PUB: call for proposals—Mosaic Literary Conference 2010

Mosaic Literary Conference 2010

Type:
Start Time:
Friday, November 5, 2010 at 12:30pm
End Time:
Saturday, November 6, 2010 at 3:30pm

Description

The Mosaic Literary Conference presents creative ways for keeping books and reading valuable sources of knowledge and creativity. This day of professional-development workshops will help educators incorporate literature into existing curricula to further explore course work that focuses on cultures, history, and social studies.

This year we celebrate the 85th anniversary of the birth of Malcolm X and the 45 anniversary of the publishing of The Autobiography of Malcolm X.

Request For Proposals
The Mosaic Literary Conference provides a platform for literature-based creative thinking and knowledge sharing. Each year we invite educators, arts & community organizations, and parents to participate. MLC is presented by The Literary Freedom Project, a 501(c)3 tax-exempt not-for-profit arts organization that supports the literary arts through education, creative thinking, and new media.

MLC invites proposals for workshops focused on the literary arts, literacy, and reading comprehension, and how educators and parents can incorporate these subjects to increase the adoption of reading as a tool for understanding of culture, history, and social studies.

Coinciding with the 85th anniversary of his birth and 45th anniversary of the publishing of The Autobiography of Malcolm X, our secondary focus is on the life of Malcolm X. Submissions focused on teaching his autobiography, life, and legacy are encouraged (but will not be given preference).

Download RFP: http://mosaicmagazine.org/mlcrfp2010.pdf

Info & Registration: http://mosaicmagazine.org/literary-conference.html
twitter: https://twitter.com/mosaiclitcon

 

PUB: Bellday Books Poetry Contest

BELLDAY POETRY PRIZE
 

$2,000 PRIZE

TO WINNING POET

Submission Deadline: March 15, 2010

CONTEST FINAL JUDGE: Lucia Perillio
Lucia Perillo has published five books of poetry, including Dangerous Life (1989), The Body Mutinies (1996), The Oldest Map with the Name America (1999), Luck is Luck (2005) and Inseminating the Elephant (2009). She has also published one book of essays, I’ve Heard the Vultures Singing (2005). She has taught at four universities and was awarded a MacArthur Foundation fellowship.

Bellday Books will publish the winning book and award $2,000 and 25 copies of the book to the winning author.

Contest Rules:

 

  • Submit a manuscript of 60-90 pages of original poetry in any style in English. The manuscript must not have been published in book or chapbook, but may contain poems that have appeared in print or on the Internet. Entries may consist of individual poems, a book-length poem or any combination of long or short poems.

     

  • Submitted manuscript must contain 2 title pages: Name and contact information should appear on first title page only. Name should not appear anywhere else in the manuscript. Include a table of contents page, but do not send an acknowledgements page.

     

  • Manuscript must be typed single-spaced, paginated and bound with a spring clip.
 
  • Enclose an SASE for announcement of the winner. Manuscript cannot be returned.

     

  • Postmark deadline: March 15, 2010.

     

  • Include a check or money order for $25 reading fee, payable to BELLDAY BOOKS.

     

  • Bellday Books reserves the right not to select an award winner, in which case all reading fees will be refunded.

CONTEST MAILING ADDRESS:
Bellday Books, Inc.
P.O. Box 3687
Pittsburgh, PA 15230

Questions may be directed to:
office@belldaybooks.com

 

Frequently Asked Questions:

  1. Does the poet retain full rights?
    The poet retains full rights, but there must be an acknowledgement or citation of the book at each subsequent printing or printed use.

     

  2. Will Bellday publish submitted poetry in any instance but the winner?
    Bellday may (or may not) approach poets who submitted other manuscripts and negotiate for publication of their manuscripts.

     

  3. What will be done with rejected manuscripts?
    Manuscript paper will be recycled, as with virtually all other competitions.

     

  4. Would you consider a manuscript co-authored by two poets?
    We will accept a manuscript in which two poets wrote the poems together. If it's merely two poets putting a book out together, the manuscript is not eligible for the award.

     

  5. Is it okay if some of the poems were already published in a chapbook?
    As long as they are not the only poems in the book. The book can not just be a reprint of a chapbook.
 
  1. Is the contest only open to U.S. citizens?
    The only stipulation is that the poetry be in English. Anyone can enter.
  2. Who are the prescreening judges?
    There will be 5-8 preliminary screeners from around the country, all of whom are writers, students or otherwise involved with literature.

     

  3. Is it a one-time or ongoing award?
    It is an annual award.

     

  4. What kind of poetry do you want?
    Good poetry of any style on any subject will be considered. Lucia Perillo will make the final selection.

     

  5. Are you posting an announcement anywhere?
    We are posting announcements in the January-February issues of both Poets & Writers and American Poetry Review.

     

  6. When do you plan to announce winners?
    We hope to announce the winner by July 14, 2010.

 

PUB: Field Poetry Contest - Oberlin College Press

2010 FIELD POETRY PRIZE

The editors of FIELD are pleased to announce the fourteenth annual FIELD Poetry Prize competition. The contest is open to all poets, whether or not they have previously published a book. Unpublished poetry manuscripts between 50 and 80 pages in length will be considered. All manuscripts will be read by the editors of the Press, David Young and David Walker. Oberlin College Press publishes the winning manuscript in the FIELD Poetry Series and awards the winning author one thousand dollars ($1,000).

Manuscripts must be postmarked during May 2010. The contest reading fee is $25 and includes one year’s subscription to FIELD. Please make checks payable to Oberlin College Press.

Manuscripts will not be returned. Include a self-addressed, stamped postcard if you wish to be notified that your manuscript has been received at our office.

We will announce the winner here in August 2010.

Send manuscript and reading fee to:

FIELD Poetry Prize
Oberlin College Press
50 North Professor Street
Oberlin, OH 44074

Please note: Persons interested in submitting work for the FIELD Translation Series should read the guidelines.

Council of Literary Magazines and Presses

Contest Code of Ethics

CLMP's community of independent literary publishers believes that ethical contests serve our shared goal: to connect writers and readers by publishing exceptional writing. We believe that intent to act ethically, clarity of guidelines, and transparency of process form the foundation of an ethical contest. To that end, we agree to
1) conduct our contests as ethically as possible and to address any unethical behavior on the part of our readers, judges, or editors;
2) to provide clear and specific contest guidelines—defining conflict of interest for all parties involved; and
3) to make the mechanics of our selection process available to the public. This Code recognizes that different contest models produce different results, but that each model can be run ethically.
We have adopted this Code to reinforce our integrity and dedication as a publishing community and to ensure that our contests contribute to a vibrant literary heritage.

Oberlin College Press supports the CLMP code, and in an effort to make our contest selection process as ethical as possible, close friends, relatives, and those whose manuscripts have been shaped in any way by the contest judges are ineligible to enter our contest.

PUB: Lois Cranston Memorial Poetry Contest - Calyx Publishing Journal and Books

2010 Lois Cranston Memorial Poetry Prize

 

Contest Guidelines

Final Judge: Frances P. Adler

Submission dates: March 1, 2010-May 31, 2010(postmarked)

Prize: Winner will receive $300 cash award and publication in CALYX Journal (Vol. 24:2, Winter 2011). The winner and all finalists will receive a one-volume subscription, and all their poems will be published on CALYX’s website (www.calyxpress.org).

Details: Each entry can include up to three (3) unpublished poems, no more than six (6) manuscript pages total. Do not put your name on the same page as a poem; all entries are read blind. Include a separate cover letter with name, address, phone, email, and titles of poem/s. No manuscripts will be returned. Please send unpublished work and please do not send simultaneous submissions. The Journal Editorial Collective reads manuscripts first, then selects 15-20 to send to the final judge. Judge’s decisions are final.

Reading Fee: $15 per entry, all checks in U.S. currency on a U.S. bank, checks payable to CALYX.

Notification: Contest winner and finalists will be notified by October 30, 2010, and announced on CALYX’s website, www.calyxpress.org. All entrants will receive prize results, and U.S. entrants will receive an issue of CALYX Journal in October 2010.

Final Judge: Frances P. Adler is the author of five books: two poetry collections, Making of a Matriot (Red Hen Press, 2003), and Raising The Tents (Calyx Books, 1993), and three collaborative poetry-photography books. She is also the co-editor of Fire and Ink: An Anthology of Social Action Writing (University of Arizona Press, Fall 2009). Adler's poems and prose are published in Poetry International, CALYX Journal , Counterpunch, Bridges, Ms. Magazine, The Progressive, and The Congressional Record, among others. Her awards include a California State Senate Award for Artistic and Social Collaboration, an NEA Regional Award, and the Obama New Millennium Award. Adler is a professor of creative writing at California State University Monterey Bay, and founder of their Creative Writing and Social Action Program.

Send submission to:                     

CALYX, INC.

Lois Cranston Poetry Prize

PO Box B

Corvallis, OR 97339

VIDEO: Just Wright Starring Common & Queen Latifah (Movie Trailer) | from SoulCulture.co.uk

Just Wright Starring Common & Queen Latifah (Movie Trailer)

March 10, 2010 by Verse  
Filed under Film

 

Common & Queen Latifah take the lead roles in the Romantic Comedy “Just Wright”, The movie is about a sports trainer (Latifah) who falls in love with a pro basketball player (Common) after injury nearly ends his career.

Directed by Sanaa Hamri and starring Queen Latifah, Common, Paula Patton, Phylicia Rashad, Pam Grier, James Pickens Jr, Mehcad Brooks, Michael Landes, Dwyane Wade, Dwight Howard, Rashard Lewis, Bobby Simmons.
“Just Wright” is released on May 14, 2010.

 

 

INTERVIEW: African Writing Online; Issue No. 9; The Sarah Manyika Interview, with Ovo

 
 
       
  Sarah Manyika
 

Sarah Ladipo Manyika

Manyika lived in Kenya, England and France. She spent her undergraduate years in the Universities of Birmingham and Bordeaux and did her doctorate at UC Berkeley. She currently lives in San Francisco where she lectures in English literature at San Francisco State University. She has published essays, academic papers, book reviews and short stories. She was married in Harare, Zimbabwe in 1994 and now divides her time between San Francisco (where she teaches literature at San Francisco State University), London and Harare. Sarah's novel, In Dependence, was published by Legend Press in 2008 and was chosen by the UK's largest bookstore chain as its featured book for Black History Month. In 2009, In Dependence, was published by Cassava Republic, a literary press based in Abuja, Nigeria.

 
     
 
 
                 
   The Sarah Ladipo Manyika Interview
       
             
   
Ovo Adagha
 
 
Ovo Adagha
is a Nigerian writer. His short stories, poems and non-fiction works have been published in several online and print journals. He recently co-edited a multi-ethnic anthology of short stories, One World, published in 2009. He lives in London.
 
 

 
We are in fact never really “free” and “independent”

In Dependence is a story of individuals struggling to find their place within uncertain political times – a story of idealism, courage and betrayal, and the universal desire to love and be loved. In this conversation with London-based Nigerian writer, Ovo Adagha, Sarah speaks about hope, love and other compelling motifs behind her book. She provides an instructive insight into the period of colonialism to the heady days of independence and what has followed till date
 
I thought we might begin by comparing the critical reviews of your novel In Dependence. There are varying accounts of its texture: some describe it as a complex love story; others wager on its synthetic explorations of interracial and intercultural relationships; while some relate it with an underlying and implied tendency to history, albeit with some political extensity in tow.  How would you describe the peculiar motivations that derived it? And was it based on a biographic foundation?

SLM: I am very grateful for the attention the novel has received thus far, and intrigued to see what aspects of the novel readers find themselves drawn to.  My intention was to write a story of unfulfilled love fraught with the weight of history, race and geography and intertwined with questions of belonging, aging, religious faith and family secrets. I also hoped that the novel might speak to the complexities of contemporary Africa, its Diaspora and its interdependence with the rest of the world.  I was drawn to write about all of the above simply because these happened to be themes and ideas that I was thinking about at the time of writing the story.  In Dependence has an autobiographical base only to the extent that I am familiar with the places that I describe.  The characters and the story are made up, although, of course there will inevitably be autobiographical elements in characters that are often an amalgam of people that I have known. And I am sure that little bits of “me” have, from time to time, crept into some of my characters “independent” of any authorial intent.

: How long did it take to write? And would you say your 'intentions' were accomplished?

SLM: It took me several years to write this novel.  At the time that I began to write the novel I was looking for a really good love story set in geographical locations and historical periods that I was particularly interested in (namely West Africa from the 1960s to present day) and because I did not find that story, I ended up writing the story that I wanted to read.  And so in that sense I accomplished what I intended.  I wrote a novel and was lucky enough to find a publisher that wanted to publish it. However, there is still a part of me that wishes that some other writer, a better writer than me, might have written this story which is not to say that what I have done is not good, but only to underline how important and exciting I think this particular era was and the potential therein for many more great stories. All one has to do is look at the real life examples of Barack Obama’s parents or that of Botswana’s Seretse Khama and his wife, Ruth Williams, to realize how important such stories are.  Living in the so-called West, I often hear writers say that there are no new stories to be written, that everything has already been written about.  But when it comes to Africa’s stories and the stories of Africans in the Diaspora I believe that we are only at the beginning.  Oh – and one more thing on intentions … when I wrote this novel I gave it a sound track and envisaged it as a film.  For the lead character I had Chiwetel Ejiofor in mind, but alas, this intention has yet to be realized.

: We will return to your plans for Mr. Chiwetel as I am sure he would be honoured.  But a few things about the early decisions you made or where trying to make stoke my curiosity: Why a love story?  I see in the end the story you wrote crossed several borders but why the peculiar reference to West Africa and the timeline from 1960?

SLM: Why a love story?  Well, what could be better than a really good love story?  And as I alluded to in the previous question, it seems to me that there is a dearth of love stories written about contemporary Africans or Africans in the Diaspora.  It is not hard to find stories of war and civil strife, of tyranny, and of corruption, but where are all the grand amours, the tales of love and heartache?  We all fall in love, don’t we?  I believe it was Toni Morrison who once said that if there is a book that you want to read but cannot find, then you must write it yourself.  So this is what I did.  And yes, you’re right that the novel crosses several geographical borders, winding its way between Nigeria, England, France, Senegal, and the US, but West Africa is particularly important because the book begins in Nigeria.  Nigeria is the country that formed me and inspired the writing of this novel and so in a sense the novel is a love story to Nigeria.  As for the 1960s, these years have always struck me as an exciting period for much of the world.  This was the time of independence movements across Africa, the Civil Rights movement in the US, and various countercultural movements across Europe.  Artists ranging from Bob Dylan to Fela Kuti and the Beatles were amongst many to herald this change.  And in a way there is an interesting symmetry between this period and the present day in which Barack Obama, a product of this earlier generation, has once again championed change.  I would hope that my book evokes some of the excitement of this earlier period and perhaps leaves the reader with continued hope for today.

: As I read In Dependence, I find that there are significant issues of imperial literary history, Pan-Africanism, racism and colonialist discourse buried in the narrative. Even your characters – especially in the early stages of the book – are mired in heated discussions on these and other precocious issues. I found these discussions fascinating and in some ways I am reminded of the insurrectionary elements in Soyinka’s The Interpreters and Clark’s America, Their America. Were you perhaps striving to stimulate your readers to a higher level of awareness or is this an insightful style of delivery you are naturally drawn to?

SLM: Imperialism, Pan - Africanism, racism and colonialism are all raised in the novel because these were issues that my characters would have been discussing at the time and issues that touched them personally to one degree or another.  Soyinka and J.P. Clark emerged as significant authors in the 1960s and this too is why a reader should not be surprised to find references to their works by one or more characters in the novel.  I am particularly intrigued though, by your use of the word “precocious” to the extent that it’s one of the adjectives that I might use to describe Vanessa, the main female character in this novel.  I find myself increasingly drawn to women characters that do not conform to what society expects.  “Insurrectionary,” perhaps?

: And there is also the politics of the complex Nigerian state.  Your portrayal of the decadence and the manner in which it affected your main characters was done in deft snatches – almost laconically. Yet there still emerged a sense of disappointment. 

SLM: The other day, while reorganizing my bookshelf, I was struck by book titles.  More specifically, I was struck by the collection of novels that I teach to undergraduates, and I’m sure I heard the books whispering to each other as they sat there, quietly, on the shelves.  The books were: Things Fall Apart, The Beautiful Ones Are Not Yet Born, Nervous Conditions, Ways of Dying, No Longer at Ease, Waiting for an Angel, Corruption, and Every Day is for the Thief.  Now what struck me, and perhaps what also strikes you, is the sentiment carried in each of these titles – the undeniable element of despair, and yes, disappointment, conveyed merely by title.  These titles would seem to reflect the mood of our continent and the complex, lived realities that have caused many to leave.  Out of the exodus arise books with such titles as: A Life Elsewhere and Home and Exile.  But there are also book titles hinting at hope, levity, and arguably, at first glance at least, nothing to do with despair of the societal sort.  Take, for example, Everything Good Will Come, Nights of the Creaking Bed, African Love Stories, Fathers and Daughters.  But who am I to know what these books were whispering to each other?  For all I know, these books might merely have been discussing who had the better book cover, or they might have been arguing over why they were so often shelved only with other African-authored books when, for goodness sakes, why couldn’t they be mixed with books from other parts of the world? 

But whatever their collective thoughts, this preamble conveniently brings me to a discussion of In Dependence and what I, as author, hoped to convey in the book and through the title.  This novel starts in the independence era – a time of great hope for the future.  The so-called “winds of change” were said to be sweeping through Africa and indeed, when you go back to newspapers and journals of the time, you see this confidence mirrored in the writing.  There was initially, immense hope, but with time, that hope faded.  Recalling this time of hope was a conscious decision on my part and if, as a result, my portrayal of what went wrong is sometimes done in “deft snatches – almost laconically” it is only to avoid having the book being overwhelmed by despair and disappointment.  For while, I recognize the sadder parts of life, and of our country’s history; I wanted the focus of In Dependence to be on something different.  This brings me back to my earlier response in which I spoke of how easy it is to find stories of war and civil strife, of tyranny, and of corruption, but where are all the grand amours, the tales of love and heartache?  I continue to hold great hope for our country and our continent’s future (no doubt in some way influenced by the wave of hope I recently experienced in America’s last election).  That said, I am also a realist and indeed, one of the core themes of In Dependence is that we are in fact never really “free” and “independent” when it comes to some of the big choices in our lives – whom to marry, where to live, what causes to attach ourselves to.   And yet and yet …

: And yet while we speak about the bad political turns, it seems your characters are enmeshed in the same cycles of degradation, discovery and hope in their personal relationships.

SLM: Ah-ha, characters!  And just when you were beginning to think that we had exhausted our discussion of book titles, here’s one more thought:  While I was writing this novel, I considered many different titles, but for a very long time my working title for this novel was “Tayo and Vanessa,” and I mention this to highlight the importance of these two main characters.  While Tayo and Vanessa were inevitably “enmeshed,” within the wider contexts in which they lived, their lives were never completely subsumed by it.  I strove to create characters with their own unique strengths, weaknesses and contradictions.  I wanted characters with real depth, characters that readers would be drawn to and care about.  Books with memorable characters are what I enjoy reading the most, and hence why I worked so hard on character.  Of course, one of the greatest challenges about writing this story was that it spanned a large period of time in which my characters would grow and evolve as they moved from youth to old age.   Or should I say “old-ish” age?  For isn’t it interesting how with age, one’s own definition of age evolves.  Curious too, how that first person “I” just disappeared in favour of the more ambiguous, “one”.

: Seeing that you invested a lot of time and deliberation in your characterization, I reckon it’s no coincidence that your female characters – from Christine to Elizabeth, Modupe, Vanessa, Jane, Miriam, Kemi and Aunty Bayo –  were all emotionally exploited in their liaisons with men.

SLM: As a lecturer of English literature I respond to your statement with a nod of understanding for, as I often remind students, any good piece of literature is open to numerous interpretations.  On the other hand, as the author of the book in question, I respond with slightly raised eyebrows, for were I to describe the female characters in the novel, I would not have started with this particular observation.  But you are right that a number of female characters in the novel experience some form of emotional exploitation in their liaisons with men.  What is also true, however, is that many of these women, including the main character, Vanessa, find ways of either moving beyond or rising above debilitating liaisons.  And then of course, there are always those characters, such as Tayo’s mother and Madame Pagnole, who, from the very beginning, seem impervious to any sort of exploitation. 

: Let’s return to the earlier comment you made about, Mr. Chiwetel, playing your leading character, Tayo, in an envisaged motion picture of the novel. Isn’t it odd that there’s hardly any form of interaction between novel stories by Nigerian writers and the local film industry?

SLM: I first saw Chiwetel in Dirty Pretty Things and thought he was amazing (his acting was pretty good too.)  Dirty Pretty Things was a ground breaking film with its focus on a largely untold story of London’s various “illegal” immigrant communities, and Chiwetel did a superb job playing his character, a Nigerian doctor illegally working in London as a cab driver and hotel receptionist.  Sophie Okonedo (another actor with Nigerian connections) also starred in the film.  I have subsequently seen Chiwetel in many more films including Inside Man, Children of Men, and Red Belt and feel that he’s now ready to play the role of Tayo.  With his Nigerian background, his British education and his international exposure, I think he’d make a perfect fit.  I am not as familiar with actors in Nigeria’s local film industry as I’d like to be, but I’m sure there are many great actors who could play Tayo.  I find it amazing that in the space of just two short decades, Nollywood has apparently become the second largest film industry in the world!  I think it is only a question of time before one begins to see greater collaboration between writers and filmmakers for a more diverse offering of films.  Nigerians are a creative people, and the incredible success of Nollywood ought to be an inspiration and encouragement for a variety of art forms.

: Are you working on anything now? Another love story?

SLM:This question comes to me in the wake of so much terrible world news - the cataclysmic devastation caused by Haiti’s recent earthquake and the news of yet more horrendous killings in the city of Jos, my childhood home.  It also comes at a time when political uncertainty hovers ominously over Nigeria with its absentee President, and when political shenanigans here in America threaten to derail important legislative change.  At times like this, despair and sadness makes what is already a difficult process of writing even harder for me.  I find myself asking, over and over again, what is the point of writing.  In calmer moments I know that there are all sorts of good reasons for writing, not least of which is the fact that writing can, and does, make a difference in our troubled world.  And so it is against this backdrop that I am currently completing a collection of short stories with the working title of “Translatlantic Blues”.  Some of the stories are set in San Francisco, where I currently live, while others are set in London, Paris, Harare, Lagos, Delhi, Antigua and New York, and so the canvas is international and features characters from a diverse set of backgrounds.  And yes, love in its various manifestations features in this book (e.g. romantic, filial, religious, servant-master relations etc.) but it is only one of many strands in this collection.  Perhaps what is most noticeable in this new book is the thematic of identity as it pertains, for example, to women, immigrants and people in old age. 

: Can you say a word or two about your recent book tour to Nigeria?

SLM: I am so excited that the novel is now available in Nigeria.  My Nigerian publishers, Cassava Republic Press, did an outstanding job with In Dependence from the editing, to the book cover, to organizing a wonderful mix of book tour events.  Obviously one of the big differences about talking about this novel in Nigeria (versus readings done in America or England) is that Nigerian audiences generally “get” the many cultural/historical contexts of this novel in a way that allows me to spend less time explaining context. While I very much enjoy talking about my book wherever I am invited to speak, there is something extra special about being able to discuss a book in the place that has inspired its writing.  In the case of In Dependence, this place is, of course, Nigeria.  I have always dreamt of a thriving publishing industry in Nigeria and, thanks to the amazing work of publishing houses such as Cassava Republic, it looks like this is indeed a dream coming true.

: Often, as writers, we are ushered into a period of knowing and learning by the very process of our writing.  Would you say that this book has impacted on your character as a writer -  by the experiences and encounters you had in the making?

SLM: In Dependence took a long time to write and a long time to find itself a publisher, and so one would think that by now I would have a learnt a little more patience.  But unfortunately, knowing and learning do not always go together.  I still find myself immensely frustrated by how long it takes me to settle on a new project.  I am not the sort of writer who plots things out before I write (though I wish I were) and therefore my method of writing has always seemed incredibly inefficient and messy.  I do take some comfort, though, in the knowledge that other authors whom I admire, seem to face the same challenge.  Where there has been significant change, however, is in the way I deal with feedback and criticism.  I cannot deny that I still prefer praise to criticism, but I am now much less sensitive to critique, especially when I feel that there is something to be learnt from it.  As for encounters along the way that have impacted my writing, I am immensely grateful to my husband, my family, and friends for their support and encouragement.  I am also grateful to Sarah Vaughan, Hugh Masekela, Oliver Mtukudzi, Fela Kuti, Handel, Mozart, Bob Marley, Diane Reeves, and many more whose work has kept me company both when the writing was tough, and also in those rare, but oh-so-blissful, moments when I had the distinct impression that my writing was actually beginning to sing..

   
         
   
 
Copyright © African Writing Ltd & respective copyright owners.

 

INFO: Kansas City, Mo., school board to vote on closures

Kansas City, Mo., school board to vote on closures

By HEATHER HOLLINGSWORTH | Posted: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 6:43 pm | 

Parents and students are making final bids to persuade Kansas City school board members not to close nearly half the district's schools.

More than 200 people packed a Wednesday night meeting where the board is expected to vote on a proposal to close 29 out of 61 schools to erase a projected $50 million budget shortfall. One mother held a sign reading "Vote No to Close Our Buildings."

Teachers at six other low-performing schools would be required to reapply for their jobs, and the district would sell its central office.

The district also would cut about 700 of its 3,000 jobs _ including 285 teachers.

Superintendent John Covington says district schools are half-full as enrollment has plummeted.

Administrators say the district will be in the red by 2011 without cuts.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) _ The Kansas City school board is facing a stark choice: close nearly half its public schools or face a potential bankruptcy.

The board was scheduled to vote Wednesday night on its superintendent's proposal to shut down 29 out of 61 schools in a bid to erase a projected $50 million budget shortfall. Teachers at six other low-performing schools would be required to reapply for their jobs, and the district would sell its downtown central office.

The plan also would eliminate about 700 of 3,000 jobs, including 285 teachers. The district has said it would offer retirement incentives and rid itself of struggling teachers.

Superintendent John Covington has spent the past month making the case to sometimes angry groups of parents and students that the closures are necessary.

Covington has stressed that the district's buildings are only half full as its population has plummeted amid political squabbling and chronically abysmal test scores. The district's enrollment of fewer than 18,000 students is about half of what the schools had a decade ago and just a quarter of its peak in the late 1960s.

Fewer students means less money from the state. For the past few years, the district has been plowing through the large reserves it built up when money from a $2 billion court-ordered desegregation plan was flooding its coffers.

School administrators have said that without radical cuts, the district could be in the red by 2011.

Further stressing the budget, the district will lose $23.5 million in the upcoming academic year that it had received from the state for educating students who attended seven schools that have switched to a better-performing neighboring district.

While there has been a national rise in the closing of public schools as districts cope with a recession that has eaten away at academic budgets, the potential closures in Kansas City are striking in scope.

Detroit closed 29 schools before classes began this fall, but that still left the district with 172 schools. Many big districts are closing only one or two schools.

 

OP-ED: The New Jim Crow—How the War on Drugs Gave Birth to a Permanent American Undercaste | from TomDispatch

Tomgram: Michelle Alexander, The Age of Obama as a Racial Nightmare

[Note to TomDispatch readers:  When you’re done with today’s surprising and, I think, revelatory post, you may want to check out Michelle Alexander’s recently published book, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness.  As I’ve discovered, it’s worth considering her case in depth (and she happens to be a superb writer).  Keep this in mind as well: every time you click on a book link or cover-image at this site, go to Amazon.com, and buy anything, book or otherwise, you make a painless contribution to TomDispatch -- we get a small cut -- without spending an extra penny.  Tom

California is, as the time-worn adage has it, our nation's bellwether, and nowhere is that truer than in the Golden State’s prison crisis. California’s inmate population is among the highest in the nation. Its complex of prisons spills over with tens of thousands of inmates housed in every available inch of space and sleep-stacked three-high. So overcrowded are California’s prisons that the state penal system has been successfully sued for violating the constitutional rights of inmates -- essentially by subjecting them to a public-health crisis. That its inmates consistently resort to violence in prison should come as no surprise.

The dire state of California’s prisons can, in part, be traced to its draconian “three-strikes law,” which throws three-time felons behind bars for a mandatory 25 years. Overflowing prison populations have, in turn, contributed to that state’s bleak economic future, helping consign California to a perpetual budget deficit, annual financial crises, and repeated deep cuts in education and social funding. The state currently spends a staggering 10% of its annual operating budget, or $10.8 billion, on its prison system and its nearly 170,000 prisoners -- more than it spends on the University of California system, once the jewel in the crown of American public higher education.

And which Americans have borne the brunt of California’s prison boom? Mostly minorities, African Americans especially. In 2005, the state was incarcerating, on average, 5,125 for every 100,000 male adult blacks in the population -- nearly four-and-a-half times more than for Latino men and six-and-a-half times more than for white men. California’s prisons are also notorious for separating their prisoners by skin color, a form of segregation that was, one lawyer remarked, “not tolerated in any other aspect of American life and hasn't been for fifty years. It's the shame of California.”

As Michelle Alexander, legal expert and author of a startling just-published book, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, points out in her first TomDispatch post, California’s racially infused prison quagmire is only a snapshot of a growing racial divide, one which includes the formation of a new undercaste in America that loses its normal rights at the prison gates and often never recovers them.  (To check out the latest TomCast, Timothy MacBain’s striking audio interview with Alexander in which she explains how she came to realize that this country was bringing Jim Crow into the Age of Obama, click here.) Andy

The New Jim Crow
How the War on Drugs Gave Birth to a Permanent American Undercaste

By Michelle Alexander

Ever since Barack Obama lifted his right hand and took his oath of office, pledging to serve the United States as its 44th president, ordinary people and their leaders around the globe have been celebrating our nation’s “triumph over race.”  Obama’s election has been touted as the final nail in the coffin of Jim Crow, the bookend placed on the history of racial caste in America. 

Obama’s mere presence in the Oval Office is offered as proof that “the land of the free” has finally made good on its promise of equality.  There’s an implicit yet undeniable message embedded in his appearance on the world stage: this is what freedom looks like; this is what democracy can do for you.  If you are poor, marginalized, or relegated to an inferior caste, there is hope for you.  Trust us.  Trust our rules, laws, customs, and wars.  You, too, can get to the promised land.

Perhaps greater lies have been told in the past century, but they can be counted on one hand.  Racial caste is alive and well in America.

Most people don’t like it when I say this.  It makes them angry.  In the “era of colorblindness” there’s a nearly fanatical desire to cling to the myth that we as a nation have “moved beyond” race.  Here are a few facts that run counter to that triumphant racial narrative:

*There are more African Americans under correctional control today -- in prison or jail, on probation or parole -- than were enslaved in 1850, a decade before the Civil War began.

*As of 2004, more African American men were disenfranchised (due to felon disenfranchisement laws) than in 1870, the year the Fifteenth Amendment was ratified, prohibiting laws that explicitly deny the right to vote on the basis of race.

* A black child born today is less likely to be raised by both parents than a black child born during slavery.  The recent disintegration of the African American family is due in large part to the mass imprisonment of black fathers.

*If you take into account prisoners, a large majority of African American men in some urban areas have been labeled felons for life.  (In the Chicago area, the figure is nearly 80%.) These men are part of a growing undercaste -- not class, caste -- permanently relegated, by law, to a second-class status.  They can be denied the right to vote, automatically excluded from juries, and legally discriminated against in employment, housing, access to education, and public benefits, much as their grandparents and great-grandparents were during the Jim Crow era.

Excuses for the Lockdown

There is, of course, a colorblind explanation for all this: crime rates.  Our prison population has exploded from about 300,000 to more than 2 million in a few short decades, it is said, because of rampant crime.  We’re told that the reason so many black and brown men find themselves behind bars and ushered into a permanent, second-class status is because they happen to be the bad guys.   

The uncomfortable truth, however, is that crime rates do not explain the sudden and dramatic mass incarceration of African Americans during the past 30 years.  Crime rates have fluctuated over the last few decades -- they are currently at historical lows -- but imprisonment rates have consistently soared.  Quintupled, in fact.  And the vast majority of that increase is due to the War on Drugs.  Drug offenses alone account for about two-thirds of the increase in the federal inmate population, and more than half of the increase in the state prison population.

The drug war has been brutal -- complete with SWAT teams, tanks, bazookas, grenade launchers, and sweeps of entire neighborhoods -- but those who live in white communities have little clue to the devastation wrought.  This war has been waged almost exclusively in poor communities of color, even though studies consistently show that people of all colors use and sell illegal drugs at remarkably similar rates.  In fact, some studies indicate that white youth are significantly more likely to engage in illegal drug dealing than black youth.  Any notion that drug use among African Americans is more severe or dangerous is belied by the data.  White youth, for example, have about three times the number of drug-related visits to the emergency room as their African American counterparts.

That is not what you would guess, though, when entering our nation’s prisons and jails, overflowing as they are with black and brown drug offenders.  In some states, African Americans comprise 80%-90% of all drug offenders sent to prison.

This is the point at which I am typically interrupted and reminded that black men have higher rates of violent crime.  That’s why the drug war is waged in poor communities of color and not middle-class suburbs.  Drug warriors are trying to get rid of those drug kingpins and violent offenders who make ghetto communities a living hell.  It has nothing to do with race; it’s all about violent crime.

Again, not so.  President Ronald Reagan officially declared the current drug war in 1982, when drug crime was declining, not rising.  From the outset, the war had little to do with drug crime and nearly everything to do with racial politics.  The drug war was part of a grand and highly successful Republican Party strategy of using racially coded political appeals on issues of crime and welfare to attract poor and working class white voters who were resentful of, and threatened by, desegregation, busing, and affirmative action.  In the words of H.R. Haldeman, President Richard Nixon’s White House Chief of Staff: “[T]he whole problem is really the blacks.  The key is to devise a system that recognizes this while not appearing to.”

A few years after the drug war was announced, crack cocaine hit the streets of inner-city communities.  The Reagan administration seized on this development with glee, hiring staff who were to be responsible for publicizing inner-city crack babies, crack mothers, crack whores, and drug-related violence.  The goal was to make inner-city crack abuse and violence a media sensation, bolstering public support for the drug war which, it was hoped, would lead Congress to devote millions of dollars in additional funding to it. 

The plan worked like a charm.  For more than a decade, black drug dealers and users would be regulars in newspaper stories and would saturate the evening TV news.  Congress and state legislatures nationwide would devote billions of dollars to the drug war and pass harsh mandatory minimum sentences for drug crimes -- sentences longer than murderers receive in many countries. 

Democrats began competing with Republicans to prove that they could be even tougher on the dark-skinned pariahs.  In President Bill Clinton’s boastful words, “I can be nicked a lot, but no one can say I’m soft on crime.”  The facts bear him out.  Clinton’s “tough on crime” policies resulted in the largest increase in federal and state prison inmates of any president in American history.  But Clinton was not satisfied with exploding prison populations.  He and the “New Democrats” championed legislation banning drug felons from public housing (no matter how minor the offense) and denying them basic public benefits, including food stamps, for life.  Discrimination in virtually every aspect of political, economic, and social life is now perfectly legal, if you’ve been labeled a felon.  

Facing Facts

But what about all those violent criminals and drug kingpins? Isn’t the drug war waged in ghetto communities because that’s where the violent offenders can be found?  The answer is yes... in made-for-TV movies.  In real life, the answer is no. 

The drug war has never been focused on rooting out drug kingpins or violent offenders.  Federal funding flows to those agencies that increase dramatically the volume of drug arrests, not the agencies most successful in bringing down the bosses.  What gets rewarded in this war is sheer numbers of drug arrests.  To make matters worse, federal drug forfeiture laws allow state and local law enforcement agencies to keep for their own use 80% of the cash, cars, and homes seized from drug suspects, thus granting law enforcement a direct monetary interest in the profitability of the drug market.

The results have been predictable: people of color rounded up en masse for relatively minor, non-violent drug offenses.  In 2005, four out of five drug arrests were for possession, only one out of five for sales.  Most people in state prison have no history of violence or even of significant selling activity.  In fact, during the 1990s -- the period of the most dramatic expansion of the drug war -- nearly 80% of the increase in drug arrests was for marijuana possession, a drug generally considered less harmful than alcohol or tobacco and at least as prevalent in middle-class white communities as in the inner city. 

In this way, a new racial undercaste has been created in an astonishingly short period of time -- a new Jim Crow system.  Millions of people of color are now saddled with criminal records and legally denied the very rights that their parents and grandparents fought for and, in some cases, died for.

Affirmative action, though, has put a happy face on this racial reality.  Seeing black people graduate from Harvard and Yale and become CEOs or corporate lawyers -- not to mention president of the United States -- causes us all to marvel at what a long way we’ve come.  

Recent data shows, though, that much of black progress is a myth.  In many respects, African Americans are doing no better than they were when Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated and uprisings swept inner cities across America.  Nearly a quarter of African Americans live below the poverty line today, approximately the same percentage as in 1968.  The black child poverty rate is actually higher now than it was then.  Unemployment rates in black communities rival those in Third World countries.  And that’s with affirmative action!

When we pull back the curtain and take a look at what our “colorblind” society creates without affirmative action, we see a familiar social, political, and economic structure -- the structure of racial caste.  The entrance into this new caste system can be found at the prison gate.

This is not Martin Luther King, Jr.’s dream.  This is not the promised land.  The cyclical rebirth of caste in America is a recurring racial nightmare.

Michelle Alexander is the author of The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness  (The New Press, 2010). The former director of the Racial Justice Project of the ACLU in Northern California, she also served as a law clerk to Justice Harry Blackmun on the U.S. Supreme Court.  Currently, she holds a joint appointment with the Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity and the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University.  To listen to a TomCast audio interview in which Alexander explains how she came to realize that this country was bringing Jim Crow into the Age of Obama, click here. 

Copyright 2010 Michelle Alexander

VIDEO: IMAN: Supermodel. Businesswoman. Activist. Refugee.

Iman is famous worldwide as a supermodel, successful businesswoman and fashion icon alongside her husband David Bowie. That's just the beginning -- she is also a refugee. Born in Somalia, Iman and her family fled war in the 1970s, making their way to Kenya on foot. Discovered there by fashion photographer Peter Beard, Iman came to the U.S. and took the fashion world by storm, breaking barriers as a supermodel and businesswoman. She also became a leading activist for peace in Africa. 

In this wide-ranging interview in honor of International Women's Day, Iman talks with the Enough Project's John Prendergast about her remarkable life, her activism and her take on war in the Congo -- the deadliest war in the world.

To learn more, visit www.raisehopeforcongo.org.

Directed and produced by Robert Padavick. Filmed and edited by Ivan Kander.

Copyright 2010 Center for American Progress