PUB: PrincessDominique.com Shoe Anthology Call For Submission

PrincessDominique.com Shoe Anthology Call For Submission

A Love Affair with Shoes Anthology

A Love Affair With Shoes

Call for submission of personal accounts of shoe lovers and their adoration and ultimate obsession with shoes.

Our upcoming anthology, A Love Affair With Shoes (working title), will explore the journeys of avid shoe lovers through stories and essays written by women.

An existing love affair intricately binds women and shoes. Statistics show that about one in every two women own more than 20 pairs of shoes – with about 8% having more than 100 pairs in their own wardrobes. One in every 5 women admits spending more than $1,000 on shoes in a year. Shoes do more than change your outfits look. It can change your entire persona and easily give you a new outlook.

Little girls dream of owning their first pair of heels and practice walking in their mother’s stilettos.  A shoe can make an outfit, transform who you are, or invoke deep memories.

The stories we receive from shoe lovers will in large part dictate the structure of our book. We will focus on the what shoes mean to women and the feelings they invoke.

Possible Topics Might Include:

Your first pair of heels.
Shoe addictions.
Shoes that transform you into another woman.
Sad memories.
Walking in another’s shoes (did you want to be like a glamorous woman that you knew when you were a girl and have you lived up to the image?)

Things to Consider:

Writing can be wonderfully therapeutic and a lot of distressing feelings can come up in the process. This sounds like an easy topic, but we urge writers to dig deeper and really find out what it is about shoes that makes them feel they way they do.

Guidelines:

· Good writing skills are helpful, but not necessary – we will work closely with contributors to polish their writings.  Mostly we are looking for the heart and wisdom of our story-tellers.

· Please submit your 1000 word story (or as close to 1000 words as you can get) in the “body” of an email. Please no attachments to: PrincessChick@Gmail.com

· Be sure to include your name, address, phone number and email address along with your submission. Remember to notify us at once if you move, change your phone number or email.

· Each contributor chosen for the anthology will receive $100.00 (US) upon publication, a pair of Solemates, and a copy of the book when it is published in addition to the ability to join other contributors on a nationwide tour or other places they are able to make appearances.

· It may take time for you to write your story. We’d like to know you are considering making a submission, so, send us a note/email by June 1, 2010 as space for this project is limited.

· Final drafts of stories and essays must be received by August 1, 2010. The final selection process will begin then.

· Address your submissions to: Princess Dominique

Questions or Suggestions?

Contact Princess Dominique at princesschick@gmail.com

P.S. Follow us on Twitter (http://Twitter.com/MissPrincessDom) or log on to http://www.PrincessDominique.com to get updates and information on the book as it develops.

VIDEO: Sands of Oman > from Red Room

Naseem Rakha Author of THE CRYING TREE Broadway Books July, 2009

A prose/poem written by Naseem Rakha. In Sands a war correspondent attempts to lose herself and her memories in Oman's endless dunes.

Naseem Rakha

 
photo credit: Gretchen Mashkuri

Author Biography

  • Naseem Rakha is an award winning author and journalist whose stories have been heard on National Public Radio. Her best selling debut novel, The Crying Tree, has received the 2010 PNBA Award. She lives in Silverton, Oregon with her husband, son and a whole bunch of animals.
  • Continue Reading »

Influences

  • Kent Haruf, Wendel Berry, Truman Capote, David Gunderson

Favorite Books

  • A Place on Earth By Wendell Berry, Eventide By Kent Haruf, Sometimes a Great Notion by Ken Kesey, To Kill a Mockingbird By Harper Lee, Snow Falling an Cedars By David Guterson, Cry the Beloved Country Alan Paton, A Lesson Before Dying Ernest Gaines, Empire Falls Richard Russo, 1000 Acres Jane Smiley, A Passage to India E.M Forster, Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoyevsky

Favorite Authors

  • Kent Haruf, Wendell Berry, Ken Kesey, Ernest Gaines, Richard Russo, E.M. Forster, Truman Capote

What I'm Reading

  • The Book Thief By Markus Zusak

Web Links

 

INFO: Harryette Mullen Receives Jackson Poetry Prize > from Poets & Writers

Harryette Mullen Receives Jackson Poetry Prize

New York, NY -- Poets & Writers, Inc. is pleased to announce that Harryette Mullen is the recipient of the fourth annual Jackson Poetry Prize. The $50,000 prize honors an American poet of exceptional talent who deserves wider recognition. The award is designed to provide what all poets need -- time and the encouragement to write.

Ms. Mullen was selected by three esteemed judges: the poets Fanny Howe, Ted Kooser, and C. K. Williams. There was no application process. Poets were nominated by a panel of their peers who will remain anonymous.

The judges described Ms. Mullen's poems as "brilliant and enigmatic, familiar and subversive. Like jewels, her poems are multifaceted and shoot off lights. Mullen uses the techniques of sound association, innuendo, and signifying, and this way makes the reader alert to the cunning of the English language."

Mullen's books include Recyclopedia (Graywolf, 2006), Blues Baby: Early Poems (Bucknell University Press, 2002), Muse & Drudge (Signing Horse Press, 1995), S*PeRM**K*T (Singing Horse Press, 1992), and Trimmings (Tender Button Books, 1991). Her book Sleeping with the Dictionary (University of California Press, 2002) was a finalist for the National Book Award, the National Book Critics Circle Award, and the Los Angeles Times Book Award in poetry. She teaches African-American literature, American poetry, and creative writing at the University of California, Los Angeles. She has earned degrees in English and in literature from the University of Texas, Austin, and the University of California, Santa Cruz.

The previous recipients of the Jackson Poetry Prize are Linda Gregg (2009), Tony Hoagland (2008), and Elizabeth Alexander (2007).

The Jackson Poetry Prize, which is sponsored by Poets & Writers, Inc, was made possible by a significant donation from the Liana Foundation and named for the John and Susan Jackson family.

###

Photo Credit: Hank Lazer

via pw.org

 

INFO: Iraq War Vet: "We Were Told to Just Shoot People, and the Officers Would Take Care of Us" > from t r u t h o u t

Iraq War Vet: "We Were Told to Just Shoot People, and the Officers Would Take Care of Us"

by: Dahr Jamail, t r u t h o u t | Report

photo
(Image: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: The U.S. Army, K. OS, whiteblot)

On Monday, April 5, Wikileaks.org posted video footage from Iraq, taken from a US military Apache helicopter in July 2007 as soldiers aboard it killed 12 people and wounded two children. The dead included two employees of the Reuters news agency: photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen and driver Saeed Chmagh.

The US military confirmed the authenticity of the video.

The footage clearly shows an unprovoked slaughter, and is shocking to watch whilst listening to the casual conversation of the soldiers in the background.

As disturbing as the video is, this type of behavior by US soldiers in Iraq is not uncommon.

Truthout has spoken with several soldiers who shared equally horrific stories of the slaughtering of innocent Iraqis by US occupation forces.

"I remember one woman walking by," said Jason Washburn, a corporal in the US Marines who served three tours in Iraq. He told the audience at the Winter Soldier hearings that took place March 13-16, 2008, in Silver Spring, Maryland, "She was carrying a huge bag, and she looked like she was heading toward us, so we lit her up with the Mark 19, which is an automatic grenade launcher, and when the dust settled, we realized that the bag was full of groceries. She had been trying to bring us food and we blew her to pieces."

The hearings provided a platform for veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan to share the reality of their occupation experiences with the media in the US.

Washburn testified on a panel that discussed the rules of engagement (ROE) in Iraq, and how lax they were, to the point of being virtually nonexistent.

"During the course of my three tours, the rules of engagement changed a lot," Washburn's testimony continued, "The higher the threat the more viciously we were permitted and expected to respond. Something else we were encouraged to do, almost with a wink and nudge, was to carry 'drop weapons', or by my third tour, 'drop shovels'. We would carry these weapons or shovels with us because if we accidentally shot a civilian, we could just toss the weapon on the body, and make them look like an insurgent."

Hart Viges, a member of the 82nd Airborne Division of the Army who served one year in Iraq, told of taking orders over the radio.

"One time they said to fire on all taxicabs because the enemy was using them for transportation.... One of the snipers replied back, 'Excuse me? Did I hear that right? Fire on all taxicabs?' The lieutenant colonel responded, 'You heard me, trooper, fire on all taxicabs.' After that, the town lit up, with all the units firing on cars. This was my first experience with war, and that kind of set the tone for the rest of the deployment."

Vincent Emanuele, a Marine rifleman who spent a year in the al-Qaim area of Iraq near the Syrian border, told of emptying magazines of bullets into the city without identifying targets, running over corpses with Humvees and stopping to take "trophy" photos of bodies.

"An act that took place quite often in Iraq was taking pot shots at cars that drove by," he said, "This was not an isolated incident, and it took place for most of our eight-month deployment."

Kelly Dougherty - then executive director of Iraq Veterans Against the War - blamed the behavior of soldiers in Iraq on policies of the US government.

"The abuses committed in the occupations, far from being the result of a 'few bad apples' misbehaving, are the result of our government's Middle East policy, which is crafted in the highest spheres of US power," she said.

Michael Leduc, a corporal in the Marines who was part of the US attack on Fallujah in November 2004, said orders he received from his battalion JAG officer before entering the city were as follows: "You see an individual with a white flag and he does anything but approach you slowly and obey commands, assume it's a trick and kill him."

Brian Casler, a corporal in the Marines, spoke of witnessing the prevalent dehumanizing outlook soldiers took toward Iraqis during the invasion of Iraq.

"... on these convoys, I saw Marines defecate into MRE bags or urinate in bottles and throw them at children on the side of the road," he stated.

Scott Ewing, who served in Iraq from 2005-2006, admitted on one panel that units intentionally gave candy to Iraqi children for reasons other than "winning hearts and minds.

"There was also another motive," Ewing said. "If the kids were around our vehicles, the bad guys wouldn't attack. We used the kids as human shields."

In response to the WikiLeaks video, the Pentagon, while not officially commenting on the video, announced that two Pentagon investigations cleared the air crew of any wrongdoing.

A statement from the two probes said the air crew had acted appropriately and followed the ROE.

Adam Kokesh served in Fallujah beginning in February 2004 for roughly one year.

Speaking on a panel at the aforementioned hearings about the ROE, he held up the ROE card soldiers are issued in Iraq and said, "This card says, 'Nothing on this card prevents you from using deadly force to defend yourself'."

Kokesh pointed out that "reasonable certainty" was the condition for using deadly force under the ROE, and this led to rampant civilian deaths. He discussed taking part in the April 2004 siege of Fallujah. During that attack, doctors at Fallujah General Hospital told Truthout there were 736 deaths, over 60 percent of which were civilians.

"We changed the ROE more often than we changed our underwear," Kokesh said, "At one point, we imposed a curfew on the city, and were told to fire at anything that moved in the dark."

Kokesh also testified that during two cease-fires in the midst of the siege, the military decided to let out as many women and children from the embattled city as possible, but this did not include most men.

"For males, they had to be under 14 years of age," he said, "So I had to go over there and turn men back, who had just been separated from their women and children. We thought we were being gracious."

Steve Casey served in Iraq for over a year starting in mid-2003.

"We were scheduled to go home in April 2004, but due to rising violence we stayed in with Operation Blackjack," Casey said, "I watched soldiers firing into the radiators and windows of oncoming vehicles. Those who didn't turn around were unfortunately neutralized one way or another - well over 20 times I personally witnessed this. There was a lot of collateral damage."

Jason Hurd served in central Baghdad from November 2004 until November 2005. He told of how, after his unit took "stray rounds" from a nearby firefight, a machine gunner responded by firing over 200 rounds into a nearby building.

"We fired indiscriminately at this building," he said. "Things like that happened every day in Iraq. We reacted out of fear for our lives, and we reacted with total destruction."

Hurd said the situation deteriorated rapidly while he was in Iraq. "Over time, as the absurdity of war set in, individuals from my unit indiscriminately opened fire at vehicles driving down the wrong side of the road. People in my unit would later brag about it. I remember thinking how appalled I was that we were laughing at this, but that was the reality."

Other soldiers Truthout has interviewed have often laughed when asked about their ROE in Iraq.

Garret Reppenhagen served in Iraq from February 2004-2005 in the city of Baquba, 40 kilometers (about 25 miles) northeast of Baghdad. He said his first experience in Iraq was being on a patrol that killed two Iraqi farmers as they worked in their field at night.

"I was told they were out in the fields farming because their pumps only operated with electricity, which meant they had to go out in the dark when there was electricity," he explained, "I asked the sergeant, if he knew this, why did he fire on the men. He told me because the men were out after curfew. I was never given another ROE during my time in Iraq."

Emmanuel added: "We took fire while trying to blow up a bridge. Many of the attackers were part of the general population. This led to our squad shooting at everything and anything in order to push through the town. I remember myself emptying magazines into the town, never identifying a target."

Emmanuel spoke of abusing prisoners he knew were innocent, adding, "We took it upon ourselves to harass them, and took them to the desert to throw them out of our Humvees, while kicking and punching them when we threw them out."

Jason Wayne Lemue is a Marine who served three tours in Iraq.

"My commander told me, 'Kill those who need to be killed, and save those who need to be saved'; that was our mission on our first tour," he said of his first deployment during the invasion.

"After that the ROE changed, and carrying a shovel, or standing on a rooftop talking on a cell phone, or being out after curfew [meant those people] were to be killed. I can't tell you how many people died because of this. By my third tour, we were told to just shoot people, and the officers would take care of us."

When this Truthout reporter was in Baghdad in November 2004, my Iraqi interpreter was in the Abu Hanifa mosque that was raided by US and Iraqi soldiers during Friday prayers.

"Everyone was there for Friday prayers, when five Humvees and several trucks carrying [US soldiers and] Iraqi National Guards entered," Abu Talat told Truthout on the phone from within the mosque while the raid was in progress. "Everyone starting yelling 'Allahu Akbar' (God is the greatest) because they were frightened. Then the soldiers started shooting the people praying!"

"They have just shot and killed at least four of the people praying," he said in a panicked voice, "At least 10 other people are wounded now. We are on our bellies and in a very bad situation."

Iraqi Red Crescent later confirmed to Truthout that at least four people were killed, and nine wounded. Truthout later witnessed pieces of brain splattered on one of the walls inside the mosque while large blood stains covered carpets at several places.

This type of indiscriminate killing has been typical from the initial invasion of Iraq.

Truthout spoke with Iraq war veteran and former National Guard and Army Reserve member Jason Moon, who was there for the invasion.

"While on our initial convoy into Iraq in early June 2003, we were given a direct order that if any children or civilians got in front of the vehicles in our convoy, we were not to stop, we were not to slow down, we were to keep driving. In the event an insurgent attacked us from behind human shields, we were supposed to count. If there were thirty or less civilians we were allowed to fire into the area. If there were over thirty, we were supposed to take fire and send it up the chain of command. These were the rules of engagement. I don't know about you, but if you are getting shot at from a crowd of people, how fast are you going to count, and how accurately?"

Moon brought back a video that shows his sergeant declaring, "The difference between an insurgent and an Iraqi civilian is whether they are dead or alive."

Moon explains the thinking: "If you kill a civilian he becomes an insurgent because you retroactively make that person a threat."

According to the Pentagon probes of the killings shown in the WikiLeaks video, the air crew had "reason to believe" the people seen in the video were fighters before opening fire.

Article 48 of the Geneva Conventions speaks to the "basic rule" regarding the protection of civilians:

"In order to ensure respect for and protection of the civilian population and civilian objects, the Parties to the conflict shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives and accordingly shall direct their operations only against military objectives."

What is happening in Iraq seems to reflect what psychiatrist Robert Jay Lifton calls "atrocity-producing situations." He used this term first in his book "The Nazi Doctors." In 2004, he wrote an article for The Nation, applying his insights to the Iraq War and occupation.

"Atrocity-producing situations," Lifton wrote, occur when a power structure sets up an environment where "ordinary people, men or women no better or worse than you or I, can regularly commit atrocities.... This kind of atrocity-producing situation ... surely occurs to some degrees in all wars, including World War II, our last 'good war.' But a counterinsurgency war in a hostile setting, especially when driven by profound ideological distortions, is particularly prone to sustained atrocity - all the more so when it becomes an occupation."

Cliff Hicks served in Iraq from October 2003 to August 2004.

"There was a tall apartment complex, the only spot from where people could see over our perimeter," Hicks told Truthout, "There would be laundry hanging off the balconies, and people hanging out on the roof for fresh air. The place was full of kids and families. On rare occasions, a fighter would get atop the building and shoot at our passing vehicles. They never really hit anybody. We just knew to be careful when we were over by that part of the wall, and nobody did shit about it until one day a lieutenant colonel was driving down and they shot at his vehicle and he got scared. So he jumped through a bunch of hoops and cut through some red tape and got a C-130 to come out the next night and all but leveled the place. Earlier that evening when I was returning from a patrol the apartment had been packed full of people." 

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

  

»


Dahr Jamail, an independent journalist, is the author of "The Will to Resist: Soldiers Who Refuse to Fight in Iraq and Afghanistan," (Haymarket Books, 2009), and "Beyond the Green Zone: Dispatches From an Unembedded Journalist in Occupied Iraq," (Haymarket Books, 2007). Jamail reported from occupied Iraq for nine months as well as from Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Turkey over the last five years.

Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

And here we go in

And here we go in Afghanistan, the same old shit !!!My god will we ever learn ?? Obama, bring our troops home !!!

"Just following orders" is

"Just following orders" is reminiscent of the excuse of many Gestapo foot-soldiers following the post-Hitler era.

I applaud those who returned

I applaud those who returned and told what I "hope" are true stories about the atrocities done in the name of America. Certainly the Iraqis and other Muslims know these truths, and based on them and our illegal incursion into Iraq will undoubtedly become our enemies in the future.

I think every American citizen should think about what would have happened during our Revolutionary War if the British and the Hessians had had access to such indiscriminate fire power and remote killing by drones.

Although I can find NO way to defend my country's intrusion into Iraq since it was almost entirely based on lies from the previous administration and a desire for oil and strategic base locations, I certainly understand a soldier's reaction to the possibility of death.

Obama, support the troops and bring them home now. Do not support the self-serving and imperialistic motivations that got us into this mess.

It is not the soldiers'

It is not the soldiers' fault.

It is our fault. The soldier's job is to kill people as efficiently as possible. That is what armed forces are supposed to do.

The Constitution gives Congress the exclusive right to declare war; i.e., to send soldiers to kill people.

We elect representatives to Congress in order to make that kind of decision in our name. The House of Representatives has the exclusive right to fund ---or de-fund--- wars and all other federal activities.

Those are the basic facts. I don't care if the war was never declared; if Bush did it; if Obama continues it; etc. They represent us, the American electorate (We, the People). So it is our fault that it has happened, and our fault if it continues.

War is...... a video game.

War is...... a video game.

The US has become as guilty

The US has become as guilty as the enemy! Self righteous in the murder and mayhem against innocents has created a shameful nation forever. There is no pride in fighting a war like a rabid animal, just a unforgiven soul to burn in hell for eternity.

Just keep track of how many

Just keep track of how many mid-level officers get promoted because they were willing to whitewash and cover-up these actions.

why does this suprise

why does this suprise anyone? As if this war would be "different". It's appalling, for years and years we've counted how high the bodies piled from US action, yet we're supposed to be shocked at sudden "new" articles highlighting typical conduct.

And the Republicans wonder

And the Republicans wonder why nobody likes nor trusts us.

I am so ashamed of my

I am so ashamed of my country. These atrocious actions by our troops will ensure that we will one day have the same kind of treatment done to us...and rightfully so. " Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." The government that not only condones, but encourages this complete evil against innocent human beings will suffer for it...mark my word. God will not be mocked. The Neocons that saturate this entire Administration are Satan's spawn. Hell was prepared for such as they.
This is Supposed to be a Christian Nation. What a lie the people are fed. This is the most evil nation on the face of this earth mainly because of it's Hypocrisy. We say one thing and do the opposite.

VIDEO: “Brownstones To Red Dirt” (Pan Africanism At Work) > from Shadow And Act

Preview – “Brownstones To Red Dirt” (Pan Africanism At Work)

1010The story goes…

A group of students from Brooklyn housing projects are paired with pen pals from Sierra Leone, orphans from that country’s brutal civil war. The two groups of students begin to share everything, from favorite colors and sibling rivalries, to grief over the current circumstances of their lives. Their simple written connection shows them that even if they can’t count on the world they live in, they can count on each other.

Brownstones To Red Dirt is “a tender and inspiring tale that demonstrates the power of intimate friendship.”

Currently on the film festival circuit… no word on distribution.

Trailer follows below:

INFO: Dave Lindorff: Welcome to Obama's War > from Counterpunch.org

April 6, 2010

Death to Women and Children and Cover-Ups to Protect the U. S. Killers

Welcome to Obama's War

By DAVE LINDORFF

So finally the truth comes out...sort of.

After initially claiming that two pregnant women and a teenage girl killed in a US Special Forces raid on an Afghan home in Khataba in February had been discovered bound and slain by the Americans, the US military has admitted that they were actually shot and killed by those US troops--who then tried to cover up their “mistake” by carving the bullets out of the bodies with knives, removing other incriminating bullets from the compound’s walls, and then washing away the bloody evidence with alcohol.

In this new grisly version of the story issued from the US command in Afghanistan, it was a case of the Special Forces Unit lying to superiors about what had transpired in their botched raid, which also killed an Afghan police commander and a government prosecutor.

The only reason we know all this today is because of the intrepid digging by a relentless reporter from the Times of London, Jerome Starkey, who, unlike the hacks in Kabul passing themselves off as journalists from American news organizations, didn’t just accept the press release on the incident put out by Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s office, but instead did his own investigation, talking to Afghan and UN investigators, as well as local people where the incident happened.

For his efforts at getting to the truth, Starkey was attacked by the US military, accused of lying and misrepresenting US statements.

Now that Starkey has been fully vindicated, there has been no apology from McChrystal’s office, or from the military public relations operation. Nor have US reporters and editors, who left Starkey undefended while his credibility was being attacked by the US, said anything about his role in bringing the truth to light.

The New York Times, in an article today by Richard A. Oppel, Jr., datelined Kabul, said that the US military, “after initially denying involvement in any cover-up in the deaths,” had “admitted that its forces had killed the women during the nighttime raid.”

The paper also credited the Times of London (without mentioning Starkey), with, a day before the military’s about face, disclosing that American forces on the scene had “dug bullets out of their victims’ bodies in the bloody aftermath” and then “washed the wounds with alcohol before lying to their superiors about what happened.”

What the paper didn’t mention is that Starkey had broken the story weeks earlier, only have his exposé ignored by the US media, which allowed him to be slandered by the American military.

This story is not over yet, either.

The US military, incredibly, is still claiming that despite an official investigation by US/NATO personnel into the incident, “Nothing pointed conclusively to the fact that our guys were the ones who tampered with the scene.” As Oppel demurely observed, “However, given that Special Operations forces killed the women, it was not clear why anyone else would have a motivation to remove bullets from the bodies or tamper with evidence at the scene.”

It would appear that a cover-up is still underway.

There has been no talk of bring charges against the Special Forces personnel who committed these killings and who then sought to cover up their actions, or those who were with them who allowed this crime to be committed and didn’t report it.

It is worth pointing out that Gen. McChrystal’s background is running Special Forces operations. He ran a major death squad operation in Iraq before being put in charge of the Afghan War, and was widely reported to be planning to repeat that tactic in Afghanistan. This particular night raid, on what was thought to be a Taliban household, but which turned out to be a party for the naming of a new baby boy, was almost certainly part of just such a mission.

The point to be taken from this ugly window on American operations in Afghanistan is that far from being an aberration, this is precisely how the war is being fought. Had this raid not been based on bad information, so that instead of killing a police officer and a prosecutor, the Special Forces hit-men had actually taken out a Taliban fighter or two, the fact that they also slaughtered a few pregnant women and a girl would have gone unnoticed and unremarked. In fact, the Special Forces killers wouldn’t have even bothered to try to cover up their handiwork by digging knives into the victims’ bodies to gouge out their bullets.

We can safely assume that this kind of thing is going on all over Afghanistan every day.

Welcome to Obama’s War.

Dave Lindorff is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. His latest book is “The Case for Impeachment” (St. Martin’s Press, 2006 and now available in paperback). He can be reached at dlindorff@mindspring.com

WORDS THAT STICK

 

 

INFO: Breath of Life: Wayne Shorter, Sam & Ruby, 15 versions “Everybody Loves The Sunshine”

Jazz composer and saxophonist Wayne Shorter starts us off. Sam & Ruby bring us something new. We dance on and on with 15 flavors of "Everybody Loves The Sunshine" featuring Roy Ayers with support from Erykah Badu, Heidi Leonore, Full Intention, Incognito, Tom Browne, Ramp, N'Dambi, and D*Note featuring Beth Hirsch. Cold weather is finally gone!

http://www.kalamu.com/bol/

 


PUB: DIAGRAM >> Information and Guidelines for NMP/DIAGRAM Contests

2010 Chapbook Contest Guidelines

The New Michigan Press / DIAGRAM chapbook contest announces our guidelines for 2010. We pick the majority of our chapbook titles each year from the ranks of the chapbook contest finalists, so this is an important one for us.

The Prize
 

$1000 plus publication; finalist chapbooks also considered for publication

 

The Entry Fee
  $16.00

The Mailing Deadline
 

 

April 30, 2010

What we want
 

 

Interesting, lovely unpublished work (unpublished as a whole; individual pieces may be published already of course), prose or poetry or some combination or something between genres, 18-44 manuscript pages (no more than one poem per page if you're sending poems unless they are very, very short)

 

 

Images okay?
 

Yes. We don't print color interiors, so black and white images are acceptable; you must be able to obtain reprint rights for any images you include; please don't send originals of anything, since we cannot return manuscripts.

 

 

Other questions?
 

It's fine with us if individual works have been published elsewhere, but the manuscript can't have been published as a whole before. Please include specific acknowledgments if any of the works have appeared elsewhere—tell us where individual pieces appeared, as we consider submitted work for possible publication in DIAGRAM.

We recommend that your manuscript be as coherent--as much a project--as possible. Not to say everything needs to be thematic or narratively related, but most of our winning chapbooks show a sense of aesthetic unity so that the books make sense as books. Chapbook manuscripts do not necessarily have to be diagrammatic (though the diagrammers among us do enjoy those).

Co-authored manuscripts are fine.

Submitting multiple manuscripts is fine with entry fees for each.

Please don't put your name/identifying info on the piece itself. If you send electronically, it'll be in the submitter info only. If you send snail mail, include a detachable cover page.

Email nmp--at--thediagram.com with further questions if you have them.

 

 

How to Get Your Work to Us (electronic, preferred)
 

REQUIRED STEP ONE: Pay contest fee through Paypal by filling out the form with your last name and the manuscript title, then clicking on the [Add to Cart] button just below this paragraph. You may use a credit card if you like (or a checking account etc.). No need to create an account. Once you complete step one it will click through to a page with step two on it (also copied below just in case).

 

 

Last Name/Title

Great. Note that the payment goes to New Michigan Press, which is the publisher of DIAGRAM

REQUIRED STEP TWO: submit your manuscript through our Submissions Manager system [here]. You'll have to create an account with the system if you haven't submitted to us before. Make SURE, SURE, that when you enter the submission's genre, you choose CHAPBOOK CONTEST SUBMISSION ONLY. Do NOT select "fiction," "poetry," or anything else. That way it gets read, processed, and responded-to properly (our contest submissions go through different process than regular submissions). If you submit under something else things will get munged (though we are happy to read your non-contest submissions whenever, of course) and you'll have to resubmit. Please give us some kind of cover letter if you like. Or not.

Note: only one file may be submitted through the submissions manager. PDF preferred, or Word format (.doc, .docx), or .rtf is fine if necessary (we cannot read any other word processing formats; sorry). If your submission is more than one file, copy and paste it into one file or otherwise attach it. A zipfile would be acceptable if you prefer.

*If you'd like a complimentary copy of the winning chapbook or another NMP chapbook of your choice (if we have it in stock; please indicate on envelope), send us a 6" x 9" or larger self-addressed envelope to NMP/DIAGRAM Chapbook Contest, English Department, P.O. Box 210067, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0067.

If you send electronically you'll be notified electronically by default. No SASE required unless you want a copy of the winning chapbook. If you'd like us to send you a hardcopy results letter, that's fine.

How to Get Your Work to Us (snail mail)
 

If you'd rather send traditional mail, fine. Mail your manuscript and check (made out to New Michigan Press--or pay online above if you'd rather and include the receipt) for $16 to: NMP/DIAGRAM Chapbook Contest, English Department, P.O. Box 210067, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0067.

So, make sure you send us a business-sized SASE with $0.46 of postage if you'd like notification of the results in the USA. Manuscripts cannot be returned (sorry—please don't send your only copy). And we can't do email if you don't submit online.

Enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard if you'd like confirmation that we received your manuscript.

Enclose a self-addressed 6" x 9" envelope with $2 of postage (in USA—$6 is a safe bet if you're sending from overseas) if you would like a complimentary copy of the winning chapbook (or another chapbook in our series—please specify which, if any, on the envelope). If you do not care, there is no need for this. Unfortunately we are giving up on IRCs. They don't seem to work. It is truly horrible.

Please send your manuscripts via airmail.

Please do not send submissions certified mail, express mail, or anything we have to sign for; it's a pain and if we're not home, we're not going to be able to make a trip to the post office, which is truly horrible in Arizona, to pick up your manuscript. If you want to overnight it, fine, please check off the "no signature req'd" box.

Judge
 

We don't have a celebrity judge for our chapbook contest. Since we pick the majority of our chapbooks from the submissions to the contest, we judge everything internally. The final judge is our editor, Ander Monson. Readers change and vary year to year. We read anonymously and try to vary our aesthetic year to year. Still, we like what we like. To find out what we like, you should probably check out our chapbooks if you haven't already.

Okay
  That's it. Good luck!

 

   

 

pub: Global Oneness Book Project


A Global Call for Submissions

Deadline: May 1, 2010 

You are invited to reflect on personal experiences of deep connection 

With a neighbor, a stranger, 

With a tradition, culture, community, 
With a place, a mountain, or a passing butterfly 
With the Earth 
With Life



Featured Stories

We are gathering personal stories and photos from every region of the world on the theme of connection, and will publish selected submissions in a book, to be released internationally in 2010. This project was born out of a firm belief in the power of stories to shape the world we live in, and the core importance of moments of deep connection to our sense of shared responsibility, care, and belonging in one Earth community. Amidst the daily onslaught of stories that further division, it is our hope to share moments of connection that bring us closer together and foster a common vision of a better world.

Please share with us your voice, your images, and your inspiration!



The Question
When have you experienced moments of deep connection in your life? 



What are we looking for?
Stories and photos about moments of deep connection in your life. This connection could be with anything that has inspired in you a feeling of connection – with a culture, a stranger, a mountain, a community, or a passing butterfly. We are particularly looking for submissions from a great diversity of ages, cultures, religions, and walks of life.

Who can submit?

Everyone. We especially encourage contributions from individuals with no previous publication experience and those who might otherwise be underrepresented, such as people from younger and older generations, women, and people living in marginalized regions or communities. 



When is the deadline for submissions?
Send in your submissions by May 1st, 2010 (12 midnight GMT).

General rules for submission:


  • All submissions should reflect the theme of "experiencing deep connection in your life.”
 
  • Each person may submit 1 story and up to 3 photos for consideration.

  • All submissions should be sent by email to submissions @ earthcharter.org, and must include in the body of the email the following information: 1) Your Full Name; 2) Your Birth Date; 3) Your Sex; 4) Your Native Language; 5) Your Country of Origin; and, 6) Your Country of Residence. Photo submissions must also include additional information detailed below, under Guidelines for Photos. Each submission should be attached to a separate email with “photo” or “story” in the subject line to identify the type of submission. Please also include your full name in the subject line (example: “story Maria Sanchez”). 

  • Submissions must be entirely your own work, and not previously published.

  • We reserve the right to edit and publish your submissions in our 2010 compilation, and in other Earth Charter International publications.

Guidelines for written submissions: 

  • Submissions should be in a Microsoft Word compatible document.

  • 1-4 pages, single-spaced (500-2400 words).

  • Times New Roman, 12 point font Please include your full name and a title for the piece on the front page of your submission.

  • The final publication will be in English, but we also have the editorial capacity to translate French, Spanish and Portuguese submissions. We will try our best to translate submissions in other languages as feasible. 

  • Submissions must be true stories based on your personal experience. In exceptional cases, poetry may also be considered for publication.

Guidelines for photos:
  • Photos can be submitted digitally, in black and white or color.

  • They should be at least 1819 x 2598 pixels [154 x 220mm horizontal] at 300 dpi resolution or higher.

  • Digital photos should be sent in jpeg format, and should not exceed a file size of 10 MB.
  • For photo submissions, please include the following additional information in your email: 
1) A title for the photo
2) The date the photo was taken
3) The place the photo was taken, including town or region and country
4) A brief one or two sentence caption describing the photo.


What to expect?

You will be sent an email confirmation upon receipt of your complete submission. All participants will be notified about the outcome of the selection process by July 1, 2010. Bios and pictures will be solicited from selected contributors. Selected submissions will be published both online and in print form in a global compilation to be released and widely distributed in 2010. All selected participants will receive a copy of the book. The submissions may continue to be used by Earth Charter International in future publications and its campaigns for a more sustainable world.



How will submissions be selected?
Every submission will be carefully considered, and we will select those that best reflect the theme of connectedness and the diversity of contributions we are seeking. A key criterion for selections will be achieving a gender, intergenerational and regional balance.



The Advisory and Editorial Team includes:


  • Alide Roerink (Netherlands), National Committee for International Cooperation and Sustainable Development (NCDO)

  • Anna Duhon (USA), Elected Regional Co-Representative, Youth Leadership Team

  • Barbara Lorraine Laing, Educator, Marlowe Academy
  • Camila Argolo Godinho (Brazil), Environmental Activist, and Member of the Commission of Sustainable Development Youth Caucus and Education Caucus

  • Dominic Stucker (USA/Germany), Fellows Network Coordinator, Donella Meadows Sustainability Institute
  • Jaana Laitinen (Finland), International Youth Coordinator, Earth Charter International

  • Dumisani Nyoni (Zimbabwe), Advisor and Board Member of TakingITGlobal

  • Henriette Rasmussen (Greenland), Indigenous Representative and former Minister in the Government of Greenland
  • Karim El Mantawi (Egypt), Researcher, Media, Peace and Conflict Studies, the United Nations-mandated University for Peace

  • Laurie Lane-Zucker (USA), Founder & President, Triad Institute; Founder & CEO, Hotfrog.org; Co-founder and former Executive Director, The Orion Society

  • Lisa Marika Jokivirta (Canada/Finland), Elected Regional Co-Representative, Youth Leadership Team
 
  • Mamata Pandya (India), Programme Director, Center for Environmental Education, Ahmedabad

  • Mary Evelyn Tucker (USA), Founder of the Forum on Religion and Ecology and Professor at Yale University

  • Mirian Vilela (Brazil), Executive Director, Earth Charter International

  • Sam Crowell (USA), Co-Director, Center for Holistic & Integrative Learning, California State University


  • Shannon Walsh (Canada), Educator and Sustainability Activist

Who are we?

This publication is a global action project of the Earth Charter Initiative, and is being implemented in the spirit of Earth Charter’s broader Campaign for Intergenerational Partnership for Sustainability. The Earth Charter is a widely recognized, global consensus statement on ethics and values for a more just, sustainable, and peaceful future. The themes of oneness and connection are at the core of the Earth Charter, and integrated across all its four core values: respect and care for the community of life, ecological integrity, social and economic justice, and democracy, nonviolence and peace. You can find out more at www.earthcharter.org.