PUB: The Crazyhorse Fiction Prize/Lynda Hull Memorial Poetry Prize

The Crazyhorse Fiction Prize and

The Lynda Hull Memorial Poetry Prize

Winners receive $2000 each and publication in Crazyhorse.

The deadline to enter this year's prizes: January 15, 2012.

Enter by uploading a file of your manuscript online or by mailing in a paper manuscript. Each manuscript entered should consist of up to twenty-five pages of fiction or up to three poems (up to 10 pages total of poetry). For each manuscript entered, include a reading fee of $16 per manuscript, which includes a one-year/two-issue subscription to Crazyhorse. More than one manuscript may be entered. For each additional fiction or poetry manuscript entered and entry fee paid, your subscription to Crazyhorse will extend by one year/two issues. Subscriptions begin with Crazyhorse Number 81, Spring 2012; the winning manuscripts will be published in Crazyhorse Number 82, Fall 2012.


How to enter a manuscript file online

After you log in through the red box above, click “Enter Prizes” in the red box (and not “Submit Manuscript” in the red box, which is for regular non-prize submissions).

Upload a .docx, .doc, .pdf, or .rtf file only. If .rtf, use a common font (such as Times or Arial) and check your file to see that your formatting (italics, tabs, columns, etc.) displays as you wish. Pay each uploaded manuscript's $16 entry fee by secure online credit-card payment via Authorize.net, or by check or money order.

If paying for your manuscript upload by check or money order, write it to “Crazyhorse”. Check must draw from a US bank. With check or money order payment, include a printout of the e-mail you will receive after you upload your prize manuscript. Or, include the first name, last name, and manuscript number associated with your entry so that your payment can be matched with your manuscript. Mail entry fee payment checks to Entry fee payment, Crazyhorse, Department of English, College of Charleston, 66 George Street, Charleston SC 29424, USA

Each manuscript entered should consist of up to twenty-five pages of fiction or up to three poems (up to 10 pages total of poetry). Like mailed manuscripts, uploaded manuscript files will be read blindly, unassociated with your contact information. Do not include identifying information on the manuscript itself; all manuscript entries are made anonymous for review.

Entrants must upload manuscript files and pay entry fees by end of day, Jan. 15, 2012.


How to enter a paper manuscript

Mail in each paper manuscript along with a $16 entry fee (check or money order only) for each manuscript entered. Write check or money order to “Crazyhorse”. Check must draw from a US bank.

Each manuscript entered should consist of up to twenty-five pages of fiction or up to three poems (up to 10 pages total of poetry). Each entry should have a cover page placed on the top of the manuscript with the entrant’s name, address, e-mail, and telephone number. Do not include identifying information on the manuscript itself; all manuscript entries are made anonymous for review.

Mail manuscript and entry fee payment together to

Fiction Prize / Poetry Prize
Crazyhorse
Department of English
College of Charleston
66 George Street
Charleston SC 29424
USA

Entrants must mail paper manuscripts and mail check entry fees by postmark deadline of Jan. 15, 2012. Include an e-mail address or a self-addressed stamped envelope for notification of winners. Paper entry manuscripts can not be returned by SASE.
 

General entry information

All manuscripts entered must be original and previously unpublished. All entries are considered for publication in Crazyhorse. New prize-entry subscriptions will begin with Crazyhorse Number 81, Spring 2012. Renewal prize entries will extend the entrant's subscription. The winning manuscripts will be published in Crazyhorse Number 82, Fall 2012. Entries are accepted from Oct. 1, 2011 to Jan. 15, 2012. Winners will be announced in spring, 2012.


Prize process and timeline

All manuscripts entered are made anonymous before they are reviewed: the identity of each entrant is separated or removed from each entrant’s manuscript and each manuscript is only identified by number when it is read by reviewers.

The Crazyhorse editors will together review all manuscripts entered and select up to 30 finalists in each genre for review by the prize judges in each genre.

Each finalist's manuscript is reviewed by a judge in the respective genre. The fiction judge selects one story from the fiction prize finalists as the winner; the poetry judge selects one poem from the poetry prize finalists as the winner.  Only after the deadline to enter manuscripts has passed is a judge for each genre selected.  Past judges have included Jaimy Gordon, Aimee Bender, Ann Patchett, Ha Jin, Antonya Nelson, Dan Chaon, T. M. McNally, Diana Abu-Jaber, Michael Martone, and Charles Baxter for fiction; for poetry, past judges have included Richard Jackson, Larissa Szporluk, James Tate, Billy Collins, Marvin Bell, Dean Young, Albert Goldbarth, Nance Van Winckel, Dara Wier, and Mary Ruefle. The identity of each genre’s judge will be disclosed with the announcement of each genre’s winner and finalists at the end of the judging.

After the two winners are announced, the editors consider manuscripts entered in the prizes for publication in Crazyhorse.

 

PUB: In the Snake - Fiction Contest

Winter 2011-2012 Elephant Prize

for Short Fiction

Results of the Summer 2011 Elephant Prize are listed here.

Results of the Autumn 2011 Snake Prize will be announced on December 31.

We are currently accepting short story submissions for the Winter 2011-2012 Elephant Prize. Submissions must be under 7500 words. Multiple submissions are accepted: you may submit as many stories as you like.

There is a $10 reader's fee per entry. We understand the reluctance many writers have toward reader's fees. The contest entry fee allows us to pay out prizes and keep our site running. We try to keep our fees at a minimum. If you do not wish to pay the fee, you may still submit your story to us via Standard Submission, which implies no fee.

All contest entries are also considered as standard submissions and are eligible for the standard payment of $50 per story if accepted.

Contest submissions will be judged based on the criteria listed on our Guidelines page.

Contest prizes are as follows:

First Place prize is $500 and publication in In The Snake.
Second Place earns $125 and possible publication.
Third Place earns $75 and possible publication.
In addition, 10-20 finalists will receive certificates of honorable mention.

Contest begins on Tuesday November 15, 2011, and ends Monday January 16.

Winners will be announced on March 31, 2012

Autumn 2011 Snake Prize for Flash Fiction

We are now accepting short story submissions for the Autumn 2011 Snake Prize. This is a Flash fiction contest: Submissions must be under 1000 words. Multiple submissions are accepted: you may submit as many stories as you like.

There is a $5 reader's fee per entry. We understand the reluctance many writers have toward reader's fees. The contest entry fee allows us to pay out prizes and keep our site running. We try to keep our fees at a minimum. Contest prizes are as follows:

First Place prize is $250 and publication in In The Snake.
Second Place earns $125 and possible publication.
Third Place earns $75 and possible publication.
In addition, 10 finalists will receive certificates honorable mention.

This contest begins on Thursday September 15, 2011, and ends Monday October 31.

Winners will be announced on January 1, 2012.

--> Summer 2011 Elephant Prize for Short Fiction

This contest has closed.

Winners will be announced on October 31, 2011

We are currently accepting short story submissions for the Summer 2011 Elephant Prize. Submissions must be under 7500 words. Multiple submissions are accepted: you may submit as many stories as you like.

There is an $8 reader's fee per entry. We understand the reluctance many writers have toward reader’s fees. The contest entry fee allows us to pay out prizes and keep our site running. We try to keep our fees at a minimum. If you do not wish to pay the fee, you may still submit your story to us via Standard Submission, which implies no fee.

All contest entries are also considered as standard submissions and are eligible for the standard payment of $50 per story if accepted.

Contest prizes are as follows:

First Place prize is $350 and publication in In The Snake.
Second Place earns $175 and possible publication.
Third Place earns $125 and possible publication.
In addition, 10 finalists will receive honorable mention.

Contest begins on Friday July 1, 2011, and ends Wednesday August 31.

Winners will be announced on October 31, 2011

-->

 

PUB: Dream Quest One Poetry Contest & Writing Contest

Dream Quest One 

Poetry and Writing Contest

Postmark Deadline: December 31, 2011

Attention! Yes, there is still time to submit poems and/or short stories to be entered in the contest.

 

Hello and Welcome to Dream Quest One Poetry and Writing Contest! This poetry contest and writing contest is open to everyone and international.  We are excited about showcasing the creative writing and poetic talent, skill and ability of all poets and writers.  We hope that you have the inspiration to display the beauty and art of writing short stories and poems for the entire world to see your "gift of a dream."


Writing Contest entries may be written on a maximum of (5) pages, either neatly handwritten or typed, single or double line spacing, on any subject or theme.

  • Poetry Contest entries may be written on any subject or theme. All poems must be 30 lines or fewer and either neatly handwritten or typed, single or double line spacing.

Please read the "Official Rules" for more in-depth information.


*Postmark Deadline is December 31, 2011


The Mission of Dream Quest One Poetry & Writing Contest is to inspire, motivate and encourage anyone who has the desire or love of poetry and writing, to continue doing so without the fear of failure or success! And remember, in whatever you do, "it's okay to dream," for dreams do come true.

 

 

Win Prizes!

Poetry Contest:                                                        

 

First Place... $250.00
Second Place... $125.00
Third Place... $50.00
dreamquestone.com

Writing Contest:

 

First Place... $500.00
Second Place... $250.00
Third Place... $100.00
dreamquestone.com

 

There is a $10.00 (US dollars) entry fee per short story submitted and a  $5.00 (US dollars) entry fee per poem submitted.


Contestants may enter via PayPal or through the mail. An entry form is also available in the "Enter Now" section.

 

VIDEO: ’25 To Life,’ A Film About HIV, Lies, and Redemption > Clutch Magazine

Must See:

'25 To Life,' A Film About

HIV, Lies, and Redemption

Wednesday Dec 7, 2011 – by

We’ve all heard the stats. Black women across this country are being infected with HIV at alarming rates. Many have pinned this epidemic on the backs of “down low” men, while others see it as irresponsibility at its finest. Whatever the case may be, nearly thirty years after HIV/AIDS first began to ravage communities of Americans, it’s still here tearing them apart.

Recently, I had the pleasure of viewing a trailer for Mike Brown’s unfinished documentary 25 To Life.’ The documentary takes an honest and surprising look at a man with HIV on a quest for redemption.

The film follows William Brawner, a young man who contracted HIV when he was just 18-monts-old. Since he was a child, his family told him to conceal his status and he kept the secret under wraps for 25 years. During this time, however, Brawner engaged in rampant sexual activity with unknowing women, many of whom he failed to protect.

Now, Brawner is married and an active HIV advocate, and wants to set the record straight and get a bit of redemption from those whose lives he changed forever.

But is it too late?

Check out the trailer for ’25 To Life’ and go to the film’s website to donate

What do you think? Could you forgive someone who knowingly slept with you while they were HIV-positive? 

 

CULTURE: "The Ultimate Niggabitch" Controversy

Monday, December 19, 2011

Dutch Magazine

calls singer Rihanna

"The Ultimate Niggabitch"

 

From Madnews
In an article published in the latest issue of Dutch fashion magazine Jackie, the magazine offers a little advice on how to dress like Rihanna without looking like the “ultimate niggerbitch.” That’s right. No typo there. Check out the full English translation below:
“She has street cred, she has a ghetto ass and she has a golden throat. Rihanna, the good girl gone bad, is the ultimate niggabitch and displays that gladly, and for her that means: what’s on can come off. If that means she’ll be on stage half naked, then so be it. But Dutch winters aren’t like Jamaican ones, so pick a clothing style in which your daughter can resist minus ten. No to the big sunglasses and the pornheels, and yes to the tiger print, pink shizzle and everything that glitters. Now let’s hope she won’t beat anybody up at daycare.”


Two hours ago, Jackie Editor in Chief Eva Hoeke posted the below apology on the magazine’s Facebook page:
Dear readers,
First: thanks for all your responses. We are of course very fed up over this and especially very shocked. However I’m glad that we’re engaging in a dialogue on this page — not everybody does that. Thanks for this. Other than that I can be brief about this: this should have never happened. Period. While the author meant no harm — the title of the article was intended as a joke — it was a bad joke, to say the least. And that slipped through my, the editor-in-chief’s, fingers. Stupid, painful and sucks for all concerned. The author has been addressed on it, and now I can only ensure that these terms will no longer end up in the magazine. Furthermore I hope that you all believe there was absolutely no racist motive behind the choice of words. It was stupid, it was naive to think that this was an acceptable form of slang — you hear it all the time on tv and radio, then your idea of what is normal apparently shifts — but it was especially misguided: there was no malice behind it. We make our magazine with love, energy and enthusiasm, and it can sometimes happen that someone is out of line. And then you can only do one thing: apologize. And hope that others wish to accept it.

From the bottom of my heart I say it again: we never intended to offend anyone. And I mean that.

Regards,

Eva Hoeke


So, as editor in chief, Hoeke had no idea that this was offensive before running it and actually considered it a joke? In addition to being blatantly racist, calling Rihanna Jamaican (she’s from Barbados) and actually suggesting that mothers should dress their daughters like her, this article is just wrong from every angle.

According to our source in Holland, Jackie is a well known local fashion publication with a circulation of 57,700 copies per month. (Source Parlour website)

I don't think the Editor in Chief Eva Hoeke is really sorry about publishing the story. Being offensive is the Dutch norm these days, so this story was a perfect fit.

__________________________

 

Editor in Chief Jacky resigns

after Rihanna n*gg*b*tch

controversy

According to the Dutch magazine Elsevier Eva Hoeke has decided to resign as Chief Editor of the Dutch magazine Jacky after the controversy surrounding the singer Rihanna. In the magazine Rihanna is referred to as a "niggabitch", a statement which infuriated the singer.

In the interest of the magazine and all parties involved she will resign immediately, according to Yves Gijrath, the director of GMG.

Hoeke concludes: "I should have counted to ten before making oversimplified statements via social media channels."

Today Rihanna lashed out to magazine Jacky who described her as a n*gg*b*tch. 

To Editor in Chief Eva Hoeke she tweeted "@evajackie I hope u can read english, because your magazine is a poor representation of the evolution of human rights! I find you disrespectful, and rather desperate!! You ran out of legit, civilized information to print! There are 1000's of Dutch girls who would love to be recognized for their contributions to your country, you could have given them an article. Instead, u paid to print one degrading an entire race! That's your contribution to this world! To encourage segregation, to mislead the future leaders to act in the past! You put two words together,

@evajackie with the intent of abasement, that made no sense..."NIGGA BITCH"?!....Well with all respect, on behalf of my race, here are my two words for you...FUCK YOU!!!

Apparently magazine Jacky realised they had gone one step to far. Today Eva Hoeke wrote on twitter they would rectify the story in the next edition. 

The first to respond to the story was Dutch black Televion hostZarayda Groenhart. According to the newspaper she was furious.

Chief Editor of Jacky first responded on twitter with: "I think it's more than obvious that it's a joke. Anyone who doesn't see this is extremely sensitive to the topic." Afterwards Eva Hoeke gained some new insights. For her boss that apparently was not enough. 

 

 

__________________________

 

December 20, 2011 | Parlour Fam

Sometimes a joke … is not a joke. Sadly, Eva Hoeke (at left), Editor-In-Chief of Dutch magazine Jackielearned this the hard way in the past 36 hours when she issued the most non-apology-apology for her publication’s decision to refer to Rihanna as a “niggabitch” in their latest issue. After we reported the rundown, Rihanna issued her own response directly to Eva via Twitter that ended with “Fuck You.” Well, it seems that Eva has had it up to here with the mess that her own niggabitchness has created, so she’s decided to quit her job as editor. We got our hands on the press release, here is a translation: Read the rest

Eva Hoeke Quits as Editor-in-Chief of Jackie

Following a recent publication in Jackie magazine, issue 49, a worldwide outcry arose over an article on page 45 entitled “De Niggabitch”, which refers to Rihanna and her style of dress. This word is used in America as slang.

Throughout the various social media there has been an emotional response to this choice of words, as published in Jackie. As a first reaction to this editor-in-chief Eva Hoeke said via Twitter that the choice of words was meant as a joke and offered an apology to anyone who felt offended. This reaction cause further consternation, as Hoeke herself also referred to the term elsewhere in the magazine. In a second reaction through Twitter, Hoeke came to the following conclusion: ‘1. Don’t publish bad jokes in the magazine 2. Don’t pretend as if a bad joke is good. Sorry guys. My bad.’ The response on social media now took on an international character. In a third reaction Hoeke even offered to rectify in the next issue of Jackie. This morning Rihanna response on the article through Twitter. She was furious over the use of the word ‘niggabitch’ and ended her message with ‘Fuck you Eva’. Through social media Hoeke was taunted and threatened in various ways.

Following these events she consulted with publisher Yves Gijrath of GMG. Together they came to the following joint conclusion:  In the interest of Jackie Magazine and all involved she will leave her function as editor-in-chief effective immediately. Hoeke gives the following comment:

“I realize that my first reaction through Twitter, in which I indicated that it was a joke, has been an incomplete description of what me, and also the author of the article, meant. The term ‘niggabitch’ came from America and we solely used it to describe a style of dress. Because of the enormous pressure through social media I was tempted to promise amendment regarding the language in future issues of Jackie. Apart from that I also offered an rectification. I have now come to the conclusion that rectification is not the right solution. I regret that I have taken a stand too quickly regarding an article in Jackie — which moreover had no racial motive at its basis. Through the course of events, me and the publisher have concluded that because my credibility is now affected, it is better for all parties if I quit my function as editor-in-chief effective immediately. After putting my heart and soul into for Jackie for eight years, I realize that these errors  although not intented maliciously  are enough reason for leaving.”

Publisher Yves Gijrath regrets the state of affairs and praises Hoeke’s attitude, who primarily chooses for the credibility of the title, which – as she realizes herself – would have been damaged had she stayed. According to Gijrath there’s no doubt about the intentions and qualities of Eva Hoeke, however he does think this joint decision is the correct one. Hoeke concludes:

“I should have counted to ten before taking unnuanced stands through social media channels. Through this my credibility has been hurt and that neither fits the role of an editor-in-chief, nor Jackie Magazine. Jackie Magazine will invite Rihanna to share her feelings and thoughts on the article in the next issue.”

 

Well there it is folks. Offensive article runs. Editor in Chief offers a half-apology. Artist responds. Editor in Chief quits. I wonder if the response that this ignited globally will make a difference in how issues like this are handled in the future or if Hoeke’s resignation is simply a temporary solution to a deep-rooted problem.

__________________________

 

Rihanna Responds to Racist Incidents,

Is She Justified in Her Reactions?

(UPDATED)

TUESDAY DEC 20, 2011 – BY 

Those of you who follow Rihanna on Twitter know that she does not take any foolishness and is very quick to let folks know how she feels about being slighted or insulted and does not mince words in doing so. The singer endured two racist incidents this week and used Twitter as a platform to make her reaction clear.

First, Rihanna shared a racist incident that occurred in a hotel in Portugal:

“I just met the most racist c**t EVER!!! This man said the craziest sh*t abt black women called us dogs, sluts, we don’t look like sh*t, we don’t belong in the same hotels….needless to say, the #N***A in me came out! Bajan accent and all! Lol! Turns out the hotel manager’s black. Oh and he had the NERVE to diss black people in his Tighty whitey’s!!!! SMH…and tbh (to be honest) a lil black wouldn’t hurt him.”

Wow.

What followed for Rihanna in Europe was more racial unpleasantness. The tweet below was sent directly to Eva Hoeke, editor in chief of the Dutch magazine Jackie that referred to her as “niggabitch”among other things:

@evajackie I hope u can read english, because your magazine is a poor representation of the evolution of human rights! I find you disrespectful, and rather desperate!! You ran out of legit, civilized information to print! There are 1000′s of Dutch girls who would love to be recognized for their contributions to your country, you could have given them an article. Instead, u paid to print one degrading an entire race! That’s your contribution to this world! To encourage segregation, to mislead the future leaders to act in the past! You put two words together, with the intent of abasement, that made no sense…”N***A B***H”?!….Well with all respect, on behalf of my race, here are my two words for you…F**K YOU!!!”

Well that handles that, I guess. Hoeke could only reiterate her apologies through the magazine’s Facebook page, claim that the words were meant as a joke, and the other excuses one would expect in this scenario.

One has to wonder what Rihanna’s European reception means in a social and political context, and furthermore if her vulgar reaction is the right way to respond.

What do you think about Rihanna’s responses?

UPDATE: Eva Hoeke has stepped down from her position as Editor In Chief of Jackie, citing the uproar over her ill-fated piece as the reason. Her departing statement reads as follows:

“Because of the enormous pressure from social media, I can promise improvement in terms of language used in future issues of Jackie. Previously, I offered rectification. As I now come to the conclusion that rectification is not the right solution, I am departing. The term ‘nigga bitch” has come over from America and we have only this to describe this particular style of clothes that we can try to interpret. After eight years, with my heart and soul, I have worked for Jackie. I realize that these errors – although no malicious intent – is a reason to leave.”

So now “nigga bitch” is a style of clothes whose term is American? Interesting…

What do you think of her reasoning, Clutchettes?

 

 

 

 

 

 

EGYPT: Between A Rock & A Hard Place - The Complex Struggle To Make Real Revolution

Glimmers of Public Support for Cairo Protesters Begin to Show

 

Egyptian women hold signs during a protest in downtown Cairo on 20 December 2011 to denounce the military's attacks on women and to call for an immediate end to the violence against protesters. (Photo: AFP - Khaled Desouki)

 

By: Serene Assir

Published Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Some public support for protesters demanding the end of military rule begins to show, in spite of a fierce crackdown alongside a media campaign designed to make activists out to look like thugs.

Cairo - The ruling Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) has waged an intense media campaign over recent months to smear the image of protesters demanding it hand over power to a civilian government. This crusade reached new heights Monday December 19, when SCAF General Adel Emara told reporters that protesters were plotting to ruin Egypt.

Emara asserted that protesters had provoked the military and Central Security Forces’ joint crackdown. But his claims paled before evidence, mainly distributed via social media channels, that the youth had in fact suffered excessive violence, especially on both Friday and Monday morning.

Such was the violence in the early hours of Monday, during which up to four people were killed according to medical sources at Tahrir Square, that the public mood began to show signs of shifting. Symbolically, denunciations of the military’s cruel suppression of protests in downtown Cairo spread to the very same spot that first hosted a demonstration calling for the fall of former President Hosni Mubarak in 2005.

While the Egyptian military violently confronted protesters at Tahrir Square for the fourth consecutive day, more than 300 people gathered on Monday at the entrance to the Egyptian Supreme Court to decry the military’s callous and unjustified use of force. They also demanded SCAF immediately surrender power to a civilian government, echoing Tahrir Square protesters’ appeals.

Among those outside the Supreme Court were some 40 MPs and politicians, according to independent Egyptian newspaper al-Masry al-Youm. They launched an open-ended sit-in in support of protesters at Tahrir. “This is just the first step,” said Waai Party chief Shady Ghazali Harb.

“We are here to stand with the youth of Tahrir,” added Ghazali Harb, who gained prominence during the January 25 revolution. “We may move to Tahrir Square soon. It’s important for us to help Egyptians who are being misinformed to understand what is actually happening. As such, we are here to raise our voices.”

The crowd in front of the court grew later in the day when as demonstrators marching from Cairo University arrived. “Military rule is shameful and insulting!” chanted protesters. “We are the kids of bread and freedom. They are calling us infiltrators!”

Street action veteran Kamal Abu Ayta, president of the Federation of Independent Trade Unions, said “it is crucial that we help break the false barrier SCAF has set up between the revolutionaries and the protesters. All the Egyptian population took part in the revolution, and the revolution is ongoing.”

Abu Ayta did not think it would take long for the protesters’ demands to be met. “To date, all the youth’s demands have been met,” he said. “Tomorrow, we are holding a meeting with the unions to see how we can act in order to put a stop to this crisis.”

Crucially, other governorates in Egypt have also started to move. Tareq Ezzat, a youth activist from Suez, arrived in Cairo to stand in solidarity with protesters in Tahrir Square. “We need to support our revolutionary brothers here,” Ezzat said. “I can guarantee that within hours, a decision will be taken in Suez to act fast. And if Suez moves, SCAF will have to hand over power to a transitional civilian government.” Should Suez inhabitants take action in coming days, other governorates may follow suit if trends over the course of the past 10 months are any indication.

Some have found parallels between recent events and those of January 28 given the total media blackout imposed by the army on Tahrir Square in the early hours of Monday. Under the cover of darkness, snipers shot into the crowds below and a ferocious military attack left four dead and scores injured on just one night

The feeling of hope that activists transmitted was not without its more sombre side. The intense pain of the death of up to four people just one night before meant that the sense of responsibility and the need for an immediate solution, was stronger than ever. But of those protesting at the Supreme Court, relatively few were actually willing to go to Tahrir Square, despite the fact that it was close by.

“What is clear to us is the fact that we cannot win by just staying put, or by waiting for a solution to appear,” said Ezzat. “There are some signs that things are changing fast. I just hope that we are collectively responsible enough to do the right thing and stop playing reactive politics.”

 

__________________________

 

Peter Hapak for TIME
Mahmoud Salem, a.k.a. Sandmonkey, Egyptian revolutionary blogger, activist and protester.
Read more: http://lightbox.time.com/2011/12/14/person-of-the-year-2011-protesters-2/#ixzz1h8YHxZkZ

============================

Underneath

Lately I have been hard to reach, even when I am surrounded by friends and loved ones. I don’t want to talk or think, my brain is a merry-go-round of ideas and knowledge that I wish were not there. 2 weeks ago I was noticing how everyone around me is falling apart: physically, psychologically, and emotionally. And the worst part is the helplessness you feel, knowing that you can’t offer them any real comfort or solution. We are in the shit. The Dark Days.

This is not an uplifting post. You have been warned.

My helplessness reached its peak when my friend S. came over two nights ago, and she was not alright. Fighting to release the thousands that are getting military tried over the months has been a draining crusade for her, and it only got worse the moment she got involved in trying to ensure that the death reports of those killed in Mohamed Mahmoud do not get forged, which meant she had to be at the Zeinhom morgue the night those bodies would come in, surrounded by wailing families and crying loved ones, seeing dead bodies after dead body come in, and almost getting arrested by the authorities that didn’t want her stopping the cover-up. She told me after wards that she now sees those dead bodies everywhere, and she can’t escape them. But that night, 2 nights ago, she had just come back from Tahrir, where a man , standing inches away from her, ended up getting set on fire due to an exploding Molotov cocktail. She could see the fire engulf him, the smell of burnt flesh and hair, his agonizing screams for help. She was silent. Very calm and silent. She was sitting next to me and I couldn’t reach her, and all I could do is hold her without being able to tell her that things will be alright. Because..how? How will they be alright exactly?

Cold comfort I proved to be..    

I haven’t written in two months. Two months I have spent running for parliament, stopping my campaign to run around all the field hospitals in Mohamed Mahmoud and ensuring they are well supplied, to losing the election and heading to Suez to lead another one, one that I managed to “win”. The things I have seen, on the street, I do not wish on anyone. One day I will write about that experience, but not today. Today, allow me to take you into my fragmented mind a bit. I have been silent, I have been tied up by advisors over what you can and cannot say during an election. This is over. The elections, for me, are over. I am done being silent. I am now loose, and I don’t think this was the desired effect

……………………………….

One of the biggest mistakes of this revolution, and there are plenty to go around, was that we allowed its political aspects to overshadow the cultural and social aspects. We have unleashed a torrent of art, music and creativity, and we don’t celebrate or enjoy it, or even promote it. We have brought the people to a point where they were ready to change. To change who they are and how they act, and we ignored that and instead focused all of our energies in a mismanaged battle over the political direction of this country. We clashed with the military, and we forgot the people, and we let that small window that shows up maybe every 100 years where a nation is willing to change, to evolve, to go to waste. Even the work that was being done, it focused on teaching them their political rights, or superficial behavioral things like “don’t litter” or “don’t break traffic laws”, and nothing regarding respecting the women or the people from other faiths that share this cursed land. Wasn’t a priority back then, because in our arrogance and hubris we assumed that people will change by themselves. That they will act right, despite the fact that throughout the history of humanity, there wasn’t a single proof that people, by themselves, will act right. Sorry everyone, we were arrogant and idealistic. Forgive us.

………………………………

The parliamentary elections are fraudulent. I am not saying this because I lost- I lost fair and square- but because it’s the truth. The fraud happened on the hands of the election workers and the Judges. People in my campaign were offered Ballot boxes, employees and judges in polling stations were instructing people who to vote for and giving unstamped ballots to Christians in polling stations where they are heavily present to invalidate their votes, and the Egyptian bloc has about half a ton of correct ballots- ones that showed people voting for them- found being thrown in the streets in Heliopolis, Ghamra, Shubra, Zaitoun, Alexandria, Suez and many other districts. The amount of reports of fraud and legal injunctions submitted against these elections are enough to bring it all down and have it done all over again. Hell, a simple request for a vote recount would be enough to expose the fraud, since the ballots were thrown in the street. The people, however, are not privy of this, because it all looked very functional and organized to them. This is very important, because it tells you the shape of things to come.

When you ask the average Egyptian, you will find that they didn’t have a problem per say with corruption, but rather with the fact that things were both corrupt and dysfunctional. How many times have I heard the phrase of “He could’ve stolen all he wanted, and we wouldn’t mind, had he only made the country better while he stole” regarding Mubarak? Hundreds. Well, now we will get our wish. The shape of new Egypt will not be a place that’s free of corruption, but rather more like South American countries: Corrupt, yet functional. People will do their jobs, but they will allow the same level of corruption to exist on the down low. Give us a make-over, a window-dressing, and we will be happy & impressed with the apparent improvement. We never were high maintenance people anyway. You want security? We will place a bunch of cops in the street and you will feel secure, even though they won’t do much to protect you from criminals. You want democracy? We will create a media campaign, organize polling stations, and have you stand in cues and put your ballots in the box, while vote counters can tally the votes in any way they wish, and judges can change the total at any time they choose to, and you will be none the wiser and will believe whatever results you hear. Democracy is brilliant, ain’t it?

………………………………

Sorry to go back to the March 19th referendum, but there is something that was just brought to my attention: Did you notice that back then we voted yes or no, so we can elect 500 people to the parliament, who will put the rules to choose 100 people for the constitutional committee, who will be chosen by 80 different authorities/syndicates/groups alongside with the parliament, who will choose the remaining 20, so that we can write a constitution in 6 months that will be presented to the SCAF, and if approved by them, will be put into a referendum for another Yes or No vote?

God Bless Tunisia. The only time they went to vote was for the members of the constitutional committee.

……………………………..

There is a disconnect between the revolutionaries and the people, and that disconnect exists in regards of priorities. Our priorities are a civilian government, the end of corruption, the reform of the police, judiciary, state media and the military, while their priorities are living in peace and putting food on the table. And we ignore that, or belittle it, telling them that if they want this they should support what we want, and deriding their economic fears by telling them that things will be rough for the next 3 to 5 years, but afterwards things will get better on the long run. Newsflash, the majority of people can’t afford having it even rougher for 3 to 5 years. Hell, they can’t afford to have it rough for one more month. We tell them to vote for us for a vague guarantee and to not to sell their votes or allow someone to buy their loyalty, while their priorities are making sure there is food on the table for their families tonight. You sell them hope in the future, and someone else gives them money and food to survive the present. Who, do you think, they will side with?

…………………………….

In the past two months I have been both a candidate and a campaign manager, and what you see as a campaign manager is very different than what you see as a candidate, especially when you are a campaign manager in Suez. To make a long story short, in the 10 days we were there, this is what went down: We had one of our campaign workers fall victim to a hit and run “accident”, a campaign operative getting arrested by the military police at a polling station for filming the army promoting the Salafi Nour Party (with a big banner carrying the Noor Party slogan being placed on the side of an Army Truck) and his film confiscated of course, our campaign headquarters got attacked with molotov cocktails by thugs sent by a “moderate” islamist centrist party (hint: It’s not ElAdl) , the hotel we were staying in got repeatedly attacked by thugs till 3 am, with the army platoon leader protecting the Hotel informing me that if I don’t resolve the situation, he will “deal violently” with those outside and inside the hotel, the Leader of the 3rdEgyptian Army calling us looking for me, the Chief of Security for Suez doing the same thing, Lawyers and thugs working for a semi-leftist party filed police reports against us claiming we hired them and owed them money when we didn’t, and the other campaign manager finally going to deal with the situation, ends up getting arrested, and the two campaign members that were with him were left outside under the mercy of groups of thugs, and we managed by the grace of god get them all out unharmed and we escape Suez while Trucks filled with guys with guns going around Suez looking for us.

Oh, and we also sent in one of our campaign operatives dressed as a salafi into the Suez central committee for vote counting, where Army personnel assured him that they have helped the Noor Party and told him that they hooked them up with two seats, while winking.

Oh yeah.

In other news, we won a seat there.

………………………….

So, why would the military be “helping” the Salafi Noor Party get votes? Well, mainly because they invented them. It was a match made possible by State-Security, who probably alerted the military of how reliable were the salafis in their previous “cooperation” to scare the living shit out of the population into submission and supporting the regime. Remember the All Saints church attack, the one that happened this New Year? Remember the documents proving that our very own State Security had arranged it to take place to force the Coptic population to support Mubarak? Yeah, it’s kind of like that. Only on a higher level. Ensuring that the Salafis have a big chunk of the parliament (one that is neither logical or feasible considering their numbers in Egypt) achieves two goals: 1) Provide a mechanism for the security apparatus to keep the Muslim Brotherhood in check if they ever thought of using religion as a weapon against SCAF (As far as the salafis are concerned, the MB are secular infidels) and 2) to really frame the choice in our (and the international community’s) heads between a “Islamist country or a military regime”, because, let’s face it, The MB are not scary enough for the general population. But the Salafis? Terrifying shit. You add to that the piece of news that the average Egyptian duty-free buying alcohol limit over night went from 4 bottles to a single bottle, and that they now have a “women only” cue in the Airport, and you have the Upper-class and Upper-middle class – alongside with the west- pissing in their pants and psychologically ready to accept military rule over Islamic one. A fake and a false choice, especially that new parliament will have no power what so ever over anything.

So why bother with the elections? Well, because this is a fight for the nation’s morale. We know that you don’t know this country, that you live in social and cultural ghettos of your own making and that if we are not competing you will end up with a 95% Islamist parliament and you will believe that this is an islamist country and 50% of you will be booking their tickets out of here tomorrow rather than living in Egyptistan. That we too need to go down and see for ourselves how things work, since this is an election without data, real media coverage, and very few people have the experience or the knowledge of the areas that you would need to win an election in a district. Here is a fun fact: about 40% of the people head to the polls not knowing who they will vote for, and are simply there because they are afraid of the 500LE fine they must pay for abstaining to vote; about another 50% go to the polls with a piece of paper that has the names & symbols of the people they will vote for, people that they don’t know, or their history or anything about them. They simply asked their friends and they told them that these are “good people to vote for”, and this is true across the board in all classes, upper and lower, uneducated and educated. And you can’t blame them really, because each district has over 100 candidates fighting over 2 seats and only 4 weeks to campaign. If you are the average new voter, there is no time to meet or evaluate or educate yourself about all of them in order to choose objectively between them. I know people that voted for me simply because I was the only candidate they met. I am not kidding.

………………………..

So many times I have met people who are terrified at the electoral successes of the Islamic parties in the election, and while they acknowledge that there “must be a deal” between the SCAF and the Islamists, they sit back with a knowing smile and tell me : “But you know what? The SCAF are not stupid. They will screw the Muslim Brotherhood over. They are just waiting for the right moment and they will destroy them. You just wait and see!”

I tell them that they are disgusting for thinking this way. That they are like a raped woman who is rooting for her rapist to rape the other woman who got away so that she wouldn’t be the only raped one.

…………………………..

I love it when a fellow revolutionary asks me : ” I don’t understand what’s going on. Why are the Police/Military shooting and killing people and prolonging street conflicts in Mohamed Mahmoud/ ElQasr Eleiny? What do they want? What’s the big plan?”

Well, to put it simply, The Big plan is the same as the immediate plan: they want you dead. It’s not that they want to kill opposition; they want to kill the opposition, literally. This country ain’t big enough for the both of you, and they have everything to lose. And they have guns. And the media. And all the keys of power. And you want to overthrow them. How do you think they will react to that? Give you cookies?

……………………………

One question that keeps nagging me for the past 10 months: Who, exactly, cut off the communications on the 28th of January?

Some people say it was the Ministry of Interior, but that’s not right, because the soldiers and officers on the street had no idea that the communication is about to get shut-off. Most of them were surprised by it as the rest of us, and using their radios was not an effective way to relay a plan or organize a police force against demonstrators. This is why they were so easily beaten. Every Police Officer I met has told me that they woke up to find the phone network down, and none of them were given a plan to begin with. If there was no plan, and no coordination, why would they shut down all communications? And if the MOI is the one that cut-off the communication, how long would it have taken them to realize that they are shooting themselves in the foot and switch it back on to save their soldiers from the epic beat down that they received? Half an hour, maximum? The communication was down for 4 days.

Who cut off the Communications? Mubarak? But the Police were his private army. They existed to serve him. How long would it have taken before he had the MOI chiefs’ informing him that cutting off the communications was getting the soldiers he needed to stop the revolution killed and beaten? How long would it have taken him to execute the order to bring it back on? Ten minutes? Why didn’t that happen?

And if both the President and the MOI both wanted the communications back on, at least the cell phones, who had the power to refuse their orders or stop them?

Who cut off the communications? And why?

……………………………

I didn’t partake in the events of Mohamed Mahmoud. I was there every day, getting medical supplies and helping people, but I didn’t partake at all. And in the current battle still going on at the Egyptian Cabinet building, I didn’t even set foot on any pavement near Tahrir for the past 3 days. I didn’t go not out of fear or cowardice, but because those two events crystallize to me the real problem in the Egyptian revolution: The schism between the symbol and the cause, or rather how we are always fixated on the symbol, and not the cause itself.

For example, the case of Khaled Said was not about Khaled Said himself, it was about Police brutality and lack of accountability towards those who are paid to protect us and instead have no problem killing us. The cause was to end this, not to try the murderers of Khaled Said. But instead of focusing on that cause, we focused on the symbol, and we ignored the cause. Police killing without accountability still happens to this day, but The killers of Khaled Said received a verdict, so Justice is served. The same goes for Alaa, who wanted- through his bravery- to give the cause of stopping the military trials for civilians the push and international pressure it needed, but instead, and in spite of his intentions, ended up becoming the Symbol that everyone rallies around, ignoring the cause. All got jubilant when Alaa got transferred to a civilian court, all the while, more than 12,000 other Egyptians are still serving year-long sentences they received in military trials that took on average 15-20 minutes for the entire trial. The Symbol and the Cause.

Tahrir became an international symbol, thanks to the foreign media, and everyone believed that the regime was brought down because of the people in Tahrir, even though every revolutionary knows that the regime was brought down because the revolution was at every square in the country, not just Tahrir. But, amazingly, we also believed the Hype that the media created. We believed in the Symbol, and it became a fixture in our thinking. If there is a problem, go to Tahrir. Hell, centralize the entire revolution into Tahrir, and instead of going to every other square and concentrating our bases in the country, we demanded – like the chauvinist Cairiens that we are- for them to come to us. That as long as we have many numbers in Tahrir, we will get somewhere, we will bring down the regime.

But here is the truth: Tahrir is not a magical land, one which if we occupy we can hold all the magical keys of our kingdom and bring down the evil regime of whomever is in Power. Tahrir is a square. A piece of land. A symbol, but a piece of land nonetheless. And just because it worked before, it doesn’t mean it will work again. We are like an old married couple trying to recapture the magic of their early days by going to the same place they went to on their honeymoon, or dance to the same song they fell in love to, and discovering that it’s not working because there are real problems that need to be resolved. Symbols are nice, but they don’t solve anything.

And this is why I didn’t get involved: I couldn’t understand the Battle for Mohamed Mahmoud, because it’s a battle to hold on to a street of no actual significance or importance, and yet some of the best youth this country had to offer died or lost their eyes or were seriously injured protecting it. The same thing goes for the current battle. What is the purpose? What is the end Goal? A battle for the sake of battle? Just like maintaining a sit-in for the sake of maintaining the sit-in, even though a sit-in is supposed to be a means to an end, not an end in itself? I mean, I would understand if the aim was to occupy Maspiro or something, but they are not even attempting that. They are maintaining a fight in the street, because they got attacked at that street, so the street immediately becomes a symbol and we must fight back and not be driven away even as we get beaten and killed. Because it’s all about the Symbol, and not about the cause or the goal, and people are dying.

It’s like reading Bad Poetry….Now what?

There is no solution. It’s the unstoppable force meeting the immovable object. There must be a way out, but I can’t seem to find one without more blood getting spilled. There is no panacea here, no exit strategy. Just helplessness, and waiting for whatever it is that will happen next, even though we can rest assured it won’t be good news. I am sorry that I cannot comfort you, but maybe, just maybe, this is not the time to be comforted.

Comments
  1. yqxo says:

    As a foreigner I see a great meaning in the current battle, especially debunking the lies of the SCAF. Bear in mind that most Egyptians are being lied on the State TV. Information spreads rather slowly in country of 20% internet penetration.

    In this context there is a great meaning in current battle. If Tahrir can prove that it is 1. wrong for the state to conduct violence under any excuse, and 2. those in charge must be held accountable, if they can prove these to Egyptian people now then any future government that may be formed will be very cautious to use force against protesters.

    If the Tahrir wins this media war, they might be able to set Egypt to more just path. Since election results are seen somehow representative, the Tahrir should support parliament to take over power from SCAF.

    I hope SCAF-in-the-box can be shut soon enough.

    • karim elias says:

      The media war cannot be won because the people simply want to believe the lies, it is the same as the US citizens believing the lies of their politicians about Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo. point 1 and 2 cannot be proven, they mist be enforced…

  2. Sarah Fenwick says:

    It’s demoralising to see things falling apart, but if you keep trying and seeing things through, you will succeed in your vision for a better Egypt. Good luck, and remember that your mountain can only be climbed one step at a time!

  3. brobof says:

    Revolution… Reaction… Realisation. And so it starts again:
    http://pastebin.com/BxK2FvWK

    A two words of comfort:
    Patience: http://www.opendemocracy.net/nawal-el-saadawi/second-egyptian-revolution-millions-of-egyptians-have-left-their-homes
    Precedent: 


    #OpBast

  4. Noussa says:

    my beloved Egypt, my heart is broken when I see what happens in your streets. My heart is broken when I see my brothers die under the bullets with the mute consent of the majority, and my sisters’ clothes torn off and raped.

    I wish I knew what to do, not to comfort any of us here, maybe we dont deserve to be comforted, but to change the things, to turn the horror we are experiencing today into something useful for for Egypt today before tomorrow.

    Is our revolution dead? Some days I wonder if it really existed or if it was but a mirage. I wish I can say it is not dead, it is only waiting for our care and attention, but I don’t know.

    My heart aches for Egypt, and I feel I am selfish to complain about it, because at least my heart still beats while so many egyptian hearts stopped to beat for mine and yours to continue.

    What now?

  5. Omneya Mamdouh says:

    One of the best I have read since the begining of the revolution and it indeed put lots of pieces together. You spoke what some of us are thinking down to the dot. However, unless this writing and the like reache the 80% that ygxo is talking about, it is a storm in a tea cup! I wish you would translate it in Arabic and post it on your twitter and facebook.

    On a different note, no, it is not comforting and no, it is not the time to be comforted by any means, but can you see any glimpse of light??!

  6. Dina says:

    I salute suchnan analysis, yu have voiced my thought eloquently……it beats me why we are loosing all these lives with non strategy or clear plan…..I think I would opt for any election that would lead to a civil govt and perhaps an earlypresidential….this should b the goal…get ridnofnscaf fast and through the ballot boxes ….it’s our only hope!

  7. mycr says:

    « […] I show you the land in turmoil,
    What should not be has come to pass.
    Men will seize weapons of warfare,
    The land will live in uproar.
    Men will make arrows of copper,
    Will crave blood for bread,
    Will laugh aloud at distress.
    […]
    Every mouth is full of « how I wish »
    All happines has vanished ;
    The land is ruined, its fate decreed,
    Deprived of produce, lacking in crops […] »

    Or

    « […] I meditate on what has happened :
    While trouble entered in today,
    And turmoil will not cease tomorrow,
    Everyone is mute about it.
    The whole land is in great distress […] »

    These small extracts of poems come from « Prophecies of Neferti » (written probably in the 3500 years ago) for the first text and « The complaints of Khakheperre-Sonb » (written about 4000 years ago) (as translated by Miriam Lichtheim, in Ancient Egyptian Litterature, University of California Press, 1975.

    They can apply to what is going on today. But from the trouble times before the Middle Kingdom a great civilisation was reborn.

    Your text is a clear and powerful analysis of the situation. Keep writing and speaking. Your voice like a few others are important. And not only important but necessary.

  8. liquidmind says:

    here is the solution:
    please unite around a well-thought out approach from our most prominent non-political figure

  9. londongirl says:

    Your best ever, Sandmonkey. Dark and dangerous, the truth of your piece cuts through me like an icy wind.However, could this perhaps be ‘those darkest hours just before the dawn?’ And if we are to live this day, the dawn will surely come. May your spirit rise up again. All respect to you!

  10. Kanaafa says:

    I am not Egyptian
    Egypt is my home, and has been these past 19 years. My little family is Egyptian, most friends Egyptians. I sometimes dream Egyptian and I believe that I will live and die in Egypt. However I am not Egyptian. So when it comes to commenting on how Egyptians should run their revolution, or their daily lives, my comments are, ultimately, disposable. My views are a product of who I am and where I am from.
    But for all that I will venture to say the following:
    You are right that the opportunity to make the real changes passed – the ‘Junta Shuffle’ in February fooled too many people, people weary of days and nights of fighting, marching, waiting for announcements, and a large swathe of people in midans all around the country ready to believe the army leadership was the best that could come out of the situation – and an even larger population of people pressuring the youth all through the 18 days to “go home, what more do you want?”

    So yes, the revolution was caught off-guard; hoodwinked, bamboozled and quickly turned into a spectacle of patriotic and commercial flag waving and genuine relief on the majority of people’s part.

    So overwhelming was this, coupled with multiple distractions (referendum on the national level) and the willingness of activists to be distracted by Coptic rights, Palestine, women’s rights that the momentum on the revolution was lost. It stumbled. Its leading youth pulled into TV appearances, invitations to appear in conferences abroad and show other countries how Egypt unseated a dictatorial regime in 18 days. Yes hubris there was, aplenty.
    And the cracks in the beautiful picture began to appear – people started to be tortured, thrown in prison, molested – by the glorious army.
    Protests were still being violently dispersed. The old regime’s killers and their masters were not brought to swift trial and justice was not served.
    The revolution was taken away. The families of its martyrs abused and beaten. The old guard was very much the new guard – and the specter of the jihadi bogeyman was paraded as killers were let out of jail and allowed to form political parties and appear on talk-shows.
    And the elections – the big distraction of our time – all the political forces – and there are many now – agreed to participate, so shiny was the bauble dangled in front of them – and the silent majority whispered loud that the hope was in elections.
    And a week before those elections the army/police attacked Tahrir’s last remaining stragglers so brutally and so unexpectedly that people – people of conscience – woke up and said here is the red line you cannot cross.
    I don’t agree entirely that it was the symbol of Tahrir that sent people down in November, but the symbol of state oppression – which is also the cause.
    So here I disagree – the symbol is not Tahrir, or any building, or street. The symbol has become the injustice, brutality, callousness and disregard for Egyptian people’s rights. The symbol is therefore very much aligned with the cause, which is/was eradication of a corrupt, oppressive, brutal and morally bankrupt regime – regardless of where the do their dirty work or who the victims are (Copts in Maspero, women in Tahrir, kids in Alex, Moslem brotherhood in Assiut).

    If the cause is to be taken anywhere, symbols of brutality will be opposed, resisted.

    The cause is a long-haul. Years. But until the cause is realized people will continue to resist oppression and injustice wherever it appears. And they must, or the cause is lost.

    However, while resistance is necessary and protests, marches, strikes and other acts of civil disobedience will continue, those working towards the cause need to be on the front foot, not just a reaction to the next inevitable escalation by the regime. Someone needs to say “today we protest, tomorrow we go home” and here I agree with you that people, for all the reasons we know – loss of friends and family, outrage at injustice, feelings of impotence and helplessness, get sucked in to protracted battles and play into the plan of the regime, which is to wear them down, pick them off, reduce public sympathy for them.

    Somebody has to say, “objective achieved” and take people out of the street when THEY say so – make it consensual if it pleases – and not let it run into a protracted battle that implodes or is routed.

    Blood and eyes and teeth and bones are not easily replaced and should not be thrown away – and lives even less so.

    The talk about withdrawal being either cowardice or somehow less important for the cause is what gets people killed for no reason – and this needs to be stopped – and someone needs to remind people that there is a cause – and here I am in total agreement with your well written and timely piece.

    Thanks ya monkey

  11. A German from Berlin says:

    Up to last weekend I had the impression that SCAF was succeeding in keeping their hands clean, while at the same time dismantling the revolution. Since then showed their true ugly face. Especially the brutality against women was all over the news world wide. So don’t give up! Keep on fighting for your freedom. Especially keep on protesting and never let them shut you up again. Often when everything seems all hopeless, it is just short before victory or at least a major improvement.
    When they do something wrong the need to know there will be people on the streets.
    On thing I find remarkable is the patience you have with the military trials. As Alaa’s case proves, the military can’t try civilians. Therefore all these prison sentences are void and the army is holding people against the law. Try to get them out. Whoever is in power has to serve the people and be accountable to the people.
    You have many people in your population with the ancient egyptian slave mentality. They have never know anything else. So when Pharao Tantawi speeks they follow. They can only learn about democracy by following examples. They even have to learn a whole knew view of life. You have tens of thousands of young man who have the men/women = predator/prey relation raised onto them from childhood on. So there are a whole lot of people who fear to take responsibility for their own actions and rather follow some in their view legitimate leader.
    And just now the women march is going on and the tides are turning again. What can SCAF do now? Send thugs and start shooting? Even the dumbest people would understand, that an army who attacks women, especially if they are part of the people they are supposed to protect, doesn’t deserve any respect. So either they give in in some way and at least agree to fulfill some of the demands or they speed up their own downfall.
    At some point there will also be army people who have some honor left and speak up.
    So you just keep on protesting and you will get everything , even though it might cost more blood. You focus on a goal until you reach it, then you choose a new goal. This continues until the people who are in power stop using violence and then you have democracy. Ordinary people everywhere are with you. If you succeed, the whole world we be a better place and even though you were not the first, you will be the leader.

  12. Khaled Tantawi says:

    Chapeau, I agree we focused on reforming politics at time when the average Egyptian wanted a social reform, He won’t go home to feed his kids “freedom” and “democracy”..and when some people tried to do something about their economic status, ask for a better pay, people attacked them, and asked them to wait..so yes I don’t blame whoever sold his voice in the parliamentary elections..
    However, I never lose hope as long as the persistent hardcore revolutionaries are present..things will get better, just in time..

  13. Sherif says:

    I don’t recall reading such crap in a long time, about two months to be exact. You are full of shit.

  14. TheInquisit0r says:

    Thanks for connecting the dots for me Mahmoud. I was confused as to who were the sides fighting recently and why. I thought that the Salafists were a tool used by Saudi Arabia against Egypt to keep them from leaving the Sunni-Zionist Alliance. Nonetheless what you saud makes more sense, but don’t you think that the salafists could backstab the military at some point and climb to the top?

    From my research, the MB is a ‘moderate’ version of Islam endorsed and created by the West as a force created to covertly support their agenda. – http://www.redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan/MB.htm –This is an excellent article that connects all the dots, an eye opener – Their purpose is to pose as the saviors of the Islamic people and nations by appealing to the religious minded and those who harbor anti-globalist sentiment. The army and MB’s jousting for power is nothing new and is an ongoing conflict.

    So it would only make sense that the Army creates a counter Islamic force or bogeyman ally to counter the globalist endorsed MB faction.

    The only truly tragic outcome was that the most educated and rational activists have been squeezed out and are being slaughtered. If it wasn’t for their efforts, the country would have maintained the status quo

  15. Dahlia says:

    I definitely agree with symbolizing things…its part of our culture….alot of my friends after all the killing and torturing happening in the past days, wrote 25-1-2012 is the solution? So ikept asking them why specifically this date? Why not now? Why not the day the violence started…? No one had an answer….its just commemorating a date and not really thinking why not now……i think the reolutionaries lost the support of the egyptian population sometime down the line of their sit ins which some i wasnt supporting at all…..probably those lower income people who need their bread and butter more than anything else…..then those revolutionaries who lost alot of thier close friends or saw them get tortured from military became living in their own bubble….they only listen to the voices in their heads and maybe to those who say the things that support those inner voices….they are making the cause of their sit ins personal and not onlyfor egypts good…..i sympathise with tjem and support their vision but not the means they wnat to achieve their goal with…..and then this scaf who keep building walls to keep the 2 sides apart? Is this some sortof joke? For me its a symbol f ekhbato rasko fel 7eeta and protestors keep doing it and keep dying in vain…….and all this happening and still tahrir which is the biggest symbol of ur revolution is still empty….?? We have to find the missing link between the protestors and the rest of the egyptian population or we all Lose……i have no idea what i just wrote…..mixed up feelings of mine……

  16. Mark Malone says:

    Heres some info on how the communications got cut

    State Security had planned it in advance as was discovered from some of the documents recovered from the HQ is SSIS

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/video/2011/oct/20/esc-ctrl-arab-spring-video?CMP=twt_gu

    Here a Vodafone spokeperson describes the role played.

    I have a little bit of research on it here
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/71262336/Tweeting-History-An-Enquiry-Into-Aspects-Of-Social-Media-in-the-Egyptian-Revolution

    Love and solidarity

  17. Sarah says:

    1st : this land isn’t cursed ya Mahmoud! well, at least we shouldn’t say it out loud 

    2nd: it is never too late. I think building on the cultural change should be a priority regardless how tight the window seem to be. The real problem with the revolutionaries is that they want everything right now. You can’t see change in a country like Egypt instantly unless it is a catastrophe. So you build & you wait.

    3rd: the salafis thing … hmmm

    4th: there is a way out of this without blood. but all what is needed a little self control from the revolutionaries side. As long as u have groups calling for violence & acting upon those calls bloodshed won’t stop.

    5th: this is Egypt, we don’t fly we fall in style. we will get out of this, maybe not in the way we thought we will. but sure it will be magnificent. it is all over history.

  18. Victoria says:

    It’s very sad and dark days for Egypt and it’s people. I wish Egypt will see bright days sooner,then later. Remember French and Russian Revolutions,it’s took years to change country,regime,mentality of people. Egypt is a great country with rich history. Yes we hoped by removing Mubarak,we will change country in few months? Illusion,beautiful dream. The reality is cruel! But solution will come in own way and in own time. Never give up Sandmonkey!

  19. DippyFreeman says:

    Your writing is terrific.. this is what Scaf wants to do wear people down until they are discouraged, don’t let them do it!! They want the locals to get fed up and turn back to the army for security etc.

    Follow the money.. ad campaign? radio time? street festivals.. something to get grass root support back. I know it sounds not to bad from where I am sitting.. my heart goes out to you and your colleagues in the campaign.. the election accounts are shocking..

    Is there any way to attack that angle of the Military trying civilians as mentioned above?? International Court? something? Where is the judiciary in all this?

  20. Amin says:

    Change the symbol, the revolution symbol. The Egyptian flag red white and black is the military symbol of the last 60 years. How about the old Egyptian green flag with the 3 stars? For symbolizing the revolution, a civil and just government.
    Peace

  21. Faisal says:

    Salamtak ya sh2ee2.

    Well-written.

  1. >via: http://www.sandmonkey.org/2011/12/20/underneath/

 

__________________________

Egypt army dawn raid

kills five protesters

 

Published Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Egyptian troops fired live ammunition in a dawn raid on Tahrir Square, killing at least five protesters and wounding 48 in another attempt to end a sit-in against military rule, a medical source said.

"There's blood everywhere," a medic, wishing to remain anonymous, exclaimed from Tahrir Square.

Gunfire rang out across Tahrir Square at dawn as security forces charged hundreds of protesters attempting to hold their ground, activists and a Reuters journalist at the scene said.

Clashes are now in their fifth day as Egypt's military intensifies its efforts to crush protests demanding an immediate transfer of power from the ruling Supreme Council of Armed Forces (SCAF) to a civilian government.

The death toll is in dispute, with the Ministry of Health placing it at 11 with 201 injured, while medics on the ground in Tahrir Square say at least 19 have been killed.

The source fears many deaths have not been accounted for, as there are concerns that death certificates are being manipulated to lower the death toll.

Graphic scenes from the military's brutal crackdown on protests has sparked international condemnation, with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton slamming the army's treatment of women as a "disgrace."

"This systematic degradation of Egyptian women dishonors the revolution, disgraces the state and its uniform, and is not worthy of a great people," Clinton was quoted as saying in a speech at Washington's Georgetown University.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon criticized the use of "excessive" force by Egyptian authorities, while Amnesty International urged arms suppliers to stop sending small arms and ammunition to Egypt's military and security forces.

Reporters Without Borders said the army's "systematic use of violence against media personnel," was blocking access to information in and around the square.

Egypt's military remains defiant, however, with unusually strong words condemning protesters, with one retired general saying they should be sent to "Hitler's incinerators."

"What is your feeling when you see Egypt and its history burn in front of you?" retired general Abdel Moneim Kato, an army adviser, told al-Shorouk daily, referring to a government archive building set alight during clashes.

"Yet you worry about a vagrant who should be burnt in Hitler's incinerators."

General Adel Emara, a member of Egypt's ruling military council, said "evil forces" wanted to sow chaos and that said soldiers had shown "self-restraint" despite provocation.

"What is happening does not belong with the revolution and its pure youth, who never wanted to bring down this nation," he said. Despite the actions of the security forces in Tahrir, Emara denied that the army had given orders to clear the square.

Egypt remains tense 10 months after mass protests swept dictator Hosni Mubarak from power after three decades of rule.

Egypt's military immediately assumed power to fill a vacuum left by Mubarak's rule, pledging to transform the country into a fully-fledged democracy.

Recent actions, however, have led many Egyptians to believe the military is tightening its grip on power. The SCAF still conduct military trials for civilians; detain activists, bloggers, and journalists; and have reimposed the dreaded emergency laws.

(al-Akhbar, Reuters)

 

>via: http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/egypt-army-dawn-raid-kills-five-protesters

__________________________

 

Egyptian women

decry abuse by soldiers

View Photo Gallery — The ruling military council quickly apologized for the violent beating of a woman, and vowed to punish those responsible for the recent violence. View more photos of protests against the regime.

By Leila Fadel and Ragia Mostafa

CAIRO — Thousands of women, enraged by images of female protesters being dragged through the streets by soldiers during weekend protests, marched Tuesday in central Cairo to decry the Egyptian military’s recent use of force against demonstrators.

The rare public outpouring by women, young and old, religious and secular, appeared to turn up the pressure on the country’s ruling military council. The generals, who had shownno remorse for the recent violence, quickly issued a statement Tuesday evening offering “sincerest apologies to the great women of Egypt for what happened” and promising that those responsible would be reprimanded.

Video

A video showing a young woman being beaten by Egyptian police and having her religious robe pulled off is fueling protests. (Dec. 19)

Video

In Egypt, the army has turned on the civilian demonstrators who once saw the military as their friends. A second day of violence left at least nine dead and hundreds wounded. (Dec. 17)

Egypt’s conservative society has been shaken by nearly a week of deadly protests and by powerful images of women being stripped and beaten by soldiers in riot gear. Many in Tuesday’s crowd carried a widely circulated photo of a woman being dragged by soldiers, her scarf and abaya ripped from her body to expose her blue bra.

“Egypt was stripped,” their posters read.

The military leadership has tried to paint demonstrators as paid thugs and conspirators intent on destabilizing Egypt.

But as the women chanted for an end to military rule and waved to bystanders to join them, they seemed to signal renewed solidarity among Egyptians. In recent days, activists and politicians have increasingly called for presidential elections no later than the end of January to remove the military council from power.

The protest appeared to be the largest march by women since demonstrations began here 11 months ago. A group of men, including newly elected members of parliament, formed a shield around them.

“Egyptian girls are a red line,” they chanted hours after another predawn raid on Tahrir Square by soldiers and military police. At least 13 people have been killed, including nine by gunfire, and nearly 1,000 wounded since violence began on Friday whenmilitary police tried to break up a sit-inoutside the cabinet building.

“Even those not sympathetic to protesters can’t deny the power of an image of a defenseless woman being attacked,” said Heba Morayef, an Egypt researcher at Human Rights Watch. But, she acknowledged, images of young men hurling stones and setting fire to buildings also have had a powerful effect.

The march followed a news conference Monday by Maj. Gen. Adel Emara, a member of the ruling military council, who called soldiers who shot and beat protesters heroes and praised them for their “restraint.”

Journalists and other witnesses said that in recent days they had seen soldiers rushing to Tahrir Square with guns in their hands and using truncheons to beat fleeing protesters, scenes that were captured on video. The sounds of gunfire also were heard.

“Despite the pain it caused, it was a slap in the face to the military council, it weakened its power and showed its true face to the world,” said Ghada Ibrahim, who was beaten and detained Friday.

Special correspondent Ingy Hassieb contributed to this report.

>via: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/egyptian-women-decry-abuse-by-soldiers/2011/12/20/gIQATGld7O_story.html?tid=sm_btn_tw

 

 

 

OCCUPY: Is Occupy Wall Street The New Civil Rights Movement? > Loop21

Is Occupy Wall Street
The New Civil Rights
Movement?
BY C. CRYN JOHANNSEN

Some say yes, others say no!

The Occupy Wall Street movement began on September 17th in New York City. The movement quickly gained momentum with encampments springing up in over one thousand cities nationwide. Shortly thereafter it spread across the globe with occupies now flourishing in Sydney, London, Paris, and so forth. Inspired by the ‘Arab Spring’ revolutions that spread across the Middle East last year, Occupy protesters are denouncing economic injustice in the United States and elsewhere. Despite challenges – like winter weather and the destruction of most of the major encampments – the occupiers do not seem to have lost their momentum. In fact, it appears the number of participants is growing. With these new challenges, occupiers’ tactics are continually changing on a day-to-day basis. One tactic, however, that has not changed is the protesters’ commitment to acts of non-violent, civil disobedience. This has led many experts to compare and contrast occupy to that of the civil rights movement and other major social movements.

Activist, investigative journalist, and author of Nickel & Dimed, Barbara Ehrenreich see both similarities and differences when comparing it to previous popular movements in the U.S.

“OWS is much more broad-based in terms of class than the anti-war and feminist movements were initially. In some ways it is, much like the Southern civil rights movement, a movement of the poor,” Ehrenreich stated in an email.

When asked about its particular strengths, Ehrenreich built on this idea of it being a movement for the poor. She wrote, “It’s biggest strength is the near-universality of its concerns (the 99%.) Also, their refusal to get involved in politics-as-we-know-it is another strength.” She also does not believe it is just a fad.

Michael McCray, an attorney, civil rights expert, and author (his forthcoming book is ACORN 8: Memoirs of an ACORN Whistleblower) echoed a similar sentiment about occupy’s similarities to the civil rights movement.

In a phone interview, McCray stated, “They are both a people's movements. I actually think that occupy is a continuation of the civil rights movement.”

Unlike Ehrenreich, McCray believes that in order for occupy to succeed, it needs to enter the body politic. Referring to Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals as an important primer for social movements of this nature, McCray stated that occupy has already achieved the first goal in that book: to agitate and disrupt. In so doing, they have gotten the establishment’s attention. However, they have not moved beyond this first stage. If they do not move on to engage the body politic, McCray said, “it's going to wind up being more of a demonstration.” In his view, that means it will eventually lose its effectiveness. But he added, “the movement is still young.”

While McCray and Ehrenreich believe the occupy movement is similar in nature to the civil rights protests, former member of the SNCC, author, and poet Kalamu ya Salaam does not see similarities between the two movements, explaining, “First of all, the civil rights movement grew, as it is often discussed, out of two or three specific currents. One was the effort led largely by NAACP to work through the courts to achieve equal access to public accommodations and public institutions, such as schools. Of course, it is often said that civil rights movement, for some people, marked the beginning with 1954 Brown v. The Board of Education ruling by the Supreme Court. But that was one current of the civil rights movement. There were many, many people working in that area, not just the schools, but in other areas of public accommodations. There was an established goal, which was the ending of segregation, and an established methodology to try and get it done legally, that is to get the segregation laws overturned and get laws put in place to guaranteeing equal access. That's a very specific goal and orientation. Another current, which many people are not fully aware of, is that after World War II and the Korean conflict you had a large number of black men who had been trained in the military and many of whom had actually fought in the theaters of war in Europe, in the Pacific, and in Korea, and who were returning home and would not take second class citizenship.”
The third current that fueled the civil rights movement, Salaam argued, was the international struggle by people of color.

Although Salaam does not see direct similarities between the civil rights movement and occupy, and has not been involved with Occupy New Orleans, (where he was born and is still a resident), he made it clear that he supports it, he publicizes information about it, and he encourages it.  He does, however, see a link between the Arab Spring protests and the occupy protests. But he warns, “To compare the two is, from my way of thinking, an inaccurate analysis. To link the two is important. They are linked, but not comparable.”

Salaam explains why he does not think Occupy and the Arab Spring as being comparable.

“I really don't believe that middle class America is anywhere near ready to confront the issues that face this country. I think people are uncomfortable. I think people, in many cases, are in some really tight situations. A large segment of the population is suffering economically. But that doesn't mean they are ready to confront the seriousness of the issues.”

In other words, the country itself is not ready to assume collective responsibility to carry through with lasting and exceptional change. This is especially true when it comes to economic exploitation.

He pointed to a profoundly difficult societal issue to make this point: sexual molestation and assault.

“This is one example. They have been doing studies, and it is coming out piece by piece by piece by piece, the seriousness of sexual assault in this country on children and women. You can look at television all day and not fully understand the extent of it, and also not understand that it has been this way for a long time in the United States. People are not willing to deal with it. If people are not willing to do deal with that, then they are not prepared to actually fight a resistance and a battle to stop economic exploitation. If you are not willing to fight to end the sexual molestation of women and children in this society, don't tell me you are ready to fight to end economic exploitation. I think very seriously - and this is just one example - that sexual assault against women and children in this society is a very accurate index of how sick this society is. And the fact that that is not at the top of the agenda for people is an indication of people not being ready to deal seriously with issues because sexual assault affects far more people right now than the economic stuff.”

 

VIDEO: 2011′s Music Video Picks > Africa is a Country

2011′s Music Video Picks

 

 

Spoek Mathambo

Inexplicably absent in this year’s fashionable blogs’ and magazines’ year-end lists are videos by African artists, or those videos recorded somewhere in Africa. I’ve picked ten which I think stood out. South Africans Pieter Hugo and Michael Cleary directed and shot the video for Spoek Mathambo’s ‘Control’ in Langa, Cape Town. We took issue with aspects of it when it came out in February, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t striking:

Directed by Juliet Rios and Gabe Imlay, and choreographed by “Fela!” on Broadway assistant choreographer Maija Garcia, the video for Seun Kuti’s ‘Rise’ comes close to capturing his live performances. It was released in April:

Blitz The Ambassador calls his album Native Sun “a journey backwards, back through hip hop, the Caribbean soundsystem culture that preceded it, back to its African roots, with the final kora.” This historical journey and the return to his land of birth, Ghana, are reflected in the stream of archive material used when Blitz threw the full album on YouTube, also in April:

In May, Buraka Som Sistema released the video for their kuduro-infused ‘Hangover (BaBaBa)’. Directed by João Pedro Moreira and Carlos Afonso, the video uses images from the Portuguese band’s performance at the Festival Baía das Gatas in São Vicente, one of Cape Verde’s islands:

When Tumi shared his POWA mixtape in June, it came with a video directed by Teboho Mahlatsi. The school girls who go on a violent Clockwork Orange-like rampage are as angry as Tumi’s lyrics, with the end of the video leaving the viewer confused:

In July, Nneka came up with a first animated video for the title song of her album ‘Soul is Heavy’ (and got the hang of it because she released a second one just last month):

If you were to rely on the average South African music video (especially the kwaito-heavy ones from Johannesburg), you’d be forgiven for believing South African city life is all about heavy boozing, tuning and styling. Director Anne-Sophie Leens and Cape Town spaza crew Driemanskap showed us the flip-side of those cities in the video for ‘I Will Make It’, recorded in Gugulethu:

Still in July, J Majik and Wickaman cleverly used Josh Cole’s images of Rwandan and Burundian dancers in the streets of Kigali and Bujumbura. I wonder whether the dancers got to see the video themselves:

I hadn’t heard of Kommanda Obbs before August when he plugged the video for ‘Ts’epe’, recorded in Lesotho. Pheello Makosholo captures the country’s high mountain life in black and white unlike any Sotho music video I have seen before:

And finally, in October, X Plastaz released the video for ‘Africa’ with the island of Zanzibar and the streets of the Tanzanian crew’s home town Arusha as their stage. The scenery is efficient enough, but the one reason why I think it works is for their subtitling of the lyrics. Raps and lyrics by artists trying to stay true to their local audience in Swahili, Zulu, Lingala, Arabic or Wolof are often lost on the African diaspora so eager to connect with these songs and artists — an easy English or French YouTube translation will get the artists’ message out in a way no other social platform or expensive overseas touring can.

 

 

VIDEO: Talib Kweli - "Distractions" > SoulCulture

| Music Video

Talib Kweli – “Distractions” 

 

December 19, 2011 by  

After dropping off the audio a few days ago, Talib Kweli returns with some visuals for the Oh No produced “Distractions” the first cut from his forthcoming album Prisoner of Conscious. Watch the video below directed by Darryl Phillips, of ICU Media .

Talib Kweli on “Distractions”: “A little less a year ago, I got a beat from one of my favorite producers, Oh No, that I felt would be a perfect sound bed for the album I was working on, Prisoner Of Conscious. As I played the beat over and over trying to write lyrics, I kept finding myself distracted. By the TV, by twitter, by trivial things. I realized then that the beat was asking me to write about Distractions. Beats talk to me. They tell me what to rap about, they suggest a guest for the song. One of the things I was distracted by was the news coming from Tahrir Square last year. The Arab Spring was unlike anything I’ve seen in my lifetime. Beginning with a vegetable cart owner named Mohammed Bouazizi setting himself on fire in Tunisia to protest general unfair treatment, the Arab Spring spread like wildfire to Sudan and then to Egypt, as thousands of protestors occupied Tahrir Square to call for corrupt president  Hosni Mubarak  to step down. The first line that I wrote for my song Distractions was, “they say it ain’t about the spoils of war, but turn around and tell you how much more the oil will cost.” This was inspired by the Arab Spring. Fast forward to September, 2011. Occupy Wall Street exploded into the collective consciousness of the world, but it started right here in New York City. I didn’t understand that this protest was something that was ongoing at first, so I did not pay much attention in the beginning. However, when I saw my contemporaries like  Lupe Fiasco  bringing blankets and  Immortal Technique  making multiple trips, I knew this was something I had a responsibility to be involved in. I went to Zucotti Park the day after I arrived back in NY. I traveled with Jamie Kilstein and Allison Kilkenny from Citizen Radio, and res, my partner in Idle Warship. What I saw made me proud of my hometown. Sure, I probably saw some homeless people. If the homeless aren’t in the 99 percent, who is? What was more prevalent was the organization, the sense of community. I saw students, musicians, wall street types, blue collar types, older activists and fresh faced newbies. It was the most democratic, American thing I had ever witnessed. And to think, it was inspired by the Arab Spring, just like my song! I was asked to address the crowd at the General Assembly, which is a daily gathering to discuss the issues at hand and how the people can move forward. Even though I am accustomed to being an entertainer, the thought of addressing people who were literally giving everything they had to this cause was a bit overwhelming. It was in that moment that I made the connection between my song Distractions and OWS. I sort of sputtered out Distractions, because this was the first time I was ever saying it out loud. The response to it has been nice, largely because a clip of it has made the rounds online. However, it wasn’t me kicking a verse that resonated the most with the people actually at Zucotti Park, it is what I said from my heart. When I stopped rapping and addressed the people directly, I had, in my opinion, a bigger impact. It showed me the humanity of the movement. We were one, stripped of our titles. I strive to be a great artist. But I also strive to be a greater man. I am not here to convince you one way or the other about Occupy Wall Street. I know how I feel about the movement and that’s good enough for me. I was so inspired by what those people are doing for our future that I wanted to celebrate them in the video for Distractions. I had some reservations about it. I did not want to appear like I was capitalizing. I hope that people see this video as I intended it, as a love letter to the Occupy Movement everywhere. Here it is, enjoy! For more information on Occupy Wall Street, including how you can participate, please visit http://occupywallst.org One love to my good friend Darryl Phillips, who always comes through for me and speaks truth to power. – Talib Kweli