the Form.
Unforeseen Events: MaturityMatters.net reserves the right to change this sweepstakes at itssole discretion at any time that MaturityMatters.net become aware of any circumstances or occurrence which would materially affect the sweepstakes security or fairness. MaturityMatters.net reserves the right to announce any sweepstakes rules changes over the air, in print or posters.
MaturityMatters.net is not responsible for the inability of the winner to accept the prize for any reason.
List of Winners:
For a copy of winner list, send a self-addressed, stamped envelope to: MaturityMatters Seniors / Boomers Essay Contest, c/o MaturityMatters, PO Box 182, Port Murray, NJ 07865. In your request, state that you would like a copy of the "winners list" between 06/01/10 through 06/30/10.
Writing Competitions
First Crime Novel Competition \ Minotaur Books/Malice Domestic Competition \ Best Private Eye Novel Competition \ Hillerman Mystery Contest
First Crime Novel Competition
Rules for the 2011 Minotaur Books/ Mystery Writers of America First Crime Novel Competition
Sponsored by St. Martin's Minotaur and Mystery Writers of America (MWA)
1. The Competition is open to any writer, regardless of nationality, who has never been the author of a published novel, as defined by the guidelines below, (except that authors of self-published works only may enter, as long as the manuscript submitted is not the self-published work) and is not under contract with a publisher for publication of a novel. Only one manuscript entry is permitted per writer.
2. All manuscripts submitted: a) must be original, previously unpublished works of book length (no less than 220 typewritten pages or approximately 60,000 words) written in the English language by the entrants; b) must not violate any right of any third party or be libelous, and c) must generally follow the guidelines below.
GUIDELINESa. Murder or another serious crime or crimes is at the heart of the story.b. WHAT CONSTITUTES PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED: For the purpose of this Competition, previously published material includes the publication or distribution of the entry, in part or whole, in paper or electronic format or in any other medium, including self-published works. This does not include a chapter excerpt on an author's website, subject to the conditions that: (i) the excerpt is the only text that exists for public viewing; (ii) the excerpt is not for sale to the public, and (iii) the number of words in the excerpt does not exceed 10% of the total number of words in the work as a whole.(The decision of the Competition's judges as to whether or not a manuscript qualifies will be final.)3. Nominees will be selected by judges chosen by MWA, with the assistance of the editorial staff of Minotaur Books, and the winner will be chosen by Minotaur Books editors on the basis of the originality, creativity and writing skill of the submission. The decision of the editors as to the winner of the Competition will be final. Minotaur Books reserves the right not to select any winner if, in the sole opinion of the editors, none of the manuscripts submitted are of publishable quality.
4. An attempt will be made to notify the Competition winner, if any, no later than March 31, 2011. The winner will then be recognized at the Edgar Awards Banquet in New York City in April 2011.
5. If a winner is selected, Minotaur Books will offer to enter into its standard form author's agreement with the entrant for publication of the winning manuscript. After execution of the standard form author's agreement by both parties, the winner will receive an advance against future royalties of $10,000. THE WINNER WILL NOT RECEIVE ANY OTHER PRIZE AND WILL NOT RECEIVE ANY PART OF THE ADVANCE UNTIL THE STANDARD FORM AUTHOR'S AGREEMENT HAS BEEN EXECUTED BY BOTH PARTIES. Those terms of the offer not specified in the printed text of the Minotaur Books standard form author's agreement will be determined by Minotaur Books at its sole discretion. The entrant may request reasonable changes in the offered terms, but Minotaur Books shall not be obligated to agree to any such changes. Minotaur Books may, but will not be required to, consider for publication manuscripts submitted by other entrants.
6. All requests for entry forms must be received by Minotaur Books at the address below by November 13, 2010. DO NOT SEND MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSIONS TO MINOTAUR BOOKS. For copies of these rules and to request an entry form, please send a stamped, self addressed envelope to:
Minotaur Books/MWA Competition
St. Martin's Minotaur
175 Fifth Avenue, 18th Floor
New York, New York 10010
Each entrant will receive an entry form containing the address of the judge to whom he or she will send his or her manuscript. Entries must be postmarked no later than November 30, 2010 and received by judges no later than December 15, 2010 and must include:
a) A double-spaced and neatly typed copy of the manuscript (photocopies are acceptable), with pages numbered consecutively from beginning to end.b) A letter or cover sheet containing the name, address, email address and telephone number of the entrant and the entrant's previous writing credits, if any.c) The application form, duly completed, and a self-addressed letter-sized envelope for our response.d) A digital copy of the manuscript either burned to a CD or saved to a disk as a Microsoft Word document. All disks and CDs should be marked with the author's name and the title of the manuscript.
*Each entrant must keep a copy of the manuscript for his or her own protection. Minotaur Books will not be responsible for lost, stolen, or mislaid manuscripts. Because of the great volume of submissions we receive, the fact that judges are volunteers with full-time responsibilities elsewhere, and the fact that most writers now have the work in their computers, manuscripts, CDs and disks will not be returned. Please do not send return postage or envelopes for return of your manuscript.
No critical evaluation or commentary will be offered by the judges or the editorial staff of St. Martin's Minotaur unless, in the sole opinion of the editorial staff, evaluation or commentary is appropriate in the case of a manuscript being considered for publication.
8. This Competition is void where prohibited or restricted by law.
*It is important that you submit your manuscript as early as possible. Our judges are volunteers who are extremely busy with their primary concerns, and it is inevitable that your submission will get a more careful reading if the judge does not have to contend with a flood of last-minute entries. However, it is not necessary to send it the most expensive way. We judge on-time delivery by the post-mark or equivalent, not by the date the judge receives the manuscript.
Good luck!
Minotaur Books/Malice Domestic Competition
Rules for the 2010 Minotaur Books/Malice Domestic Competition for the Best First Traditional Mystery Novel
1. The competition is open to any professional or non-professional writer, regardless of nationality, who has never been the author of a published traditional mystery (that includes self-published works), as defined by the guidelines below, and is not under contract with a publisher for publication of a traditional mystery. Only one manuscript entry is permitted per writer.
2. All manuscripts submitted: a) must be original works of book length (no less than 220 typewritten pages or approximately 60,000 words) written in the English language by the contestants; b) must not violate the rights of any third party, and c) must generally follow the guidelines below.
GUIDELINES
1. Murder or another serious crime is at the heart of the story, and emphasis is on the solution rather than the details of the crime.
2. Whatever violence is necessarily involved should be neither excessive nor gratuitously detailed, nor is there to be explicit sex.
3. The crime is an extraordinary event in the lives of the characters.
4. The principal characters are people whom the reader might not like, but would be interested in knowing.
5. The suspects and the victims should know each other.
6. There are a limited number of suspects, each of whom has a credible motive and reasonable opportunity to have committed the crime.
7. The person who solves the crime is the central character.
8. The “detective” is an amateur, or, if a professional (private investigator, police officer) is not hardboiled and is as fully developed as the other characters.
9. The detective may find him or herself in serious peril, but he or she does not get beaten up to any serious extent.
10. All of the cast represent themselves as individuals, rather than large impersonal institutions like a national government, the mafia, the CIA, etc.
(The decision of the contest’s judges as to whether or not a manuscript qualifies will be final.)
3. Nominees will be selected by judges chosen by the editorial staff of St. Martin’s Press, with the assistance of the organizers of MALICE DOMESTIC, and the winner will be chosen by St. Martin’s editors. The decision of the editors as to the winner of the contest will be final. St. Martin’s reserves the right not to select any winner, if in the sole opinion of the editors, none of the manuscripts submitted are of publishable quality.
4. An attempt will be made to notify the contest winner, if any, no later than April 1, 2010. The winner will be officially announced at the Malice Domestic Convention in April 2010.
5. If a winner is selected, St. Martin’s Minotaur will publish the winning manuscript by offering to enter into its standard form author’s agreement with the contestant. The winner will receive an advance against future royalties of $10,000. Those terms of the offer not specified in the printed text of the St. Martin’s Press standard form author’s agreement will be determined by St. Martin’s Press at its sole discretion. The contestant may request reasonable changes in the offered terms, but St. Martin’s shall not be obligated to agree to any such changes. St. Martin’s may, but will not be required to, consider for publication manuscripts submitted by other contestants.
6. All entries must be received or postmarked no later than October 15, 2009 and must include:
a) A double-spaced and neatly typed copy of the manuscript (photocopies are acceptable), with pages numbered consecutively from beginning to end.
b) A letter or cover sheet containing the name, address, and telephone number of the contestant and the contestant’s previous writing credits, if any.
c) The application form, duly completed, and an SASE.
All entries must be mailed to the judge whose address is on the application form. Do not send the entry to St. Martins’ Press. For additional copies of the rules and entry blank only, please send a stamped, self addressed envelope to:
Malice Domestic Competition
Thomas Dunne Books
St. Martin’s Press
175 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10010*Each contestant must keep a copy of the manuscript for his or her own protection. St. Martin’s Press will not be responsible for lost, stolen, or mislaid manuscripts. Because of the great volume of submissions our judges receive, the fact that they are volunteers with full-time responsibilities elsewhere, and the fact that most writers now have their work saved on their computers, manuscripts will not be returned. Please do not send return postage or envelopes.
7. No critical evaluation or commentary will be offered by the judges or the editorial staff of St. Martin’s Press unless, in the sole opinion of the editorial staff evaluation or commentary is appropriate in the case of a manuscript being considered for publication.
8. This contest is void where prohibited or restricted by law.
*It is important that you submit your manuscript as early as possible. Our judges are volunteers who are extremely busy with their primary concerns, and it is inevitable that your submission will get a more careful reading if the judge does not have to contend with a flood of last-minute entries. However, it is not necessary to send it the most expensive way. We judge its on-time performance by the post-mark or equivalent, not by the date the judge receives the manuscript.
Best Private Eye Novel CompetitionRules and Guidelines for the Best Private Eye Novel Competition
Sponsored by the Private Eye Writers of America (PWA)
and St. Martin's Press, LLC1. The contest is open to any professional or non-professional writer, regardless of race or nationality, who has never been the author of a published "private eye" novel and who is not under contract with a publisher for publication of a "private eye" novel.
2. All manuscripts submitted: a)must be original works of book length (no less than 220 type-written pages or approximately 60,000 words) written in the English language by the contestants; b) must not violate the rights of any third party; and c) must be a "private eye" novel as defined by these rules:
A novel in which the main character is an independent investigator who is not a member of any law enforcement or government agency, and who receives a fee for his or her investigative services.
(There are no other restrictions as to plot or subject matter. The decision of the contest's judges as to whether a manuscript qualifies as a "private eye" novel will be final.)3. The contest will be judged by judges selected by the PWA and the editorial staff of St. Martin's Press, LLC. The decision of the judges as to the winner of the contest will be final. The judges reserve the right not to select any winner, if, in the sole opinion of the judges, none of the manuscripts are of publishable quality.
4. An attempt will be made to notify the contest winner, if any, no later than September 15th, 2008. The winner will be officially announced at the Bouchercon conference in October 2008.
5. If a winner is selected, St. Martin's Press will publish the winning manuscript by offering to enter into its standard form author's agreement with the contestant. The winner will receive an advance against the future royalties of $10,000. Those terms of the offer not specified in the printed text of the St. Martin's Press standard form author's agreement will be determined by St. Martin's Press at its sole discretion. The contestant may request reasonable changes in the offered terms, but St. Martin's Press shall not be obligated to agree to any such changes. St. Martin's Press may, but will not be required to, consider for publication manuscripts submitted by other contestants.
6. All entries must be received or postmarked no later than July 1, 2008 and must include:
a) A double-spaced and neatly typed copy of the manuscript (photocopies are acceptable).
b) An application form, duly completed.
c) A list of previous writing credits, if any.
All entries must be mailed to the PWA judge whose address appears on the application form. Any entries submitted directly to St. Martin's Press will not be considered for the contest. For additional copies of the rules and entry blank only, please send a self-addressed stamped envelope to:
Best First Private Eye Novel Competition
St. Martin's Press/PWA
Thomas Dunne Books
175 5th Avenue
New York, NY 100107. Please note that declined manuscripts will not be returned to the author, so there is no need to include a SASE. There will be no exceptions. Each contestant must keep a copy of the manuscript for his or her own protection. Neither the PWA nor St. Martin's Press will be responsible for lost, damaged or mislaid manuscripts.
8. No critical evaluation or commentary will be offered by the judges or the editorial staff of St. Martin's Press unless, in the sole discretion of the judges and/or the editorial staff, evaluation or commentary is appropriated in the case of a manuscript being considered for publication.
9. This contest is void where prohibited or restricted by law.
To request guidelines and an application form, please send an SASE to:
Best First Private Eye Novel Competition
St. Martin's Press/PWA
Thomas Dunne Books
175 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10010
Hillerman Mystery Contest
Rules for the HILLERMAN MYSTERY CONTEST Sponsored by the Tony Hillerman Writers Conference (THWC) and St. Martin's Press, LLC
back to top
The contest is open to any professional or non-professional writer, regardless of nationality, who has never been the author of a published mystery, as defined by the guidelines below, and is not under contract with a publisher for publication of a mystery. Only one manuscript entry is permitted per writer.
All manuscripts submitted: a) must be original works of book length (no less than 220 typewritten pages or approximately 60,000 words) written in the English language by the contestants; b) must not violate the rights of any third party, and c) must generally follow the guidelines below.
GUIDELINES
1. Murder or another serious crime or crimes is at the heart of the story, and emphasis is on the solution rather than the details of the crime.
2. The story’s primary setting is the Southwestern United States, including at least one of the following states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, and Utah.
(The decision of the Competition's judges as to whether or not a manuscript qualifies will be final.)
Nominees will be selected by judges chosen by the organizers of the THWC, with the assistance of editorial staff of St. Martin's Press, and the winner will be chosen by St. Martin's editors. The decision of the editors as to the winner of the contest will be final. St. Martin's reserves the right not to select any winner if, in the sole opinion of the editors, none of the manuscripts submitted are of publishable quality.An attempt will be made to notify the contest winner, if any, no later than October 1.
If a winner is selected, St. Martin's Press will publish the winning manuscript by offering to enter into its standard form author's agreement with the contestant. The winner will receive an advance against future royalties of $10,000. Those terms of the offer not specified in the printed text of the St. Martin's Press standard form author's agreement will be determined by St. Martin's Press at its sole discretion. The contestant may request reasonable changes in the offered terms, but St. Martin's shall not be obligated to agree to any such changes. St. Martin's may, but will not be required to, consider for publication manuscripts submitted by other contestants.
All entries must be received or postmarked no later than June 1 and must include:
a) A double-spaced and neatly typed copy of the manuscript (photocopies are acceptable), with pages numbered consecutively from beginning to end. The author’s name should appear only on the title page, and otherwise not appear anywhere on the manuscript pages.
b) A letter or cover sheet containing the name, address, email address and telephone number of the contestant and the contestant's previous writing credits, if any.
c) The application form, duly completed and an SASE. Click here to print the application form.All entries must be mailed to St. Martin's Press. For additional copies of the rules and to request an entry form, please send a stamped, self addressed envelope to:
St. Martin's Minotaur/THWC Competition
St. Martin's Minotaur
175 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10010*Each contestant must keep a copy of the manuscript for his or her own protection. St. Martin's Press will not be responsible for lost, stolen, or mislaid manuscripts. Because of the great volume of submissions we receive, the fact that judges are volunteers with full-time responsibilities elsewhere, and the fact that most writers now have the work in their computers, manuscripts will not be returned. Please do not send return postage or envelopes.
No critical evaluation or commentary will be offered by the judges or the editorial staff of St. Martin's Press unless, in the sole opinion of the editorial staff evaluation or commentary is appropriate in the case of a manuscript being considered for publication.
This Competition is void where prohibited or restricted by law.
*It is important that you submit your manuscript as early as possible. Our judges are volunteers who are extremely busy with their primary concerns, and it is inevitable that your submission will get a more careful reading if the judge does not have to contend with a flood of last-minute entries. However, it is not necessary to send it the most expensive way. We judge on-time delivery by the post-mark or equivalent, not by the date the judge receives the manuscript.
Good luck!
We're excited to announce that this current contest is being generously sponsored by Leah's Homemade Cookies. In addition to cash prizes, Leah's Homemade Cookies will be awarding one dozen gourmet cookies to the first and second place winners! The winners will select the flavor of their choice, and Leah will ship them to their doorstep. Visit Leah's website to give a gourmet gift or treat youself: www.leahshomemadecookies.com Leah's cookies are delivered fresh to doorsteps nationwide.
Current Contest Prompt:
Summer had resurrected the woods, fabulously so; as a result the house that Marley had dreamed of was nearly obscured by a riot of wild chartreuse foliage. Despite careful attention to direction, it had taken her longer than she had expected to find it. The house’s grey stone exterior blended with its ultra-natural environment. It had stood the test of time, two stories of fine craftsmanship built on the side of the mountain, accessible only by a winding dirt road. In contrast to the freely growing trees and ferns, the house’s flower beds were bastions of painstakingly organized gardening. Rosebushes climbed neat wooden trellises while daylilies, carnations and star gazer flowers were among those Marley was able to identify under the windows, where they erupted in rainbows of color that contrasted nicely with the surrounding greens, browns and greys of the forest and house. The soft crunch of tires on the seldom-traveled road signaled that Sarah was arriving as Marley knelt in front of one of the flowerbeds. Carefully, Marley reached for a particular blossom that had caught her eye and brought it closer for examination. She bit her lip in confusion, wondering if something was wrong with her eyesight. The flower was beautiful, but she couldn’t have said what color it was if her life depended on it. It was as if she was seeing a fantastic new color, something impossible…
Finish the story! (The above paragraph must be the first paragraph of your story.)
Submission Deadline: August 31, 2010$50 cash, plus one dozen of Leah's Homemade Cookies (in the flavor of your choice) shipped to your doorstep*Word Limit: 3,500
Prizes:
First Place:
Second Place: $25 cash, plus one dozen of Leah's Homemade Cookies (in the flavor of your choice) shipped to your doorstep*Winner Announced: September 15, 2010
Published on Thursday, June 24, 2010 by CommonDreams.orgJean-Jean's Survival:
What's the Worth of a Haitian Child?
Jean-Jean, six, is part of the pack of kids that races to meet me each time I arrive at one internally displaced people's camp in Port-au-Prince. Jean-Jean is usually at the front, all flashing eyes and big toothy grin, out-shouting the others or engaging in some ridiculous antic for my attention.
On one visit, Jean-Jean's mother appeared dragging by the arm a very different little boy, slow and sad. Jean-Jean feebly raised his eyes to me; the whites were just one shade this side of mustard-yellow. Hepatitis.
"How long has he been like this?" I asked, trying to mask my panic.
"Five days."
"And what have you given him?"
"Nothing. I know he's supposed to be drinking a lot of water, but we don't have any money just now." Of course, that also meant no medication and little food - or perhaps, on some days, no food. Many of the people in these camps can go days without a single small coin touching their palm. Some have asked me if it's true that Haiti has received billions of dollars in aid.
"Have you taken him to the doctor?"
I knew the answer before I asked. There are a few free clinics around town, but even then the tests and medicines usually cost money, and there is bus fare to be paid. "No, but I will," she said. I bought a shopping bag full of small water sacks, two for a quarter; asked Jean-Jean's neighbor, my friend, to keep an eye on him; finished my business at the camp; and moved on with the day.
Three days later, I returned. Jean-Jean had still not gone to the doctor. An all-too-familiar look on the mother's face - some combination of shame and desperation - let me know that that had not been an option for her. This time we worked together and devised a way to get medical care.
This story has a happy ending. Jean-Jean is now well and back to being a heart-stealing mischief-maker.
But I've known it to go the other way, many times over. At one point, decades before the earthquake when I was living in a Haitian village, an unofficial part of my job description was to transport to the hospital babies and little children who were sick or dying, effectively, from poverty. Another part of my de facto duties was to collect from the morgue the bodies of some of those same small patients.
Late one night, someone knocked on my door. It was a woman I didn't know, clutching a baby to her chest. The child's wizened face, loose skin, distended stomach, and thin hair made it clear that she was in the final stages of dehydration and starvation.
Not having a car to drive her to the Leogane hospital forty minutes away, I instead wrote a note to the staff. By virtue of my knowing many of them through repeated visits there with children such as this, and of my U.S. citizenry and white skin, this note was all but guaranteed to give the infant quick access to health care.
The next morning, a neighbor came to tell me the baby had died. "Died?" Her admission was good to go and the treatment was free. "Didn't they connect her to an IV?"
"No," the neighbor said. "The mother didn't go to the hospital. She couldn't come up with the gourde" - at that time, twenty cents - "to take the bus there."
An estimated 62 Haitian children out of each 1,000 die in the first year of life, and 85 of those 1,000 never made it to age 5.1 A Haitian child under 5 dies every hour from hunger, according to the World Food Programme,2 while chronic undernutrition of children under 5 is 24%.3
The U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Jean Ziegler, says that there exists enough food worldwide to feed 12 billion people, almost double the number of the global population. Yet hunger is growing. And according to Ziegler, none of its causes are natural; they are all human-made. "Every child who dies from hunger is assassinated," Ziegler commented.4
Similarly, the World Health Organization's Commission on the Social Determinants of Health credits the "grand scale" of death from illness and disease to "social injustice." The Commission attributes the fact that the majority of the world's inhabitants do not have the good health that is biologically possible to "a toxic combination of bad policies, economics, and politics."5
If the government or more rich citizens of Haiti and other low-income countries, or the governments of wealthy countries, or the World Bank and IMF, valued the fate of poor children over profits and were willing to better share wealth and other resources, a lot more babies and children like that starving one who showed up at my door would be alive today. (See Paul Farmer's excellent The Uses of Haiti for more on the role of the U.S. and other powers in getting Haiti to its current state.) More would be alive, too, if the international financial institutions and World Trade Organization did not strong-arm low-income counties into accepting policies that promote so-called free trade at any cost. The costs have been borne by an unknowable number of children.
The roots of profound suffering on the western portion of the island of Hispañola go back to 1492, when the Spanish colonists who arrived with Columbus enslaved the Arawaks and Caribs, and worked almost all to death, literally, within 27 years.6 This led the Spanish to replenish their labor force with captive Africans, which the French later imported at much higher numbers.7
After the 1804 revolution, large Haitian landowners replaced the French landowners and the slaves became serfs. Neglect and exploitation by landowners and other wealthy classes were backed by successive regimes, whose raison d'être was to serve that small elite while keeping profits flowing to government officials. Violent security forces helped accomplish the job.
Social abandonment and economic exploitation by the Haitian government and elite have been mirrored in foreign policies. Their roots go back to Haiti's beginning as a free nation, too, when the U.S. imposed a trade embargo so that word of the successful slave emancipation didn't spread. Moreover, France kept Haiti in debt until it paid off the former colonist for lost income due to the revolution.
Post-earthquake politics offer new twists on the same theme. The IMF, for example, is apparently still considering whether it will convert a $100 million post-earthquake loan to a grant. (Surely the IMF doesn't expect to ever collect this debt, but its creditor status gives it a lot of power over Haiti's economy.) As another example, the disaster food aid which the U.S. procures from domestic agribusiness has further crippled local agriculture and the national economy. The U.S. and U.N.'s plan for reconstruction is based on a sweatshop model, a ‘race to the bottom' in which the lowest wages, the fewest health and safety standards, and the worst possibilities for unionizing are considered advantages for the industry.
All of these historic and global forces converge to affect whether a child like Jean-Jean survives.
But alternatives do exist. As the U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food and the World Health Organization indicate, the suffering with which Haiti and other low-income nations are branded is not inevitable. It is the result of economic and political choices by a few. But other choices can be made that will yield different outcomes. Progressive Haitian social movements - the grouping of women's, youth, student, farmer, street vendors, and many other sectors - are advocating those other choices. They are urging the Haitian government and international community to adopt policies and programs which can produce a more just and equitable future. They are demanding that all citizens, not just a few wealthy ones, be active participants in the process. (For more about alternative redevelopment options in Haiti, see other articles in this series, including: Post-Disaster Reconstruction: Putting Haitian Citizens into the Equation; A Future for Agriculture, A Future for Haiti; Haiti: "Post-Disaster Needs Assessment" - Whose Needs? Whose Assessment?; and Raising Up Another Haiti.)
I have thought about the baby girl that died that fateful night in the village hundreds of times throughout my life. She is an indicator of the failure of our global society.
I have also wondered about the woman she might have become. I have always imagined that she would be fighting to create a new world in which no one dies for lack of twenty cents. Today, I like to think, she would be out there working hard to ensure that the Haiti that is reconstructed doesn't look anything like Haiti before the earthquake. She'd be making sure that the rebuilt Haiti is based on equity, rights, and democratic participation in a world in which all, not just a few, stand a chance.
1 Figures are estimates for 2005-2010 from "World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision," United Nations Population Division. data.un.org/Data.aspx?q=haiti&d=PopDiv&f=variableID%3a80%3bcrID%3a332.
2Guy Gauvreau, "Feeding Haiti's Future," World Food Programme News, April 13, 2005. www.wfp.org/stories/feeding-haitis-future
3 United Nations World Food Programme, www.wfp.org/countries/haiti
4 United Nations Department of Public Information, "Press Conference by United Nations Special Rapporteur on Right to Food," October 26, 2007. http://www.un.org/News/briefings/docs/2007/071026_Ziegler.doc.htm.
5 World Health Organization, "Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health," Geneva, August 20, 2008.
6 Brutal labor practices and the spread of European diseases killed off roughly 900,000 of the million indigenous people in 27 years of colonization. "Histoire des caciques d'Haïti," (Editions Panorama, Port-au-Prince, 1894), quoted in Carolyn Fick, The Making of Hatii: The Saint Domingue Revolution from Below (Knoxville, University of Tennessee Press, 1990), p. 288.
7 The French introduced the highly labor-intensive sugar cane to the French West Indies. This led the colonists to increase the number of Africans they brought into the region each year to roughly 37,000. Fick, Op. Cit., p. 22.
“We Are Not Post-racial:”
An Interview with Toi Derricotte
By Elizabeth Hoover
In 1996 poets Toi Derricotte and Cornelius Eady founded Cave Canem as a retreat for black poets. Since then, the organization has grown in size and reputation. It is now a renowned and influential institution with an annual writing retreat at the University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg, two book prizes with well-known presses, and a national reading series.
On June 24, City of Asylum/Pittsburgh will partner with Cave Canem and host a reading with Colleen J. McElroy, Carl Phillips, Claudia Rankine, and Sapphire. Click here to reserve your seat.
Toi Derricotte joined Sampsonia Way editor Elizabeth Hoover to talk about the history of Cave Canem and how it supports free expression for African-American writers.
Why did you and Eady think that an organization for black poets was necessary?
Because we both had been in so many situations where we were the only black poets—in workshops, in graduate school, and in the places we taught. It was fortunate we were both at the Community of Writers at Squaw Valley workshop together. I got to know Cornelius and his wife Sarah very well there. I had been asked to bring students with me—as frequently happens when people want more black writers at a conferences—and they had a hard time. They felt like their work was exoticized and that there were certain expectations that made them uncomfortable.
When I first started out as a poet, I was afraid of going to an artist colony because I was always the only person of color. The first time I went to one was in 1984. The day I arrived another black poet left. My whole time there, I was praying that another black poet wouldn’t come on the day I left—and they did. That’s the way people integrated then: one person at a time. It was degrading and not very compassionate.
Cave Canem gives poets a chance to talk about these types of experiences and form their own community. This way they know they are not alone and they are much more comfortable even in situations where they are the only person of color.
I had wanted to start something for African-American poets of color since the early 1980s, but I couldn’t get funding. Then Cornelius, Sarah, and I decided to just do it out of our pockets because if we waited for funding we would be waiting forever.
It sounds like poets of color always face a pressure to write “black.”
Yes, and face that dreaded question: Are you a poet or are you a black poet? That question creates a terrible division in the soul. That’s the great thing about Cave Canem: You have permission to write whatever you want to write and then we will critique it as art.
The inspiration for the name Cave Canem came from a mosaic of a guard dog in the House of the Tragic Poet in Pompeii, Italy. It’s Latin for “beware of the dog.” What has that name come to mean for you?
For me it has a lot to do with safety and being protected. Our organization has credibility and it gives individuals a kind of armor, or something that says you are a poet, you don’t have to prove it. You don’t have to prove that black people can write poetry. That’s already done. I think it gives people a good kind of visibility rather than invisibility or a bad kind of visibility.
Derricotte reads at Cave Canem. Photo by Alison Meyers.
Cave Canem has really grown since you started it. You have a national fellowship of nearly 300 poets and programs all over the country. Were you expecting it to take off like this?
I can’t believe it. The first year we had 25 fellows and the faculty was me, Cornelius, Elizabeth Alexander, and Afaa Michael Weaver. The first night when everyone sat in a circle and started breaking down about how they had never felt safe and never studied with an African-American poet, you could see something had really happened. But we had no idea how far we’d come from sitting around Cornelius and Sarah’s coffee table to having these fabulous offices in DUMBO, Brooklyn, overlooking the Manhattan Bridge.
Since the election of President Barak Obama there has been a lot of talk that we are in a “post-racial age.” Why do you think Cave Canem is still relevant?
Because we are not post-racial. This year at the Associated Writers Program’s conference almost no white people came to the Cave Canem panel. Things have changed in the sense that a lot of poets of color have been published and are teaching at great schools, but you can’t say that American literature represents in an integrated way the diverse voices of the American people. There are still these separations that have to do with class and money and power and race and all those things.
Does Cave Canem implicitly support that segregation by being exclusive to black writers?
Look, the integration plan just hasn’t worked. In fact, this has worked better. There is more integration of black writers than before and that has to do with the visibility of Cave Canem. We have high quality writers because the program is so competitive. We get 150 applicants for 20 spots. People can’t buy their way in because we don’t charge tuition.
It also has to do with the way Cave Canem empowers its writers. Writers don’t grow in solitude. They get their confidence and they study their subjects in dialogue with other writers. If black writers are being forced into narrow categories then that dialogue is cut off. When you have brilliant people discussing literature or just the issues of being alive today, it’s very inspiring and it encourages you to keep writing.
Cave Canem is partnering with City of Asylum/Pittsburgh for a reading on June 24. How do you see this partnership?
I think it is wonderful. We share a lot of our commitments. I am on COA/P’s board and Henry Reese, director of COA/P, is on our board. The strengths we each bring as individuals and as organizations works very well. I am interested in seeing Cave Canem becoming more invested in Pittsburgh and have more events here. I want us to have a real bedrock here. And it’s happening!
Read Elizabeth’s bio.
Inconsistent statements and the justice system: Mehserle, Domenici, Pirone, Grant
June 24, 2010by Chela Simone
Never before has a police officer been charged with murder for actions taken while on duty. Johannes Mehserle fled to Nevada after being brought up on charges for the murder of Oscar Grant in Oakland on Jan. 1, 2009. Mehserle claims that he was receiving death threats and was in fear for his life and the DA was aware of his location. His bail was set for $3 million, which implies a flight risk.
The defense is taking the position that Oscar was a threat and noncompliant and that Mehserle thought he was tasing him but shot him by mistake. The trial is expected to wrap up soon.
The prosecution team rushed the jury selection, cutting it a day short, thus forfeiting a pool of 50 potential jury members. The jury consists of seven whites, four Latinos and one East Indian. The argument for this is that Los Angeles County is 74.1 percent white.
The videos that have been circulating in the press are the same videos that are being presented in court. However, the images and audio have been enhanced.
In one video the suspects are up against the wall. You can clearly see Oscar on the phone – we find out later he’s talking with his girlfriend – saying that he and his friends were being beaten for no reason. At that point Oscar took a picture of Mehserle pointing his taser at Oscar Grant.
Enter Tony Pirone. He points at Oscar, singling him out as the one taking pictures. Pirone walks over to him and begins to assault him. The attorney for Tony Pirone, the first officer on the scene, attempted to exclude the racially charged Pirone statement: “Bitch ass nigga! Bitch ass nigga, huh?” But the judge said it will be admitted.A youth artist at the Chuco Justice Center in LA has added color to a grim situation. As in Oakland, youth in LA are grasping the significance of the trial to their hopes for freedom from police harassment, terrorism and occupation of their neighborhoods. – Photo: Chela Simone
After kneeing Ocsar Grant in the face and slamming him on the ground Pirone slams his knee into Oscar’s head. Mehserle positions himself over the lower half of Oscar.
Oscar is lying over the legs of his friend, Carlos Reyes. You can see Carlos motion to the officers, “He is on my legs.” At that point they pull Oscar off of Reyes’ legs.
Anger and emotion take over and “pop”!
On Wednesday, June 16, Officer Marysol Domenici testified in the courtroom that she was afraid she might have to kill somebody after she heard that “pop” noise that “sounded like a firecracker.” And then she realized that Mehserle had shot Grant.
She said after that it became more chaotic.
“I said to myself, ‘Oh, Jesus Christ! Jesus Christ! If I have to, I’m going to have to kill somebody,” Domenici said. “That’s when I started thinking, ‘If I have to go to lethal force, I will go to lethal force.’ … They were coming everywhere. It was so chaotic.”
Unfortunately for Officer Domenici, none of the video supports her claim that “they coming from everywhere.”
She claimed that there were 40-50 people on the platform that she had to veer left to get through. The video did not support her claim.
She claimed she had to push Oscar Grant and one of the other detained men backward because he was advancing and that Oscar Grant grabbed her arm. She testified that she had no memory of Oscar Grant grabbing her arm but she was made aware of it by her attorney. In three initial interviews, she never mentioned any such thing. Not only did the video NOT show Oscar Grant grabbing her arm but it showed Oscar Grant holding his friend back in an obvious attempt to keep the peace.Oscar Grant joins the shrine of fallen soldiers at the Chuco Justice Center along with Jeremy Burrell, another victim of senseless violence. The LA Coalition for Justice for Oscar Grant meets at the Chuco Center. – Photo: Chela Simone
The mood in the courtroom was restless as she struggled with her answers.
Domenici was quoted at a preliminary hearing in Oakland as saying that Grant would have lived if he had obeyed the police officers. “If they would have followed orders, this wouldn’t have happened,” Domenici said, adding, “If he had just sat down, he’d have been fine.”
She also testified to the allegation that BART Officer Tony Pirone “appears on the video to punch Grant.” Domenici claims she saw Pirone’s hand go up, but she did not see Pirone hit Oscar.
She claimed that the group of young men were cussing at her and saying, “Yeah, blood cuz.” This is an obvious attempt to lead the gang stricken LA jury to believe that Oscar Grant and his friend were gang members.
But I offer a question for those of you that know: When have you ever heard a gang affiliate use both of those terms in one sentence? I will also offer this information as a member of the Oakland community: It is rare to meet an African American male in Oakland who is a Crip or Blood. The methods in the streets here are more financially motivated than territorial or affiliation related.
Domenici had no consistent memory of anything that led up to the shooting incident and was visibly nervous when she was faced with previous testimony. She had been placed on active leave and reassigned as a tactical training officer for BART after the fatal shooting of Oscar Grant.These posters set the theme in a classroom at the Chuco Justice Center in LA. People are asking what will happen – in LA as well as Oakland – if Mehserle is acquitted or convicted of involuntary manslaughter and given a two-year sentence. – Photo: Chela Simone
On Friday, Tony Pirone testified that he left a suspect in his patrol car while answering the dispatch call at the Fruitvale BART. He asked a train station operator to “make sure he stayed alive.”
When ask why he didn’t have his partner Domenici watch the suspect, he replied she was busy with someone else.
In earlier testimony Domenici said she was dealing with a woman that was drunk but she was no “real threat.”
He was then asked if that was standard procedure to have a train station operator watch a suspect. He replied, “No.”
He was asked if he had ever seen any transcripts from previous testimony. He said, “Some.”
Pirone was asked where he had seen these transcripts and whether he had any at his home. He said he didn’t know.
When faced with previous testimony, where he admits to having transcripts at his home, he recalled that he did have some transcripts in his home.
He also testified to the description of the suspects in the initial call, which was played in the court: a large group of Black men all wearing all black, no weapons. Oscar Grant was actually wearing a black T-shirt and blue jeans.
Testimony earlier in the trial from witnesses said Tony Pirone was aggressive and hostile toward Grant and his friends. Pirone also has been let go from BART and has joined the military. Domenici is appealing her termination, which means she is still receiving pay.
The Mehserle trial resumes every morning at 8 a.m. at Los Angeles Superior Court, 210 W. Temple at Broadway. There are 12 seats available to the public via lottery. Arrive 30 minutes early for seating.
Chela Simone, born and raised in Oakland, child of revolutionary thought, a musical misfit and a solider for social justice, can be reached at chelac@gmail.com. Listen to her music at www.myspace.com/ChelaSimone.
Related Posts
Oliver Stone: The US Has Launched Military Interventions and Political Coups Fifty-Five Times in Latin America
June 26, 2010 |
Critically-acclaimed Hollywood Director Oliver Stone dropped by our studio for a Brave New Conversation, where I spoke with him about his latest documentary South of the Border, scheduled to be released in more than 30 countries this month. South of the Border begins by exploring the role that the corporate-owned mainstream media in the U.S. and Venezuela have played in shaping American's perspectives on South America, beginning with clips of the attempted coup on Venezuela's Hugo Chavez. In the Brave New Conversation, Stone describes the South American press:
The press [in South America] is totally owned privately, and most of that press, unlike most Americans realize, is anti-reform. Anybody who comes along and wants to change anything is castigated in the press. Chavez is one example: They kill him every day. The press is vibrant, it's oppositional, calls for his resignation, calls him a madman, and sometimes calls for an overthrow of the government. This is going on everyday and in America they say there's censorship. We're crazy; if we had a press like that, it'd be Fox News on steroids.
http://www.facebook.com/v/404947097830> " />http://www.facebook.com/v/404947097830%3E%20" allowfullscreen="true" type="application/futuresplash" allowscriptaccess="always" height="224" width="400">
South of the Border offers a unique perspective on Latin America, one of a quiet revolution taking place where democratically-elected presidents have braved the strong arm of the US and its policies throughout the region by daring to oppose money for the War on Drugs and structural adjustment policies of the International Monetary Fund, making history with their efforts. Oliver Stone interviews Brazil's Lula da Silva, Argentina's Cristina Kirchner and her husband, ex-President Nestor Kirchner, Ecuador's Rafael Correa, Fernando Lugo of Paraguay, Evo Morales of Bolivia, Castro of Cuba, and Hugo Chavez of Venezuela: Leaders who are committed and unified in strengthening their countries' economic engine without the interference from the US.To give you a glimpse of what the US has done in Latin America, Stone explains the following:
The only two allies we have left are Peru and Colombia -- both bad guys, because we've given Colombia 6 billion dollars to fight this so-called drug war. The paramilitaries in Colombia have killed close to maybe 30 thousand -- we don't even know -- maybe 120,000, maybe even 200,000 people have vanished in Colombia over the last 20 years. It's a horrible war.South of the Border was an eye-opening experience, and I hope people will see it. I thought I was well-informed about South America before the film, but I came away with a whole new perspective. This is what is so wonderful about films that make a difference: you go in with one set of eyes and perceptions and come out thinking and feeling entirely different.
Robert Greenwald is the director/producer of "Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism," as well as many other films. He is a board member of the Independent Media Institute, AlterNet's parent organization.
James Mackenzie · 1 day ago
Ad Hominem · 14 hours ago
Chela Simone · 14 hours ago
Thank you for your critique. please feel free to join us IN the court room IN LA so you can voice your opinion of the real world.
We need more people that are willing to write, and speak up for the community, against the injustice in the court systems.
The idea that my voice is irrelevant because it doesn't meet your criteria of journalism is exactly what this is all about for me.
I am HERE..
Where are you?
At your desk? telling me what is or is not going to work...
In what real world.
The REAL world
the one that convicts the guilty... and frees the innocent?
AP press? ABC/NBC?
or the one on Mtv.. or the one where an innocent man gets shot in the back on a BART platform in Oakland... yes this article is trying to make a point...
I am far from a journalist, just a human from Oakland that cares.
Take it seriously or don't take it seriously... that would be your choice or not ...
just know, I drove from my home in Oakland to LA to support the family of the victim, I sat in the court room every day with out the security of a paycheck.
I am not following any rules... I am just writing.
I have organized on the families behalf and wrote what I witnessed.
Please do better than I can do... we need that.
One Love.- Chela Simone
Mike Chase · 1 day ago
Trife · 14 hours ago
@James Mackenzie Why do you feel it necessary to attack the writer by pissing on the writing style?
Writing of fifth grader that attended the trail, full of miss spelling and Bad grammar > would still be a valid point of view! Granted James Mackenzie might not like to read it... It's still a valuable point of view.